A valued voice: A qualitative analysis of parental decision-making preferences in emergent paediatric surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Shared decision-making, with an emphasis on patient autonomy, is often advised in healthcare decision-making. However, this may be difficult to implement in emergent settings. We have previously demonstrated that when considering emergent operations for their children, parents prefer surgeon guidance as opposed to shared decision-making. Here, we interviewed parents of paediatric patients who had undergone emergent operations to better understand parental decision-making preferences. METHODS: Parents of paediatric patients who underwent surgery over the past 5 years at a University-based, tertiary children's hospital for cancer, an emergent operation while in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) were invited to complete a 60-min semi-structured interview. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic content analysis was performed via deductive and inductive analysis. An iterative approach to thematic sampling/data analysis was used. RESULTS: Thematic saturation was achieved after 12 interviews (4 cancer, 5 NICU and 3 ECMO). Five common themes were identified: (1) recommendations from surgeons are valuable; (2) 'lifesaving mode': parents felt there were no decisions to be made; (3) effective ways of obtaining information about treatment; (4) shared decision-making as a 'dialogue' or 'discussion' and (5) parents as a 'valued voice' to advocate for their children. CONCLUSIONS: When engaging in decision-making regarding emergent surgical procedures for their children, parents value a surgeon's recommendation. Parents felt that discussion or dialogue with surgeons defined shared decision-making, and they believed that the opportunity to ask questions gave them a 'valued voice', even when they felt there were no decisions to be made. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: For this study, we interviewed parents of paediatric patients who had undergone emergent operations to better understand parental decision-making preferences. Parents thus provided all the data for the study.

Communication skills in practice vs. communication in the real world: Insights from an international medical student symposium.

OBJECTIVE: To explore and compare medical students' experiences with communication skills training (CST) in medical education. METHOD: Five medical students from the U.S., U.K., and Ireland shared their experiences with CST at a 90-minute symposium held at the 2022 International Conference on Communication in Healthcare (ICCH). RESULTS: Students identified two areas of CST that may affect their preparedness for real-world clinical practice: 1) the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on communication teaching and learning, and 2) the need to effectively communicate with diverse patient populations. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic brought major changes to CST, and though training programs varied in their approach, students found that they were able to successfully adapt while gaining valuable skills needed to navigate communicating with patients on virtual platforms. When learning to communicate with patients from diverse backgrounds, students perceived generalized strategies that equipped them with the skills needed to adapt to uncertainty to be the most valuable. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Collaboration between medical schools, both nationally and internationally, provides opportunity to share areas of strength and avenues for improvement in CST. Representation of learner perspectives is essential in order to better understand how well current educational methodologies prepare learners to enter real world clinical practice.

"More than Scabs and Stitches": An Interview Study of Burn Survivors' Perspectives on Treatment and Recovery.

Sustaining a burn injury often results in a life-long recovery process. Survivors are impacted by changes in their mobility, appearance, and ability to carry out activities of daily living. In this study, we examined survivors' accounts of their treatment and recovery in order to identify specific factors that have had significant impacts on their well-being. With this knowledge, we may be better equipped to optimize the care of burn patients. We conducted inductive, thematic analysis on transcripts of in-depth, semistructured interviews with 11 burn survivors. Participants were purposefully selected for variability in age, gender, injury size and mechanism, participation in peer support, and rurality. Survivors reported varied perceptions of care quality and provider relationships. Ongoing issues with skin and mobility continued to impact their activities of daily living. Many survivors reported that they did not have a clear understanding or realistic expectations of the recovery process. Wound care was often described as overwhelming and provoked fear for many. Even years later, trauma from burn injury can continue to evolve, creating fears and impediments to daily living for survivors. To help patients understand the realistic course of recovery, providers should focus on communicating the nature of injury and anticipated recovery, developing protocols to better identify survivors facing barriers to care, and referring survivors for further support.