Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 76(10): 1784-1792, 2023 05 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36610464

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate icatibant, a competitive antagonist of the bradykinin B2 receptors, for the treatment of inpatients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia admitted in the early hypoxemic stage. METHODS: The randomized, open-label clinical trial of icatibant for COVID-19 pneumonia (ICAT·COVID, registered as NCT04978051 at ClinicalTrials.gov) was conducted in Barcelona. Inpatients requiring supplemental but not high-flow oxygen or mechanical ventilation were allocated (1:1) to treatment with either three 30-mg icatibant doses/d for 3 consecutive days plus standard care or standard care alone, and followed for up to 28 days after initial discharge. The primary and key secondary outcomes were clinical response on study day 10/discharge and clinical efficacy at 28 days from initial discharge, respectively. RESULTS: Clinical response occurred in 27 of 37 patients (73.0%) in the icatibant group and 20 of 36 patients (55.6%) in the control group (rate difference, 17.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], -4.22 to 39.06; P = .115). Clinical efficacy ensued in 37 patients (100.0%) in the icatibant group and 30 patients (83.3%) in the control group (rate difference, 16.67; 95% CI, 4.49-28.84; P = .011). No patient died in the icatibant group, compared with 6 patients (16.7%) in the control group (P = .011). All patients but 1 had adverse events, which were evenly distributed between study arms. No patient withdrew because of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Adding icatibant to standard care was safe and improved both COVID-19 pneumonia and mortality in this proof-of-concept study. A larger, phase 3 trial is warranted to establish the clinical value of this treatment. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04978051.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , Hospitalização , Pacientes Internados , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudo de Prova de Conceito
2.
Emergencias ; 34(1): 38-46, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35103442

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the frequencies of 3 types of hospital revisits by patients after treatment for COVID-19 in the emergency department. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study of consecutive patients who came to the emergency department in March and April 2020 and were discharged alive with a diagnosis of COVID-19. Baseline and acute episode data were collected and the patients were followed for 1 year. We analyzed variables associated with revisits for any reason, revisits related to COVID-19, and early COVID-19-related revisits (within 30 days). RESULTS: A total of 1352 patients with a mean age of 62.1 years (52.9% male) were studied. A total of 553 revisits were made by 342 patients (25.3%) for any reason; 132 (9.8%) revisited in relation to COVID-19 at least once. Of those, 103 (7.6%) revisited within 30 days (early) and 29 (2.2%) came later. COVID-19-related revisits were associated with thrombotic events (odds ratio [OR], 7.58; 95% CI, 1.75-32.81) and pulmonary fibrosis (OR, 4.95; 95% CI, 1.27-19.24); early revisits were inversely associated with follow-up management by a contracted health care support service (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.03-0.92). Hospital admission during the initial visit was significantly associated with fewer revisits for any reason or related to COVID-19 at any time. CONCLUSION: Fewer than half the total number of emergency department revisits after initial care for COVID-19 were related to the novel coronavirus infection. Revisits occurred more often in the first 30 days after discharge. Later COVID-19-related revisits were uncommon, but given the large number of patients with this infection, such visits can be expected.


OBJETIVO: Analizar diferentes categorías de revisita (RV) al año en pacientes con infección COVID-19 que consultan en un servicio de urgencias hospitalario (SUH). METODO: Estudio observacional, retrospectivo, que incluyó pacientes consecutivos que consultaron al SUH en los meses de marzo y abril de 2020 con diagnóstico de COVID-19 y fueron dados de alta vivos del hospital. Se recogieron variables basales y del episodio agudo y se realizó un seguimiento al año. Se hicieron tres comparaciones identificando variables asociadas a la RV total, RV relacionada con COVID-19 (RCovid) y RCovid precoz (# 30 días). RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 1.352 pacientes con edad media de 62,1 años y 52,9% varones. En el seguimiento al año hubo 553 RV en 342 (25,3%) pacientes, 132 (9,8%) con al menos una RCovid, 103 (7,6%) precoz y 29 (2,2%) tardía. La RCovid se relacionó con la presencia de fenómenos trombóticos [OR 7,58 (IC 95%: 1,75-32,81)] y la fibrosis pulmonar [OR 4,95 (IC 95%: 1,27-19,24)]; y la RCovid precoz se relacionó inversamente con alta a dispositivo de soporte sanitario [OR 0,18 (IC 95%: 0,03-0,92)]. El ingreso hospitalario en el evento índice disminuyó la RV total y RCovid y las hospitalizaciones derivadas de esta RV de manera significativa a largo plazo. CONCLUSIONES: Menos de la mitad de la RV total tras una infección COVID-19 está relacionada con la infección, y es más frecuente en los primeros 30 días. La RCovid tardía no es frecuente, pero dado el elevado número de pacientes que han sido infectados por COVID-19 se debe tener en cuenta.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Emergencias ; 32(5): 332-339, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33006833

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To identify factors associated with worsening renal function (WRF) and explore associations with higher mortality in patients with acute heart failure (AHF). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seven emergency departments (EDs) in the EAHFE-EFRICA study (Spanish acronym for Epidemiology of AHF in EDs - WRF in AHF) consecutively included patients with AHF and creatinine levels determined in the ED and between 24 and 48 hours later. Patients with WRF were identified by an increase in creatinine level of 0.3 mg/dL or more. Forty-seven clinical characteristics were explored to identify those associated with WRF. To analyze for 30-day all-cause mortality we calculated odds ratios (ORs). To analyze mortality at the end of follow-up and by trimester, adjusted for between-group differences, we calculated hazard ratios (HRs). The data were analyzed by subgroups according to age, sex, baseline creatinine levels, AHF type, and risk group. RESULTS: A total of 1627 patients were included. The subgroup of 220 (13.5%) with WRF were older, had higher systolic blood pressure, were more often treated with morphine, and had chronic renal failure; there was also a higher rate of hypertensive crisis as the trigger for AHF in patients with WRF. However, only chronic renal failure was independently associated with WRF (adjusted OR, 1.695; 95% CI, 1.264-2.273). The rate of 30-day mortality was 13.1% overall but higher in patients with WRF (20.9% vs 11.8% in patients without WRF; adjusted OR, 1.793; 95% CI, 1.207-2.664). Accumulated mortality at 18 months (average follow-up time, 14 mo/patient) was 40.0% overall but higher in patients with WRF (adjusted HR, 1.275; 95% CI, 1.018-1.598). Increased risk was greater in the first trimester. Subgroup analyses revealed no differences. CONCLUSION: AHF with WRF in the first 48 hours after ED care is associated with higher mortality, especially in the first trimester after the emergency.


OBJETIVO: Identificar los factores asociados con el empeoramiento de la función renal (EFR) y si este se asocia a mayor mortalidad en pacientes que presentan un episodio de insuficiencia cardiaca aguda (ICA). METODO: Participaron 7 servicios de urgencias (SU) que incluyeron consecutivamente pacientes con ICA con determinación de creatinina en urgencias y a las 24-48 horas, y se identificaron aquellos con EFR (incremento de creatinina $ 0,3 mg/dL). Entre 47 características clínicas, se identificó las asociadas a EFR. Se investigó la mortalidad por cualquier causa a 30 días (OR) y al final del seguimiento (HR), esta última global y por periodos trimestrales, que se ajustó por las diferencias entre grupos. Se analizaron subgrupos según edad, sexo, creatinina basal, tipo de ICA y grupo de riesgo. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 1.627 pacientes, 220 (13,5%) con EFR, los cuales presentaban mayor edad, presión arterial sistólica, crisis hipertensiva como precipitante, tratamiento con morfina e insuficiencia renal crónica, aunque solo esta última se asoció independientemente a EFR (ORajustada = 1,695, IC 95% = 1,264-2,273). La mortalidad a 30 días fue de 13,1% (mayor en pacientes con EFR: 20,9% vs 11,8%, ORajustada = 1,793, IC 95% = 1,207-2,664) y la mortalidad acumulada a 18 meses (tiempo medio de seguimiento 14 meses/paciente) fue del 40,0% (mayor en pacientes con EFR: HRajustada = 1,275, IC 95% = 1,018-1,598). Este incremento de riesgo fue durante el primer trimestre. El análisis de subgrupos no mostró diferencias. CONCLUSIONES: La ICA con EFR en las primeras 48 horas posteriores a la atención en el SU se asocia a mayor mortalidad, que se concentra durante el primer trimestre.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Doença Aguda , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Humanos , Rim/fisiologia , Prognóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA