[Diagnostic utility of creatine kinase elevation in the routine biochemical profile in cats]. / Diagnostischer Nutzen einer Kreatin­kinase Erhöhung im Routine­chemogramm bei Katzen.

INTRODUCTION: Creatine kinase (CK) is a muscle enzyme that is very sensitive to muscle damage. Therefore, serum CK is measured particularly to confirm suspected myopathy. Since 2013, this enzyme has been included in the routine chemistry profile in our hospital. Soon thereafter, the subjective impression developed that its elevation did not correlate to and was not explainable with the actual clinical problem. Therefore, the aim of this retrospective study was to investigate in which clinical cases the CK elevation was adequate and in which cases without clinical evidence of muscle damage the CK was so markedly elevated that it implied a clinically relevant muscle damage. For this purpose, we evaluated the CK values of 1641 cats presented in the years 2013/2014 at our university animal hospital. The CK was comprehensibly elevated in cats with trauma and various diseases with obvious and traceable muscle damage like thrombo-embolic damage or seizures. In addition, the CK was elevated in diseases where concomitant muscle damage is perceivable like in cats with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. However, the CK also was commonly and sometimes dramatically elevated in cats of essentially any disease group without any comprehensible skeletal muscular lesion. These results confirm the hypothesis that the diagnostic value of this parameter is most questionable. A CK elevation does not allow any conclusion regarding its original diagnostic purpose, i.e. to confirm the presence of a clinically relevant myopathy.

INTRODUCTION: La créatine kinase (CK) est une enzyme musculaire très sensible lors de dommages musculaires. Par conséquent, la CK sérique est mesurée en particulier pour confirmer une myopathie suspectée. Depuis 2013, cette enzyme fait partie du chimiogramme de routine de notre hôpital. Après peu de temps, l'impression subjective s'est développée que son élévation n'était pas corrélée ni explicable avec le problème clinique réel. Par conséquent, le but de cette étude rétrospective était d'étudier dans quels cas cliniques l'élévation de la CK était adéquate et dans quels cas sans signe clinique de lésion musculaire, la CK était si nettement élevée qu'elle impliquait une lésion musculaire cliniquement pertinente. À cette fin, nous avons évalué les valeurs CK de 1641 chats présentés dans les années 2013/2014 à notre hôpital universitaire pour animaux. La CK était sensiblement élevée chez les chats souffrant de traumatismes et de diverses affections avec des lésions musculaires évidentes et traçables comme des dommages thrombo-emboliques ou des convulsions. De plus, la CK était élevée dans les maladies où des lésions musculaires concomitantes étaient décelables comme chez les chats atteints de cardiomyopathie hypertrophique. Cependant la CK était également couramment et parfois considérablement élevée chez les chats de pratiquement n'importe quel groupe de pathologies sans aucune lésion musculaire squelettique explicable. Ces résultats confirment l'hypothèse que la valeur diagnostique de ce paramètre est très discutable. Une élévation de la CK ne permet aucune conclusion concernant son objectif diagnostique d'origine, c'est-à-dire de confirmer la présence d'une myopathie cliniquement significative.

A randomized crossover trial assessing patient preference for two different types of portable infusion-pump devices.

BACKGROUND: A variety of anticancer agents are better tolerated and more effective if given as continuous compared to bolus administration. Portable pump devices are needed to allow outpatient continuous infusion. Different types of portable pumps are available and we tested patient preference in a randomized crossover design. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients on continuous infusion fluorouracil were randomly assigned to start treatment with an elastomeric infusor (Baxter) or a mechanical, electronically controlled pump (CADD-1, Pharmacia) and crossed over to the alternative model after three weeks. After exposure to both pump types patients were asked to indicate their preferred device. RESULTS: After 10 patients the study was closed because all study participants preferred the elastomeric pump (P < 0.01). Reasons were pump weight (100%), smaller pump size (89%), interference with daily activities (89%), user friendliness (56%), impact on sleep (44%), and lack of technical problems (22%). Although the mechanical pump required more handling time for the first two refillings, the learning curve suggested about equal time requirement thereafter. CONCLUSION: In the interest of patient comfort, the disposable elastomeric infusor is an acceptable alternative to the more accurate electronically controlled pumps especially for drugs with a short half-life and a favorable toxicity profile.