RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a complex multisystemic severe drug hypersensitivity reaction whose diagnosis and management are troublesome. DRESS syndrome requires management by various specialists. The correct identification of the culprit drug is essential to ensure safe future therapeutic options for the patient. There are no previous Spanish guidelines or consensus statements on DRESS syndrome. Objective: To draft a review and guidelines on the clinical diagnosis, allergy work-up, management, treatment, and prevention of DRESS syndrome in light of currently available scientific evidence and the experience of experts from multiple disciplines. METHODS: These guidelines were drafted by a panel of allergy specialists from the Drug Allergy Committee of the Spanish Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (SEAIC), together with other medical specialists involved in the management of DRESS syndrome and researchers from the PIELenRed consortium. A review was conducted of scientific papers on DRESS syndrome, and the expert panel evaluated the quality of the evidence of the literature and provided grades of recommendation. Whenever evidence was lacking, a consensus was reached among the experts. RESULTS: The first Spanish guidelines on DRESS syndrome are now being published. Important aspects have been addressed, including practical recommendations about clinical diagnosis, identification of the culprit drug through the Spanish pharmacovigilance system algorithm, and the allergy work-up. Recommendations are provided on management, treatment, and prevention. Algorithms for the management of DRESS in the acute and recovery phases have been drawn up. Expert consensus-based stepwise guidelines for the management and treatment of DRESS syndrome are provided.
Assuntos
Síndrome de Hipersensibilidade a Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Fígado/metabolismo , Pele/patologia , Algoritmos , Alopurinol/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Anticonvulsivantes/efeitos adversos , Comorbidade , Consenso , Síndrome de Hipersensibilidade a Medicamentos/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome de Hipersensibilidade a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Eosinofilia , Prova Pericial , Humanos , Leucocitose , Fígado/patologia , Fatores de Risco , Espanha/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Edema of the uvula (EU) may appear in isolation or in association with clinical manifestations such as urticaria, angioedema, and anaphylaxis. EU may lead to upper airway obstruction, provoking obstructive respiratory distress and asphyxia. Objective: We sought to investigate the etiology of and predisposing factors for EU in a large population of patients referred to an outpatient clinic. METHODS: In this 3-year follow-up cohort study, 171 patients presenting with EU were identified and classified as having isolated EU or nonisolated EU. The etiology of each patient's condition was studied, and possible predisposing factors were recorded. An allergology work-up and a statistical study (bivariate/multivariate analyses) were performed. RESULTS: The predisposing factors for both groups of EU patients were found to be different. The etiology of the problem was identified for most patients; allergy to Anisakis simplex was the most common cause in both groups. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and antibiotics were also found to be triggers in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated EU was associated with snoring, an elongated uvula, and having experienced previous episodes of EU. We found no associations between groups of EU patients and gender, obesity, smoking, alcohol consumption, personal and family history of atopy, and obstructive sleep apnea. Allergy to A simplex was the most commonly recorded cause.
Assuntos
Edema/epidemiologia , Edema/etiologia , Úvula/patologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Suscetibilidade a Doenças , Edema/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Testes Cutâneos , Espanha/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Component-resolved diagnosis based on the use of well-defined, properly characterised and purified natural and recombinant allergens constitutes a new approach in the diagnosis of venom allergy. Prospective readers may benefit from an up-to-date review on the allergens. The best characterised venom is that of Apis mellifera, whose main allergens are phospholipase A2 (Api m1), hyaluronidase (Api m2) and melittin (Api m4). Additionally, in recent years, new allergens of Vespula vulgaris have been identified and include phospholipase A1 (Ves v1), hyaluronidase (Ves v2) and antigen 5 (Ves v5). Polistes species are becoming an increasing cause of allergy in Europe, although only few allergens have been identified in this venom. In this review, we evaluate the current knowledge about molecular diagnosis in hymenoptera venom allergy.
Assuntos
Alérgenos/imunologia , Venenos de Artrópodes/imunologia , Himenópteros/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade/diagnóstico , Mordeduras e Picadas de Insetos/imunologia , Alérgenos/análise , Alérgenos/química , Animais , Venenos de Artrópodes/química , Humanos , Himenópteros/química , Hipersensibilidade/imunologiaAssuntos
Dor nas Costas/tratamento farmacológico , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/diagnóstico , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Eritema Multiforme/diagnóstico , Mucosa Bucal/patologia , Pele/patologia , Tramadol/uso terapêutico , Administração Oral , Alérgenos/imunologia , Dor nas Costas/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Imunização , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tramadol/efeitos adversos , Tramadol/imunologiaRESUMO
We report a case of a male painter who visited our outpatient clinic after developing a distinct skin reaction 15 min after the ingestion of a laxative solution containing polyethylene glycol (PEG) prior to colonoscopy. He described suffering from the same skin reaction when he was previously exposed to paints that contained PEG-4000. An exposure challenge test with pure PEG-4000, simulating his workplace conditions, elicited a generalized urticarial reaction. Allergy to PEG should be considered in painters who develop urticarial or other systemic symptoms after handling PEG-containing products.