How a Subclinical Unilateral Vestibular Signal Improves Binocular Vision.

The present study aimed to determine if an infra-liminal asymmetric vestibular signal could account for some of the visual complaints commonly encountered in chronic vestibular patients. We used infra-liminal galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) to investigate its potential effects on visuo-oculomotor behavior. A total of 78 healthy volunteers, 34 aged from 20 to 25 years old and 44 aged from 40 to 60 years old, were included in a crossover study to assess the impact of infra-liminal stimulation on convergence, divergence, proximal convergence point, and stereopsis. Under GVS stimulation, a repeated measures ANOVA showed a significant variation in near convergence (p < 0.001), far convergence (p < 0.001), and far divergence (p = 0.052). We also observed an unexpected effect of instantaneous blocking of the retest effect on the far divergence measurement. Further investigations are necessary to establish causal relationships, but GVS could be considered a behavioral modulator in non-pharmacological vestibular therapies.

Antero-Posterior vs. Lateral Vestibular Input Processing in Human Visual Cortex.

Visuo-vestibular integration is crucial for locomotion, yet the cortical mechanisms involved remain poorly understood. We combined binaural monopolar galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to characterize the cortical networks activated during antero-posterior and lateral stimulations in humans. We focused on functional areas that selectively respond to egomotion-consistent optic flow patterns: the human middle temporal complex (hMT+), V6, the ventral intraparietal (VIP) area, the cingulate sulcus visual (CSv) area and the posterior insular cortex (PIC). Areas hMT+, CSv, and PIC were equivalently responsive during lateral and antero-posterior GVS while areas VIP and V6 were highly activated during antero-posterior GVS, but remained silent during lateral GVS. Using psychophysiological interaction (PPI) analyses, we confirmed that a cortical network including areas V6 and VIP is engaged during antero-posterior GVS. Our results suggest that V6 and VIP play a specific role in processing multisensory signals specific to locomotion during navigation.

Parkinson's patients can rely on perspective cues to perceive 3D space.

3D perception, which is necessary for an optimal navigation in our environment, relies on 2 complementary kinds of cues; binocular cues allowing precise depth localization near the point of visual interest and monocular ones that are necessary for correct global perception of visual space. Recent studies described deficient binocular 3D vision in PD patients; here we tested 3D vision in PD patients when based on monocular cues (m3D). Sixteen PD patients and 16 controls had to categorize visual stimuli as perceived in 2D (flat) or 3D (with depth). Both performance and response times were measured. EEGs were recorded to extract Visual Evoked Potentials. Effects of PD were tested by comparing psychometric and electrophysiological data obtained in controls and PD patients evaluated without dopaminergic treatment. Effects of Levodopa were tested by comparing data in PD patients with and without dopaminergic treatment. We didn't find statistical differences between PD patients and controls' performance. Severity of PD (UPDRS III) in OFF condition is positively correlated with P1 amplitudes and latencies for both 2D and m3D stimuli. Levodopa administration didn't modify either PD patients' performances although it increases principal visual components latencies for both 2D and m3D stimuli. Unlike binocular 3D vision, monocular 3D vision does not seem to get affected by PD. However given the correlation between severity of PD and VEPs' modifications, alteration of visual cortical processing might have nonetheless begun. PD patients reporting trouble in perceiving space must rely more on m3D cues present in the environment.

At what stage of neural processing do perspective depth cues make a difference?

The present study investigated the cortical processing of three-dimensional (3D) perspective cues in humans, to determine how the brain computes depth from a bidimensional retinal image. We recorded visual evoked potentials in 12 subjects in response to flat and in-perspective stimuli, which evoked biphasic potentials over posterior electrodes. The first, positive component (P1, at 90 ms) was not sensitive to perspective, while the second, negative peak (N1 at approximately 150 ms) was significantly larger for 3D stimuli, regardless of attention. The amplitude increase due to perspective was seen on all posterior electrodes, but was largest over the right hemisphere, particularly at parietal sites. Source modeling low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) confirmed that among the different areas participating in two- and three-dimensional stimuli processing, the right parietal source is the most enhanced by perspective depth cues. We conclude that the extraction of depth from perspective cues occurs at a second level of stimulus processing, by increasing the activity of the regions involved in 2D stimuli processing, particularly in the right hemisphere, possibly through feedback loops from higher cortical areas. These modulations would participate in the fine-tuned analysis of the 3D features of stimuli.

Short-latency eye movements evoked by near-threshold galvanic vestibular stimulation.

To investigate whether the primary planes of eye and body responses to galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) are congruent, we have measured the binocular, three-dimensional eye movements (scleral coil technique) to bilateral bipolar GVS in six normal human subjects. Stimulation intensities were kept deliberately low in order to characterize the response to near-threshold intensities of stimulation (0.1-0.9 mA) that had been used previously to characterise body postural responses. Stimuli were applied for 4 s, but only the early responses that occurred within the initial 300 ms of turning the current on or off were measured. At intensities of 0.1-0.7 mA the 'on' response consisted almost exclusively of a torsional slow phase eye movement in which the top of the eyes rotated towards the anode. The latency of the torsional response was ca. 46 ms. A weak polarity-dependent disconjugate response was also observed in which the intorting eye elevated and the extorting eye depressed ('skew eye deviation'). When the current was turned off similar responses occurred in the reverse direction. Removal of the visual fixation light-emitting diode (LED) had no consistent effect on the short-latency ocular responses. The direction of the ocular response was similar to that of the postural response and is compatible with GVS inducing an apparent dynamic roll-tilt of the head towards the cathode. However, weak horizontal eye movements, which became more prominent as the stimulus intensity was increased to 0.9 mA, were also observed. This suggests that an additional weak rotational component about the yaw axis, or a component of lateral translation in the frontal plane, is contained in the GVS-evoked signal. The overall pattern of eye movement suggests that semicircular canal afferents contribute to these low-intensity GVS responses.