Effect of Utilizing Cheek Retractors on Patient Satisfaction and Trueness of Peripheral Borders in Maxillary Digital Scans for Totally Edentulous Patients: An In Vivo Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of cheek retractors on the accuracy of capturing peripheral borders in totally edentulous digital scans by comparing the conventional impression technique to digital scans made using two different cheek retractors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixteen edentulous maxillary impressions were made using three techniques: the conventional impression technique, using modeling thermoplastic compound and zinc oxide eugenol paste; the digital intraoral scanning technique using the DIO scan retractor (DIO); and using the Br.nemark lip retractor (BRAN). The control impressions of each patient were poured, scanned using a desktop scanner, then transferred into a three-dimensional analysis software. DIO and BRAN groups were scanned using an intraoral scanner, imported, and superimposed using best fit algorithm on the corresponding control. The root mean square for the whole surface and for particular interest regions were calculated to assess the degree of trueness. The patients' perceptions of the impression techniques were the secondary outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using the one sample T-test and Wilcoxon test (α=.05). RESULTS: Significant discrepancies were found for BRAN and DIO compared to the control. No significant discrepancies were found when comparing RMS of BRAN and DIO at different regions. Scan retractors had a significant impact on patient satisfaction, with patients preferring DIO. CONCLUSIONS: Edentulous intraoral scans made using cheek retractors had similar deviations when compared to each other but diverged from the conventional impression in edentulous maxilla. Patient preferences for intraoral scans over conventional impressions were confirmed. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The use of different retracting methods during intraoral scanning of totally edentulous maxillary arches does not affect the peripheral border registration.

Three-dimensional radiographic assessment of immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: A novel parameter-based classification.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the implant position (IP), the interradicular septum width (ISW) and radiographic bone to implant contact (BIC), when simulating an immediate implant placement in first and second mandibular molars. STUDY DESIGN: 75 patients (150 sites) were studied using cone beam computed tomography scans (CBCT) and computer aided design software. Implants were placed in a prosthetically driven position; subsequently, IP and BIC were digitally calculated. Linear ISW was also analyzed at 2, 4 and 6mm apically to the highest septal bony peak. Multiple linear regressions were performed to assess relationships between BIC and the different predictive variables. Additionally, the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to create a model for BIC based on the ISW at 2mm. RESULTS: BIC in implants replacing first molars was the highest at the septal (S) position when compared to those in septal-mesial (S-M) position (p-value 0.001). As for the second molar, the highest percentage of BIC was recorded at the septal (S) position, followed by those in S-M and mesial (M) positions (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: According to the proposed classification, clinician must consider the ISW and IP when placing immediate implant in the first and second mandibular molar sites. When tackling first molars, S position is predominant, while S-M position is the most common in the second molars. ISW at 2mm should be at least respectively 2mm and 2.5mm at the first and second molar sites to achieve 50% of BIC.