Clinical genome sequencing: Three years' experience at a tertiary children's hospital.

PURPOSE: Genome sequencing (GS) may shorten the diagnostic odyssey for patients, but clinical experience with this assay in nonresearch settings remains limited. Texas Children's Hospital began offering GS as a clinical test to admitted patients in 2020, providing an opportunity to study GS utilization, possibilities for test optimization, and testing outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed GS orders for admitted patients for a nearly 3-year period from March 2020 through December 2022. We gathered anonymized clinical data from the electronic health record to answer the study questions. RESULTS: The diagnostic yield over 97 admitted patients was 35%. The majority of GS clinical indications were neurologic or metabolic (61%) and most patients were in intensive care (58%). Tests were often characterized as candidates for intervention/improvement (56%), frequently because of redundancy with prior testing. Patients receiving GS without prior exome sequencing (ES) had higher diagnostic rates (45%) than the cohort as a whole. In 2 cases, GS revealed a molecular diagnosis that is unlikely to be detected by ES. CONCLUSION: The performance of GS in clinical settings likely justifies its use as a first-line diagnostic test, but the incremental benefit for patients with prior ES may be limited.

Prenatal genetic counseling practices regarding recommendations for cancer genetic counseling: A retrospective chart review from two academic institutions.

Prenatal and preconception genetic counselors are trained to take patient pedigrees to evaluate for potential risks for genetic conditions, including hereditary cancer syndromes. However, little research has been published on how often prenatal/preconception genetic counselors provide recommendations for cancer genetic counseling solely based on a family history of cancer. Therefore, this study sought to (a) characterize the types of cancers recognized for a cancer genetic counseling recommendation, (b) analyze appointment indications associated with discussion documentation, and (c) investigate how often National Comprehensive Cancer Center (NCCN) genetic testing criteria for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer syndrome (HBOC) and Lynch syndrome were met and how often a recommendation for cancer genetic counseling was made. A retrospective chart review and pedigree analysis were performed for prenatal/preconception genetic counseling patients with a family history of cancer seen at two academic institutions between August 10, 2019, and December 1, 2019. In the 170 charts included, a recommendation for cancer genetic counseling was documented in 40% of all genetic counseling summaries and in 59.2% of summaries when NCCN genetic testing criteria for HBOC and/or Lynch syndrome was met. Using chi-squared and logistic regression analysis, these data support that individuals were significantly more likely to receive a recommendation when NCCN genetic testing criteria were met (OR = 5.01, p < .001) or when the family history contained two or more types of cancer (OR = 2.24, p = .02). Overall, this study identified the NCCN genetic testing criteria for HBOC and Lynch syndrome for which recommendations for cancer genetic counseling were commonly missed. This characterization suggests that continuing education for prenatal and preconception genetic counselors on updated NCCN guidelines may be helpful for improving rates of cancer genetic counseling referrals, uptake of genetic testing, and cancer screening recommendations.