Estimated plasma volume status in COVID-19 patients and its relation to comorbidities and clinical outcomes.

Blood plasma is a large reservoir of circulating mediators of inflammation and its expansion has been associated with unfavorable outcomes in patients with inflammatory and cardiovascular diseases. The aim of this study was to determine clinical and prognostic value of estimated plasma volume status (ePVS) in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. We retrospectively investigated 5871 consecutive COVID-19 patient hospitalized in our tertiary-level institution in period 3/2020-6/2021. ePVS was determined using the Strauss-derived Duarte formula and was correlated with clinical characteristics and unwanted outcomes. Median ePVS was 4.77 dl/g with interquartile range 4.11-5.74. Higher ePVS was significantly associated with older age, female sex, higher comorbidity burden, worse functional status, less severe COVID-19 clinical presentation with lower severity and longer duration of symptoms, but more pronounced inflammatory profile with higher C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 and D-dimer levels (P < 0.05 for all analyses). In the multivariate regression analysis U shaped relationship of ePVS with mortality was revealed, present independently of age, sex, COVID-19 severity and comorbidity burden. In addition, higher ePVS was independently associated with higher tendency for mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit treatment, venous thromboembolism, major bleeding and bacteriemia and lower ePVS was independently associated with tendency for arterial thrombotic events. Higher ePVS, indicative of plasma volume expansion and inflammatory cytokine accumulation, may predispose respiratory deterioration and venous thromboembolism, despite less severe initial clinical presentation. Lower ePVS, indicative of hemoconcentration, may predispose arterial thrombotic events. Both may be associated with higher mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Secondary polycythemia in acutely ill COVID-19 patients is associated with higher mortality but not markedly higher thrombotic risk.

Secondary polycythemia is commonly observed among patients with chronic pulmonary diseases. However, its significance in the context of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is unknown. We retrospectively evaluated a total of 5872 hospitalized COVID-19 patients with mostly severe and critical symptoms, and without prior or subsequently diagnosed myeloproliferative neoplasm. Patients were stratified based on admission hemoglobin into four subgroups: anemia (hemoglobin <120 g/L for females and 130 g/L for males), normal hemoglobin, mild (hemoglobin 160-165 g/L for females and 165-185 g/L for males) and severe polycythemia (hemoglobin >165 g/L for females and >185 g/L for males). Among 5872 patients, a total of 158 (2.7%) had mild and 25 (0.4%) severe polycythemia. Polycythemia was significantly associated with higher respiratory and functional impairment, reduced plasma volume, higher serum osmolarity and comorbidity burden specific to the degree of polycythemia. Patients presenting with mild (odds ratio (OR) = 1.63, p = .003) and severe polycythemia (OR = 4.98, p < .001) had increased risk of death in comparison to patients with normal hemoglobin, whereas no significant associations with venous thromboembolism, arterial thrombosis nor major bleeding were observed. Anemia was associated with higher risk of death (OR = 1.42, p < .001), venous thromboembolism (OR = 1.34, p < .006) and major bleeding (OR = 2.27, p < .001) in comparison to normal hemoglobin. Associations of polycythemia and anemia with mortality diminished, and anemia with venous thromboembolism and major bleeding persisted, after multivariate adjustments for age, sex, comorbidities, COVID-19 severity and functional status. Secondary polycythemia in hospitalized COVID-19 patients without prior of subsequently diagnosed myeloproliferative neoplasm is rare and is associated with high mortality, increasing with degree of polycythemia, but not markedly higher thrombotic risk.

No Evident Prognostic Benefit of Statin Use in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients with Unfavorable Disease Features Treated with R-DA-EPOCH.

Recent reports indicate that patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas might benefit if concomitantly receiving statins with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin, vincristine (Oncovin) and prednisone immunochemotherapy. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 130 newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphomas with unfavorable clinical features treated with first-line rituximab, dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine [Oncovin], cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin (R-DA-EPOCH) immunochemotherapy in period 2005-2019. A total of 17/130 (13.1%) patients received statins concomitantly with immunochemotherapy, mostly atorvastatin and in intermediate statin dose intensity. Besides tendency to be associated with older age (p = 0.070), there were no other significant associations of statins use with neither sex, disease stage, R-IPI, or other unfavorable disease features (p > 0.05 for all analyses). Also, no significant differences were present considering feasibility (number of cycles with dose escalation/reduction), toxicity (number of cycles with anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and septic complications) nor efficacy (response rates) of R-DA-EPOCH regimen (p > 0.05 for all analyses). Also, statin use had no significant association with neither OS (p = 0.480) nor PFS (p = 0.891). Lack of associations of statin use with relevant clinical outcomes was further corroborated by multivariate analyses.

Incidence and risk factors for venous and arterial thromboses in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019: data on 4014 patients from a tertiary center registry.

AIM: To evaluate the burden and predictors of thromboembolic complications in a large real-life cohort of hospitalized patients with established coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 4014 consecutive adult patients admitted to a tertiary-level institution because of COVID-19 from March 2020 to March 2021 for the presence of venous and arterial thrombotic events. RESULTS: Venous-thromboembolic (VTE) events were present in 5.3% and arterial thrombotic events in 5.8% patients. The majority of arterial thromboses occurred before or on the day of admission, while the majority of VTE events occurred during hospitalization. The majority of both types of events occurred before intensive care unit (ICU) admission, although both types of events were associated with a higher need for ICU use and prolonged immobilization. In multivariate logistic regression, VTE events were independently associated with metastatic malignancy, known thrombophilia, lower mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, higher D-dimer, lower lactate dehydrogenase, longer duration of disease on admission, bilateral pneumonia, longer duration of hospitalization, and immobilization for at least one day. Arterial thromboses were independently associated with less severe COVID-19, higher Charlson comorbidity index, coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease, history of cerebrovascular insult, aspirin use, lower C reactive protein, better functional status on admission, ICU use, immobilization for at least one day, absence of hyperlipoproteinemia, and absence of metastatic malignancy. CONCLUSION: Among hospitalized COVID-19 patients, venous and arterial thromboses differ in timing of presentation, association with COVID-19 severity, and other clinical characteristics.

Evaluation of Absolute Neutrophil, Lymphocyte and Platelet Count and Their Ratios as Predictors of Thrombotic Risk in Patients with Prefibrotic and Overt Myelofibrosis.

AIM: To investigate the prognostic contribution of absolute neutrophil (ANC), lymphocyte (ALC), platelet count and their ratios, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), to thrombotic risk in patients with prefibrotic and overt fibrotic myelofibrosis (MF). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 256 patients with prefibrotic (85 patients) and overt fibrotic MF (171 patients) treated in six Croatian hematological centers. RESULTS: Prefibrotic compared to overt fibrotic MF patients presented with significantly higher ALC, platelet count and PLR, and experienced longer time to thrombosis (TTT). Among prefibrotic patients, ANC > 8.33 × 109/L (HR 13.08, p = 0.036), ALC > 2.58 × 109/L (HR 20.63, p = 0.049) and platelet count > 752 × 109/L (HR 10.5, p = 0.043) remained independently associated with shorter TTT. Among overt fibrotic patients, ANC > 8.8 × 109/L (HR 4.49, p = 0.004), ALC ≤ 1.43 × 109/L (HR 4.15, p = 0.003), platelet count ≤ 385 × 109/L (HR 4.68, p = 0.004) and chronic kidney disease (HR 9.07, p < 0.001) remained independently associated with shorter TTT. CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic properties of ANC, ALC and platelet count are mutually independent and exceed those of NLR and PLR regarding thrombotic risk stratification. ALC and platelet count associate in opposite directions with thrombotic risk in prefibrotic and overt fibrotic MF patients.

Risks associated with prior oral anticoagulation use in hospitalized COVID-19 patients - A retrospective cohort study on 5392 patients from a tertiary centre.

INTRODUCTION: There are conflicting data on prior oral-anticoagulant (OAC) use and outcomes of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Due to uncertainties regarding associated risks with the prior OAC use, we have investigated this issue in a large cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients from our institution. METHODS: We have retrospectively evaluated a total of 5392 consecutive COVID-19 patients hospitalized in our tertiary center institution in period 3/2020 to 6/2021. Majority of patients received low-molecular-weight-heparin thromboprophylaxis and corticosteroids during hospitalization. Patients' characteristics and clinical outcomes were documented as a part of a hospital registry project and were evaluated according to the prior non-OAC, warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) use. RESULTS: Median age was 72 years, median Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was 4 points. There were 56.2% male patients. Majority of patients had severe (70.5%) or critical (15.8%) COVID-19 on admission. A total of 84.8% patients did not receive prior OAC, 9% were previously anticoagulated with warfarin and 6.2% were previously anticoagulated with DOACs. In the multivariate regression analyses, prior warfarin use was associated increased in-hospital mortality (OR 1.24, P = 0.048) independently of older age (OR 2.12, P < 0.001), male sex (OR 1.27, P < 0.001), higher CCI (OR 1.26, P < 0.001) and severe or critical COVID-19 on admission (OR 22.66, P < 0.001). Prior DOAC use was associated with higher occurrence of major bleeding (OR 1.72, P = 0.045) independently of higher CCI (OR 1.08, P = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Prior OAC use could be associated with worse clinical outcomes during COVID-19 hospitalization. These phenomena might be OAC type specific and persist after multivariate adjustments.

Higher estimated plasma volume status is associated with increased thrombotic risk and impaired survival in patients with primary myelofibrosis.

Introduction: Blood plasma represents a large reservoir of cytokines and other mediators of inflammation. Higher estimated plasma volume status (ePVS) has been shown to correlate with increased thrombotic risk in polycythemia vera patients, but its clinical and prognostic associations in patients with myelofibrosis are unknown which we aim to evaluate in this study. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analysed a multicentric cohort of 238 patients with primary (PMF) and secondary myelofibrosis (SMF). Estimated plasma volume status was calculated using the Strauss-derived Duarte formula. Overall survival (OS) and time to thrombosis (TTT) considering both arterial and venous thromboses were primary endpoints of interest. Results: Median ePVS was 5.8 dL/g and it did not significantly differ between PMF and SMF patients. Patients with more advanced disease features, more pronounced inflammation and higher comorbidity burden had higher ePVS. Higher ePVS (> 5.6 dL/g) was associated with shorter OS in PMF (unadjusted hazard ratio, HR = 2.8, 95% confidence interval, CI (1.79-4.41), P < 0.001) and SMF (unadjusted HR = 2.55, 95% CI (1.1-5.71), P =0.025) and with shorter TTT in PMF (> 7 dL/g, unadjusted HR = 4.1, 95% CI (1.44-11.59), P = 0.009) patients. Associations with OS diminished in multivariate analyses after adjustments for the dynamic-international-prognostic-scoring-system (DIPSS) and myelofibrosis-secondary-to-PV-and ET-prognostic-model (MYSEC-PM), respectively. Association with TTT remained significant independently of JAK2 mutation, white blood cell count and chronic kidney disease. Conclusions: Myelofibrosis patients with more advanced disease features and more pronounced inflammation have higher ePVS, indicative of expanded plasma volume. Higher ePVS is associated with impaired survival in PMF and SMF and higher thrombotic risk in PMF patients.