Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Presse Med ; 19(18): 860-3, 1990 May 05.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2140181

RESUMO

Urinary (CPU) and plasma C peptide values at baseline (CP0) and under stimulation with glucagon were determined in healthy subjects (n = 17) and in insulin-dependent (IDD, n = 45) and non insulin-dependent (NIDD, n = 32) diabetics. A significant difference in the parameters of insulin secretion (x? SD) was found on the one hand between the IDD group (CPU = 5.58 +/- 5.58 nmol/24 h; CP = 0.14 +/- 0.08 nmol/l; maximum C peptide value after stimulation (CPmax) = 0.33 +/- 0.31 nmol/l; C peptide delta (delta CP) = 0.14 +/- 0.14 nmol/l; area under the curve (A) = 5.00 +/- 4.84) and the NIDD group (CPU = 15.47 +/- 8.22 nmol/24 h; CP = 0.64 +/- 0.28 nmol/l; CPmax = 1.14 +/- 0.44 nmol/l; delta CP = 0.50 +/- 0.31 nmol/l; A = 17.5 +/- 5.86) and on the other hand between the IDD group and the control group (CPU = 18.20 +/- 8.40 nmol/24 h; CP = 0.41 +/- 0.11 nmol/l; CPmax = 1.00 +/- 0.31 nmol/l; delta CP = 0.69 +/- 0.20 nmol/l; A = 17.10 +/- 4.45). As regards the NIDD group, only the fasting C peptide and delta C peptide values were significantly different from those found in the control group. The significance of each parameter of insulin secretion was also studied. There was a correlation between the values of C peptidaemia before and after stimulation with glucagon. However, the correlation between plasma C peptide and urinary C peptide values was mediocre, probably because of the numerous variability factors which intervene in the urinary excretion of C peptide.


Assuntos
Peptídeo C , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/metabolismo , Glucagon/metabolismo , Adulto , Idoso , Peptídeo C/sangue , Peptídeo C/urina , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valores de Referência , Estimulação Química
2.
Glob Public Health ; 2(4): 325-41, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19283631

RESUMO

The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria was launched in 2002 with the goals of financing a turnaround in the fight against the three diseases and fundamentally changing the manner in which money is channeled to poor countries. This paper explores the organization's success in fulfilling that mandate over its first five years of operation, examining both its execution of the core business of raising and distributing funds on the basis of proven performance, dramatically increased financing and its realization of this innovative model. The evidence collected demonstrates that, while improvement is needed in a number of areas, the Global Fund has made rapid progress towards realizing its founding ambition and has begun to have its intended impact on global health and development.


Assuntos
Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Organização do Financiamento , Saúde Global , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Malária/prevenção & controle , Tuberculose/prevenção & controle
3.
Pathol Biol (Paris) ; 46(6): 369-74, 1998 Jun.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9769863

RESUMO

In 1996-1997 a multicentre study was carried out on 450 Streptococcus pneumoniae strains to compare the MICs and susceptibility categories obtained with the Etest (AB Biodisk) used under routine conditions in 22 hospital laboratories in the Rhône-Alpes region, France, with those obtained by the reference technique of agar dilution performed in a single coordinating centre. Each laboratory detected penicillin resistant pneumococci (PRP) by the oxacillin disk method (1 microgram and 5 micrograms) and determined the MICs of penicillin G (PG), amoxycillin (AMX) and cefotaxime (CTX) by the Etest. All the PRP strains were collected in the coordinating centre where MICs were carried out. The strains were classified as susceptible (S), intermediate (I) and resistant (R) according to the CASFM criteria (Comité de l'Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie). The concordance results based on susceptibility categories are as follows: PG = 67.6%, AMX = 63.6%, CTX = 71.5%. Minor errors are as follows: PG = 31.2%, AMX = 36%, CTX = 28.5%. Major and very major errors are rare (0% to 0.6%). Agreement within 1 log2 dilution was obtained for about 80% of the strains. The minor errors results from strains clustering near the breakpoints 1 mg/l (PG) and 0.5 mg/l (AMX, CTX), and from practical difficulties in routine use of the Etest. These discrepancies may result in severe therapeutic problems. This study confirms the limits of the Etest. The authors insist on standardization and rigorous use of the Etest under routine conditions.


Assuntos
Amoxicilina/farmacologia , Cefotaxima/farmacologia , Resistência às Cefalosporinas , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Penicilina G/farmacologia , Resistência às Penicilinas , Streptococcus pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos , Meios de Cultura , Difusão , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Reações Falso-Negativas , Reações Falso-Positivas , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/normas , Controle de Qualidade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
4.
Pathol Biol (Paris) ; 50(10): 595-8, 2002 Dec.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12504368

RESUMO

In 1999, in Rhône-Alpes region, in a survey of resistance to antibiotics of Streptococcus pneumoniae, 35 cases of meningitis were observed. A retrospectic questionnary was sent to each participant. MICs to Penicillin, Amoxicillin and Cefotaxime were determined with ATB-PNEUMO gallery or E-test and by disk diffusion for the other antibiotics. The results were interpreted according to the recommendations of the CA-SFM. Mean age was 38.1 years (range : 1 month -78 years) and sex-ratio 2/5. Eight patients had previously received antibiotics, 22 patients had risk factors and 23 were transferred in intensive care unit. The patients received C3G + glycopeptide in 15 of 16 children and in 13/19 adults according to the consensus recommendations. Diagnostic was made on the direct examination of CSF in 83%, and blood cultures was positive in 74.3% of cases. The percentage of PRP was 48.6% with 17.1% of intermediate-amoxicilline and 14.3% intermediate-cefotaxime strains. Resistance to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was 45.7%, to chloramphenicol 30% and to fosfomycin 6.9%. All the strains were susceptible to rifampicin and vancomycin. Among the 17 PRP strains, 7 were belonging to serotype 6 (6 in children). The clinical outcome was fatal in 7 male cases (20%), without risk factors in 3 children and 6 of 7 strains were susceptible to penicillin. Six patients (17%) had auditive and/or neurologic sequellaes. This study shows that nearly 50% of strains isolated in meningitis, in Rhône-Alpes region, were not susceptible to penicillin, and confirms the frequency of sequellaes while the mortality is not related with the resistance of strains to the antibiotics.


Assuntos
Meningite Pneumocócica/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Amoxicilina/administração & dosagem , Cefotaxima/administração & dosagem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Cloranfenicol , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos , Feminino , Fosfomicina , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Meningite Pneumocócica/diagnóstico , Meningite Pneumocócica/tratamento farmacológico , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Penicilinas/administração & dosagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rifampina/administração & dosagem , Inquéritos e Questionários , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol , Vancomicina/administração & dosagem
5.
Pathol Biol (Paris) ; 49(7): 548-52, 2001 Sep.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11642017

RESUMO

In 1999, during the survey of resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae to antibiotics by 31 clinical laboratories of Rhône-Alpes area, MIC to penicillin (P), amoxicillin (AMX) and cefotaxime (CTX) of 877 PRP strains or with a diameter of inhibition to oxacillin inferior to 26 mm, were determined by each institution by E-test (n = 220 strains) or ATB-PNEUMO (n = 657 strains). MICs of these three antibiotics were determined by dilution in agar medium by the coordinating center. The essential agreement was respectively for ATB-PNEUMO and E-test 89% versus 84% for P (p > 0.05), of 86% vs 79% for AMX (p < 0.01), and of 91% vs 86% for CTX (p = 0.03). When the strains were classified in clinical category, the differences were significant (p < 0.001) for AMX (85% vs 71%) and for CTX (82% vs 75%) but not for P (73% vs 78%). ATB-PNEUMO method was more sensitive than E-test for the detection of strains susceptible to P (90 vs 73%), to AMX (83 vs 78%) and to CTX (80 vs 72%) and for the strains intermediate to AMX (90 vs 78%). On the contrary, E-test is more specific than ATB-PNEUMO for the detection of P-resistant strains (94 vs 86%). Finally, the specificity of both methods is the same for detection of P-S, AMX-R and CTX-I strains.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Resistência a Medicamentos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Streptococcus pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos , Amoxicilina/farmacologia , Cefotaxima/farmacologia , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Humanos , Oxacilina/farmacologia , Resistência às Penicilinas , Infecções Pneumocócicas/microbiologia , Padrões de Referência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA