Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Assunto principal
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Infect Dis Clin Pract (Baltim Md) ; 29(4): e224-e229, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34276175

RESUMO

The outbreak of novel coronavirus infection emerged in and spread from China to other countries. Health care workers are at significant risk of infection from this virus in medical settings. We aimed to explore and evaluate the response of medical doctors and hospital administration to infection prevention and control of suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 108 doctors who had exposure to suspected/confirmed COVID-19 patients in public hospitals. RESULTS: The doctors were aged 24 to 53 years, working in general hospitals (72.2%), primary health centers (23.1%), and a special coronavirus hospital (4.6%). One third (33.3%) reported that their hospitals had established a clinical triage station at the entrance to the facility. Suspected COVID-19 cases were immediately placed in an area separate from other patients (63.9%). The doctors ensured that patients covered their nose and mouth with a tissue to cough or sneeze (53.7%), and they performed hand hygiene after patient contact (98.1%). A medical team designated to care exclusively for suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cases was reported by 50.9%. The screening equipment was shared among patients (56.5%). The doctors avoided moving and transporting patients out of their room or designated area (83.3%). Many hospitals (76.9%) limited the number of medical staff and visitors who come in contact with suspected or confirmed patients. Most hospitals (72.2%) did not have a surveillance process for acute respiratory infections. Only 51.9% reported that staff collecting specimens used appropriate personal protective equipment. CONCLUSIONS: The doctors reported that we adhere to infection prevention in providing health care, in contrast with hospital administration.

2.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep ; 16(4): 1322-1325, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33691810

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The public's perceptions toward the COVID-19 crisis and the government's attempts to handle the crisis are critically noteworthy. The public opinions toward the COVID-19 crisis were explored in this study. METHODS: In this report, 1102 participants were included from 2 popular social media platforms from the Duhok Governorate in Iraqi Kurdistan between June 2 and 22, 2020, through an online technique. RESULTS: The study revealed that 14.0% of the participants believed that there is no COVID-19 in this region, and 20.1% had no concerns about the disease spread. This study revealed that 27.4% had conspiracy thinking about the COVID-19 outbreak, including that the outbreak is a plot against/of the Kurdistan Region Government, 16.4% and 19.3%, respectively. The outbreak caused considerable changes in participants' lives (85.8%). The participants who had conspiracy thinking were younger (27.0 vs 30.0; P = 0.001) and had a higher level of education (37.50% high school and under, 26.0% college and above, 16.2% illiterate: P < 0.001). In addition, they had a private job (43.7%), and were unemployed (23.9%; P < 0.001), and had negative views on the TV information (38.9% vs 17.5%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A considerable percentage of the public exhibits conspiracy thinking toward the COVID-19 crisis in Iraqi Kurdistan.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Opinião Pública , SARS-CoV-2 , Iraque/epidemiologia , Surtos de Doenças
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA