The community-acquired pneumonia symptom questionnaire: a new, patient-based outcome measure to evaluate symptoms in patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: s: To develop and validate a patient-based outcome measure to evaluate symptoms in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). DESIGN: A psychometric study within an international, prospective, randomized, double-blind study. The CAP-symptom questionnaire (CAP-Sym) is a new, 18-item, patient-reported outcome measure that evaluates the bothersomeness of CAP-related symptoms during the past 24 h using a 6-point Likert scale. We used "gold standard" psychometric methods to comprehensively evaluate the acceptability, reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the CAP-Sym. SETTING: Sixty-four centers in 13 countries (France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Norway, Poland, Portugal, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom). PATIENTS: Five hundred fifty-six patients with CAP, recruited from outpatient clinics, general practice, and hospital centers. INTERVENTIONS: Randomization 1:1 to moxifloxacin (400 mg once daily), oral or standard oral treatment (amoxicillin, 1 g tid, or clarithromycin, 500 mg bid), alone or in combination, for up to 14 days. RESULTS: Standard psychometric tests confirmed the acceptability (item nonresponse, item-endorsement frequencies, item/scale floor and ceiling effects), reliability (internal consistency, item-total and inter-item correlations, test-retest reliability), validity (content, construct, convergent, discriminant, known groups), and responsiveness of the CAP-Sym. CONCLUSIONS: The CAP-Sym is a practical and scientifically sound patient-based outcome measure of CAP-related symptoms that has been developed using "gold standard" methods. As the only fully validated measure of symptoms in patients with CAP, which is quick and easy to administer and is more responsive than the generic Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, the CAP-Sym provides a practical and rigorous method for improving the evaluation of outcomes in clinical trials and audit.

An economic evaluation of sequential i.v./po moxifloxacin therapy compared to i.v./po co-amoxiclav with or without clarithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate costs, clinical consequences, and cost-effectiveness from a German and French health-care system perspective of sequential i.v./po moxifloxacin monotherapy compared to co-amoxiclav with or without clarithromycin (AMC +/- CLA) in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) who required parenteral treatment. METHODS: Costs and consequences over 21 days were evaluated based on clinical cure rates 5 to 7 days after treatment and health resource use reported for the TARGET multinational, prospective, randomized, open-label trial. This trial compared sequential i.v./po monotherapy with moxifloxacin (400 mg qd) to i.v./po co-amoxiclav (1.2 g i.v./625 mg po tid) with or without clarithromycin (500 mg bid) for 7 to 14 days in hospitalized patients with CAP. Since no country-by-treatment interaction was found in spite of some country differences for length of hospital stays, resource data (antimicrobial treatment, hospitalization, and out-of-hospital care) from all centers were pooled and valued using German and French unit prices to estimate CAP-related cost to the German Sickness Funds and French public health-care sector, respectively. RESULTS: Compared to AMC +/- CLA, treatment with moxifloxacin resulted in 5.3% more patients achieving clinical cure 5 to 7 days after therapy (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 11.8%), increased speed of response (1 day sooner for median time to first return to apyrexia, p = 0.008), and a reduction in hospital stay by 0.81 days (95% CI, - 0.01 to 1.63) within the 21-day time frame. Treatment with moxifloxacin resulted in savings of 266 euro and 381 euro for Germany and France respectively, primarily due to the shorter length of hospital stay. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves show moxifloxacin has a > or = 95% chance of being cost saving from French and German health-care perspectives, and higher probability of being cost-effective at acceptability thresholds up to 2,000 euro per additional patient cured. CONCLUSION: i.v./po monotherapy with moxifloxacin shows clinical benefits including increased speed of response and is cost-effective compared to i.v./po AMC +/- CLA in the treatment of CAP.

Current status of patient-reported outcomes in industry-sponsored oncology clinical trials and product labels.

Assessing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical trials is of interest to clinicians, patients, regulators, and industry. The use and impact of PROs is a growing area of methodologic research, particularly as they relate to tumor types, biomarkers, and various patient populations and cultures. Both the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products in recent guidance have acknowledged the need to account for treatment-related impact on patient symptoms and/or health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Clinical research likely reflects the informative value of PROs. A search of www.clinicaltrials.gov, the FDA Web site, and product package inserts was conducted to assess the inclusion of symptom assessment and HRQOL within industry-sponsored clinical trials in cancer and approved cancer therapies and their respective product labels. Overall, there were 2,704 industry-sponsored oncology trials, of which 322 (12%) included a PRO measure. Of the 70 FDA new or revised labels, only six package inserts include PRO data. Symptoms were assessed uniformly across the phases of clinical trials, whereas HRQOL assessment increased in the later phases of clinical trials. Collecting PRO data can enhance our understanding of cancer burden and the impact of interventions on patients' lives.

The treatment satisfaction scale: a multidimensional instrument for the assessment of treatment satisfaction for erectile dysfunction patients and their partners.

BACKGROUND: The development of the Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS) was previously reported (Kubin et al., 2004). OBJECTIVE: This article describes the psychometric validation process and psychometric properties (e.g., reliability, validity, and responsiveness) of TSS. METHODS: Initial patient and partner questionnaires were administered in a multi-national clinical trial. On the basis of exploratory analyses, iterative psychometric testing, and consideration of face validity and interpretability, the number of items was reduced, and six scales were constructed: "Satisfaction with Medication," "Ease with Erection," "Satisfaction with Erectile Function," "Pleasure from Sexual Activity," "Satisfaction with Orgasm," and either "Sexual Confidence" (for patients) or "Confidence in Completion" (for partners). RESULTS: Multi-item scales had good internal consistency reliability and concurrent validity with the IIEF. All patient scales and most partner scales were valid in relation to clinical criteria, and all tested scales were responsive to change over time. CONCLUSION: The TSS is brief, culturally valid, and the most comprehensive multidimensional measure of satisfaction with ED treatment for patients and their partners, and addresses some of the shortcomings of existing measures.

Validity of the St George's respiratory questionnaire at acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis: comparison with the Nottingham health profile.

The purpose of the study is to compare a generic and a specific quality of life (QoL) instrument in the assessment of QoL in chronic bronchitis. Data from 320 patients were collected at acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB), and from 230 patients during a subsequent stable phase (non-AECB), utilising both the specific St George's respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ) and the generic Nottingham health profile (NHP). Patients (maximum n = 200) reported significantly poorer QoL at AECB than at non-AECB for all domains except the SGRQ symptom domain (SRM = 0.02). The SGRQ was more sensitive than the NHP to QoL differences between patients. The correlations between the scores across the two assessments were generally higher for the SGRQ, with the correlations between the NHP and SGRQ being lower at AECB, suggesting that the instruments are measuring different constructs at AECB, with the SGRQ being less responsive to QoL change. Indeed, the NHP was generally more responsive to QoL change in terms of 'risk' and clinical factors, with the SGRQ symptom domain appearing particularly non-responsive. In conclusion, this study suggests that the condition-specific SGRQ, and particularly its symptom domain, is less responsive than the generic NHP to QoL change accompanying AECB. This reflects the construct of the symptom domain which measures chronic bronchitis symptoms over the previous year.