Long-Acting Local Anesthetics for Total Knee Arthroplasty: Past, Present, and Future.

Pain management remains a challenge in the optimization of outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. Multimodal analgesia is commonplace for modern elective joint replacement, combining various medications and anesthetics along the pain pathway. Local analgesics have the advantage of avoiding systemic effects and offering concentrated local delivery of medications. Long-acting local anesthetics provide the added advantage of providing sustained pain relief when other treatment options may no longer be effective. It is important to provide an update on current local analgesic strategies available with a review of the current literature, outlining the potential benefits and unique considerations of each treatment. Novel medications in development targeting pain management following total knee arthroplasty are possible options in the future.

Preoperative Evaluation, Anesthetic Considerations, and Perioperative Oral and Parenteral Medications in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Effective pain management protocol is critical to early mobilization, early discharge, and increasing patient satisfaction for hip and knee arthroplasty. Surgeons have tried to minimize dependence on opioids and opioid-related adverse events through multimodal protocols that use periarticular injections as well as oral and parenteral medications. The efficacy, cost, and adverse effects of each of these components need to be considered when formulating an evidence-based multimodal pain protocol. Recent advancements have changed understanding of the variability in metabolism of commonly given agents around the time of surgery. It is important to provide a systematic approach to the preoperative evaluation, anesthetic considerations, and the administration of oral and parenteral medications routinely used in total knee arthroplasty.

Alphabet Soup of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Liner Options-Cruciate Retaining, Posterior Stabilized, Medial Congruent, Medial Pivot: Making Sense of the Options and What the Latest Data Show.

The traditional dual-option debate of cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized knee arthroplasty designs has evolved into a more complex discussion in recent years. The growing interest and rapid adoption of medial conforming and medial pivot designs has made the original debate surrounding cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized designs more interesting. Each liner option has its own advantages and disadvantages. Although conforming tibial liner options are increasing rapidly, traditional cruciate retaining and posterior stabilized are the most common designs, as recorded in most registries. However, it is important to understand the updated pros and cons of each liner design as surgeons focus on personalization of their total knee arthroplasty procedures to the individual patient. Different liner options may be more advantageous in certain situations or vary with surgical technique. Several different types of tibial liner options are currently available, and it is important to review and summarize the latest literature available for each.

Safe and reliable clinical outcomes at 2 years of a fixed-bearing partial knee arthroplasty with a morphometric tibial tray in a large worldwide population.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate: (1) improvement of functional and quality of life scores, (2) adverse events, (3) short-term implants survivorship of a newly designed fixed-bearing partial knee replacement (PKR) with a morphometric tibial tray in a large and multicentric population at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. METHODS: From 2017 to 2019, 479 medial PKR were implanted by 16 non-developing surgeons from United States, Europe, and Japan. Eight patients were lost to follow-up (1.8%). Standardized follow-up procedures included patient-reported outcomes (Oxford Knee Society score, Forgotten Joint Score, EQ VAS, EQ 5D), patient satisfaction, radiographic assessments, adverse event at 2 years. Comparisons between the preoperative and postoperative values were performed using Student t test. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed with knee revision as the endpoint. RESULTS: The mean age was 65.6 ± 9.6 years. Mean body mass index was 29.5 ± 5.1 kg/m2. Oxford Knee Society score and Forgotten Joint Score, respectively, improved from 23.7 ± 8 and 16 ± 15.8 preoperatively to 42.4 ± 6.5 and 74 ± 24.9 at 2 years (p < 0.0001). Satisfaction Score was 92.3 ± 13.4 at 2 years. Ten re-operations (2.1%) were reported including seven implant removals (1.5%). No other adverse event was reported. The causes of conversion to total knee arthroplasty were: nickel allergy (n = 2), patellofemoral osteoarthritis (n = 1), pain (n = 1), deep infection (n = 3). Two re-operations were performed due to infection, and one for internal fixation for a tibial plateau fracture. The 2-year Kaplan-Meier survival estimate was 98.4%, with implant removals as the endpoint. CONCLUSION: This prospective multicentric study reported safe and reliable clinical outcomes of a morphometric PKR, which optimized tibial coverage and femoral fit, in a large population of patients worldwide at 2 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective cohort study-therapeutic study, Level II.

Outpatient Joint Arthroplasty: Practical Guidelines for Success, Effect of COVID--19, and the Roles of Technology and Partnering With Industry.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a drastic effect on the landscape of outpatient joint arthroplasty. By accelerating the migration to ambulatory surgery centers and hospital outpatient departments, protocols and techniques had to adapt quickly. In addition, the roles of technology and partnering with industry became more appealing in some cases to address specific voids and needs during this transition period. The COVID-19 pandemic abruptly affected the state of outpatient joint arthroplasty in 2020 with long-lasting effects that will continue to shape the practice of outpatient total joint arthroplasty for years to come.

How Much Hip Motion Is Used in Real-Life Activities? Assessment of Hip Flexion by a Wearable Sensor and Implications After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Hip range of motion precautions are often considered a requirement for patients after total hip replacement. Few studies have attempted to estimate hip motion during activities of daily living. The purpose of this study is to evaluate hip range of motion and gait during real-life activities in healthy individuals with a novel tracking wearable sensor. METHODS: Thirty subjects used a hip motion tracking device during a series of tested activities. Healthy volunteers were selected, and subjects were excluded if they reported symptoms in the limb or known deviation in their gait. Hip flexion was evaluated during common activities of daily living. RESULTS: Hip range of motion during walking averaged minimum to maximum hip flexion of 9.9°-49.3°, respectively. During stair ascent, the average flexion arc widened from minimum 19.6° to maximum 67.8° flexion. Stair descent had the most narrow arc of 26.2°-52.4° hip flexion. Squatting averaged 120.0° of hip flexion, with the transition from sitting to standing averaging 103.0°. Getting on and off of the toilet averaged maximum 112.6°, while tying shoes averaged 126.1° maximum hip flexion. CONCLUSION: Hip precautions are often enforced after total hip arthroplasty without knowing normal arcs of motion during real-life activities. Knowledge of hip motion during activities of daily living in healthy individuals is useful information in setting goals and in educating total hip arthroplasty patients. This technology can be useful in guiding postoperative precautions and also in monitoring patients after hip replacement with real-time monitoring.

2022 American College of Rheumatology/American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Guideline for the Perioperative Management of Antirheumatic Medication in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases Undergoing Elective Total Hip or Total Knee Arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVE: To develop updated American College of Rheumatology/American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons guidelines for the perioperative management of disease-modifying medications for patients with rheumatic diseases, specifically those with inflammatory arthritis (IA) and those with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) or elective total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: We convened a panel of rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, and infectious disease specialists, updated the systematic literature review, and included currently available medications for the clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes (PICO) questions. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to rate the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations using a group consensus process. RESULTS: This guideline updates the 2017 recommendations for perioperative use of disease-modifying antirheumatic therapy, including traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, biologic agents, targeted synthetic small-molecule drugs, and glucocorticoids used for adults with rheumatic diseases, specifically for the treatment of patients with IA, including rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis, those with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, or those with SLE who are undergoing elective THA or TKA. It updates recommendations regarding when to continue, when to withhold, and when to restart these medications and the optimal perioperative dosing of glucocorticoids. CONCLUSION: This updated guideline includes recently introduced immunosuppressive medications to help decision-making by clinicians and patients regarding perioperative disease-modifying medication management for patients with IA and SLE at the time of elective THA or TKA.

Safety and Efficacy of Perioperative Intravenous Meloxicam for Moderate-to-Severe Pain Management in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of perioperative meloxicam IV 30 mg on opioid consumption in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SUBJECTS: In total, 181 adults undergoing elective primary TKA. METHODS: Subjects received meloxicam 30 mg or placebo via an IV bolus every 24 hours, the first dose administered prior to surgery as part of a multimodal pain management protocol. The primary efficacy parameter was total opioid use from end of surgery through 24 hours. RESULTS: Meloxicam IV was associated with less opioid use versus placebo during the 24 hours after surgery (18.9 ± 1.32 vs 27.7 ± 1.37 mg IV morphine equivalent dose; P < 0.001) and was superior to placebo on secondary endpoints, including summed pain intensity (first dose to 24 hours postdosing, first dose to first assisted ambulation, and first dose to discharge) and opioid use (48-72 hrs., 0-48 hrs., 0-72 hrs., hour 0 to end of treatment, and the first 24 hours after discharge). Adverse events (AEs) were reported for 69.9% and 92.0% of the meloxicam IV and placebo groups, respectively; the most common AEs were nausea (40% vs. 59%), vomiting (16% vs 22%), hypotension (14% vs 15%), pruritus (15% vs 11%), and constipation (11% vs 13%). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative meloxicam IV 30 mg as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen for elective primary TKA reduced opioid consumption in the 24-hour period after surgery versus placebo and was associated with a lower incidence of AEs typically associated with opioid use.

Outpatient Joint Replacement: Practical Guidelines for Your Program Based on Evidence, Success, and Failures.

Joint arthroplasty is increasingly being performed in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). Enabled by enhanced recovery protocols and multimodal pain management, and incentivized by the implementation of value-based payment models, this trend is projected to continue, with more than half of total joint replacements predicted to be outpatient by 2026.1 Like any advance in healthcare, this transition offers both new advantages and new challenges. ASCs provide opportunities to improve patient satisfaction and outcomes while lowering costs, but realizing these advantages requires a new level of presurgery preparation for both surgeons and patients. This chapter outlines key considerations for success when transitioning to performing joint arthroplasty at ASCs. Paramount among these are patient selection and preparation. Additional considerations include protocol optimization through data tracking and iterative refinement. A clear understanding of the differences in performing joints at an ASC versus a hospital outpatient setting enables surgeons to make the transition smoothly, maintain a high-quality patient experience, and deliver optimum outcomes.

HTX-011 Reduced Pain and Opioid Use After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Results of a Randomized Phase 2b Trial.

BACKGROUND: HTX-011 is an extended-release, dual-acting local anesthetic consisting of bupivacaine and low-dose meloxicam in a novel polymer that is administered by needle-free application during surgery. The active ingredients are released from the polymer by controlled diffusion over 72 hours. METHODS: This phase 2b, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active-controlled trial enrolled patients undergoing primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty under general anesthesia. Two hundred thirty-two patients were randomized into 4 groups: HTX-011 400 mg bupivacaine/12 mg meloxicam, applied without a needle into the surgical site, the same dose of HTX-011 with a separate 50 mg ropivacaine injection into the posterior capsule, bupivacaine hydrochloride (HCl) 125 mg injection, and saline placebo injection. Only opioids were permitted for postoperative pain rescue. Primary and key secondary endpoints were mean area under the curve of pain intensity scores over 48 hours and 72 hours, respectively, for HTX-011 groups vs placebo. RESULTS: Both HTX-011 groups had significantly reduced mean pain intensity vs placebo through 48 and 72 hours (both P < .001). Ropivacaine added a small initial benefit in the first 12 hours. Both HTX-011 groups also had decreased mean pain intensity vs bupivacaine HCl alone through 48 and 72 hours (P < .05). The HTX-011 groups had significantly earlier discharge readiness along with lower opioid consumption through 72 hours. HTX-011 alone or with ropivacaine was well-tolerated with a safety profile similar to controls. CONCLUSION: Needle-free application of HTX-011 400 mg bupivacaine/12 mg meloxicam provided superior pain reduction through 72 hours after total knee arthroplasty compared with placebo and bupivacaine HCl alone.

Considerations for Office and Staff Protocols for Outpatient Joint Replacement.

Elements of a successful comprehensive joint replacement program include preoperative education, joint class or camps, office support, and follow-up staff and systems. To meet the demand for consistent and safe outpatient joint replacement discharges, these elements must be optimized and, in many cases, enhanced beyond standard procedures. The office and staff protocols that support the outpatient joint replacement patient before and after surgery are as important as the surgery itself. There are unique consequences, or "ripple effects", of speeding patient recovery after joint replacement surgery and proceeding to early discharges. By understanding these differences and by being proactive, rather than reactive, the enhanced protocols can provide a safe and successful outpatient experience.

The Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Network Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an antifibrinolytic agent commonly used to reduce blood loss in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of TXA in primary THA to support the combined clinical practice guidelines of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Hip Society, Knee Society, and American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine on the use of TXA in primary total joint arthroplasty. METHODS: A search was performed using Ovid-MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Reviews, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify all publications before July 2017 on TXA in primary THA. We completed qualitative and quantitative homogeneity testing of all included studies. Direct and indirect comparisons were analyzed using a network meta-analysis followed by consistency testing of the results. RESULTS: Two thousand one hundred thirteen publications underwent critical appraisal with 34 publications identified as representing the best available evidence for inclusion in the analysis. Topical, intravenous, and oral TXA formulations provided reduced blood loss and risk of transfusion compared to placebo, but no formulation was clearly superior. Use of repeat doses, higher doses, or variation in timing of administration did not significantly reduce blood loss or risk of transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Strong evidence supports the use of TXA to reduce blood loss and risk of transfusion after primary THA. No specific routes of administration, dosage, dosing regimen, or time of administration provides clearly superior blood-sparing properties.

The Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Network Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: A growing body of published research on tranexamic acid (TXA) suggests that it is effective in reducing blood loss and the risk for transfusion in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this network meta-analysis was to evaluate TXA in primary TKA as the basis for the efficacy recommendations of the combined clinical practice guidelines of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Hip Society, Knee Society, and American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine on the use of TXA in primary total joint arthroplasty. METHODS: We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Reviews, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for publications before July 2017 on TXA in primary total joint arthroplasty. All included studies underwent qualitative and quantitative homogeneity testing. Direct and indirect comparisons were performed as a network meta-analysis, and results were tested for consistency. RESULTS: After critical appraisal of the available 2113 publications, 67 articles were identified as representing the best available evidence. Topical, intravenous (IV), and oral TXA formulations were all superior to placebo in terms of decreasing blood loss and risk of transfusion, while no formulation was clearly superior. Use of repeat IV and oral TXA dosing and higher doses of IV and topical TXA did not significantly reduce blood loss or risk of transfusion. Preincision administration of IV TXA had inconsistent findings with a reduced risk of transfusion but no effect on volume of blood loss. CONCLUSIONS: Strong evidence supports the efficacy of TXA to decrease blood loss and the risk of transfusion after primary TKA. No TXA formulation, dosage, or number of doses provided clearly improved blood-sparing properties for TKA. Moderate evidence supports preincision administration of IV TXA to improve efficacy.

The Safety of Tranexamic Acid in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Direct Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Tranexamic acid (TXA) is effective in reducing blood loss in total joint arthroplasty (TJA), but concerns still remain regarding the drug's safety. The purpose of this direct meta-analysis was to evaluate and establish a basis for the safety recommendations of the combined clinical practice guidelines on the use of TXA in primary TJA. METHODS: A search was completed for studies published before July 2017 on TXA in primary TJA. We performed qualitative and quantitative homogeneity testing and a direct comparison meta-analysis. We used the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of 3 or greater as a proxy for patients at higher risk for complications in general and performed a meta-regression analysis to investigate the influence of comorbidity burden on the risk of arterial thromboembolic event and venous thromboembolic event (VTE). RESULTS: Topical, intravenous, and oral TXA were not associated with an increased risk of VTE after TJA. In addition, meta-regression demonstrated that TXA use in patients with an ASA status of 3 or greater was not associated with an increased risk of VTE after total knee arthroplasty. CONCLUSION: Although most studies included in our analysis excluded patients with a history of prior thromboembolic events, our findings support the lack of evidence of harm from TXA administration in patients undergoing TJA. Moderate evidence supports the safety of TXA in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty with an ASA score of 3 or greater. The benefits of using TXA appear to outweigh the potential risks of thromboembolic events even in patients with a higher comorbidity.

2017 American College of Rheumatology/American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Guideline for the Perioperative Management of Antirheumatic Medication in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases Undergoing Elective Total Hip or Total Knee Arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVE: This collaboration between the American College of Rheumatology and the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons developed an evidence-based guideline for the perioperative management of antirheumatic drug therapy for adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA) including ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) undergoing elective total hip (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: A panel of rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons specializing in hip and knee arthroplasty, and methodologists was convened to construct the key clinical questions to be answered in the guideline. A multi-step systematic literature review was then conducted, from which evidence was synthesized for continuing versus withholding antirheumatic drug therapy and for optimal glucocorticoid management in the perioperative period. A Patient Panel was convened to determine patient values and preferences, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to rate the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations, using a group consensus process through a convened Voting Panel of rheumatologists and orthopedic surgeons. The strength of the recommendation reflects the degree of certainty that benefits outweigh harms of the intervention, or vice versa, considering the quality of available evidence and the variability in patient values and preferences. RESULTS: The guideline addresses the perioperative use of antirheumatic drug therapy including traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, biologic agents, tofacitinib, and glucocorticoids in adults with RA, SpA, JIA, or SLE who are undergoing elective THA or TKA. It provides recommendations regarding when to continue, when to withhold, and when to restart these medications, and the optimal perioperative dosing of glucocorticoids. The guideline includes 7 recommendations, all of which are conditional and based on low- or moderate-quality evidence. CONCLUSION: This guideline should help decision-making by clinicians and patients regarding perioperative antirheumatic medication management at the time of elective THA or TKA. These conditional recommendations reflect the paucity of high-quality direct randomized controlled trial data.

Is There an Advantage to Knotless Barbed Suture in TKA Wound Closure? A Randomized Trial in Simultaneous Bilateral TKAs.

BACKGROUND: Effective wound closure is critical to minimizing wound complications and withstanding the forces associated with early knee motion after TKA. Barbed sutures allow for knotless fixation, have been used successfully in other specialties, and may provide for more even distribution of tension along the length of the incision; however, data regarding unidirectional barbed sutures from randomized trials have raised important concerns about their use. Bidirectional barbed sutures offer a potential alternative, but have not been studied extensively in orthopaedic surgery. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Using a prospective, randomized, within-patient controlled study design I compared wound closure performed with bidirectional barbed sutures in one knee of bilateral TKAs performed under the same anesthetic with those performed with standard sutures in the other knee to determine whether the barbed suture was associated with (1) faster closure times; (2) fewer intraoperative suture issues, such as needle sticks or suture breakage, and fewer postoperative wound complications; (3) no detrimental effect on clinical outcomes, including knee ROM and Knee Society scores; and (4) lower total operative cost, considering suture material cost and operating room time savings. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2012, 50 consecutive patients meeting prespecified inclusion criteria with simultaneous bilateral TKAs had deep and superficial closures performed using interrupted and running standard sutures in one randomly assigned knee, and running knotless bidirectional barbed sutures in the other knee. The barbed suture is US FDA-approved for soft tissue approximation wherever absorbable sutures are appropriate. Intraoperative suture issues and the number of sutures used were recorded at the time of wound closure. Suture cost was compared between the standard and barbed sutures and measured against the operative time cost, as estimated per minute saved. Patients were followed postoperatively at 2, 6, and 12 weeks, and 1 year. Outcomes assessed included detailed operative and tourniquet time, knee ROM, Knee Society scores, postoperative complications, use of antibiotics, and any subsequent surgical interventions. These outcomes were assessed at each visit except for Knee Society scores which were collected at the 12-week and 1-year evaluations. All patients completed followups up to the final evaluation at 1 year. RESULTS: Mean wound closure time was 4.7 minutes less using barbed sutures (SD, ± 2.8; 95% CI, -5.5 to -3.7; p < 0.001), average 16.1 (SD, ± 2.2) versus 11.4 (SD, ± 2.2) minutes for the standard versus barbed suture types, respectively. Overall tourniquet time was not different at 78.7 minutes (SD, ± 11.1 minutes) versus 74.9 minutes (SD, ± 10.1 minutes), respectively (p > 0.1). There were no intraoperative clinical issues, such as provider or patient injury, using either suture. There were no needle disengagements or suture breakages with barbed-suture closure; five episodes of premature disengagement of the suture from the needle and three suture breakages were observed with standard closures (p < 0.005). There were no postoperative wound dehiscences or disruptions of the arthrotomy closure with either closure technique. Final ROM was not different with the numbers available (barbed-suture group mean, 126.7° ± 6.9° SD vs standard-suture group mean, 125.6° ± 7.0° SD; p = 0.4, 95% CI, -3.77 to 1.73) between patient groups at 1 year. There were no differences with the numbers available in 1-year Knee Society knee scores (barbed mean, 92.8 ± 6.69 SD vs standard mean, 93.3 ± 6.2 SD; p = 0.6, 95% CI, -1.97 to 3.36). Considering suture material cost against time savings in operating room time, there was a cost savings of mean USD 175 per case when using barbed suture. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized controlled trial, I found knotless bidirectional barbed suture to be more efficient in terms of closure time and lower in direct operative cost than conventional suture material, while showing no difference in terms of Knee Society knee scores, ROM, or wound appearance with the numbers available. Future studies with larger numbers will be needed to compare overall costs of care and to detect uncommon complications that might arise, although none were observed in this small series. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study.

Clinical Outcomes and Experience of a Multiyear Consecutive Case Series of Total Knee Arthroplasty Procedures Conducted with a Bipolar Sealer System for Hemostasis.

Maximizing hemostasis during total knee replacement procedures remains a key challenge in current practice. Bipolar sealer technology achieves intraoperative hemostasis through tissue sealing and coagulation with adjustable radio frequency energy and a saline-irrigated tip. Optimal surgical site hemostasis is important to avoid potential complications such as hemarthrosis, wound drainage, increased pain, delayed discharge, and readmissions. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the bipolar sealer device in primary knee replacement in the largest consecutive series to date. A consecutive, treatment-control series of subjects who underwent a primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) utilizing a bipolar sealer for hemostasis, one subgroup with concomitant tranexamic acid (TXA) administration (n = 1599) and one subgroup without TXA administration (n = 3582), compared with a control group of primary TKA under tourniquet only (n = 667). Statistical analyses were performed through two-tailed unpaired t-tests. There was less total postoperative drain output and a lower overall transfusion rate in the bipolar sealer group (807ml ± 428) (2.5%) than the tourniquet only group (1290 ± 658, p = 0.001) (8.4%, p = 0.0001), respectively. Drainage output in bipolar sealer + TXA (450 ± 297 ml) was lower than the other two groups (bipolar sealer 807 ± 428 mL, p = 0.0001; tourniquet only 1290 ± 658 ml, p = 0.0001). The bipolar sealer group had a higher hematocrit at postoperative day 1 (POD1) (bipolar sealer: 33.1 ± 4.3 cc, tourniquet only: 32.5 ± 4.3 cc, p = 0.001) and at discharge (POD2, bipolar sealer: 31.5 ± 3.7 cc, tourniquet only: 30.2 ± 3.9 cc, p = 0.0001). There were zero reported serious adverse events related to hemostasis management in any group. The bipolar sealer system is a safe and effective instrument to achieve intraoperative hemostasis during primary TKA. The bipolar sealer group required significantly fewer postoperative blood product transfusions and maintained a higher hematocrit concentration at the time of discharge compared with subjects treated solely with tourniquet mediated hemostasis. Addition of TXA to local hemostasis methods may further reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: This is a Level III study.

2022 American College of Rheumatology/American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Guideline for the Perioperative Management of Antirheumatic Medication in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases Undergoing Elective Total Hip or Total Knee Arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVE: To develop updated guidelines for the perioperative management of disease-modifying medications for patients with rheumatic diseases, specifically those with inflammatory arthritis (IA) and those with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) or elective total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: We convened a panel of rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, and infectious disease specialists, updated the systematic literature review, and included currently available medications for the clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes (PICO) questions. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to rate the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations using a group consensus process. RESULTS: This guideline updates the 2017 recommendations for perioperative use of disease-modifying antirheumatic therapy, including traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, biologic agents, targeted synthetic small-molecule drugs, and glucocorticoids used for adults with rheumatic diseases, specifically for the treatment of patients with IA, including rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis, those with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, or those with SLE who are undergoing elective THA or TKA. It updates recommendations regarding when to continue, when to withhold, and when to restart these medications and the optimal perioperative dosing of glucocorticoids. CONCLUSION: This updated guideline includes recently introduced immunosuppressive medications to help decision-making by clinicians and patients regarding perioperative disease-modifying medication management for patients with IA and SLE at the time of elective THA or TKA.