Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 226, 2024 Feb 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38378497

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Leprosy is an infectious disease with a slow decline in global annual caseload in the past two decades. Active case finding and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) with a single dose of rifampicin (SDR) are recommended by the World Health Organization as measures for leprosy elimination. However, more potent PEP regimens are needed to increase the effect in groups highest at risk (i.e., household members and blood relatives, especially of multibacillary patients). The PEP++ trial will assess the effectiveness of an enhanced preventive regimen against leprosy in high-endemic districts in India, Brazil, Bangladesh, and Nepal compared with SDR-PEP. METHODS: The PEP++ study is a cluster-randomised controlled trial in selected districts of India, Brazil, Bangladesh, and Nepal. Sub-districts will be allocated randomly to the intervention and control arms. Leprosy patients detected from 2015 - 22 living in the districts will be approached to list their close contacts for enrolment in the study. All consenting participants will be screened for signs and symptoms of leprosy and tuberculosis (TB). In the intervention arm, eligible contacts receive the enhanced PEP++ regimen with three doses of rifampicin (150 - 600 mg) and clarithromycin (150 - 500 mg) administered at four-weekly intervals, whereas those in the control arm receive SDR-PEP. Follow-up screening for leprosy will be done for each individual two years after the final dose is administered. Cox' proportion hazards analysis and Poisson regression will be used to compare the incidence rate ratios between the intervention and control areas as the primary study outcome. DISCUSSION: Past studies have shown that the level of SDR-PEP effectiveness is not uniform across contexts or in relation to leprosy patients. To address this, a number of recent trials are seeking to strengthen PEP regimens either through the use of new medications or by increasing the dosage of the existing ones. However, few studies focus on the impact of multiple doses of chemoprophylaxis using a combination of antibiotics. The PEP++ trial will investigate effectiveness of both an enhanced regimen and use geospatial analysis for PEP administration in the study communities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NL7022 on the Dutch Trial Register on April 12, 2018. Protocol version 9.0 updated on 18 August 2022 https://www.onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/23060.


Assuntos
Hanseníase , Rifampina , Humanos , Rifampina/uso terapêutico , Profilaxia Pós-Exposição/métodos , Hanseníase/tratamento farmacológico , Hanseníase/prevenção & controle , Hanseníase/diagnóstico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Claritromicina/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
2.
Dalton Trans ; 53(4): 1551-1567, 2024 Jan 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38164612

RESUMO

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common highly aggressive malignant brain tumor, with a very limited chance for survival post-diagnosis and post-treatment. Despite significant advancement in GBM genomics implicated in molecularly targeted chemotherapies, the prognosis remains poor and requires new drug discovery approaches. We used fluoropyrimidine 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), an antimetabolite anticancer drug conjugated or 'caged' within a lipophilic Ru(II)-diphosphine (dppe) core formulated as [RuII(dppe)2(5-FU)]PF6 (Ru-DPPE-5FU), where dppe = 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane, and evaluated its in vitro cytotoxicity in depth with aggressive GBM cells (LN229). The hydrophilic nature of 5-FU limits its passage through the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which prevents its effective accumulation and efficacy for GBM tumors. Herein, we attempted to modulate the lipophilicity of 5-FU by inserting it within a well-designed lipophilic {Ru(dppe)2}-core with anticipated higher efficiency towards GBM. The physicochemical properties of [RuII(dppe)2(5-FU)]PF6 (Ru-DPPE-5FU) were studied using various spectroscopic and analytical techniques. The molecular structure was determined using X-ray crystallography, showing a distorted {RuP4NO} octahedral geometry with bidentate (N, O) binding of 5-FU and its aromatization in the Ru(II)-bound form. The 31P-NMR spectra of Ru-DPPE-5FU showed four closely spaced distinct 31P-signals, indicating four unique chemical environments around P, and the strong coupling constants between them make it a second-order spectrum. The RuII/RuIII redox potential in Ru-DPPE-5FU shifted by ∼0.91 V towards the anodic region as compared to its precursor complex cis-[Ru(dppe)2Cl2] (Ru-DPPE-Cl). DFT-based theoretical calculations have been performed to correlate the experimental electronic absorption spectra and redox behaviours of the complexes. The electrostatic potential (ESP) plots indicate the delocalization of the charge density on the O-/F-atom from the 5-FU ligand towards Ru(II) upon its complexation. The antioxidant properties of all the compounds were quantified by a 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging assay. The hyphenation of the 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) ligand to the lipophilic {Ru(dppe)2}-core endowed lipophilicity to Ru-DPPE-5FU with higher in vitro cytotoxicity (IC50 = 2.37 µM) against the LN229 GBM cells as compared to the hydrophilic 5-FU, suggesting efficient cellular uptake. Further biological assays indicated that the complex is highly potent in inhibiting significant proliferation and spheroid formation and restricting the migratory potentials of the GBM cells. Increased caspase 3/7 activity and the presence of apoptotic bodies at the center of 3-D GBM spheroids as revealed by AO/EB dual staining indicated a deeper penetration of the lipophilic complex. The Ru-DPPE-5FU complex displayed lower cytotoxicity in HaCaT normal cells (IC50 = 7.27 µM) in comparison to LN229 cancer cells with a selectivity index (S.I.) of ≥3. Overall, the synergism and caging of 5-FU within the hydrophobic {Ru(dppe)2}-core improves the pharmacokinetic profile of Ru-DPPE-5FU as a potent anticancer agent for glioblastoma.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias Encefálicas , Complexos de Coordenação , Glioblastoma , Éteres Fenílicos , Rutênio , Humanos , Fluoruracila/farmacologia , Glioblastoma/tratamento farmacológico , Rutênio/farmacologia , Rutênio/química , Ligantes , Antineoplásicos/farmacologia , Antineoplásicos/química , Espectroscopia de Ressonância Magnética , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamento farmacológico , Complexos de Coordenação/farmacologia , Complexos de Coordenação/química
3.
Cureus ; 15(12): e50640, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38229798

RESUMO

Topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs) and topical corticosteroids (TCS) are the mainstays of flare management for atopic eczema or atopic dermatitis (AD). Tacrolimus (an immunomodulator), belongs to the class of calcineurin inhibitors, with promising efficacy in AD. We performed this systematic review to obtain an up-to-date coverage map of controlled clinical trials of sequential or intermittent treatments with TCI as a therapeutic intervention for AD. Articles of interest were retrieved from PubMed, Google Scholar, and EMBASE published between between January 2000 and March 2023. Key words were "calcineurin inhibitors," "corticosteroids," "atopic dermatitis," "pruritus," "sequential," "intermittent" and "consecutive" while fixed language search consisted of "Intermittent topical calcineurin inhibitors AND topical corticosteroids AND atopic dermatitis OR eczema" AD patients who were administered sequential and/or intermittent applications of TCI for management of atopic eczema were included. Outcome measures included but were not limited to Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) and the Eczema Area Severity Score (EASI). Four clinical trials were considered for the purpose of review. A total of 101 patients with AD were analysed. The risk of bias was low in two studies, while the other two had an unclear risk of bias. Overall, pooled data from two trials revealed that sequential therapy with TCS/TCI was comparable to monotherapy or emollients, as the test for overall effect determined was non-significant with a p-value of 0.33. The two studies were highly heterogeneous, as indicated by a very high I2 of 92% and an extremely significant p-value (p=0.0005). Sequential therapy with TCS and TCIs was effective and well tolerated in the management of AD and it may be considered an important treatment approach during the initial period.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA