Larynx preservation in pyriform sinus cancer: preliminary results of a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer phase III trial. EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group.

BACKGROUND: As a general rule, surgery whenever possible, followed by irradiation is considered to be the standard treatment for cancer of the hypopharynx, thus sacrificing natural speech. In most patients, surgery includes removal of the larynx. PURPOSE: A prospective, randomized phase III study was conducted by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) starting in 1990 to compare a larynx-preserving treatment (induction chemotherapy plus definitive, radiation therapy in patients who showed a complete response or surgery in those who did not respond) with conventional treatment (total laryngectomy with partial pharyngectomy, radical neck dissection, and postoperative irradiation) in previously untreated and operable patients with histologically proven squamous cell carcinomas of the pyriform sinus or aryepiglottic fold, but free of other cancers. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to one of two treatment arms: 1) immediate surgery with postoperative radiotherapy (50-70 Gy) or 2) induction chemotherapy (cisplatin [100 mg/m2] given as a bolus intravenous injection on day 1, followed by infusion of fluorouracil [1000 mg/m2 per day] on days 1-5). An endoscopic evaluation was performed after each cycle of chemotherapy. After two cycles, only partial and complete responders received a third cycle. Patients with a complete response after two or three cycles of chemotherapy were treated thereafter by irradiation (70 Gy); nonresponding patients underwent conventional surgery with postoperative radiation (50-70 Gy). Salvage surgery was also performed when patients relapsed after chemotherapy and irradiation. The trial was designed to test the equivalence of the two treatment arms; i.e., the induction chemotherapy treatment would be judged equivalent to immediate surgery if the relative risk of death for induction chemotherapy compared with immediate surgery was significantly less than 1.43 using a one-sided hypothesis test at the .05 level of significance. RESULTS: Two hundred two patients entered the trial and were randomly assigned; only 194 were eligible for treatment (94 in the immediate-surgery arm and 100 in the induction-chemotherapy arm). In the induction-chemotherapy arm, complete response was seen in 52 (54%) of 97 patients with local disease (primary tumor) and in 31 (51%) of 61 patients with regional disease (involvement of the neck). Treatment failures at local, regional, and second primary sites occurred at approximately the same frequencies in the immediate-surgery arm (12%, 19%, and 16%, respectively) and in the induction-chemotherapy arm (17%, 23%, and 13%, respectively). In contrast, there were fewer failures at distant sites in the induction-chemotherapy arm than in the immediate-surgery arm (25% versus 36%, respectively; P = .041). The median duration of survival was 25 months in the immediate-surgery arm and 44 months in the induction-chemotherapy arm and, since the observed hazard ratio was 0.86 (logrank test, P = .006), which was significantly less than 1.43, the two treatments were judged to be equivalent. The 3- and 5-year estimates of retaining a functional larynx in patients treated in the induction-chemotherapy arm were 42% (95% confidence interval = 31%-53%) and 35% (95% confidence interval = 22%-48%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Larynx preservation without jeopardizing survival appears feasible in patients with cancer of the hypopharynx. On the basis of these observations, the EORTC has now accepted the use of induction chemotherapy followed by radiation as the new standard treatment in its future phase III larynx preservation trials.

Cisplatin and etoposide combination chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic thymoma. A phase II study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Cooperative Group.

BACKGROUND: Thymomas are rare neoplasms of the mediastinum. The role of chemotherapy in advanced thymomas is not fully established. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Lung Cancer Cooperative Group, 16 patients with recurrent or metastatic malignant thymoma were entered over 6 years onto a study of combination chemotherapy that consisted of cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1 and etoposide 120 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, and 3, every 3 weeks. RESULTS: A median of six courses per patient was administered. Main side effects of treatment were leukopenia, nausea and vomiting, and alopecia. Five complete responses and four partial responses were obtained, with a median response duration of 3.4 years. The median progression-free survival and survival times were 2.2 years and 4.3 years, respectively, with a median follow-up duration of 7 years. CONCLUSION: The combination of cisplatin and etoposide is highly effective and well tolerated in advanced thymoma. The investigation of this combination in a neoadjuvant setting in unresectable invasive thymoma is warranted.

Prognostic factors in patients with pleural mesothelioma: the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer experience.

PURPOSE: Identification of prognostic factors in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma based on prospectively collected international data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 1984 to October 1993, 204 eligible adult patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma were entered into five consecutive prospective European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) phase II clinical trials designed to assess the efficacy of various anticancer drugs (mitoxantrone, epidoxorubicin, etoposide, and paclitaxel). The Cox model was used to assess 13 factors related to biology and disease history with respect to survival. RESULTS: The median survival duration was 12.6 months from diagnosis and 8.4 months from trial entry. In the multivariate analysis, poor prognosis was associated with a poor performance status, a high WBC count, a probable/possible histologic diagnosis of mesothelioma, male gender, and having sarcomatous tissue as the histologic subtype. Taking these five factors into consideration, patients were classified into two groups: a good-prognosis group (1-year survival rate, 40%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 30% to 50%) and a poor-prognosis group (1-year survival, 12%; 95% CI, 4% to 20%). CONCLUSION: These results may help to design new clinical trials in pleural mesothelioma by selecting more homogenous groups of patients.

Modulation of high-dose infusional fluorouracil by low-dose methotrexate in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer: final results of a randomized European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study.

PURPOSE: Methotrexate (MTX) has been described to modulate the activity of fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group (GITCCG) conducted a phase III trial to investigate the efficacy and tolarability of the addition of low-dose MTX (40 mg/m2) to high-dose infusional 5-FU (60 mg/kg over 48 hours) given weekly for 4 weeks and thereafter every 2 (for 4 weeks) and 3 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred ten patients were randomized between 1987 and 1992. Eligible patients had measurable advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer and had not been pretreated with antifolates or fluorodinated pyrimidines. All 297 eligible patients were evaluated for survival; toxicity was assessed in 292 patients who received at least one course of treatment. Patients with bidimensionally measurable disease (n = 230) were also evaluated for response according to standard criteria. RESULTS: The addition of low-dose MTX to high-dose infusional 5-FU led to a doubling of the response rate from 10% to 21% (P = .025). The median survival time also increased from 9.3 to 12.5 months, but this difference was not statistically significant (P = .12). High-dose infusional 5-FU with or without low-dose MTX was well tolerated, with grade 3 to 4 toxicity in greater than 10% of patients only occurring for stomatitis with the combination treatment. Performance status was the sole prognostic factor for survival in a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Low-dose MTX effectively modulated high-dose infusional 5-FU in a large, randomized trial in which less than 5% of patients received leucovorin.

Improved local control and disease-free survival after perioperative chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer. A European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Breast Cancer Cooperative Group Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether a short intensive course of perioperative polychemotherapy can change the course of early breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 2,795 women with early breast cancer, stage I to IIIA, were randomized onto a trial (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] 10854) to compare surgery followed by one course of perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone. Patients assigned to the chemotherapy arm received one course of fluorouracil 600 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 (FAC) intravenously, within 24 hours after surgery. In both randomized treatment arms, a recommendation was made for premenopausal women with positive axillary nodes to receive prolonged courses of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF), according to the standard treatment for this subgroup. RESULTS: At a median follow-up time of 41 months, local control was significantly better in the perioperative treatment arm as compared with the observation arm (hazards ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.44 to 0.83; P < .01). Disease-free survival was significantly prolonged in the chemotherapy arm (hazards ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.70 to 0.99; P = .04). Premenopausal node-negative patients especially showed an advantage for the perioperative chemotherapy arm. No advantage for perioperative chemotherapy was observed in premenopausal node-positive women who also had received prolonged chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: We conclude that one course of perioperative FAC is able to improve local control and can prolong disease-free survival in women with early breast cancer. However, our results also suggest that a perioperative timing cannot improve the results of standard prolonged chemotherapy in premenopausal women with positive axillary nodes.

Randomized trial of alternating versus sequential radiotherapy/chemotherapy in limited-disease patients with small-cell lung cancer: a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Cooperative Group Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of alternating or sequential schedules of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide (CDE) chemotherapy and irradiation in patients with previously untreated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 335 eligible patients were randomized between five courses of CDE chemotherapy followed by thoracic irradiation 50 Gy in 20 daily fractions (S) and the same total dose of chemotherapy and irradiation split into four courses of five daily fractions delivered on days 14 to 21 of the second and subsequent chemotherapy courses (A). Patients had a median age of 61 years (range, 33 to 75); 224 (66%) were male; the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) was 0 or 1 in 311; and 254 had weight loss less than 10%. RESULTS: The overall median survival duration was 15 months, with 62% (95% confidence interval [CI], 57% to 67%) 1-year, 25% (95% CI, 20% to 30%) 2-year, and 14% (95% CI, 10% to 18%) 3-year survival rates. There was no significant difference between the arms. The median survival time was 14 months in A and 15 months in S. One-year survival was 60% in A (95% CI, 53% to 67%) and 64% in S (95% CI, 57% to 71%); 2-year survival was 26% in A (95% CI, 19% to 33%) and 23% in S (95% CI, 16% to 30%); and 3-year survival was 12% in A (95% CI, 6% to 18%) and 15% in S (95% CI, 9% to 21%). World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 90% of A and 77% of S patients (P < .001) and WHO grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia in 33% of A and 20% of S patients (P < .001). Rates of other acute and late toxicities were similar in both arms. Hematologic toxicity compromised treatment dose delivery; less than 50% of A patients received greater than 95% of prescribed chemotherapy and 77% their full radiation course, compared with 60% and 93% for arm S (P < .009). Local relapse was the site of first failure in 60% of all patients and 75% of these suffered an in-field relapse; no difference could be seen between the two arms. CONCLUSION: This trial failed to confirm the superiority of an alternating schedule of delivery. For this combination of chemotherapy and irradiation, hematologic toxicity compromised treatment delivery and could have contributed to the overall result. The poor rates of local control are disappointing and require intensification of the radiation therapy strategy.

Final results of a phase III clinical trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with the modified fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and mitomycin regimen in resectable gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: In a randomized clinical trial (European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] no. 40813) on adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer, results obtained after administration of the FAM2 regimen (fluorouracil [5-FU], doxorubicin, and mitomycin) were compared with results obtained after surgery alone to assess the effect of this regimen on overall survival, time to progression, and disease-free interval. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred fourteen patients who had undergone curative resection for stage II or stage III (International Union Against Cancer [UICC] 1978) gastric adenocarcinoma were randomized to receive chemotherapy (treatment arm) or no further treatment (control arm). The chemotherapy schedule was repeated every 43 days for seven cycles. The log-rank test and the Cox model were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Of 314 patients, 159 comprised the control group and 155 the FAM2 group. Nineteen FAM2 patients never received chemotherapy. The median number of cycles was five. Of the patients started on adjuvant treatment, severe hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity (grades 3 or 4, World Health Organization [WHO] scale) occurred, respectively, in 6% to 9% and in 1% to 29% of cases. The overall 5-year survival rate was 70% for stage II and 32% for stage III patients. No statistically significant difference was found between overall survival of the two treatment arms (P = .295). However, time to progression was significantly delayed in the FAM2 arm (P = .020) and disease-free survival showed borderline significance (P = .068). CONCLUSION: FAM2, in view of its high toxicity, cannot be advocated as standard adjuvant treatment for gastric cancer. Large-scale clinical trials using more active, less toxic regimens are required to demonstrate whether adjuvant chemotherapy provides any real benefit.

Teniposide for brain metastases of small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Cooperative Group.

PURPOSE: Here we report the results of a phase II study of teniposide, one of the most active drugs against small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), in patients with brain metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with SCLC who presented with brain metastases at diagnosis (n = 11) or during follow-up evaluation after treatment (n = 69) were treated with teniposide at a dose of 150 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 3, and 5 at 3-week intervals in an outpatient setting. Response in the brain was evaluated by brain computed tomography (CT) after two, six, and 12 courses. RESULTS: In 26 of 80 assessable patients, an intracranial response was seen, with a response rate of 33% (95% confidence interval, 22% to 44%). The median response duration was 5.4 months for patients with a complete response (CR) and 4.2 months for patients with a partial response (PR). Patients who required corticosteroids for peritumoral edema had a significantly lower response rate than patients who did not receive corticosteroids. Neurologic function at the start of treatment had a significant influence (neurologic function 1 better than 2, respectively, better than 3 and 4; P < .001), as did the number of cycles of previous chemotherapy (0 better than 1 to 5 cycles, respectively, better than > 5 cycles; P = .043). Grade 3/4 leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia were seen in 3% and 39%, respectively, of 80 patients. Toxicity-related death was seen in eight patients, seven of whom were previously treated with chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Teniposide is active against brain metastases of SCLC. It is a suitable drug for palliation, especially of patients without extensive pretreatment and with a good neurologic function and performance status. Patients previously treated with cranial radiotherapy are also candidates for this therapy. If systemic chemotherapy is considered for tumor progression outside the brain, radiotherapy of brain metastases might be omitted or delayed pending the effect of chemotherapy. The use of corticosteroids in patients with brain metastases treated with chemotherapy might influence the efficacy of the chemotherapy.

Two schedules of teniposide with or without cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Cooperative Group.

PURPOSE: We conducted a randomized trial to investigate the value of the addition of cisplatin to teniposide (VM26) and to investigate the schedule dependence of the topoisomerase II inhibitor VM26, in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred twenty-five NSCLC patients were randomized to receive VM26 120 mg/m2 on days 1, 3, and 5 or 360 mg/m2 on day 1 only, either as a single drug or in combination with cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Response rates, side effects, and survival were compared according to the 2 x 2 factorial design of this study. RESULTS: The response rate of the two cisplatin-containing arms was superior to that of the two arms that contained VM26 only (22% v 6%, P < .001); progression-free survival and survival times were also longer in the cisplatin-containing arms (median, 4.3 v 2.2 months, P = .003; median 7.2 v 5.9 months, P = .008, respectively). Toxicity was significantly higher in the cisplatin-containing arms; the most frequent side effects were leukopenia, nausea and vomiting, and alopecia. The schedule of VM26 did not significantly influence the response rate, progression-free survival interval, or survival duration. However, the response rate of the 1-day administration was significantly lower than that of the 3-day administration when given as single drugs. CONCLUSION: The addition of cisplatin to VM26 improves the response rate, progression-free survival interval, and survival duration over VM26 alone, although at the cost of a significant increase in toxicity. Cisplatin should be considered as the basis for combination chemotherapies in advanced NSCLC.

Randomized study of paclitaxel-cisplatin versus cisplatin-teniposide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Cooperative Group.

PURPOSE: To compare two cisplatin based chemotherapy schedules in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 332 patients with advanced NSCLC were randomized to receive cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 either in combination with teniposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 3, and 5 (arm A) or paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 by 3-hour infusion on day 1 (arm B); cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were ineligible; patient characteristics were well balanced between the two arms: 71% were male, 71% had less than 5% weight loss, 89% had a World Health Organization (WHO) performance status of 0 to 1, 51% had adenocarcinoma, and 61% had stage IV disease. Hematologic toxicity was significantly more severe in arm A (leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia grade 3 or 4: 66% v 19%, 83% v 55%, 36% v 2% in arms A and B, respectively), which resulted in more febrile neutropenia (27% v 3% in arms A and B, respectively), dose reductions, and treatment delays. There were a total of nine toxic deaths, six due to neutropenic sepsis: five in arm A and one in arm B. In contrast, arthralgia/myalgia (grade 2 or 3, 4% v 17%), peripheral neurotoxicity (grade 2 or 3, 6% v 29%), and hypersensitivity reactions (1% v 7%, all grades) were significantly more frequent in arm B. The frequency and severity of other toxicities were comparable between the two arms. Responses were one complete and 44 partial on arm A (28%) and two complete and 61 partial (41%) on arm B (P = .018). There was no significant difference in survival, with median and 1-year survivals 9.9 versus 9.7 months and 41% versus 43%, respectively in arm A and B. Progression-free survival was 4.9 and 5.4 months in arm A and B, respectively. Selected centers participated in a quality-of-life (QoL) assessment, which was performed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and LC-13 administered at baseline and every 6 weeks thereafter. Arm B achieved a better score at week 6 for emotional, cognitive and social functioning, global health status, fatigue, and appetite loss, which was lost at 12 weeks. In conclusion, arm B appears superior to arm A with regard to response rate, side effects, and QoL. CONCLUSION: Although survival was not improved, arm B offers a better palliation for advanced NSCLC patients than arm A.

Treatment of brain metastases of small-cell lung cancer: comparing teniposide and teniposide with whole-brain radiotherapy--a phase III study of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Cooperative Group.

PURPOSE: Approximately 60% of patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) develop brain metastases. Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) gives symptomatic improvement in more than 50% of these patients. Because brain metastases are a sign of systemic progression, and chemotherapy was found to be effective as well, it becomes questionable whether WBRT is the only appropriate therapy in this situation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a phase III study, SCLC patients with brain metastases were randomized to receive teniposide with or without WBRT. Teniposide 120 mg/m(2) was given intravenously three times a week, every 3 weeks. WBRT (10 fractions of 3 Gy) had to start within 3 weeks from the start of chemotherapy. Response was measured clinically and by computed tomography of the brain. RESULTS: One hundred twenty eligible patients were randomized. A 57% response rate was seen in the combined-modality arm (95% confidence interval [CI], 43% to 69%), and a 22% response rate was seen in the teniposide-alone arm (95% CI, 12% to 34%) (P<.001). Time to progression in the brain was longer in the combined-modality group (P=.005). Clinical response and response outside the brain were not different. The median survival time was 3.5 months in the combined-modality arm and 3.2 months in the teniposide-alone arm. Overall survival in both groups was not different (P=.087). CONCLUSION: Adding WBRT to teniposide results in a much higher response rate of brain metastases and in a longer time to progression of brain metastases than teniposide alone. Survival was poor in both groups and not significantly different.

Evaluation of antiandrogen therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: results of a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer multicentric double-blind trial.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of antiandrogen therapy on overall survival and response in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 244 patients with unresectable HCC were included in this multicentric double-blind trial. According to a two-by-two factorial design, patients were randomly assigned to receive one of the following treatments: pure antiandrogen plus placebo (A+P group, 60 patients); luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist plus placebo (LHRH+P group, 62 patients); pure antiandrogen plus LHRH agonist (A+LHRH group, 62 patients); or placebo plus placebo (P+P group, 60 patients). Pure antiandrogen consisted of Anandron (Roussel-Uclaf Laboratory, Romainville, France) administered orally (300 mg daily for 1 month, then 150 mg daily). LHRH consisted of goseriline acetate (3.6 mg) or triptoreline (3.75 mg) administered monthly by subcutaneous injection. Treatment was given until death. Response was evaluated every 8 weeks according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. RESULTS: Six patients were considered ineligible. One patient had a complete response (A+P arm) and three had a partial response (two in the LHRH+P arm and one in the A+LHRH arm). An overall log-rank test did not demonstrate any significant difference in survival among the four arms. Taking the factorial design into account, comparison of survival showed no significant difference between Anandron-containing regimens and others, or between LHRH-containing regimens and others. No serious side effects occurred for any regimen. CONCLUSION: This controlled study shows clearly the lack of efficacy of androgen treatment in unresectable HCC.

p53 protein accumulation and response to adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal women with node-negative early breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Thirty percent of women with node-negative breast cancer will have a recurrence within 10 years after diagnosis. Molecular markers may identify those patients and predict whether they benefit from adjuvant therapy. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) conducted a randomized trial (EORTC 10854) to compare perioperative treatment with one course of fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) versus no further therapy. We studied tumors from premenopausal patients with node-negative breast cancer randomized in this trial to determine whether p53 accumulation, c-erbB-2 expression, percentage of Ki-67-positive cells, estrogen receptor (ER-immunoassay [IA]), progesterone receptor (PR-IA), and angiogenesis could be used as prognostic factors and predictors of responsiveness to adjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Paraffin-embedded tumor specimens from 441 premenopausal women with node-negative breast cancer were collected from the larger EORTC trial. Paraffin sections from the tumors were analyzed for immunohistochemical expression of p53, c-erbB-2, Ki-67, ER, PR, and angiogenesis. RESULTS: Patients with p53-negative tumors showed a significant benefit from perioperative chemotherapy (P < .01), whereas patients who had p53-positive tumors did not (P = .80). At a median follow-up time of 49 months, univariate analyses for disease-free survival (DFS) failed to show prognostic value for p53, c-erbB-2 and angiogenesis. Both univariate and multivariate results showed Ki-67 positivity, ER-IA negativity, and a younger age to be associated with a worse prognosis. CONCLUSION: p53 accumulation was associated with a poor response to one perioperative course of FAC chemotherapy. Ki-67, ER-IA, and age are important prognostic factors in premenopausal women with node-negative breast cancer.

Progression to AIDS in French haemophiliacs: association with HLA-B35.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether HLA-B35 influences progression to AIDS in HIV-seropositive subjects with haemophilia. DESIGN: Retrospective (before 1985) and prospective (after 1985) follow-up of a group of French haemophiliacs. METHODS: We studied 144 seropositive patients with moderate or severe haemophilia A or B or von Willebrand's disease. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to screen patient sera for total HIV antigen and core p24 antigen antibodies. All patients were typed for HLA A, B and C antigens in the same laboratory. Time of seroconversion was estimated to be the mid-point between the last seronegative test and the first seropositive test. AIDS-free survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier estimate and differences in survival analysed using the Mantel-Cox test. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to adjust for confounding variables. RESULTS: Median follow-up after seroconversion was 8.7 years (range, 3.5-10.7 years). By the end of the study, six HLA-B35-positive patients and 12 HLA-B35-negative patients had progressed to AIDS. Individuals with HLA-B35 showed a significantly faster rate of progression to AIDS over the follow-up period than HLA-B35-negative individuals (hazard ratio, 2.72; P = 0.037). After adjusting for type and severity of haemophilia, CD4 cell count at first seropositive test, age at seroconversion, and zidovudine treatment before AIDS, the hazard ratio was 2.74 (P = 0.045). CONCLUSION: HLA-B35 is a risk factor for more rapid progression to AIDS in subjects with haemophilia.

Adjuvant therapy with dibromodulcitol and BCNU increases survival of adults with malignant gliomas. EORTC Brain Tumor Group.

OBJECTIVE: We tested adjuvant chemotherapy combining dibromodulcitol (DBD) and bischloroethylnitrosourea (BCNU) given postoperatively to adults with newly diagnosed supratentorial malignant gliomas. METHODS: We enrolled 269 patients, 255 of whom were eligible. After surgery, we treated all patients with radiation therapy, using a median dose of 60 Gy given in 30 fractions. After randomization, patients in the chemotherapy group also received (1) six weekly courses, administered during irradiation, of DBD 700 mg/m2 and (2) one to nine (median, four) courses, administered during the first year following radiation therapy, of DBD 1,000 mg/m2 on day 1 and BCNU 150 mg/m2 on day 2, with the course being repeated every 6 weeks. RESULTS: Patients treated with radiation therapy along with DBD plus BCNU (group 2) had significantly longer survival time (p = 0.044) and time to progression (p = 0.003) than did those treated with radiation therapy alone (group 1). The median survival time was 13.0 months for group 2 and 10.4 months for group 1; the median time to progression was 8.1 months for group 2 and 6.7 months for group 1. The percentage of patients alive at 18 and 24 months was 34% and 21% in group 2 compared with 21% and 12% in group 1. CONCLUSION: DBD plus BCNU is an effective adjuvant therapy for malignant glioma.

Treatment of recurrent malignant supratentorial gliomas with ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide: a phase II study.

Thirty-six patients previously treated with surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy with a nitrosourea for malignant supratentorial gliomas received a combination of ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide (ICE) at tumour progression. Carboplatin and etoposide were both given at a dose of 75-100 mg/m2/day for 3 days, whereas ifosfamide doses ranged from 750 mg/m2/day to 1500 mg/m2/ day for 3 days, according to haematological tolerance. Treatment was repeated every 4 weeks. A minimum of three courses was required to evaluate the response unless the patient had rapid tumour progression. Grade III and IV haematological toxicity occurred in 15 patients (42%) and was lethal in one patient. Grade II hepatic toxicity was observed in one patient. Five complete (CR) and five partial responses (PR) were noted. 9 patients had stable disease (SD) after a minimum of three courses. CR + PR + SD was 53% (19/36). The median time to tumour progression (MTTP) was 13 weeks. Median survival (MST) was 29 weeks (44 weeks for R + S patients and 17 weeks for patients with progressing disease). This study suggests that the ICE combination is active in recurrent supratentorial malignant gliomas after failure of surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy, but at the cost of substantial haematological toxicity.

Standard versus alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy in extensive small cell lung cancer: an EORTC Phase III trial.

Alternating chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer has been tested in several studies. Some have shown positive results that have not been confirmed in other studies. In all of the studies, however, the degree of non-cross-resistance in the regimens was questionable. The EORTC Lung Cancer Study Group developed two equipotent regimens: (i) standard (CDE)-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide; (ii) (VIMP)-vincristine, carboplatin, ifosfamide, mesna, both non-cross-resistance. These two combinations were alternated and compared with the standard chemotherapy regimen in a group of 143 patients with extensive small cell lung cancer. Median survival was 7.6 months in the standard arm and 8.7 in the alternating arm (P = 0.243). Median time to progression was 5.8 and 6.4 months, respectively (P = 0.166). Median response duration was 7.0 and 6.8 months (P = 0.221). The use of two alternating regimens with a proven degree of non-cross-resistance did not result in any improvement in survival in patients with extensive small cell lung cancer.

Final results of a phase III clinical trial on adjuvant intraportal infusion with heparin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in resectable colon cancer (EORTC GITCCG 1983-1987). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group.

In this phase III clinical trial conducted by the Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (GITCCG-EORTC), we evaluated the effect of adjuvant intraportal infusion of heparin (HEP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) on overall survival, disease-free survival and time to progression in patients with resectable colon cancer. From January 1983 to June 1987, 235 patients were randomised from 14 institutions in seven European countries: 79 patients made up the control group (control): 72 the portal vein infusion group given heparin alone (5000 IU daily x 7 consecutive days) (HEP); 84 the portal vein infusion group given heparin (5000 IU daily x 7 consecutive days) and 5-FU (500 mg/m2 daily x 7 consecutive days) (HEP/5-FU); 34 patients were considered ineligible. The 199 patients considered eligible were well balanced for age, sex, Karnofsky index, tumour location, surgery, surgical procedure and Dukes' stage. Four patients (2 control, 1 HEP, 1 HEP/5-FU) died of surgical complications. No differences were observed between control group and treatment groups (HEP, HEP/5-FU) for postoperative complications and number of hospitalisation days. Severe toxicity (grade 3-4, WHO) was found in 12% of patients in the HEP group and 8% in the HEP/5-FU group. After a median follow-up of 9 years, disease progression was reported in 40% of patients in the control group, 40% in the HEP group and 29% in the HEP/5-FU group. Five-year survival, time to progression and disease-free survival were 69%, 58% and 56%, respectively, in the control arm, 61%, 58% and 56% in the HEP arm, and 71%, 69% and 65% in the HEP/5-FU arm. Based on all randomised patients, the effect of treatment was not statistically significant with respect to any of the endpoints. It is confirmed that intraportal 5-FU infusion is safe and has a tolerable toxicity, but cannot be considered standard treatment for patients with resectable colon cancer.

Phase II study of weekly 4'-epidoxorubicin in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the cervix: an EORTC Gynaecological Cancer Cooperative Group study.

In this study 22 patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the cervix were treated with a weekly bolus injection of 4'-epidoxorubicin at a dose of 12 mg/m2. Seventeen patients had received prior radiotherapy, all patients were chemo-naive. Toxicity was generally absent or very mild. One patient had a complete response and 2 patients had a partial response, one was an unconfirmed partial response, giving a response rate of 14%. Six patients had stable disease. The median progression-free survival and overall survival was 2.8 months and 6.1 months, respectively. In conclusion, 4'-epidoxorubicin used at this dosage and schedule has minimal activity in metastatic adenocarcinoma of the cervix.

Genitourinary group phase II study of chemotherapy in stage T3-4 N0-X M0 transitional cell cancer of the bladder: prognostic factor analysis.

The aim of this study was to examine prognostic factors for survival of patients with invasive bladder cancer who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by further treatment. From 1986 to 1990, 149 eligible patients with T3-4 N0-X M0 bladder cancer were entered into a phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, consisting of cisplatin and methotrexate. Patients received two or four courses of chemotherapy, depending on the absence or presence, respectively, of a major clinical response after two courses. 136 patients were evaluable for clinical response after two courses of chemotherapy, and 75 patients were evaluable for pathological response after two or four courses. A multivariate analysis, based on pretreatment variables and the post-treatment variables, clinical response and pathological response, showed that performance status, tumour size and clinical response after two courses of chemotherapy were the only independent prognostic factors for all eligible patients. A second multivariate analysis in the selected subgroup of patients, who underwent a cystectomy, showed that the G-cagetory and pathological response were the only independent prognostic factors. In conclusion, in this group of patients, the response to chemotherapy was a strong and independent prognostic factor in addition to other independent variables. However, it was not accurate or strong enough to allow an impact on the choice of locoregional therapy.