The effect of vitamin D supplementation on mortality and intensive care unit admission of COVID-19 patients. A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.

AIMS: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of vitamin D supplementation on mortality and admission to intensive care unit (ICU) of COVID-19 patients. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, Web of Science and medRxiv with terms relative to vitamin D supplementation and COVID-19 was conducted on 26 March 2021. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software was used for the quantitative assessment of data and random-effects model was applied. To investigate the association between the dose of vitamin D and the outcomes of interest, meta-regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: Two thousand and seventy-eight patients from nine studies with data on mortality were included (583 received vitamin D supplementation, while 1495 did not). Sixty-one (10.46%) individuals in the treated group died, compared to 386 (25.81%) in the non-treated group (odds ratio [OR]: 0.597; 95% CI: 0.318-1.121; p = 0.109). Eight hundred and sixty patients from six studies with data on ICU admission were included (369 received vitamin D supplementation, while 491 did not). Forty-five (12.19%) individuals in the treated group were admitted to ICU, compared to 129 (26.27%) in the non-treated group (OR: 0.326; 95% CI: 0.149-0.712; p = 0.005). No significant linear relationship between vitamin D dose and log OR of mortality or log OR of ICU admission was observed. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis indicates a beneficial role of vitamin D supplementation on ICU admission, but not on mortality, of COVID-19 patients. Further research is urgently needed to understand the benefit of vitamin D in COVID-19.

A Single Center, Randomized Controlled Trial on the Efficacy of Topical Application of ReGenerating Tissue Agents (RGTA) Technology in Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a serious complication of diabetes mellitus. Clinical data from the use of ReGenerating Tissue Agents (RGTA) technology in patients with DFUs are scarce. The objective of this randomized controlled study was to evaluate the efficacy of RGTA technology in the management of DFUs. Patients with chronic, neuroischemic diabetic foot ulcers were randomized 1:1 to the control group, that received the standard of care, and to the intervention group, that additionally received RGTA twice per week. The duration of the intervention was 12 weeks. Skin biopsies for histological and immunohistochemical analyses from a sample of participants were also performed. About 31 patients completed the study. Five (31.2%) patients in the intervention group achieved complete healing at the end of the intervention period versus 0 patients in the control group (P = .043), [RR: 0.688 (95% CI: 0.494-0.957)]. The intervention group had more ulcers with at least 80% healing of their surface [10 (66.7%) versus 2 (13.3%), P = .008, RR: 0.385 (95% CI: 0.183-0.808)], higher absolute surface reduction [1.5 (0.7, 5.2) versus 0.6 (0.3, 1.0), P = .026] and higher percentages of surface reduction [94 (67, 100) versus 40 (26, 75), P = .001] at the end of the intervention period. More patients in the intervention group achieved at least 50% healing at the fourth week of the study [9 (64.3%) versus 2 (14.3%) P = .018, RR: 0.417 (95% CI: 0.200-0.869)]. Immunohistochemical analyses were performed in a sample of participants that revealed higher expression of CD163, COL3 and VEGFR in the intervention group. The adverse effects were similar between the 2 groups. The data from the present study suggest that the adjunction of RGTA technology in the management of diabetic foot ulcers is a safe practice that promotes wound healing.

Non-Classical Aspects of Obesity Pathogenesis and Their Relative Clinical Importance for Obesity Treatment.

Obesity is a chronic disease and a major public health problem due to its association with non-communicable diseases and all-cause mortality. An increased energy intake and decreased physical activity have been long recognized as the classical parameters that contribute to the development of obesity. However, several other, non-classical factors have also been associated with obesity through various complex mechanisms. Some of them are diet related, such as diet quality, dietary habits and speed of eating. Other factors are non-dietary, such as endocrine-disrupting chemicals, sleep quality and quantity, psychotropic medications and light at night. The scope of the present narrative review is to address these non-classical factors that are implicated in the pathogenesis of obesity, to clarify their potential role in the management of obesity and, where possible, to provide some practical clinical recommendations.

Rare diabetic neuropathies: It is not only distal symmetrical polyneuropathy.

The prevalence of diabetes mellitus is increasing at an epidemic level, leading to a consequent increase of its chronic complications, including neuropathy. Diabetic neuropathy constitutes a heterogeneous group of disorders with distinct clinical presentations and pathophysiological mechanisms. These distinct forms may be categorised according to their clinical presentation as symmetrical (distal symmetrical polyneuropathy, autonomic and acute sensory neuropathy) and focal or multifocal (radiculoplexus neuropathies, entrapment syndromes, cranial palsies and other mononeuropathies). Additionally, people with diabetes may have neuropathies due to causes other than diabetes. The commonest forms of diabetic neuropathy are distal symmetrical polyneuropathy and autonomic neuropathy. However, clinicians should be aware that people with diabetes may suffer from less common forms of neuropathy and should be able to recognise their symptoms and signs. The recognition of the rare diabetic neuropathies is crucial, as they often lead to different clinical outcomes and require different management. The aim of the present narrative, non-systematic review is to outline the rare types of diabetic neuropathies.

Nonpharmacological Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: An Update.

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a common and serious complication of diabetes mellitus that is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, as well as substantial economic burden for the health care system. The standard of care for DFUs includes pressure off-loading, sharp debridement, and wound moisture balance, along with infection control and management of peripheral arterial disease. A variety of advanced modalities that target distinct pathophysiological aspects of impaired wound healing in diabetes are being studied as possible adjunct therapies for difficult to heal ulcers. These modalities include growth factors, stem cells, cultured fibroblasts and keratinocytes, bioengineered skin substitutes, acellular bioproducts, human amniotic membranes, oxygen therapy, negative pressure wound therapy, and energy therapies. Additionally, the use of advanced biomaterials and gene delivery systems is being investigated as a method of effective delivery of substances to the wound bed. In the present narrative review, we outline the latest advances in the nonpharmacological management of DFUs and summarize the efficacy of various standard and advanced treatment modalities.

Therapeutic Properties of Honey for the Management of Wounds; Is There a Role in the Armamentarium of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Treatment? Results From In vitro and In vivo Studies.

Diabetic foot ulcers are one of the most dreadful complications of diabetes mellitus and efforts to accelerate diabetic wound healing are of paramount importance to prevent ulcer infections and subsequent lower-limb amputations. There are several treatment approaches for the management of diabetic foot ulcers and honey seems to be a safe and cost-effective therapeutic approach on top of standard of care. The aim of this review was to summarize the therapeutic properties of honey and the data regarding its possible favorable effects on diabetic wound healing. A literature search of articles from 1986 until April 2021 was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to assess for studies examining the therapeutic wound healing properties of honey, it's in vitro effect, and the efficacy and/or mechanism of action of several types of honey used for the treatment of diabetic animal wounds. Honey has antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antibacterial properties and in vitro studies of keratinocytes and fibroblasts, as well as studies in diabetic animal models show that treatment with honey is associated with increased re-epithelialization and collagen production, higher wound contraction, and faster wound healing. The use of honey could be a promising approach for the management of diabetic foot ulcers.