RESUMO
Bacterial panicle blight (BPB) has become one of the most destructive diseases of rice worldwide and Burkholderia gladioli and B. glumae are two major pathogens causing BPB (1). This disease causes several types of damage, most importantly grain spotting, rot, and panicle blight, which can result in yield losses of 75% or more (1,3). In recent years, symptoms including sheath rot, grain spotting, grain rot, and panicle blight have been observed in both inbred and hybrid rice varieties. These symptoms resemble those of BPB and cause cultivar-dependent yield losses. (3) also reported the same symptoms for BPB. To confirm the cause of the disease, 21 rice panicles (Haridhan, a local variety) with typical BPB symptoms were collected from a farmer's field in the region of Mymensingh, Bangladesh during the rainy season in mid-October, 2021. Due to the severity of the outbreak, the panicles became dark brown and produced chaffy grains; nearly 100% of the rice panicles in that field were severely infected. To identify the causal pathogen(s), 1g of rice grains from 20 plants with typical BPB symptoms were surface-sterilized by immersing them in 70% ethanol for a few seconds followed by sodium hypochlorite solution (3%) for 1min. The grains were then rinsed with sterilized distilled water three times. Surface-sterilized grains were then ground with a mortar and pestle; 5mL of sterile distilled water was added during grinding. The extracted suspension (20µL) was then either streaked or spread onto the selective medium (S-PG) (2). Bacterial colonies showing purple color on the S-PG medium were selected and purified as candidate pathogens. For molecular characterization, species specific primers targeting gyrB gene were used to perform PCR and resulted in 479bp as reported by (4). To verify further, the PCR products of 16SF & 16SR were amplified and sequenced partially producing around 1400bp (1) and five 16SF partial sequences were deposited into NCBI GenBank (OP108276 to OP108280). 16S rDNA and gyrB revealed almost 99% homology with Burkholderia gladioli (KU851248.1, MZ425424.1) and B. gladioli (AB220893, CP033430) respectively using BLAST analysis. These purified bacterial isolates produced a diffusible light-yellow pigment on King's B medium indicating toxoflavin production (3). The candidate five bacterial isolates were then confirmed by inoculating 10ml suspension 108CFU/mL into the panicles and sheaths of BRRIdhan28 in net house condition as described previously (1). All of the bacterial isolates obtained from the spotted rice grains produced light brown lesions on the inoculated leaf sheath as well as spotting on the grain. To fulfill Koch's postulates, the bacteria were re-isolated from the symptomatic panicles and were confirmed as B. gladioli by analyzing the sequences of gyrB and 16s rDNA genes. Taken together, these results confirmed that B. gladioli is responsible for causing BPB in the rice grain samples that we collected. To our knowledge, this is the first report of BPB caused by B. gladioli in Bangladesh and further research is necessary to develop an effective disease management technique, or else the production of rice will be severely hampered.
RESUMO
Plants are frequently exposed to one or more abiotic stresses, including combined salinity-drought, which significantly lowers plant growth. Many studies have been conducted to evaluate the responses of plants to combined salinity and drought stress. However, a meta-analysis-based systematic review has not been conducted yet. Therefore, this study analyzed how plants respond differently to combined salinity-drought stress compared to either stress alone. We initially retrieved 536 publications from databases and selected 30 research articles following a rigorous screening. Data on plant growth-related, physiological, and biochemical parameters were collected from these selected articles and analyzed. Overall, the combined salinity-drought stress has a greater negative impact on plant growth, photosynthesis, ionic balance, and oxidative balance than either stress alone. In some cases, salinity had a greater impact than drought stress and vice versa. Drought stress inhibited photosynthesis more than salinity, whereas salinity caused ionic imbalance more than drought stress. Single salinity and drought reduced shoot biomass equally, but salinity reduced root biomass more than drought. Plants experienced more oxidative stress under combined stress conditions because antioxidant levels did not increase in response to combined salinity-drought stress compared to individual salinity or drought stress. This study provided a comparative understanding of plants' responses to individual and combined salinity and drought stress, and identified several research gaps. More comprehensive genetic and physiological studies are needed to understand the intricate interplay between salinity and drought in plants.