Plasma from patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation promotes NETOSIS in vitro and correlates with inflammatory parameters and clinical severity.

Introduction: NETosis, the mechanism by which neutrophils release extracellular traps (NETs), is closely related to inflammation. During the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), different stimuli can induce NETs formation. Inflammation and endothelial injury have been associated with acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) and complications after allo-HSCT. We focus on the study of NETosis and its relation with cytokines, hematological and biochemical parameters and clinical outcomes before, during and after allo-HSCT. Methods: We evaluate the capacity of plasma samples from allo-HSCT patients to induce NETosis, in a cell culture model. Plasma samples from patients undergoing allo-HSCT had a stronger higher NETs induction capacity (NETsIC) than plasma from healthy donors throughout the transplantation process. An optimal cut-off value by ROC analysis was established to discriminate between patients whose plasma triggered NETosis (NETs+IC group) and those who did not (NETs-IC group). Results: Prior to conditioning treatment, the capacity of plasma samples to trigger NETosis was significantly correlated with the Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX) score. At day 5 after transplant, patients with a positive NETsIC had higher interleukin (IL)-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and also a higher Modified EASIX score (M-EASIX) than patients with a negative NETsIC. EASIX and M-EASIX scores seek to determine inflammation and endothelium damage, therefore it could indicate a heightened immune response and inflammation in the group of patients with a positive NETsIC. Cytokine levels, specifically IL-8 and IL-6, significantly increased after allo-HSCT with peak levels reached on day 10 after graft infusion. Only, IL-10 and IL-6 levels were significantly higher in patients with a positive NETsIC. In our small cohort, higher IL-6 and IL-8 levels were related to early severe complications (before day 15 after transplant). Discussion: Although early complications were not related to NETosis by itself, NETosis could predict overall non-specific but clinically significant complications during the full patient admission. In summary, NETosis can be directly induced by plasma from allo-HSCT patients and NETsIC was associated with clinical indicators of disease severity, cytokines levels and inflammatory markers.

Biological relapse in multiple myeloma: Outcome and treatment strategies in a Spanish real-world setting.

Recommendations regarding the best time to start treatment in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) after biological relapse/progression (BR) are unclear. This observational, prospective, multicenter registry aimed to evaluate the impact on time to progression (TTP) of treatment initiation at BR versus at symptomatic clinical relapse (ClinR) based on the Spanish routine practice in adult patients with RRMM. Patients had two or less previous treatment lines and at least one previous partial response. Baseline characteristics and treatment outcomes were recorded, and survival was analyzed. Of 225 patients, 110 were treated at BR (TxBR group) and 115 at ClinR (TxClinR group) according to the investigators' criteria. The proportion of patients with higher ECOG, previous noncomplete remission (CR), and second relapse were significantly higher in the TxBR group compared to the TxClinR group. TheTxClinR group showed improved outcomes, including TTP, compared to the TxBR group. Progression-free survival increased in the TxClinR group (56.2 months) compared to the TxBR group (32.5 months) (p = 0.0137), and median overall survival also increased (p = 0.0897). Median TTP was significantly longer in patients relapsing from a CR (50.4 months) and in their first relapse (38.7 months) compared to those relapsing from a non-CR response (32.9 months) and in their second relapse (25.2 months). Physicians seemed to start treatment earlier in RRMM patients with poor prognosis features. Previous responses to anti-MM treatment and the number of prior treatment lines were identified as prognosis factors, whereby relapse from CR and first relapse were associated with a longer time to progression.

Influence of invasive aspergillosis during acute leukaemia treatment on survival after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a prospective study of the EBMT Infectious Diseases Working Party.

Background: Infections are the main reason for mortality during acute leukaemia treatment and invasive aspergillosis (IA) is a major concern. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is a standard therapy and often is the only live-saving procedure in leukaemia patients. The profound immunodeficiency occurring after alloSCT led to high IA-associated mortality in the past. Therefore, patients with IA were historically considered transplant-ineligible. Recently, there has been improvement of anti-fungal management including novel anti-fungal agents. As a result, more leukaemia patients with IA are undergoing alloSCT. Outcome has not been prospectively assessed. Methods: We performed a prospective study in acute leukaemia patients undergoing alloSCT to analyse the impact of a prior history of probable or proven IA (pre-SCT IA). The primary endpoint was 1-year non-relapse mortality (NRM). Relapse free survival and overall survival were analysed as secondary endpoints. Findings: 1439 patients were included between 2016 and 2021. The incidence of probable or proven pre-SCT IA was 6.0% (n = 87). The cumulative incidence of 1-year NRM was 17.3% (95% CI 10.2-26.0) and 11.2% (9.6-13.0) for patients with and without pre-SCT IA. In multivariate analyses the hazard ratio (HR) for 1-year NRM was 2.1 (1.2-3.6; p = 0.009) for patients with pre-SCT IA. One-year relapse-free survival was inferior in patients with pre-SCT IA (59.4% [48.3-68.9] vs. 70.4 [67.9-72.8]; multivariate HR 1.5 [1.1-2.1]; p = 0.02). Consequently, 1-year overall survival was lower in patients with pre-SCT IA: (68.8% [57.8-77.4] vs. 79.0% [76.7-81.1]; multivariate HR 1.7 [1.1-2.5]; p = 0.01). Interpretation: Pre-SCT IA remains to be significantly associated with impaired alloSCT outcome. On the other hand, more than two thirds of patients with pre-SCT IA were alive at one year after alloSCT. IA is not anymore an absolute contraindication for alloSCT because the majority of patients with IA who undergo alloSCT benefit from this procedure. Funding: There was no external funding source for this study.