Impact of Textbook Oncologic Outcome Attainment on Survival After Gastrectomy: A Review of the National Cancer Database.

BACKGROUND: Textbook oncologic outcome (TOO) is a composite outcome measure realized when all desired short-term quality metrics are met after an oncologic operation. This study examined the incidence and impact of achieving a TOO among patients undergoing resection of gastric adenocarcinoma. METHODS: The 2004-2016 National Cancer Database was queried for patients who underwent curative gastrectomy. Textbook oncologic outcome was defined as having met five metrics: R0 resection, American Joint Committee on Cancer-compliant lymph node evaluation (n ≥ 15), no prolonged hospital stay (< 75th percentile by year), no 30-day readmission, and receipt of guideline-accordant systemic therapy. RESULTS: Of 34,688 patients identified, 8249 (23.8 %) achieved TOO. The patients for whom TOO was achieved were more likely to have traveled farther (p < 0.001) and received care in an academic (p < 0.001) or very high case-volume facility (p < 0.001). The TOO group had a significanty higher median overall survival (OS) than the non-TOO group (80.5 vs 35.3 months; p < 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier curve showed that at 12 months, the survival probability estimate was 92 % for the TOO group versus 77 % for the non-TOO group. At 60 months (long-term survival), survival probability estimates remained higher for the TOO group (57 % vs 38 %). The results of the multivariate Cox regression model found that TOO attainment was significantly associated with a reduced risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.82; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The TOO measure is associated with improved OS and reduced risk of death after gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. Unfortunately, in this study, TOO was obtained in only 23.8 % of cases.

MANAGEMENT OF HYPERPARATHYROIDISM IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION CANDIDATES: A NEED FOR CONSENSUS.

Objective: To assess the evolving standards of care for hyperparathyroidism in kidney transplant candidates. Methods: An 11-question, Institutional Review Board-approved survey was designed and reviewed by multiple institutions. The questionnaire was made available to the American Society of Transplantation's Kidney Pancreas Community of Practice membership via their online hub from April through July 2019. Results: Twenty percent (n = 41) of kidney transplant centers responded out of 202 programs in the United States. Forty-one percent (n = 17) of respondents believed medical literature supports the concept that a serum parathyroid hormone level greater than 800 pg/mL could endanger the survival of a transplanted kidney and therefore makes transplantation in an affected patient relatively or absolutely contraindicated. Sixty-six percent (n = 27) said they occasionally recommend parathyroidectomy for secondary hyperparathyroidism prior to transplantation, and 66% (n = 27) recommend parathyroidectomy after transplantation based on persistent, unsatisfactory posttransplantation parathyroid hormone levels. Forty-six percent (n = 19) prefer subtotal parathyroidectomy as their choice; 44% (n = 18) had no standard preference. Endocrine surgery and otolaryngology were the most common surgical specialties consulted to perform parathyroidectomy in kidney transplant candidates. The majority of respondents (71%, n = 29) do not involve endocrinologists in the management of kidney transplantation candidates. Conclusion: Our survey shows wide divergence of clinical practice in the area of surgical management of kidney transplantation candidates with hyperparathyroidism. We suggest that medical/surgical societies involved in the transplantation care spectrum convene a multidisciplinary group of experts to create a new section in the kidney transplantation guidelines addressing the collaborative management of parathyroid disease in transplantation candidates. Abbreviations: AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists; AAES = American Association of Endocrine Surgeons; AHNS = American Head and Neck Society; CKD = chronic kidney disease; CKD-MBD = chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder; ESRD = end-stage renal disease; HPT = hyperparathyroidism; KDIGO = Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes; KT = kidney transplantation; KTC = kidney transplant candidate; PTH = parathyroid hormone; PTX = parathyroidectomy; US = ultrasonography.

Lessons Learned from a Pilot Study Implementing a Team-Based Messaging Application (Slack) to Improve Communication and Teamwork in Veterinary Medical Education.

Communication skills are paramount for a successful veterinary curriculum. Technological advances have improved communication processes, and the way instruction is delivered. Yet, with these advances come challenges such as email overload, increased interruptions, and miscommunications. Time is a valuable commodity at any high caseload veterinary teaching hospital. When increasingly more time is spent sending and receiving emails, text messages, pages, and calls in lieu of more focused clinical teaching, then the modes of communication and traditional learning theories need to be evaluated. An effective mode of communication is needed to reduce information overload and miscommunication. This article describes lessons learned from a pilot study to determine if a team-based messaging application could improve a surgical team's communication by having all forms of transmitted media directly related to their scope of work accessible to everyone on the team in one real-time digital platform (Slack). Fifteen members of a university-based surgical team were enrolled into the study and provided with surveys at specific time points to evaluate the efficacy of an internet-based team communication tool during a 3-month period. Results of our study showed an overall perception of improved communication among team members when using a team-based communication platform. Recommendations are provided to address team member's underutilization of the platform, which resulted in duplicate messages and miscommunication. We conclude an initial adoption by staff members is essential when implementing significant shifts in communication platforms.

Impact of Minimally Invasive Approach on Attainment of a Textbook Oncologic Outcome Following Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Review of the National Cancer Database.

BACKGROUND: Textbook oncologic outcome (TOO) is a composite outcome measure realized when all desired short-term quality metrics are met following an oncologic operation. This study examined whether minimally invasive gastrectomy (MIG) is associated with increased likelihood of TOO attainment. METHODS: The 2010-2016 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy. Surgical approach was described as open (OG), laparoscopic (LG), or robotic (RG). TOO was defined as having met five metrics: R0 resection, AJCC compliant lymph node evaluation (n ≥ 15), no prolonged length of stay (< 75th percentile by year), no 30-day readmission, and receipt of guideline-accordant systemic therapy. RESULTS: Of 21,015 patients identified, 5708 (27.2%) underwent MIG (LG = 21.9%, RG = 5.3%). Patients who underwent RG were more likely to have met all TOO criteria, and consequently TOO. Logistic regression models revealed that patients undergoing MIG were significantly more likely to attain TOO. MIG was associated with a higher likelihood of adequate LAD, no prolonged LOS, and concordant chemotherapy. Patients who underwent LG and achieved TOO had the highest median OS (86.7 months), while the OG non-TOO cohort experienced the lowest (34.6 months). The median OS for the RG TOO group was not estimable; however, the mortality rate (.7%) was the lowest of the six cohorts. CONCLUSION: RG resulted in a significantly increased likelihood of TOO attainment. Although TOO is associated with increased OS across all surgical approaches, attainment of TOO following MIG is associated with a statistically significantly higher median OS.

Optimizing Triage Practice in Pediatric Trauma: Lessons From Under-triage and Over-triage Rates and Risk Factors.

BACKGROUND: Triage accuracy is essential for delivering effective trauma care, especially in the pediatric population where unique challenges exist. The purpose of this study was to investigate risk factors contributing to under-triage and over-triage in an urban pediatric trauma center. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all trauma activations at an urban level 1 trauma center between January 1, 2021, and July 31, 2023 (patients <18 years old.) Patients who were under- or over-triaged were identified based on the level of trauma activation and injury severity score. RESULTS: There were 1094 trauma activations included in this study. The rate of under-triage was 3.8% (n = 42) and over-triage was 13.6% (n = 149). Infants aged 0-1 years had the highest rate of under-triage (10.9%, n = 19, P < .001), while those aged 11-17 had the highest rate of over-triage (17.0%, n = 82, P = .003). Non-accidental trauma was the strongest risk factor for under-triage (OR 30.2 [6.4-142.8] P < .001). Penetrating mechanism was the strongest risk factor for over-triage (OR 12.2 [5.6-26.2] P < .001). DISCUSSION: This study reveals the complexity of trauma triage in the pediatric population. We identified key predictive factors, such as age, comorbidities, and mechanism of injury, that can be used to refine triage practices and improve the care of pediatric trauma patients.

Prevalence of Diabetes, Prediabetes, and Associated Risk Factors Among Agricultural Village Residents in the Dominican Republic.

This study examined the prevalence and risk factors of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes among residents of agricultural settlement villages (bateyes) in the Dominican Republic. From March to April 2016, a cross-sectional, multi-stage cluster survey was conducted across the country's three agricultural regions (southwest, east, and north). At selected households, an adult completed a questionnaire to assess demographics, diabetes knowledge, and care, and two household residents of any age provided finger-prick blood samples that were analyzed for hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). HbA1c was categorized as normal (< 5.7%), prediabetic (5.7-6.4%), or diabetic (≥ 6.5%). The prevalence rates of diabetes and prediabetes were 8.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.2-11.8%) and 20.4% (95% CI, 17.9-23.2%), respectively, among all participants (N = 1293; median age, 35 years; range, 2-96 years), and 10.0% (95% CI, 7.2-13.8%) and 20.0% (95% CI, 17.4-23.0%), respectively, among adults 18 years or older (N = 730). The average age of participants with diabetes was 47.2 years. The average age of participants with prediabetes was 40.7 years. Among adult questionnaire respondents, 64.8% of all participants and 39.4% of patients with diabetes had not been tested for diabetes previously. Among patients with diabetes, 28.4% were previously diagnosed; 1.2% of prediabetes patients were previously diagnosed. Half (50.7%) of the respondents had heard of diabetes. The majority (94.1%) of patients previously diagnosed with diabetes reported using diabetes medication. Among both undiagnosed and previously diagnosed patients with diabetes, diabetes knowledge, previous diabetes testing, and diabetes care-seeking were lowest among Haitian-born participants. A high burden of undiagnosed diabetes and deficiencies in diabetes knowledge, access to care, and diagnosis exist among all batey inhabitants, but most acutely among Haitians. Improvements will require a multi-sectoral approach.

Patient-provider communication quality for persons with disabilities: A cross-sectional analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear how perceived patient-provider communication quality (PPPCQ) varies according to disability status. Lack of adequate patient-provider communication may prevent providers from considering healthcare issues that are relevant and important to persons with disabilities (PWD), potentially contributing to poorer health outcomes. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: To examine PPPCQ by disability status using current U.S. Department of Health and Human Services standards for surveillance of functional disabilities. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used nationally-representative data from the 2012-2013 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). Participants were categorized as having any disability (hearing, vision, mobility, cognitive, self-care, and/or independent living limitations). PPPCQ was assessed using seven HINTS questions about communication with healthcare professionals. Linear regression was used to estimate mean differences in composite PPPCQ scores, and logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) for a provider "always or usually" performing PPPCQ. RESULTS: The study population comprised 5301 participants, representing 180,442,731 U.S. adults. Overall, 22.1% (weighted) reported any disability. Adjusted mean PPPCQ scores were significantly lower for PWD (72.8, 95% CI: 68.2-77.4) than persons without disability (78.3, 95% CI: 76.5-80.2), p = 0.021. More specifically, PWD were significantly less likely to be given attention needed to address feelings and emotions (OR = 0.6, 95% CI: 0.4, 0.9, p = 0.017), to have next steps understood (OR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2, 0.8, p = 0.019), and to receive a clear explanation (OR = 0.3, 95% CI: 0.1, 0.8, p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: PWD are less likely to report key elements of effective patient-provider communication. Implementing patient-centered care may improve patient-provider communication for this vulnerable population.