NSAIDs do not require the presence of a carboxylic acid to exert their anti-inflammatory effect - why do we keep using it?

The carboxylic acid group (-COOH) present in classical NSAIDs is partly responsible for the gastric toxicity associated with the administration of these drugs. This concept has been extensively proven using NSAID prodrugs. However, the screening of NSAIDs with no carboxylic acid at all has been neglected. The goal of this work was to determine if new NSAID derivatives devoid of acidic moieties would retain the anti-inflammatory activity of the parent compound, without causing gastric toxicity. To test this concept, we replaced the carboxylic acid group in ibuprofen, flurbiprofen, and naproxen with three ammonium moieties. We tested the resulting water-soluble NSAID derivatives for anti-inflammatory and ulcerogenic activity in vitro and in vivo. In this regard, we observed that all non-acidic NSAIDs exerted a potent anti-inflammatory activity, suggesting that the acid group in commercial 2-phenylpropionic acid NSAIDs not be an essential requirement for anti-inflammatory activity. These data provide complementary evidence supporting the discontinuation of ulcerogenic acidic NSAIDs.

Drug-disease interaction: Crohn's disease elevates verapamil plasma concentrations but reduces response to the drug proportional to disease activity.

AIM: Inflammation is involved in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases that includes reduced response to pharmacotherapy due to altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. It is not known if these effects exist in general in all inflammatory conditions. It also remains unknown whether in a given population the effect is a function of disease severity. We investigated whether pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a typical calcium channel inhibitor are influenced by Crohn's disease (CD), a disease for which the disease severity can be readily ranked. METHODS: We administered 80 mg verapamil orally to (i) healthy control subjects (n= 9), (ii) patients with clinically quiescent CD (n= 22) and (iii) patients with clinically active CD (n= 14). Serial analysis of verapamil enantiomers (total and plasma unbound), blood pressure and electrocardiograms were recorded over 8 h post dose. The severity of CD was measured using the Harvey-Bradshaw Index. RESULTS: CD substantially and significantly increased plasma verapamil concentration and in a stereoselective fashion (S, 9-fold; R, 2-fold). The elevated verapamil concentration, however, failed to result in an increased verapamil pharmacodynamic effect so that the patients with elevated verapamil concentration demonstrated no significant increase in response measured as PR interval and blood pressure. Instead, the greater the disease severity, the lower was the drug potency to prolong PR interval (r= 0.86, P < 0.0006), CONCLUSIONS: CD patients with severe disease may not respond to cardiovascular therapy with calcium channel blockers. Reducing the severity increases response despite reduced drug concentration. This observation may have therapeutic implication beyond the disease and the drug studies herein.

Action and disposition of the ß3-agonist nebivolol in the presence of inflammation; an alternative to conventional ß1-blockers.

Inflammation reduces pharmacological response to ß1-blockers by down-regulating the target receptor protein. This may contribute to the sub-optimal response to pharmacotherapy with ß-blockers. Nebivolol is a third generation ß-adrenoceptor (AR) blocker with high selectivity for blocking ß1 and ß3-agonistic properties. We studied whether response to nebivolol is also reduced by inflammation. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (Inflamed; Mycobacterium butyricum induced) and Control (healthy) were orally administered single doses of 2 mg/kg nebivolol (n=5) or 25 mg/kg propranolol (positive control, n=7-8); ECG recorded for PR and RR interval measurements; serial blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic assessment. Subsequently, the myocardial ß1, ß2 and ß3-AR levels were measured in homogenized hearts. For propranolol, inflammation resulted in increased concentration but reduced response and down-regulation of ß1- AR. The action and disposition of nebivolol were, however, unaffected by inflammation despite the reduced ß1-AR levels. The levels of ß2 and ß3-AR were unaffected by inflammation. The consistency of response to nebivolol despite inflammation may be due to the predominance of contribution of ß2 and ß3-AR. The lack of an inhibitory effect of inflammation on the clearance of nebivolol is suggestive of mechanisms other than an efficient hepatic metabolism for its low bioavailability. If extrapolated to human, nebivolol may be a more effective cardiovascular drug when inflammatory conditions are present.