Stackable Guide and Immediate Full Arch Loading: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 43 Edentulous Arches-The STAGE Study.

PURPOSE: As the population gets older, the prevalence of complete or partial tooth loss is increasing, significantly impacting people's quality of life. Scientific research demonstrates that implant-fixed complete dentures offer high levels of satisfaction. In certain cases, tooth loss can lead to significant bone atrophy, necessitating pre-implant bone reconstruction. We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving 43 arches, including or not bone grafts, rehabilitated using a stackable guided approach, which included an immediate loading protocol. The primary outcome measure was the survival rate of the implant at 4 months. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The digital workflow helps the design of the provisional prothesis before the implant surgery, which will be loaded immediately after the implant's placement. The stacked guides integrate both surgical and prosthetic considerations into a digital workflow. RESULT: A total of 284 implants were placed. After a 4-month follow-up period, 10 implants (3.5%) exhibited no osseointegration and were subsequently replaced, resulting in an overall success rate of 96.5%. After 1 year of follow-up, a prosthetic success rate of 100% was observed, with all patients being able to progress to the stages for the permanent fixed dentures. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the use of this protocol for all patients, whether they require bone grafts or not. However, a long-term follow-up is essential for a comprehensive evaluation of these treatment outcomes.

Baseline tumour measurements predict survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The association between tumour measurements and survival has been studied extensively in early-stage and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We analysed these factors in patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Data were derived from the E4599 trial of paclitaxel-carboplatin±bevacizumab. Associations between the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) baseline sum longest diameter (BSLD), response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using univariate and multivariable Cox regression models. RESULTS: A total of 759 of the 850 patients (89%) in the E4599 trial had measurable diseases and were included in this analysis. The median BSLD was 7.5 cm. BSLD predicted OS (hazard ratio (HR) 1.41; P<0.001) and had a trend towards association with PFS (HR 1.14; P=0.08). The median OS was 12.6 months for patients with BSLD <7.5 cm compared with 9.5 months for BSLD ≥ 7.5 cm. This association persisted in a multivariable model controlling multiple prognostic factors, including the presence and sites of extrathoracic disease (HR 1.24; P=0.01). There was no association between BSLD and response rate. CONCLUSION: Tumour measurements are associated with survival in the E4599 trial. If validated in other populations, this parameter may provide important prognostic information to patients and clinicians.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, phase II/III trials adding bevacizumab to platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Summary data from randomised trials comparing first-line bevacizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy with chemotherapy alone for inoperable locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic NSCLC were meta-analysed. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and pooled odds ratio (OR) for adverse events were calculated. The chi-squared tests evaluated interactions between treatment effects, and prognostic factors and patient characteristics. RESULTS: Data of 2194 patients (1313 bevacizumab; 881 controls) from four phase II and III trials: AVF-0757g, JO19907,ECOG 4599 and AVAiL, were analysed. Compared with chemotherapy alone, bevacizumab significantly prolonged OS(HR 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81, 0.99; P=0.03), and PFS (0.72; 95% CI 0.66, 0.79; P<0.001). Bevacizumab showed a significantly greater effect on OS in patients with adenocarcinoma versus other histologies (P=0.03), and patients with body weight loss ≤5% versus >5% (P=0.04). Bevacizumab significantly increased the risk of grade ≥3 proteinuria, hypertension,haemorrhagic events, neutropenia, and febrile neutropenia [corrected]. CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab significantly prolonged OS and PFS when added to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC; no unexpected toxicity was evident.

Cold plasma selectivity and the possibility of a paradigm shift in cancer therapy.

BACKGROUND: Plasma is an ionised gas that is typically generated in high-temperature laboratory conditions. However, recent progress in atmospheric plasmas has led to the creation of cold plasmas with ion temperature close to room temperature. METHODS: Both in-vitro and in-vivo studies revealed that cold plasmas selectively kill cancer cells. RESULTS: We show that: (a) cold plasma application selectively eradicates cancer cells in vitro without damaging normal cells; and (b) significantly reduces tumour size in vivo. It is shown that reactive oxygen species metabolism and oxidative stress responsive genes are deregulated. CONCLUSION: The development of cold plasma tumour ablation has the potential of shifting the current paradigm of cancer treatment and enabling the transformation of cancer treatment technologies by utilisation of another state of matter.

Long-term survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with atezolizumab versus docetaxel: Results from the randomised phase III OAK study.

BACKGROUND: Atezolizumab (anti-programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-L1]) received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency for previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer based on OAK-a randomised, phase III trial that showed significantly improved survival with atezolizumab versus docetaxel regardless of PD-L1 expression. With longer follow-up, we summarised the characteristics of long-term survivors (LTSs). METHODS: In OAK (NCT02008227), patients were randomised 1:1 to receive atezolizumab or docetaxel until loss of clinical benefit or disease progression, respectively. Overall survival was evaluated after a 26-month minimum follow-up, including in patient subgroups defined by best overall response (BOR). LTSs were defined as patients who lived ≥24 months since randomisation. Non-LTSs died within 24 months, and patients censored before 24 months were excluded from the analysis. The baseline characteristics, including biomarkers, BOR, subsequent non-protocol therapy (NPT) and safety, are reported. RESULTS: Survival benefit with atezolizumab was observed across all patient subgroups defined by BOR. More atezolizumab-treated patients were LTSs versus those treated with docetaxel (28% versus 18%). Most atezolizumab responders were LTSs (77%) versus only 48% of docetaxel responders. However, 21% of atezolizumab-arm LTSs had progressive disease (PD) as BOR, and more atezolizumab-arm LTSs than non-LTSs continued treatment post-PD. Fifty-two percent of docetaxel-arm LTSs received immunotherapy as subsequent NPT. Despite extended treatment duration in atezolizumab-arm LTSs (median, 18 months), atezolizumab was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: After >2 years of follow-up, atezolizumab continued to provide durable survival benefit versus docetaxel, with tolerable safety. Atezolizumab-arm LTSs were enriched for patients with high PD-L1 expression and included PD-L1-negative patients. Long-term survival was not limited to responders.

Congenital ependymoblastoma arising in the sacrococcygeal soft tissue: a case study.

Ependymoblastomas are distinct embryonal tumors of the central nervous system reported only rarely in the literature. Most examples arise in young children under the age of 2 years, in the supratentorial compartment, and may or may not be related to the ventricular system. We report the case of a one-day-old infant who presented with a 6.4 x 5.6 x 3.5 cm ruptured buttock mass. Ultrasound demonstrated a solid mass at the base of the spine that displaced the bladder anteriorly with resultant hydronephrosis. Magnetic resonance images confirmed the presence of a solid mass surrounding the lower sacrum with an internal component partially encircling and deviating the rectum. Histopathological evaluation confirmed the diagnosis of ependymoblastoma. Of note, immunohistochemical analysis revealed diffuse staining with vimentin and patchy expression of synaptophysin, glial fibrillary acidic protein, neurofilament proteins, neuron-specific enolase, CD99 and nestin. On the 42nd day of life, chemotherapy was initiated with a modified Children's Oncology Group (COG) AGCT-01P1 (cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, 70% etoposide, no bleomycin) regimen. The authors describe their experience and review the literature, emphasizing that ependymoblastomas should be considered in the differential diagnosis of sacral masses in the newborn.

Open-label use of placebos in the treatment of ADHD: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: This study examined short-term efficacy, side effects and acceptability of a placebo treatment procedure designed to maintain children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) on 50% of their usual stimulant dose. METHODS: An open-label prospective crossover trial was conducted in 26 children with ADHD, ages 7-15 years, stable on stimulant therapy, followed at a community-based developmental paediatrics ADHD clinic. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of two orders of experimental conditions: (1) baseline (100%) dose (1 week), then 50% dose (1 week), then 50% dose + placebo (1 week), or (2) baseline (100%), then 50% dose + placebo, then 50% dose. The inert nature of the placebo was fully disclosed to parent and child. Treatment was open-label for child, parents and physician, but single blind for teachers. Main outcome measures included weekly IOWA Conners parent and teacher rating scales, the Pittsburgh side effects rating scale (PSERS) and the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale. RESULTS: Parent IOWA showed ADHD behaviour tended to remain the same when the dose of stimulant medication was reduced with placebo but to deteriorate when the dose was reduced without placebo. There were no significant differences between conditions on the Teacher IOWA. PSERS scores were higher at baseline than on 50% dose. On the CGI, there was a significant difference (P = 0.004) between the 50% dose and the 50% + placebo conditions. Individual subject analysis showed that eight subjects met criteria for responder. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that the open-label placebo treatment was acceptable and efficacious in the short term for some children.

Children's and parents' perspectives on open-label use of placebos in the treatment of ADHD.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy and acceptability of an open-label conditioned placebo dose reduction (CPDR) treatment in 70 children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This paper focuses on the qualitative data from the study. METHODS: Following a double-blind, crossover dose finding procedure to determine each subject's optimal dose of stimulant medication, subjects were randomized to the CPDR treatment or one of two control groups. Outcome measures included parent and teacher ratings of ADHD behaviours and stimulant side effects. Qualitative assessments were based on open-ended interviews of children and parents. Positive responders to CPDR and controls were followed for 3 months to assess persistence of treatment benefits. RESULTS: Children randomized to CPDR showed an excellent treatment response, well maintained over time. Parents and children were generally accepting of the treatment. Most parents reported treatment benefits and 80% of the children found the placebo to be useful. Full disclosure of the placebo to parents and children did not appear to negate the placebo's effectiveness. Participation effects and changes in caregiver behaviour may have contributed to positive treatment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Open-label use of placebos as part of CPDR treatment may represent an innovative, ethical way of harnessing the power of placebos in clinical therapeutics.

Cisplatin plus etoposide with and without ifosfamide in extensive small-cell lung cancer: a Hoosier Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the addition of ifosfamide to cisplatin plus etoposide improves the response rate, time to disease progression, or overall survival in previously untreated patients with extensive-stage small-cell carcinoma of the lung (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with extensive SCLC with a Karnofsky performance score (KPS) > or = 50 and adequate renal function and bone marrow reserve were eligible. Patients with CNS metastases were eligible and received concurrent whole-brain radiotherapy. Patients were randomized to receive cisplatin (20 mg/m2) plus etoposide (100 mg/m2) (VP) both given intravenously (i.v.) on days 1 to 4 or cisplatin (20 mg/m2), ifosfamide (1.2 g/m2), and etoposide (75 mg/m2) (VIP) all given i.v. on days 1 to 4. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks for four cycles. RESULTS: From May 1989 through March 1993, 171 patients were randomized (84 to VP and 87 to VIP). The median follow-up duration is 26 months. All patients were assessable for survival; 163 were fully assessable for response and 162 for toxicity. Myelosuppression was greater with VIP. Objective responses were observed in 55 of 82 (67%) and 59 of 81 (73%) assessable patients treated with VP and VIP, respectively (difference not significant). The difference in the median time to progression was statistically different (P = .039). The median survival times on VP and VIP were 7.3 months and 9.0 months, respectively (P = .045 for survival curves by stratified log-rank test) with 2-year survival rates of 5% versus 13%, respectively. CONCLUSION: VIP combination chemotherapy is associated with an improved time to progression and overall survival over VP therapy in patients with extensive SCLC.

Phase II study of daily oral etoposide plus ifosfamide plus cisplatin for previously treated recurrent small-cell lung cancer: a Hoosier Oncology Group Trial.

PURPOSE: The study was undertaken to determine the activity and toxicity of oral etoposide (VP-16), ifosfamide, and cisplatin combination chemotherapy for previously treated, recurrent small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase II trial, 46 patients were enrolled to receive oral VP-16, 37.5 mg/m2/d for 21 days, ifosfamide 1.2 g/m2/d for 4 days, and cisplatin 20 mg/m2/d for 4 days, with courses repeated every 28 days. Response, survival, and toxicity data were then noted. RESULTS: Forty-two of 46 patients were assessable for response, survival, and toxicity. Thirty-six of 42 patients had received prior cisplatin plus VP-16. The first 22 patients received oral VP-16 for 21 days, but the subsequent 20 patients received oral VP-16 for 14 days after an interim analysis showed marked myelosuppression. Twenty-three of 42 patients (55%) had an objective response, with six complete responses (CRs; 14%), and 17 partial responses (PRs; 40%). The median progression-free survival time was 20 weeks (range, 2 to 66) and the overall median survival duration was 29 weeks (range, 1 to 76). Myelosuppression was significant, with six treatment-related deaths, four as a result of sepsis. CONCLUSION: The combination of oral VP-16, ifosfamide, and cisplatin is an active regimen in the treatment of recurrent SCLC. However, hematologic toxicity was severe in this pretreated patient population.

Phase I trial of the combination of irinotecan, paclitaxel, and carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose, toxicities, and dose suitable for phase II/III trials of irinotecan (CPT-11) combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were enrolled to this multicenter, phase I study. The initial regimen was paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2)/3 h, followed by carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 6 over 30 minutes on day 1, and CPT-11 starting at 40 mg/m(2) over 90 minutes, days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks. Dose-limiting toxicity occurred in three of seven patients. The regimen was amended, with doses reduced to paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2)/3 h, carboplatin AUC 5 and CPT-11 at 40 mg/m(2), all on day 1 every 3 weeks. Dose escalation of CPT-11 proceeded to 80 mg/m(2) then 125 mg/m(2) before dose-limiting toxicities were experienced. Subsequent patients received an intermediate CPT-11 dose of 100 mg/m(2). RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were enrolled; 32 patients were assessable for safety, and 31 were assessable for tumor response. The primary first-cycle dose-limiting toxicities were neutropenia and diarrhea. The most common grade 3/4 toxicity observed during all cycles was neutropenia (16 patients [50%], with six [19%] developing neutropenic fever). Objective tumor response was observed in 39% (12/31, 95% confidence interval, 22% to 58%). The median time to tumor progression was 6.8 months, median survival 11.0 months, and 1-year survival probability 0.46. CONCLUSION: CPT-11 100 mg/m(2), paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2), and carboplatin AUC 5 given every 3 weeks can be safely administered in patients with advanced NSCLC. Neutropenia and diarrhea are the dose-limiting toxicities. The combination shows appreciable activity, and survival data are favorable.

Role of computed tomography in the staging of primary melanoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of body computed tomography (CT) for the staging of patients with early melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 151 new patients with American Joint Committee (AJC) clinical stage I, II, and III melanoma who received a CT scan of at least the chest and abdomen are the subject of this study. CT scans considered suspicious for metastases were reviewed again by one of the investigators (A.McB.C.). RESULTS: Of 151 patients, 63 had AJC clinical stage I, 61 stage II, and 23 stage III disease. In addition, one patient each had primary melanoma of the anal canal, esophagus, or vulva. Twenty-nine (19%) of 151 patients had a CT scan that was considered suspicious for metastases. The most common radiologic findings were single hepatic, and single or multiple pulmonary nodules. Of these 29 patients with suspicious scans, 24 subsequently proved to have benign processes by biopsy or follow-up studies, three had second primary tumors (well-differentiated lymphocytic lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease, and renal cell carcinoma), and only two were found to have metastatic melanoma. Of these two patients, one had regional nodal disease (unsuspected on physical examination) and one had distant nodal metastases. CONCLUSION: Body CT is not a useful imaging study in the detection of occult metastases in patients with primary melanoma. Although body CT commonly shows suspicious radiologic abnormalities in patients with early melanoma, these abnormalities most likely represent benign processes or a second primary tumor, rather than metastatic melanoma. The value of body CT in patients who present with nodal metastases needs further study.

Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The Hoosier Oncology Group has previously reported the results of its phase II trial of the combination of cisplatin plus gemcitabine. In that study of 27 assessable patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the response rate was 33%, with a median survival of 8.4 months. Based on such favorable results, the Hoosier Oncology Group designed this randomized phase III study of gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared with cisplatin alone in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive either cisplatin (100 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 1 of a 28-day cycle) or the combination of cisplatin (100 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 1) plus gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2) administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle). RESULTS: From August 1995 to February 1997, 522 assessable chemotherapy-naive patients were randomized. Toxicity was predominantly hematologic and was more pronounced in the combination arm, with grade 4 neutropenia occurring in 35.3% of patients compared with 1.2% of patients on the cisplatin monotherapy arm. The incidence of neutropenic fevers was less than 5% in both arms. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 25. 4% of patients on the combination arm compared with 0.8% of patients on the cisplatin monotherapy arm. No serious hemorrhagic events related to thrombocytopenia were reported for either arm. The combination of gemcitabine plus cisplatin demonstrated a significant improvement over single-agent cisplatin with regard to response rate (30.4% compared with 11.1%, respectively; P <.0001), median time to progressive disease (5.6 months compared with 3.7 months, respectively; P =.0013), and overall survival (9.1 months compared with 7.6 months, respectively; P =.004). CONCLUSIONS: For the first-line treatment of NSCLC, the regimen of gemcitabine plus cisplatin is superior to cisplatin alone in terms of response rate, time to disease progression, and overall survival.

Phase I evaluation of intravenous recombinant human interleukin 12 in patients with advanced malignancies.

A Phase I dose escalation trial of i.v. administered recombinant human interleukin 12 (rhIL-12) was performed to determine its toxicity, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and biological and potential antineoplastic effects. Cohorts of four to six patients with advanced cancer, Karnofsky performance >/=70%, and normal organ function received escalating doses (3-1000 ng/kg/day) of rhIL-12 (Genetics Institute, Inc.) by bolus i.v. injection once as an inpatient and then, after a 2-week rest period, once daily for five days every 3 weeks as an outpatient. Therapy was withheld for grade 3 toxicity (grade 4 hyperbilirubinemia or neutropenia), and dose escalation was halted if three of six patients experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). After establishment of the MTD, eight more patients were enrolled to further assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunobiology of this dose. Forty patients were enrolled, including 20 with renal cancer, 12 with melanoma, and 5 with colon cancer; 25 patients had received prior systemic therapy. Common toxicities included fever/chills, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and headache. Fever was first observed at the 3 ng/kg dose level, typically occurred 8-12 h after rhIL-12 administration, and was incompletely suppressed with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Routine laboratory changes included anemia, neutropenia, lymphopenia, hyperglycemia, thrombocytopenia, and hypoalbuminemia. DLTs included oral stomatitis and liver function test abnormalities, predominantly elevated transaminases, which occurred in three of four patients at the 1000 ng/kg dose level. The 500 ng/kg dose level was determined to be the MTD. This dose, administered by this schedule, was associated with asymptomatic hepatic function test abnormalities in three patients and an onstudy death due to Clostridia perfringens septicemia but was otherwise well tolerated by the 14 patients treated in the dose escalation and safety phases. The T1/2 elimination of rhIL-12 was calculated to be 5.3-9.6 h. Biological effects included dose-dependent increases in circulating IFN-gamma, which exhibited attenuation with subsequent cycles. Serum neopterin rose in a reproducible fashion regardless of dose or cycle. Tumor necrosis factor alpha was not detected by ELISA. One of 40 patients developed a low titer antibody to rhIL-12. Lymphopenia was observed at all dose levels, with recovery occurring within several days of completing treatment without rebound lymphocytosis. There was one partial response (renal cell cancer) and one transient complete response (melanoma), both in previously untreated patients. Four additional patients received all proposed treatment without disease progression. rhIL-12 administered according to this schedule is biologically and clinically active at doses tolerable by most patients in an outpatient setting. Nonetheless, additional Phase I studies examining different schedules and the mechanisms of the specific DLTs are indicated before proceeding to Phase II testing.

Relationship between the pharmacokinetics and the analgesic and respiratory pharmacodynamics of epidural sufentanil.

To establish the relationships between epidural sufentanil analgesia and respiratory effects and to determine the pharmacokinetics of the drug, 22 adult patients undergoing thoracotomy were put into a randomized, double-blind study and received either 30, 50, or 75 micrograms per dose in 20 ml normal saline solution. Repeated doses were given on request for the 24-hour study period. There was a weak but significant nonlinear correlation between length of effective analgesia and the cumulative dose of the drug (r = 0.26, p less than 0.001). In 12 of 22 patients, the maximal length of effective analgesia was reached before the last dose and the effect tended to taper off thereafter. The mean maximal length of effective analgesia was 4.69 +/- 0.32 hours (mean +/- SEM), whereas the length of effective analgesia with the last dose was only 3.34 +/- 0.46 hours (p less than 0.0005). There was a significant correlation between the peak serum concentrations of sufentanil during the dose interval and the length of effective analgesia (r = 0.44, p less than 0.0001). Area under the concentration-time curve was proportional to the size of the epidural dose, and with all three doses tested there was a gradual accumulation of sufentanil in the serum. Mean time-to-peak concentration (tmax) increased with repeated doses (p less than 0.05). Mean serum concentration of sufentanil during periods of slow respiratory rate (0.47 +/- 0.05 ng/ml) was significantly higher than during episodes without adverse respiratory effects (0.37 +/- 0.05 ng/ml, p less than 0.05). The above data suggest that an important part of the analgesic and adverse effects of sufentanil are mediated centrally, after this opioid is absorbed systemically.

First-line combination chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group and Southwest Oncology Group experience.

Over the past 15 to 20 years we have seen small but significant improvements in the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. By the late 1980s the median survival had increased from approximately 4 months in the untreated patient to approximately 7 to 8 months with traditional cisplatin-based chemotherapy combinations. In the early 1990s several new agents, including the taxanes paclitaxel and docetaxel, gemcitabine, irinotecan, and vinorelbine, demonstrated activity in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. The combination of cisplatin with some of these newer agents such as vinorelbine or paclitaxel in recent phase II trials resulted in median survivals of approximately 9 to 10 months. Some of these results have been confirmed in large multicenter phase III trials conducted by two US Cooperative groups; the Southwest Oncology Group and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Their contribution to progress in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer is discussed.

Current management of small cell lung cancer.

There will be approximately 45,000 new cases of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) this year. Despite the initial sensitivity to chemotherapy, only 10% of all SCLC patients will have significant long-term survival. Studies have yet to show significant survival advantage for maintenance chemotherapy, and it appears that four to six cycles of chemotherapy is as effective as longer durations of chemotherapy. There is as yet no defined role for dose increase in the treatment of SCLC. In extensive disease no one chemotherapy combination has shown a definitive survival advantage, although it appears that single-agent oral etoposide may be inferior to combination intravenous chemotherapy. In limited disease, however, cisplatin plus etoposide alone or in alternation with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine is superior to other approaches. Also, in limited disease, chemotherapy plus radiotherapy is superior to chemotherapy alone and it appears that early concurrent radiotherapy may be the ideal approach. Myeloid growth factors should not be given concurrently with thoracic radiotherapy. There are several new agents with significant activity in SCLC awaiting further study.

Etoposide plus ifosfamide plus cisplatin in the treatment of small cell lung cancer.

Approximately 25% of all lung cancer cases diagnosed in 1993 were due to small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Approximately one third of all SCLC patients present with limited disease. Efforts to improve treatment results for patients with limited-stage SCLC include two recent meta-analyses of combined-modality treatment involving chemotherapy with thoracic radiotherapy versus chemotherapy alone. Both of these studies showed improvements in survival with the combined-modality approach. In addition, preliminary results of a Hoosier Oncology Group phase II study of cisplatin/ifosfamide/etoposide (VIP) in combination with thoracic radiotherapy in patients with limited disease indicate that VIP has an acceptable toxicity profile and should be studied further. For patients presenting with extensive-stage SCLC, several combination regimens have been shown to be effective in inducing responses of approximately 60%, although none has established superiority. Results of several studies evaluating the standard cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine (CAV) regimen versus cisplatin-containing combination regimens have shown no obvious survival advantage of the cisplatin regimens over CAV. On the other hand, results of a Hoosier Oncology Group study of VIP versus cisplatin/etoposide in extensive-disease SCLC showed that overall survival favored (P = .044) the VIP arm (9.1 months v 7.3 months), although these results need to be confirmed in another trial.

The activity of gemcitabine plus cisplatin in randomized trials in untreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Three separate phase III randomized studies were conducted to compare the efficacy of a gemcitabine plus cisplatin combination (GC) with other chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of European and North American patients with inoperable (stage IIIB or IV) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The Spanish Lung Cancer Group (SLCG) compared the GC regimen with an etoposide plus cisplatin combination (EP), the Hoosier Oncology Group (HOG) compared it with single-agent cisplatin, and the Italian Lung Cancer Project (ILCP) compared it with a mitomycin plus ifosfamide plus cisplatin combination (MIC). The three studies each had a different primary objective (response rate, survival, or quality of life, respectively). From July 1995 to February 1997, 751 patients were enrolled into the three studies. In the SLCG study, 69 were entered in the GC arm and 64 in the EP arm; in the HOG study, 155 were entered in the GC arm and 154 in the cisplatin-alone arm; and in the ILCP study, 154 were entered in the GC arm and 152 in the MIC arm. In the SLCG study, gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 was given by 30-minute infusion on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle. In the HOG and ILCP studies, gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 was given on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Cisplatin 100 mg/m2 was given on day 1 in the SLCG and HOG studies and on day 2 in the ILCP study. In the EP arm, etoposide 100 mg/m2 was given on days 1, 2, and 3 of each 21-day cycle. In the MIC arm, mitomycin 6 mg/m2 and ifosfamide 3 g/m2 were given on day 1 of each 28-day cycle. In the SLCG study, 28 patients (40.6%) in the GC arm and 14 patients (21.2%) in the EP arm achieved an objective response (P = .01). In the HOG study, 48 patients (31%) in the GC arm and 14 patients (9.1%) in the cisplatin-alone arm attained on objective response (P < .001). In the ILCP study, 61 patients (40%) in the GC arm and 42 patients (28%) in the MIC arm achieved an objective response (P = .03). Progression-free time was significantly longer for the GC arm (6.8 months) than for the cisplatin-alone arm (4.2 months) (P < .001). The median survival time was remarkably identical for the GC arms in the three studies (8.7 months), whereas it was 7.2 months for the EP arm, 7.6 months for the cisplatin-alone arm, and 9.5 months for the MIC arm. The main toxicities were myelosuppression and vomiting. The assessment of quality of life in the ILCP study is ongoing. Both 21- and 28-day cycles of GC were effective in the treatment of NSCLC, and this combination can be considered as a current "standard" therapy for advanced NSCLC patients.

Gemcitabine and paclitaxel combinations in non-small cell lung cancer.

Gemcitabine and paclitaxel are new cytotoxic agents that have been used both as single agents and in combination, particularly with cisplatin, in the therapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with promising results. The lack of overlapping toxicities and different mechanisms of action of gemcitabine and paclitaxel make the combination of these drugs appealing in the treatment of NSCLC. A number of phase I and II trials are evaluating the use of this combination of cytotoxic agents as first-line therapy and as second-line therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. In ongoing phase II trials using a 21-day schedule, the combination of gemcitabine and paclitaxel therapy appears to be well-tolerated, with response rates ranging from 29% to 58% and hematologic toxicities that are mild to moderate in severity. Other reported toxicities included alopecia, fatigue, and flu-like symptoms, which were also mild to moderate. However, grade 2/3 neurotoxicity was also reported. In conclusion, preliminary results from these early phase II trials of gemcitabine/paclitaxel combination therapy in advanced NSCLC are encouraging.