Serenoa repens + selenium + lycopene vs tadalafil 5 mg for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction: a Phase IV, non-inferiority, open-label, clinical study (SPRITE study).

OBJECTIVE: To compare in a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority clinical study, the efficacy and tolerability of Serenoa repens (SeR) + selenium (Se) + lycopene (Ly) (SeR-Se-Ly) therapy vs tadalafil 5 mg in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From May 2015 to January 2017, 427 patients were enrolled in 21 different centres (International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register [ISRCTN] 73316039). Inclusion criteria included: age between 50 and 80 years, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥12, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax ) ≤ 15 mL/s, and post-void residual (PVR) <100 mL. Patients were randomised into two groups in a 2:1 ratio: Group A (SeR-Se-Ly, 1 tablet daily for 6 months) and Group B (tadalafil 5 mg, 1 tablet daily for 6 months). The primary endpoint of the study was the non-inferior variation in the IPSS and Qmax in Group A vs Group B after 6 months of treatment. RESULTS: In all, 404 patients completed the full protocol. When comparing both therapies, Group A was statistically not inferior to Group B considering the median change in IPSS (-3.0 vs -3.0; P < 0.01), IPSS quality of life (-2.0 vs -2.0; P < 0.05), and Qmax (2.0 vs 2.0 mL/s; P < 0.01). We found statistically significant differences in the increase of at least 3 points in Qmax (38.2% vs 28.1%; P = 0.04) and of at least 30% of Qmax (39.2% vs 27.3%; P < 0.01) in Group A compared to Group B. The percentage of patients with an increase of at least 3 points in the IPSS and a decrease of at least 25% of the IPSS was not statistically different between the two groups. For adverse events, four patients in Group A (1.44%) and 10 in Group B (7.81%) (P < 0.05) reported side-effects. CONCLUSION: We have shown that treatment with SeR-Se-Ly was not inferior to tadalafil 5 mg for improving IPSS and Qmax in men with LUTS.

Serenoa repens, lycopene and selenium versus tamsulosin for the treatment of LUTS/BPH. An Italian multicenter double-blinded randomized study between single or combination therapy (PROCOMB trial).

BACKGROUND: Phytotherapy has been used to treat patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy between Serenoa Repens (SeR), Lycopene (Ly), and Selenium (Se) + tamsulosin versus single therapies. METHODS: PROCOMB trial (ISRCTN78639965) was a randomized double-blinded, double-dummy multicenter study of 225 patients between 55 and 80 years old, PSA ≤ 4 ng/ml, IPSS ≥12, prostate volume ≤60 cc, Qmax ≤15 ml/sec, postvoid residual urine (PVR) <150 ml. Participants were randomized group A (SeR-Se-Ly), group B (tamsulosin 0.4 mg), group C (SeR-Se-Ly + tamsulosin 0.4 mg). The primary endpoints of the study were the reduction of IPSS, PVR, and increase of Qmax in group C versus monotherapy groups. RESULTS: The decrease for combination therapy was significantly greater versus group A (P < 0.05) and group B (P < 0.01) for IPSS and versus group A (P < 0.01) for PVR from baseline to 6 months. A greater decrease in IPSS was observed for Group C versus group A (P < 0.01) and increase in Qmax versus group B (P < 0.01), from 6 months to 12 months. At one year, the changes of IPSS and Qmax were greater for Group C versus monotherapies (each comparison <0.05). The proportions of men with a decrease of at least three points (each comparison P < 0.05) and decrease of 25% for IPSS (each comparison P < 0.01) were greater for Group C. CONCLUSION: SeR-Se-Ly + tamsulosin therapy is more effective than single therapies in improving IPSS and increasing Qmax in patients with LUTS.

Association between selenium and lycopene supplementation and incidence of prostate cancer: Results from the post-hoc analysis of the procomb trial.

BACKGROUND: Many potential chemopreventive agents have been used in PCa prevention, including selenium (Se) and lycopene (Ly). However, their role has been matter of debate over the years, due to potential of promotion of PCa. PURPOSE: In this study we aimed at evaluating the incidence risk of prostate cancer (PCa) in a cohort of patients treated with Se and Ly. METHODS: The Procomb trial design has been previously published (ISRCTN78639965). From April 2012 to April 2014 209 patients were followed and underwent prostate biopsy when PSA ≥4 ng/ml and/or suspicion of PCa. The all cohort was composed by patients treated with Se and Ly (Group A = 134 patients) and control (Group B = 75 patients). RESULTS: During the follow-up time of 2 years, a total of 24 patients (11.5%) underwent prostate biopsy, of which 9 (4.3%) where diagnosed with PCa and 15 (7.2%) where diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia. We did not observe statistical differences in terms of mean changes of PSA between the two groups (p-value for trend = 0.33). The relative risk (RR) for PCa was 1.07 and 0.89 in group A and B, respectively (p = 0.95). At the multivariate Cox regression analysis supplementation with Se and Ly was not associated with greater risk of PCa (hazard ratio: 1.38; p = 0.67). CONCLUSION: In this analysis we did not show evidences supporting a detrimental role of Selenium and Lycopene supplementation in increasing PCa after 2 years of therapy, nor supporting a protective role.

Intravesical gemcitabine therapy for superficial transitional cell carcinoma: results of a Phase II prospective multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the tolerability and efficacy after 1 year of weekly intravesical gemcitabine therapy in patients with intermediate-risk and high-risk superficial transitional cell carcinoma. METHODS: A total of 116 patients with intermediate-risk and high-risk bladder cancer who had undergone transurethral resection were treated with one cycle (once a week for 6 weeks) of gemcitabine 2000 mg. Local and systemic tolerability and efficacy were evaluated. RESULTS: In terms of the tolerability of gemcitabine, 14 patients (12.0%) reported urgency, 6 (5.1%) dizziness and slight fever (less than 38 degrees C), 1 (0.8%) severe abdominal pain, with ulcerative lesions of the bladder mucosa at cystoscopy, and 1 (0.8%) parosmia. The remaining 94 patients (81.3%) did not report any local side effects during the treatment period. In terms of efficacy, recurrence developed in 29 patients (25.4%) a mean of 7 months after transurethral resection; 85 patients (74.6%) were disease free after 12 months. The univariate analysis showed a greater level of efficacy in patients with a first occurrence (P = 0.0408), patients who had had no previous treatment (P = 0.0368), and patients with Stage pTa superficial transitional cell carcinoma (P = 0.0018). The multivariate analysis did not reveal any significant data. No significant differences were found between the intermediate-risk and high-risk patients in tolerability or efficacy. No recurrence developed in 18 (75%) of 24 intermediate-risk bacille Calmette-Guérin-refractory or 7 (43.7%) of 16 high-risk bacille Calmette-Guérin-refractory patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study have confirmed the good tolerability and 1 year efficacy of intravesical gemcitabine. The treatment schedule proposed resulted in high patient compliance, and the results can be compared with the results of studies using other intravesical treatments.