New Horizons in Peripheral Artery Disease.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is the lower limb manifestation of systemic atherosclerotic disease. PAD may initially present with symptoms of intermittent claudication, whilst chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI), the end stage of PAD, presents with rest pain and/or tissue loss. PAD is an age-related condition present in over 10% of those aged ≥65 in high-income countries. Guidelines regarding definition, diagnosis and staging of PAD and CLTI have been updated to reflect the changing patterns and presentations of disease given the increasing prevalence of diabetes. Recent research has changed guidelines on optimal medical therapy, with low-dose anticoagulant plus aspirin recommended in some patients. Recently published randomised trials highlight where bypass-first or endovascular-first approaches may be optimal in infra-inguinal disease. New techniques in endovascular surgery have increased minimally invasive options for ever more complex disease. Increasing recognition has been given to the complexity of patients with CLTI where a high prevalence of both frailty and cognitive impairment are present and a significant burden of multi-morbidity and polypharmacy. Despite advances in minimally invasive revascularisation techniques and reduction in amputation incidence, survival remains poor for many with CLTI. Shared decision-making is essential, and conservative management is often appropriate for older patients. There is emerging evidence of the benefit of specialist geriatric team input in the perioperative management of older patients undergoing surgery for CLTI. Recent UK guidelines now recommend screening for frailty, cognitive impairment and delirium in older vascular surgery patients as well as recommending all vascular surgery services have support and input from specialist geriatrics teams.

Editor's Choice - An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes Following Eversion vs. Conventional Carotid Endarterectomy in Randomised Controlled Trials and Observational Studies.

INTRODUCTION: A 2011 meta-analysis comparing eversion (eCEA) with conventional (cCEA) carotid endarterectomy in 16,251 patients concluded that eCEA was associated with lower rates of peri-operative stroke and late occlusion compared with cCEA. However, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) showed no difference in outcomes. Since then, the literature contains outcome data on 49,500 patients undergoing eCEA or cCEA. An updated meta-analysis was performed to establish whether eCEA confers significant benefit over cCEA. METHODS: This was a systematic review of PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases for RCTs and observational studies (OSs) comparing eCEA with cCEA. A sensitivity analysis was also performed using data from OSs with a Newcastle-Ottawa score >5. RESULTS: There were 25 eligible studies (5 RCTs, 20 OSs) involving 49,500 CEAs (16,249 eCEAs; 33,251 cCEAs). RCT data: Compared with cCEA, eCEA did not confer significant reductions in 30 day stroke, death, death/stroke, death/stroke/MI, or neck haematoma. However, eCEA was associated with reduced late restenosis (OR 0.40; p = .001). OS data: eCEA was associated with significant reductions in 30 day death (OR 0.46; p < .0001), stroke (OR 0.58; p < .0001), death/stroke (OR 0.52; p < .0001), death/stroke/MI (OR 0.50; p < .0001), and late restenosis (OR 0.49; p = .032) compared with cCEA. RCT and OS data combined: eCEA was associated with significant reductions in 30 day death (OR 0.55; p < .0001), stroke (OR 0.63; p = .004), death/stroke (OR 0.58; p < .0001), and late restenosis (OR 0.45; p = .004) compared with cCEA. eCEA vs. patched cCEA (RCT and OS data): There were no differences between the two procedures except for neck haematoma, where eCEA was better than patched cCEA. CONCLUSIONS: Using combined RCT and OS data, eCEA was superior to cCEA regarding peri-operative outcomes (stroke, death, death/stroke) and late restenosis, but was similar to patched CEA in both early and late outcomes. This updated meta-analysis suggests that early and late outcomes following cCEA are similar to eCEA, provided the arteriotomy is patched.

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR)- and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)-associated acute kidney injury.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) after surgery or intervention is an important complication that may impact mortality, morbidity, and health care costs. Endovascular procedures are now performed routinely for a variety of pathologies that were traditionally treated with open surgery because randomized trials comparing endovascular and open surgery have shown at least equally good results and reduced complication and hospitalization rates with endovascular techniques. However, endovascular procedures have been associated with an increased risk for postoperative AKI, predominantly owing to contrast nephrotoxicity. Over the years, endovascular techniques have progressively been applied for the treatment of complex cardiovascular pathologies, and in recent years, nephrologists have increasingly encountered patients who developed AKI after endovascular aneurysm repair or transcatheter aortic valve replacement. These 2 procedures typically involve high-risk patients who have several established AKI risk factors prior to intervention. Several studies have investigated the incidence, risk factors, and natural course of AKI after endovascular aneurysm repair and transcatheter aortic valve replacement. This review summarizes current data on incidence, risk factors, pathophysiology, prognostic implications, and treatment of AKI associated with endovascular aneurysm replacement and transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

To intervene or not? A man with multidrug-resistant hypertension, endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair, bilateral renal artery stenosis and end-stage renal disease salvaged with renal artery stenting.

We report the case of a 69-year-old man with uncontrolled multidrug-resistant secondary hypertension following a 10 year history of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, with suprarenal fixation and concurrent angioplasty with stenting of the left renal artery for atherosclerotic renal disease, and progressive chronic kidney disease. Renal scintigraphy revealed complete loss of the right kidney's and severe reduction of the left kidney's perfusion and function. Following recent evidence and consultation with vascular surgeons regarding the technical difficulties of any procedure, escalation of antihypertensive treatment was initially chosen. Careful drug adjustments significantly improved but did not fully control blood pressure (BP); further, the patient experienced an acute ischaemic stroke and renal function deterioration towards end-stage renal disease within a few months. At this point, revascularization of the left renal artery coupled with three haemodialysis sessions to remove contrast media was justified as rescue therapy against permanent renal replacement therapy. Successful intervention achieved an immediate BP reduction, with BP fully controlled, despite a > 70% decrease in antihypertensive treatment, while renal function improved at 6 months from 11.5 to 22 ml/min/1.73 m(2). Renal angioplasty confers undisputed benefits in BP control and nephroprotection, and should be offered without delay to patients with renovascular hypertension and/or ischaemic nephropathy.

Impact of Fenestrated Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair on Renal Function.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (fEVAR) on renal function perioperatively and at midterm. METHODS: A case-controlled study was performed involving 58 patients (mean age 75±7 years; 51 men) who underwent elective fEVAR for a juxtarenal or short-necked abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) matched on age, sex, smoking, diabetes, and baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with a contemporaneous group undergoing open aneurysm repair (OAR) for the same indications. Perioperative incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and levels of eGFR at 30 days and 1 year were compared. A systematic literature review was performed to identify studies that had used eGFR as renal outcome after fEVAR; the pooled data were meta-analyzed using an eGFR drop >30% at 1 month and the latest follow-up as endpoints. Results are reported as the pooled proportion and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: The incidence of AKI after fEVAR was 28% compared to 10% after OAR (p=0.03). Following fEVAR, the mean eGFR dropped from 78±8 to 74±9 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at 30 days compared to a change from 79±8 to 80±16 mL/min/1.73 m(2) after OAR (p<0.01). However, the absolute drop in eGFR between fEVAR and OAR at 1 year was similar (7 mL/min/1.73 m(2); p=0.53); 7% of the fEVAR patients had an eGFR drop >30% at that point compared with none for OAR (p=0.12). The systematic literature review identified eGFR outcomes for 193 fEVAR patients. Combining these patients with the 58 from our cohort study, the pooled proportions of eGFR drop >30% were 20% (95% CI 9% to 39%) at 30 days and 8% (95% CI 0.5% to 13%) at the end of follow-up. CONCLUSION: fEVAR has a significant perioperative impact on renal function, but 1-year results are similar to OAR. fEVAR patients may benefit from targeted AKI prevention strategies that need to be assessed in relevant studies.

Acute kidney injury after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) after any type of intervention negatively impacts mortality, length of hospitalization, and perhaps long-term survival. In the case of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), the incidence of AKI ranges from 1% to 23% for elective and emergency procedures and is lower compared to open repair. The pathophysiology of AKI in EVAR is complex: contrast-induced nephropathy, renal microembolization, and acute tubular necrosis are all implicated. Prevention strategies include hydration, ischemic preconditioning, regional anesthesia, and pharmacological agents. There is no level I evidence regarding the prevention of AKI in EVAR, so this review sought to examine the mechanisms and prevention strategies for this potentially fatal complication.

Effect of thiazolidinediones on albuminuria and proteinuria in diabetes: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Because of the major clinical and economic burden of diabetic nephropathy, new therapeutic tools to delay its progression are needed. Recent studies suggest that thiazolidinediones have renal benefits. We aimed to evaluate the effect of thiazolidinediones on urinary albumin and protein excretion in patients with diabetes mellitus. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis by searching MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases (1991 to September 2009). SETTING & POPULATION: Patients with diabetes mellitus. SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES: Randomized controlled trials. INTERVENTION: Thiazolidinediones (rosiglitazone and pioglitazone) compared with placebo or other antidiabetic agents. OUTCOMES: Weighted (WMDs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs) for changes in urine albumin or protein excretion between the thiazolidinedione and control groups. RESULTS: Of 171 originally identified articles, 15 studies (5 with rosiglitazone and 10 with pioglitazone) involving 2,860 patients were included in the analysis. In participants with baseline normo- or microalbuminuria, the WMD of proportional changes between the thiazolidinedione and control groups in urinary albumin excretion measured using time-specified collections was -64.8% (95% CI, -75.6 to -53.9) and the WMD of changes in albumin-creatinine ratio was -24.8% (95% CI, -39.6 to -10.0). Overall, in participants with normo- and microalbuminuria, thiazolidinedione treatment was associated with a significant decrease in urinary albumin excretion (SMD, -0.6 units of standard deviation [SD]; 95% CI, -0.8 to -0.4). Similarly, thiazolidinediones were associated with a significant decrease in urinary protein excretion in patients with proteinuria (SMD, -1.1 units of SD; 95% CI, -1.8 to -0.4). LIMITATIONS: Significant heterogeneity across included studies in several subgroup analyses; patient-level data not available. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with thiazolidinediones significantly decreases urinary albumin and protein excretion in patients with diabetes. This finding calls for clinical trials with hard renal outcomes to elucidate the potential benefits of thiazolidinediones on diabetic nephropathy.

Evaluation of treatment with bosentan in patients with carcinoid heart disease: single center study.

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate a combined therapeutic intervention, including the dual endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan, in patients with carcinoid heart disease (CaHD). The efficacy of the treatment protocol was investigated using serological, echocardiographic, and clinical markers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Since 2003, 40 patients with neuroendocrine tumours were identified; 14 had echocardiographic findings consistent with CaHD. Six of the 14 patients with CaHD and a New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class >or= III received bosentan and were eligible for inclusion in this study. RESULTS: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) had decreased 6 months after treatment with bosentan (median: 646 pg/ml vs. 400.5 pg/ml; p = 0.02); the right ventricular systolic pressure had decreased after 3 and 6 months (median: 69 mmHg vs. 61 mmHg, p = 0.02; median: 69 mmHg vs. 48.5 mmHg, p = 0.02); the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) had significantly improved after 3 and 6 months of treatment (median: 293.5 vs. 406.5 m; p = 0.02; median: 293.5 vs. 578.5 m; p = 0.02). The NYHA functional class improved in 5/6 patients receiving bosentan. CONCLUSIONS: Combined treatment with bosentan is effective in patients with CaHD, based on functional class, 6MWD, and NT-pro-BNP. Further clarification of the CaHD fibrosis pathogenesis is needed to facilitate development of targeted antifibrotic therapeutic agents.

Inflammation and atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) associates with increased cardiovascular mortality. This appears to be predominantly due to ischaemic causes, such as myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure. The higher prevalence of cardiac ischaemia in RA is thought to be due to the accelerated development of atherosclerosis. There are two main reasons for this, which might be inter-related: the systemic inflammatory load, characteristic of RA; and the accumulation in RA of classical risk factors for coronary heart disease, which is reminiscent of the metabolic syndrome. We describe and discuss in the context of RA the involvement of local and systemic inflammatory processes in the development and rupture of atherosclerotic plaques, as well as the role of individual risk factors for coronary heart disease. We also present the challenges facing the clinical and scientific communities addressing this problem, which is receiving increasing attention.

Prevalence of risk factors for statin-induced myopathy in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

OBJECTIVES: Statins are widely prescribed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although statins offer overwhelming cardiovascular benefits, their use can be associated with the development of a statin-induced myopathy. Several factors increase the risk of developing statin-induced myopathy, including the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs4149056, located within the gene encoding solute carrier organic anion transporter (SLCO1B1). We aimed to identify the frequency of risk factors for statin-induced myopathy and establish whether the rs4149056 genotype is more prevalent in RA. METHODS: A total of 396 RA patients and 438 non-RA controls were studied. DNA samples were obtained from all patients. The SNP rs4149056 was identified using real-time polymerase chain reaction and melting curve analysis. Genotypic and allelic frequencies were calculated using the chi-squared test. RESULTS: Almost 80% of RA patients had one or more risk factor (range 1-5) for the development of statin-induced myopathy. Of the 74 RA patients treated with statins, 90% had one or more (range 1-4) risk factors. No differences in genotype or allelic frequencies were observed between RA patients and controls. CONCLUSIONS: RA patients harbour multiple risk factors for statin-induced myopathy. However, the frequency of the rs4149056 genotypes does not differ according to the presence of RA. Despite this, no cases of statin-induced myopathy were observed in this cohort over a period of four years of follow-up. Thus, we conclude that statin use among RA patients is probably safe, but large-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm this. In the meantime, it may be good practice systematically to consider and record myopathy risk factors in these patients.

Endovascular repair of traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta: single-center experience.

PURPOSE: Traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta secondary to blunt chest trauma is a life-threatening emergency and a common cause of death, usually following violent collisions. The objective of this retrospective report was to evaluate the efficacy of endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic disruptions with a single commercially available stent-graft. METHODS: Nine men (mean age 29.5 years) were admitted to our institution between January 2003 and January 2006 due to blunt aortic trauma following violent motor vehicle collisions. Plain chest radiography, spiral computed tomography, aortography, and transesophageal echocardiography were used for diagnostic purposes in all cases. All patients were diagnosed with contained extramural thoracic aortic hematomas, secondary to aortic disruption. One patient was also diagnosed with a traumatic thoracic aortic dissection, secondary to blunt trauma. All subjects were poor surgical candidates, due to major injuries such as multiple bone fractures, abdominal hematomas, and pulmonary contusions. All repairs were performed using the EndoFit (LeMaitre Vascular) stent-graft. RESULTS: Complete exclusion of the traumatic aortic disruption and pseudoaneurysm was achieved and verified at intraoperative arteriography and on CT scans, within 10 days of the repair in all patients. In 1 case the deployment of a second cuff was necessary due to a secondary endoleak. In 2 cases the left subclavian artery was occluded to achieve adequate graft fixation. No procedure-related deaths have occurred and no cardiac or peripheral vascular complications were observed within the 12 months (range 8-16 months) follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first time the EndoFit graft has been utilized in the treatment of thoracic aortic disruptions secondary to chest trauma. The repair of such pathologies is technically feasible and early follow-up results are promising.