Gender Differences in Insurance, Surgical Admissions and Outcomes at a Kenyan Referral Hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Gender is an important factor in determining access to healthcare resources. Women face additional barriers, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Surgical costs can be devastating, which can exacerbate engendered disparities. Kenya's National Hospital Insurance Fund (NHIF) aims to achieve universal coverage and protect beneficiaries from catastrophic health expenditures. We examine gender differences in NHIF coverage, health-seeking behavior, and surgical outcomes at a tertiary care hospital in Eldoret, Kenya. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients ≥13 years admitted to the general surgery service at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital from January 2018-July 2018 were enrolled. Health records were retrospectively reviewed for demographic data, clinical parameters, NHIF enrollment, and cost information. Descriptive analyses utilized Wilcoxon Rank Sum, Pearson's Chi-square, and Fisher's Exact tests. RESULTS: 366 patients were included for analysis. 48.6% were enrolled in NHIF with significant female predominance (64.8% versus 37.9%, P < 0.0001). Despite differing coverage rates, male and female patients underwent surgery and suffered in-hospital mortality at similar rates. However, women only comprised 39.6% of admissions and were significantly more likely to delay care (median 60 versus 7 days, P < 0.0001), be diagnosed with cancer (26.6% versus 13.2%, P = 0.0024), and require a palliative procedure for cancer (44.1% versus 13.0%, P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Many financial and cultural barriers exist in Kenya that prevent women from accessing healthcare as readily as men, persisting despite higher rates of NHIF coverage amongst female patients. Investigation into extra-hospital costs and social disempowerment for women may elucidate key needs for achieving health equity.

Bilateral trauma case conferences: an approach to global surgery equity through a virtual education exchange.

Purpose: With increased interest in international surgical experiences, many residency programs have integrated global surgery into their training curricula. For surgical trainees in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), physical exchange can be costly, and laws in high-income countries (HICs) prevent LMIC trainees from practicing surgery while on visiting rotations. To enrich the educational experience of trainees in both settings, we established a monthly virtual trauma conference between surgery training programs. Methods: General surgery teams from two public institutions, a public university with two surgical training programs in Kenya and a public university with two level I trauma centers in the United States, meet monthly to discuss complex and interesting trauma patients. A trainee from each institution presents a clinical case vignette and supplements the case with pertinent peer-reviewed literature. The attendees then answer a series of multiple-choice questions like those found on surgery board exams. Results: Monthly case conferences began in September 2017 with an average of 24 trainees and consultant surgeons. Case discussions serve to stimulate dialogue on patient presentation and management, highlighting cost-conscious, high-quality care and the need to adapt practice patterns to meet resource constraints and provide culturally appropriate care. Conclusion: Our 5-year experience with this virtual case conference has created a unique and robust surgical education experience for trainees and surgeons who have withstood the effects of the pandemic. These case conferences have not only strengthened the camaraderie between our departments, but also promoted equity in global surgery education and prioritized the learning of trainees from both settings.

AMPATH surgical app: Low-cost simulator for the open appendectomy.

BACKGROUND: Due to a shortage and maldistribution of surgeons within Kenya, doctors with limited formal surgical training often perform emergency surgical procedures such as appendectomy. This lack of training can compromise patient outcomes and complicate care delivery. Our aim was to develop a low-cost simulator and skills curriculum to effectively teach open appendectomy. METHODS: Surgeons from 4 countries participated in semi-structured interviews to define the steps and technique of open appendectomy using cognitive task analysis. Using this input, our Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare surgical team developed a curriculum, including a simulator and feedback mechanism. Surgeons and surgical trainees from Kenya and the United States tested the simulator prototype and provided feedback for its refinement based on clarity, utility, and realism. RESULTS: Instructions for a self-constructed simulator were developed at the cost of 70 Kenyan shillings (0.64 US dollars). Fifteen surgeons and surgical residents gave feedback on the simulator and curriculum, and each was presented with an updated version based on feedback. Overall, the curriculum was clear, with each sub-step receiving a median score of ≥83.5 out of 100 for clarity; however, through iterative design, the utility of sub-steps on the simulator improved. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive open appendectomy curriculum, including a low-cost appendectomy simulator model, was developed and refined using surgeon feedback. Such curricula may benefit trainees in low-resource settings who may otherwise have limited access to quality training material.

Use of a Novel Trigger Tool to Identify Palliative Care Needs in Surgical Patients at a National Referral Hospital in Kenya: A Pilot Study.

Background: Addressing unmet palliative care needs in high-risk surgical patients in low- and middle-income countries must include innovative approaches to limitations in personnel and culturally acceptable assessment modalities. Objectives: We assessed the utility of a novel seven-item "Step-1" trigger tool in identifying surgical patients who may benefit from palliative care. Design: All adult patients (≥18 years) on general surgery, neurosurgery, and orthopedic surgery wards were enrolled over a four-month period. Setting/Subjects: This study took place at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH), one of two Kenyan national referral hospitals. Measurements: The "Step-1" trigger tool was administered, capturing provider estimates of prognosis, cancer history, social barriers, admission frequency, hospice history, symptom burden, and functional decline/wasting. A cut-point of ≥3 positive factors was selected, indicating a patient may benefit from palliative care. Results: A total of 411 patients were included for analysis. Twenty-five percent (n = 102) of patients had scores ≥3. The cut-point of ≥3 was significantly associated with identifying high-risk patients (HRP; χ2 = 32.3, p < 0.01), defined as those who died or were palliatively discharged, with a sensitivity and specificity of 63.9% and 78.9%, respectively. Survey questions with the highest overall impact included: "Would you be not surprised if the patient died within 12 months?," "Are there uncontrolled symptoms?," and "Is there functional decline/wasting?" Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates that the "Step-One" trigger tool is a simple and effective method to identify HRP in resource-limited settings. Although this study identified three highly effective questions, the seven-question assessment is flexible and can be adapted to different settings.

Pediatric Trauma Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Brief Review of the Current State and Recommendations for Management and a Way Forward.

Traumatic injuries are a significant cause of death and disability worldwide. The vast majority of these injuries occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Attention to protocolized care and adaptations to treatments based on availability of resources, regionalization of care, and the development of centers of excellence within each LMIC are crucial to improving outcomes and lowering trauma-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Given limitations in the availability of the resources necessary to provide the levels of care found in high-income countries, strategies to prevent trauma and make the best use of available resources when prevention fails, and thus achieve the best possible outcomes for injured and critically ill children, are vital. Overall, a commitment on the part of governments in LMICs to the provision of adequate health care services to their populations will improve the outcomes of injured children. This review details the evaluation and management of traumatic injuries in pediatric patients and gives some recommendations for improvements to trauma care in LMICs.