Efficacy of Intraperitoneal 0.2% Ropivacaine With Dexmedetomidine Versus 0.2% Ropivacaine With Ketamine in Laparoscopic Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Effective pain management modalities are the armamentarium for enhanced recovery in laparoscopic surgeries. Intraperitoneal instillation of local anaesthetics with adjuvants is advantageous in minimizing pain. So, we designed this study with the aim to compare the analgesic effectiveness of intraperitoneal ropivacaine with adjuvants like dexmedetomidine versus ketamine for postoperative analgesia. OBJECTIVE:  The objective of this study is to assess the total duration of analgesia and total rescue analgesic dose requirements in the first 24 hours postoperatively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 105 consenting patients for elective laparoscopic surgeries were enrolled and divided into three groups by computer-generated randomization as follows: Group 1: 30 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine with ketamine 0.5 mg/kg diluted to 1 ml; Group 2: 30 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg/kg diluted to 1 ml; Group 3: 30 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine with 1 ml of normal saline. The postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, total duration of analgesia, and total analgesic dose were calculated and compared among the three groups. RESULTS: The postoperative analgesic duration after intraperitoneal instillation of Group 2 was longer as compared to Group 1. The total analgesic requirement was lower in Group 2 as compared to Group 1, and the p-value was significant (p ≤ 0.001) for both parameters. Demographic parameters and VAS scores among the three groups were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: We conclude that intraperitoneal instillation of local anaesthetics with adjuvants is effective for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic surgeries, and ropivacaine 0.2% with dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg/kg is more effective when compared to ropivacaine 0.2% with ketamine 0.5 mg/kg.

A Comparative Study of Intrathecal Fentanyl and Nalbuphine as an Adjuvant to Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Spinal Anesthesia in Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgeries: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Spinal anaesthesia is the most commonly used technique for lower limb orthopaedic surgeries as it is economical and easy to administer. Opioids as adjuvants to local anaesthetics during spinal anaesthesia have played a vital role in reducing post-operative pain qualitatively and effectively. METHODS: This prospective randomised study was conducted on 100 patients divided into two groups scheduled for lower limb orthopaedic surgeries. Group bupivacaine fentanyl (BF) received 25 mcg of fentanyl with 15 mg of bupivacaine and Group bupivacaine nalbuphine (BN) received 1 mg of nalbuphine and 15 mg of 0.5% bupivacaine. The aim of the study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of intrathecal fentanyl and nalbuphine as an adjuvant to hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia. Duration of effective analgesia, haemodynamic parameters, onset and duration of sensory and motor block, adverse effects, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score were assessed. RESULTS: Duration of effective analgesia was 388±24.88 minutes in the BN group and was higher (p-value <0.001) in comparison to the BF group, which was 304.70±15.76 minutes. CONCLUSION: Nalbuphine was more effective than fentanyl in providing post-operative analgesia when used as an adjuvant to hyperbaric bupivacaine.

Predictive Value of Modified Mallampati Test and Upper Lip Bite Test Concerning Cormack and Lehane's Laryngoscopy Grading in the Anticipation of Difficult Intubation: A Cross-Sectional Study at a Tertiary Care Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India.

Background and objective Many tests are at hand to predict difficult intubation preoperatively to prevent morbidity and mortality of unanticipated difficult intubation. The present study was conducted to evaluate and compare the efficacy of the modified Mallampati test (MMT) and upper lip bite test (ULBT) to foresee difficult intubation. Materials and methods After obtaining written informed consent, this prospective comparative observational study was conducted on 225 patients scheduled for elective surgery under general endotracheal anesthesia. Preoperative MMT and ULBT were performed. MMT Grade III, IV, and ULBT Grade IV were regarded as predictors of difficult intubation. The laryngoscopic view was graded as per Cormack and Lehane's laryngoscopic grading after induction of anesthesia by an experienced anesthesiologist ignorant of preoperative airway evaluation. Patients with Cormack and Lehane Class III and IV were regarded as difficult intubation. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of MMT and ULBT were computed. Agreement between two tests with the Cormack Lehane test was determined by the Kappa coefficient. Results In our research, the occurrence of difficult intubation was found to be 10.2% (23 cases of difficult intubation out of 225 patients). In our analysis, we found the sensitivity (95.5% vs. 95.4%), specificity (54.8% vs 50.0%), positive predictive value (91.6% vs 93.1%), and negative predictive value (39.1% vs 39.1%) were almost comparable between modified Mallampati test and upper lip bite test. Kappa coefficient for the upper lip bite test (0.492) was slightly higher as compared to modified Mallampati scoring (0.454), but both the values are highly statistically significant (p-value <0.001). Conclusion Both the upper lip bite test and modified Mallampati test are comparable with each other and since the upper lip bite test is easy to perform bedside test we recommend it to be used alone or in collaboration with other tests in assessing difficult airways.