The Usefulness of Using Fiducial Marker in Proton Therapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Though the dosimetric criteria for the gastrointestinal tract were met, late gastrointestinal toxicity was seen in several cases. Therefore, we thought that it was caused by the positional variation of gastrointestine surrounding pancreatic cancer because of peristalsis. METHOD: They were confirmed by CT image regularly. And we evaluated that how much the difference of matching methods for correcting the positional variation influenced dose distribution. RESULT: The fiducial markers could follow the position of pancreatic cancer and the duodenum. But it could reproduce the dose distribution to pancreatic cancer and the duodenum. DISCUSSION: In proton therapy, the reproducible improvement of the duodenum position did not make the dose of the duodenum same as planning dose because the matching of fiducial markers made the positional relations between beam compensator and the duodenum change. CONCLUSION: The fiducial markers are useful for correcting the position of pancreatic cancer and the duodenum. But in proton therapy, it could not reproduce the dose distribution to pancreatic cancer and the duodenum.

Process of care and preliminary outcome in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: results of the 1995-1997 patterns of care study in Japan.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the practice process using the national average (NA); to compare differences in the process of care by age group; and to provide a preliminary outcome data for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer in Japan. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The Patterns of Care Study conducted a nationwide survey of the care process for Stage I-III small-cell lung cancer in Japan. Patients were divided into three age groups: <65 years (younger group, n = 73); between 65 and 74 years (intermediate group, n = 81); and >or=75 years (elderly group, n = 20). RESULTS: The NA for the total dose was 49.0 Gy, and for use of photon energy >or=6 MV, chemotherapy, and prophylactic cranial irradiation was 77.3%, 93.2%, and 1.69%, respectively. Age stratification had no impact on the variables of radiotherapy (RT) such as total dose and field size. Only 37% of patients received chemotherapy and thoracic RT concurrently. The proportion of patients who received chemotherapy and RT concurrently was 44%, 27%, and 25% of the younger, intermediate, and elderly groups, respectively (p = 0.029). Etoposide and cisplatin were less frequently used in the elderly group (>or=75 years old). Overall survival at 3 years for the entire group was 26%. The 3-year survival rate was 30% in the younger group, 28% in the intermediate group, and 9% in the elderly group. Variables found to have a significant impact on survival by multivariate analysis were the use of chemotherapy (p = 0.030), age (p = 0.032), and T stage (p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: Calculated NAs showed that the results of clinical study had favorably penetrated into the practice process in Japan. The results demonstrated that patient age significantly influenced the process of chemotherapy such as the use of etoposide and cisplatin for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer in Japan. More concurrent chemotherapy and thoracic RT and the application of prophylactic cranial irradiation for complete responders need to be investigated in the future.