Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Public Health ; 14: 977, 2014 Sep 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25239081

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: While numerous studies highlight the relevance of socio-cultural factors influencing incidence and prevalence of obesity, only a few address how obese people perceive causes and prevention of or intervention for obesity. This study contributes to a more thorough understanding of subjective aetiologies and framing themes for a mainly understudied but promising field. Thus it may serve for the development of effective public health strategies to combat obesity. METHODS: Autobiographically based in-depth interviews were conducted with 20 patients (adolescents and young adults) institutionalised in the obesity rehabilitation centre INSULA in Bischofswiesen (Germany). The data were analysed with Atlas.ti with regard to two main perspectives: (1) How the interviewees perceive 'their' obesity from a subjective point of view and (2) which conclusions they draw from their own 'story' concerning prevention/intervention strategies. RESULTS: The interviewees did not indicate a clear starting point for their overweight. Nevertheless, certain life-events (e.g. divorce or illness of parents) were identified as catalysing weight gain. As a consequence of coping with distress, body weight rises rapidly and not continuously. Obesity was generally framed as a problem primarily located within the family and not in the wider environment. Corresponding to this, the family was identified as the main and most important addressee of preventive measures. The interviewees highlighted the importance of personal responsibility as a prerequisite for self-determined action against obesity, but denied any link between responsibility and guilt. CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes substantially to a broader perspective on the prevention of obesity. First, more attention has to be paid to the interactions of medical aspects and the social dimension of obesity. Second, prevention efforts should be more aware of the relevance of subjective aetiology when it comes to the definition of reasonable and effective governance strategies in tackling obesity. Third, current assumptions concerning the importance of personal responsibility for obesity prevention might underestimate the relevance of self-determined action of the obese.


Assuntos
Comportamento do Adolescente/psicologia , Obesidade Mórbida/prevenção & controle , Obesidade Mórbida/psicologia , Programas de Redução de Peso/organização & administração , Adolescente , Adulto , Comorbidade , Depressão/epidemiologia , Pesquisa Empírica , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Educação em Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Acontecimentos que Mudam a Vida , Masculino , Obesidade Mórbida/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Fatores de Risco , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/epidemiologia , Aumento de Peso , Adulto Jovem
2.
Lancet Reg Health Eur ; 39: 100861, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38384730

RESUMO

About 500,000 patients with rare adult solid cancers (RASC) are diagnosed yearly in Europe. Delays and unequal quality of management impact negatively their survival. Since 2017, European reference networks (ERN) aim to improve the quality of care of patients with rare disease. The steering committee of EURACAN, including physicians, researchers and patients review here the previous actions, present objectives of the ERN EURACAN dedicated to RASC. EURACAN promoted management in reference centres, and equal implementation of excellence and innovation in Europe and developed 22 clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Additionally, fourteen information brochures translated in 24 EU languages were developed in collaboration with patient advocacy groups (ePAGs) and seventeen training session were organized. Nevertheless, connections to national networks in the 26 participating countries (106 centres), simplification of cross-border healthcare, international multidisciplinary tumour boards, registries and monitoring of the quality of care are still required. In this Health Policy, evaluation criteria of the performances of the network and of health care providers are proposed.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA