Recommendation for a Therapeutic Reference Range of Cariprazine-A Short Communication.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic reference ranges are essential for therapeutic drug monitoring to evaluate results and adjust pharmacotherapy. The measured serum concentrations of cariprazine-treated patients have frequently been found to lie beyond the currently used therapeutic reference range; furthermore, reliable data for establishing evidence-based therapeutic ranges are scarce. The current therapeutic reference ranges have only been estimated; however, real-world data on cariprazine are missing. Individual serum concentrations were analyzed, and the validity of the currently used reference ranges was assessed. METHODS: Serum concentrations of 19 psychiatric patients treated with cariprazine without pharmacokinetic abnormalities were retrospectively analyzed. Only the last measurement per patient was included in the analysis, and patients who underwent a dose adjustment in the subsequent 2 weeks after sampling were excluded (assuming that the target dose and response had been achieved at that time). Serum concentrations were compared with the therapeutic reference range (10-20 ng/mL) of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Neuropsychiatrie und Pharmakotherapie consensus guidelines of 2017 and with a recent recommendation for a lower therapeutic reference range (5-15 ng/mL). RESULTS: The mean serum concentration was 9.1 ± 4.1 SD ng/mL. A total of 47.4% of the values were within the therapeutic reference range of 10-20 ng/mL, and 78.9% fell within the range of 5-15 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: These results support previous recommendations for lowering the therapeutic reference range to 5-15 ng/mL. The calculated therapeutic reference range was 5.0-13.2 ng/mL. It may even be potentially lower because clinicians may have tried to titrate the dose to a serum concentration within the current therapeutic reference range of 10-20 ng/mL.

Behind the Curtain: Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Psychotropic Drugs from a Laboratory Analytical Perspective.

PURPOSE: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a well-established tool for guiding psychopharmacotherapy and improving patient care. Despite their established roles in the prescription of psychotropic drugs, the "behind the curtain" processes of TDM requests are invariably obscure to clinicians, and literature addressing this topic is scarce. METHODS: In the present narrative review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the various steps, starting from requesting TDM to interpreting TDM findings, in routine clinical practice. Our goal was to improve clinicians' insights into the numerous factors that may explain the variations in TDM findings due to methodological issues. RESULTS: We discussed challenges throughout the TDM process, starting from the analyte and its major variation forms, through sampling procedures and pre-analytical conditions, time of blood sampling, sample matrices, and collection tubes, to analytical methods, their advantages and shortcomings, and the applied quality procedures. Additionally, we critically reviewed the current and future advances in the TDM of psychotropic drugs. CONCLUSIONS: The "behind the curtain" processes enabling TDM involve a multidisciplinary team, which faces numerous challenges in clinical routine. A better understanding of these processes will allow clinicians to join the efforts for achieving higher-quality TDM findings, which will in turn improve treatment effectiveness and safety outcomes of psychotropic agents.

Changes in Psychotropic Drug Concentrations Across the Menstrual Cycle: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: The escalating prescription of psychopharmacological medications to women of reproductive age underscores the growing significance of sex-specific variations in pharmacotherapy. Despite this, clinical trials have largely overlooked these differences. Preliminary data indicate sex-specific variations in the neurobiology of affective disorders and in the metabolism, pharmacodynamics, and kinetics of therapeutic drugs. This underscores the imperative for a more nuanced exploration of menstrual cycle-dependent fluctuations in psychotropic drugs. This pilot study aimed to investigate drug and hormone fluctuations in female patients with affective disorders, aiming to enhance comprehension of the interplay between cycle-related hormone fluctuations and pharmacokinetics. The ultimate goal is to facilitate more effective and safer pharmacological therapy in the future. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from 27 patients and 27 age-matched control participants at 3 distinct time points (early follicular phase, ovulation, and late luteal phase) during each menstrual cycle. Depressive and manic symptoms were assessed, and hormone concentrations were measured in the entire sample, while drug concentrations were assessed solely in the affective disorder sample using mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Significant variations in drug concentration were observed throughout the menstrual cycle for bupropion, with a trend toward altered concentration for venlafaxine. Moreover, notable differences in hormone concentrations were identified between patients and controls, even after accounting for the impact of contraceptive use, diagnoses, and medication. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study reinforces previously reported data, underscoring the significance of sex-specific pharmacological therapy approaches. It provides further evidence supporting the interaction among sex hormones, drugs, and symptoms of affective disorders.

The Relevance of Integrating CYP2C19 Phenoconversion Effects into Clinical Pharmacogenetics.

INTRODUCTION: CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 functional status as defined by genotype is modulated by phenoconversion (PC) due to pharmacokinetic interactions. As of today, there is no data on the effect size of PC for CYP2C19 functional status. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the impact of PC on CYP2C19 functional status. METHODS: Two patient cohorts (total n=316; 44.2±15.4 years) were investigated for the functional enzyme status of CYP2C19 applying two different correction methods (PCBousman, PCHahn&Roll) as well as serum concentration and metabolite-to-parent ratio of venlafaxine, amitriptyline, mirtazapine, sertraline, escitalopram, risperidone, and quetiapine. RESULTS: There was a decrease in the number of normal metabolizers of CYP2C19 and an increase in the number of poor metabolizers. When controlled for age, sex, and, in the case of amitriptyline, venlafaxine, and risperidone, CYP2D6 functional enzyme status, an association was observed between the CYP2C19 phenotype/functional enzyme status and serum concentration of amitriptyline, sertraline, and escitalopram. DISCUSSION: PC of CYP2C19 changes phenotypes but does not improve correlations with serum concentrations. However, only a limited number of patients received perturbators of CYP2C19. Studies with large numbers of patients are still lacking, and thus, it cannot be decided if there are minor differences and which method of correction to use. For the time being, PC is relevant in individual patients treated with CYP2C19-affecting drugs, for example, esomeprazole. To ensure adequate serum concentrations in these patients, this study suggests the use of therapeutic drug monitoring.

Risk Phenotypes, Comorbidities, Pharmacotherapy, and Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) in a Cohort with Difficult-to-Treat Depression in Comparison to an Unmedicated Control Group.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 15-25% of depressed patients suffer from difficult-to-treat depression (DTD). Patients with DTD require a thorough examination to avoid the oversight of treatable (psychiatric/somatic) comorbidities or (pseudo-)resistance to antidepressant drugs (ADs). Polymorphisms of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes 2D6 and 2C19, which play a major role in the metabolism of ADs, may contribute to resistance to ADs. Patients with DTD might benefit from electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). METHODS: We enrolled 109 patients with DTD and 29 untreated depressed controls (UDC). We assessed risk phenotypes, comorbidities, and treatment, including ECT. We also performed pharmacokinetic analyses of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19. RESULTS: DTD patients significantly more often suffered from comorbid psychiatric diseases, especially ICD-10: F40-F48 (DTD:40.4%, UDC:17.2%, OR 11.87, p=0.011) than UDC patients. DTD patients receiving ECT were more likely to achieve remission (37.7% vs. 11.8%, OR=3.96, p=0.023). Treatment with ADs did not differ between remitters and non-remitters. No significant differences were observed in the distribution of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 variants between both groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with DTD appear to experience comorbid neurotic stress and somatoform disorders (ICD-10: F40 - F48) more frequently. Therefore, a comprehensive differential diagnosis is crucial when patients do not respond sufficiently to antidepressant medication. Genotyping CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 should be considered.

Psychotropic medication in pregnancy and lactation and early development of exposed children.

There is still limited knowledge about alterations of blood concentrations of psychotropic drugs during pregnancy, the transfer of psychotropic drugs into breastmilk and the effects on exposed children. We investigated changes in concentrations of psychopharmacological medication during pregnancy and lactation in serum and breastmilk at different time points in a naturalistic sample of 60 mothers and observed the development of the exposed children in the first 12 months. We found a decrease in serum concentrations from the first to the second trimester of amitriptyline, duloxetine, escitalopram, quetiapine and sertraline. Citalopram stayed rather stable during pregnancy, sertraline levels interestingly increased again from the second to the third trimester. High concentration-by-dose ratios in breastmilk were found for venlafaxine as well as lamotrigine, low for quetiapine and clomipramine. Similarly, clomipramine and quetiapine showed low milk/serum-penetration ratios. Regarding the birth outcome measures in children, we found no significant differences between in utero exposed compared to nonexposed newborns. There were no significant differences in the development in the first 12 months. Psychotropic medication in the peripartum needs a balancing of risks and benefits and a continuous therapeutic drug monitoring can be a guidance for clinicians to monitor drug alteration patterns, which are likely to occur due to physiological pregnancy-associated changes in pharmacokinetics. Accordingly, therapeutic drug monitoring can optimize a medication in pregnancy and lactation with the lowest effective dose.

Effects of Anxious Depression on Antidepressant Treatment Response.

Anxious depression represents a subtype of major depressive disorder and is associated with increased suicidality, severity, chronicity and lower treatment response. Only a few studies have investigated the differences between anxious depressed (aMDD) and non-anxious depressed (naMDD) patients regarding treatment dosage, serum-concentration and drug-specific treatment response. In our naturalistic and prospective study, we investigated whether the effectiveness of therapy including antidepressants (SSRI, SNRI, NaSSA, tricyclics and combinations) in aMDD patients differs significantly from that in naMDD patients. In a sample of 346 patients, we calculated the anxiety somatization factor (ASF) and defined treatment response as a reduction (≥50%) in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)-21 score after 7 weeks of pharmacological treatment. We did not observe an association between therapy response and the baseline ASF-scores, or differences in therapy outcomes between aMDD and naMDD patients. However, non-responders had higher ASF-scores, and at week 7 aMDD patients displayed a worse therapy outcome than naMDD patients. In subgroup analyses for different antidepressant drugs, venlafaxine-treated aMDD patients showed a significantly worse outcome at week 7. Future prospective, randomized-controlled studies should address the question of a worse therapy outcome in aMDD patients for different psychopharmaceuticals individually.

Effects of Pharmacokinetic Gene Variation on Therapeutic Drug Levels and Antidepressant Treatment Response.

INTRODUCTION: Pharmacogenetic testing is proposed to minimize adverse effects when considered in combination with pharmacological knowledge of the drug. As yet, limited studies in clinical settings have investigated the predictive value of pharmacokinetic (pk) gene variation on therapeutic drug levels as a probable mechanism of adverse effects, nor considered the combined effect of pk gene variation and drug level on antidepressant treatment response. METHODS: Two depression cohorts were investigated for the relationship between pk gene variation and antidepressant serum concentrations of amitriptyline, venlafaxine, mirtazapine and quetiapine, as well as treatment response. For the analysis, 519 patients (49% females; 46.6±14.1 years) were included. RESULTS: Serum concentration of amitriptyline was associated with CYP2D6 (higher concentrations in poor metabolizers compared to normal metabolizers), of venlafaxine with CYP2C19 (higher concentrations in intermediate metabolizers compared to rapid/ultrarapid metabolizers) and CYP2D6 (lower metabolite-to-parent ratio in poor compared to intermediate and normal metabolizers, and intermediate compared to normal and ultrarapid metabolizers). Pk gene variation did not affect treatment response. DISCUSSION: The present data support previous recommendations to reduce starting doses of amitriptyline and to guide dose-adjustments via therapeutic drug monitoring in CYP2D6 poor metabolizers. In addition, we propose including CYP2C19 in routine testing in venlafaxine-treated patients to improve therapy by raising awareness of the risk of low serum concentrations in CYP2C19 rapid/ultrarapid metabolizers. In summary, pk gene variation can predict serum concentrations, and thus the combination of pharmacogenetic testing and therapeutic drug monitoring is a useful tool in a personalized therapy approach for depression.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of sertraline in children and adolescents: A naturalistic study with insights into the clinical response and treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

BACKGROUND: Sertraline is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor with specific indications in child and adolescent psychiatry. Notwithstanding its frequent use and clinical benefits, the relationship between pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and tolerability of sertraline across indications, particularly in non-adult patients, is not fully understood. METHOD: This naturalistic therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) study was conducted in a transdiagnostic sample of children and adolescents treated with sertraline (n = 78; mean age, 14.22 ± 2.39; range, 7-18 years) within the prospective multicenter "TDM-VIGIL" project. Associations between dose, serum concentration, and medication-specific therapeutic and side effects based on the Clinical Global Impression scale were examined. Tolerability was measured qualitatively with the 56-item Pediatric Adverse Event Rating Scale. RESULTS: A strong linear positive dose-serum concentration relationship (with dose explaining 45% of the variance in concentration) and significant effects of weight and co-medication were found. Neither dose nor serum concentration were associated with side effects. An overall mild-to-moderate tolerability profile of sertraline was observed. In contrast with the transdiagnostic analysis that did not indicate an effect of concentration, when split into depression (MDD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) diagnoses, the probability of clinical improvement significantly increased as both dose and concentration increased for OCD, but not for MDD. CONCLUSIONS: This TDM-flexible-dose study revealed a significant diagnosis-specific effect between sertraline serum concentration and clinical efficacy for pediatric OCD. While TDM already guides clinical decision-making regarding compliance, dose calibration, and drug-drug interactions, combining TDM with other methods, such as pharmacogenetics, may facilitate a personalized medicine approach in psychiatry.

Serious Adverse Drug Reactions in Children and Adolescents Treated On- and Off-Label with Antidepressants and Antipsychotics in Clinical Practice.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the growing evidence base for psychotropic drug treatment in pediatric patients, knowledge about the benefit-risk ratio in clinical practice remains limited. The 'Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM)-VIGIL' study aimed to evaluate serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in children and adolescents treated with antidepressants and/or antipsychotics in approved ('on-label'), and off-label use in clinical practice. METHODS: Psychiatric pediatric patients aged 6-18 years treated with antidepressants and/or antipsychotics either on-label or off-label were prospectively followed between October 2014 and December 2018 within a multicenter trial. Follow-up included standardized assessments of response, serious ADRs and therapeutic drug monitoring. RESULTS: 710 youth (age=14.6±2.2 years, female=66.6%) were observed for 5.5 months on average; 76.3% received antidepressants, 47.5% antipsychotics, and 25.2% both. Altogether, 55.2% of the treatment episodes with antidepressants and 80.7% with antipsychotics were off-label. Serious ADRs occurred in 8.3% (95%CI=6.4-10.6%) of patients, mainly being psychiatric adverse reactions (77.4%), predominantly suicidal ideation and behavior. The risk of serious ADRs was not significantly different between patients using psychotropics off-label and on-label (antidepressants: 8.1% vs. 11.3%, p=0.16; antipsychotics: 8.7% vs 7.5%, p=0.67). Serious ADRs occurred in 16.6% of patients who were suicidal at enrollment versus 5.6% of patients who were not suicidal (relative risk 3.0, 95%CI=1.9-4.9). CONCLUSION: Off-label use of antidepressants and antipsychotics in youth was not a risk factor for the occurrence of serious ADRs in a closely monitored clinical setting. Results from large naturalistic trials like ours can contribute to bridging the gap between knowledge from randomized controlled trials and real-world clinical settings.

Patients with higher vitamin D levels show stronger improvement of self-reported depressive symptoms in psychogeriatric day-care setting.

Depression is a common psychiatric disorder among geriatric patients that decreases the quality of life and increases morbidity and mortality. Vitamin D as a neuro-steroid hormone might play a role in the onset and treatment of depression. In the present study, the association between depressive symptoms and vitamin D concentration in serum was evaluated. 140 patients of a psychogeriatric day-care unit were included. The geriatric depression scale (GDS) and the Hamilton depression rating scale (HDRS) were assessed at the beginning and end of treatment, GDS scores additionally 6 weeks after discharge from the day-care unit. Vitamin D levels were measured at the beginning of the treatment, routinely. Patients with levels below 30 µg/L were treated with 1000 IU vitamin D per day. There was no association between the severity of depressive symptoms and the concentration of vitamin D at the beginning of the treatment. Patients with higher vitamin D levels showed a stronger decline of depressive symptoms measured by the GDS during their stay in the day-care unit. We provide evidence that vitamin D serum levels might influence antidepressant therapy response in a geriatric population. Prospective studies are necessary to determine which patients may profit from add-on vitamin D therapy.

Impact of Body Mass Index on Serum Concentrations of Antidepressants and Antipsychotics.

BACKGROUND: Rates of overweight and obesity are higher in patients suffering from psychiatric disorders than in the general population. Body composition and enzyme functions are affected by overweight, and consequently, the pharmacokinetics of drugs may vary in overweight patients. Thus, overweight and obesity are important factors in psychiatric disorders and their treatment. This analysis aimed to investigate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on serum concentrations of the antidepressant drugs amitriptyline, doxepin, escitalopram, mirtazapine, and venlafaxine, and the antipsychotic drugs clozapine, quetiapine, and risperidone, taking into account the following confounding parameters: age, sex, and smoking habit. METHODS: Inpatients and outpatients (N = 1657) who took at least one of the target drugs were included in this retrospective analysis. Serum concentrations of the target drugs and their metabolites were determined at the Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy of the University Hospital of Würzburg during routine therapeutic drug monitoring (January 2009-December 2010), which was performed in the morning (trough level) at steady state. RESULTS: Dose-corrected serum concentrations (CD) of the active moiety of doxepin and venlafaxine and of O-desmethylvenlafaxine were negatively associated with BMI (partial Pearson correlation, R = -0.267, P = 0.002; R = -0.206, P ≤ 0.001; R = -0.258, P ≤ 0.001), and the CDs were different in normal weight, overweight, and obese patients (analysis of covariance, P = 0.004, P < 0.001, P ≤ 0.001). No association was found between BMI and serum concentrations of amitriptyline, escitalopram, mirtazapine, clozapine, quetiapine, and risperidone. CONCLUSIONS: In obese patients, higher doses of doxepin and venlafaxine are necessary to achieve similar serum concentrations as in normal weight patients and to avoid treatment-resistant depression.

Dose-Corrected Serum Concentrations and Metabolite to Parent Compound Ratios of Venlafaxine and Risperidone from Childhood to Old Age.

OBJECTIVE: Comparative pharmacokinetic data about the antidepressant venlafaxine (VEN) and the antipsychotic drug risperidone (RIS) over the lifespan and especially in children and adolescents is lacking. This is the first cross-sectional study that aimed to investigate differences in dose-corrected serum concentrations (CDs) and metabolite to parent compound ratios (MPRs) of VEN and RIS across the lifespan. METHODS: Patients treated with VEN and RIS at the University Hospital of Würzburg, Germany were included in the study. Serum level determinations were performed during clinical routine care. Patients with CYP2D6 influencing co-medication were excluded from analyses. RESULTS: In 953 patients (12-93 years) treated with VEN and 552 patients (7-92 years) treated with RIS, children/adolescents (<18 years) showed 11% and 19%, and 44% and 42% lower CDs of the active moieties (CDsAM) of VEN and RIS than adults and elderly (≥60 years) (Kruskal-Wallis tests; p ≤ 0.001). However, when CDs were normalized to body weight, a different pattern emerged. Gender differences, with higher CDsAM in females were present in adults and elderlies but not in children/adolescents. No gender- or age-dependent difference in MPRs was found; however, 80% of MPRs of RIS in children/adolescents were below the range of "normal" CYP2D6 function for adults. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest a higher clearance as a reason for lower CDsAM of VEN and RIS in children/adolescents compared to adults/elderlies. Metabolism of VEN or RIS by CYP2D6, characterized by MPRs, was not associated with age. However, MPRs of RIS were lower in children/adolescents, possibly due to a higher renal clearance of 9-OH-risperidone.

[Therapeutic drug monitoring to optimize psychopharmacotherapy in children and adolescents - Update and guidelines for practice]. / Therapeutisches Drug Monitoring zur Optimierung der Psychopharmakotherapie von Kindern und Jugendlichen.

Therapeutic drug monitoring to optimize psychopharmacotherapy in children and adolescents - Update and guidelines for practice Abstract. Despite the improved evidence base, many uncertainties remain in child and adolescent psychiatric pharmacotherapy about the efficacy and tolerability of drugs, which are often prescribed off-label or in combination therapy in this age group. Because medium- to long-term use is unavoidable in many cases, clinicians should minimize adverse drug reactions as far as possible and tailor an effective dosage to the individual characteristics of the patient. Not only are children and adolescents particularly vulnerable to certain adverse drug effects, they are also exposed to iatrogenic risks from dosing or application errors, which can lead to under- or overdosing with correspondingly negative effects on the success of the therapy. In addition to determining a strict indication, it is therefore essential to establish precise dosage and systematic monitoring of the safety of the psychopharmacotherapy. This article introduces therapeutic drug monitoring as a useful clinical tool and describes how its correct application in practice can improve the efficacy as well as the safety and tolerability of psychotropic therapy in children and adolescents for the immediate benefit of patients. Keywords: Psychopharmacotherapy, adverse drug reactions, pharmacovigilance, therapeutic drug monitoring, quality assurance.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antidepressants for the Treatment of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain With and Without Depression.

BACKGROUND: Antidepressants are recommended for the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain; however, target serum concentrations based on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) have not been established. Therefore, the authors analyzed routine care TDM data of antidepressants in patients with chronic pain with and without depression in terms of treatment outcomes in an interdisciplinary multimodal pain treatment (IMPT) program. METHODS: Patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and TDM for amitriptyline (n = 45) or duloxetine (n = 30) were retrospectively included. The German pain questionnaire for pain intensity and the Depression Anxiety Stress scale were applied at T0 and at the end of the IMPT program (T1). A relief of pain intensity score ≥2 was considered as a positive outcome. Comorbid depression was diagnosed based on ICD-10 criteria. Serum concentrations of antidepressants were measured for routine clinical care TDM. RESULTS: After IMPT, stress improved in all subgroups, and depressive symptoms improved only in the duloxetine group. Overall, 40% and 27% of patients in the amitriptyline and duloxetine subgroup, respectively, were responders in terms of maximum pain score relief. Responders with comorbid depression were treated with a dose that led to a 1.7-fold higher serum concentration of the active moiety of amitriptyline (amitriptyline + nortriptyline) compared with nonresponders. Similarly, a 2.3-fold higher serum concentration was observed in depressed responders than in nondepressed responders (at minimum 131.5 ng/mL). CONCLUSIONS: Dosing of antidepressants for chronic pain relief should specifically take comorbid depression into account. TDM may provide better outcomes of pain relief in an IMPT setting in patients with comorbid depression.

Nortriptyline serum concentration as a predictor for cardiac risk in amitriptyline-treated patients.

PURPOSE: Tricyclic antidepressants have been shown to affect electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters, but there is limited evidence in relation to the serum concentrations. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate a prediction of cardiac risk in amitriptyline- and doxepin-treated patients by serum concentrations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The association between serum concentrations of amitriptyline (n = 100) and doxepin (n = 71) and ECG parameters was retrospectively examined using linear regression analysis. Mann-Whitney U tests were applied to evaluate differences in QTc intervals in patients with serum concentrations above and below the upper limit of the therapeutic reference range, as well as the alert level of each target drug. RESULTS: The sum serum concentration of amitriptyline and the nortriptyline serum concentration were significantly associated with an increased PQ interval (p = 0.020, p = 0.007), as well as with increased QTcB (p = 0.012, p < 0.001) and QTcF intervals (p = 0.025, p < 0.001). The nortriptyline concentration was significantly associated with the QRS interval (p = 0.003). In patients with active moiety concentrations above the alert level (300 ng/ml) and nortriptyline concentrations above the reference range (170 ng/ml), the QTcB interval was significantly prolonged (p = 0.032, p = 0.007). No significant association with any ECG parameter was detected for doxepin serum concentrations. CONCLUSION: The effect of amitriptyline on ECG parameters may be explained by nortriptyline alone. Accordingly, with increasing nortriptyline concentrations, the potential risk for an atrioventricular block, a bundle branch block, and prolongation of QTc interval may increase significantly.

Drug-Drug Interactions Between Lithium and Cardiovascular as Well as Anti-Inflammatory Drugs.

INTRODUCTION: Lithium is the gold standard in treating bipolar affective disorders. As patients become increasingly older, drug-drug interactions leading to decreased excretion of lithium represent a key issue in lithium safety. As no study considered the effect of comedications on lithium serum concentration in combination, we aimed to quantify the impact of drugs affecting renal blood flow and function and thus potentially interacting drugs (diuretics, ACE inhibitors, AT1 antagonists, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) on lithium serum levels in addition to age, sex, and sodium and potassium serum levels as well as renal function. METHODS: Retrospective data of lithium serum levels were analyzed in 501 psychiatric inpatients (2008-2015) by means of linear regression modelling. RESULTS: The number of potentially interacting drugs was significantly associated with increasing serum levels of lithium in addition to the established factors of age, renal function, and sodium concentration. Additionally, absolute lithium levels were dependent on sex, with higher values in females. However, only NSAIDs were identified to increase lithium levels independently. DISCUSSION: Routine clinical practice needs to focus on drugs affecting renal blood flow and function, especially on NSAIDs as over-the-counter medication that may lead to an increase in lithium serum concentration. To prevent intoxications, clinicians should carefully monitor the comedications, and they should inform patients about possible intoxications due to NSAIDs.

Pathological Concentration of C-reactive Protein is Correlated to Increased Concentrations of Quetiapine, But Not of Risperidone, Olanzapine and Aripiprazole in a Naturalistic Setting.

INTRODUCTION: Infections can alter drug clearance, but the impact of inflammation-induced changes is still not well known. The aim of the investigation was to examine the effect of pathological C-reactive protein (CRP) values (≥0.5 mg/dL) and leukocyte count on the metabolism of 4 different atypical antipsychotics. METHODS: Steady-state serum concentrations of individual patients under therapy with risperidone (n=45), aripiprazole (n=30), olanzapine (n=24), and quetiapine (n=166) were retrospectively analyzed during a period of inflammation by Spearman's Rho correlation analysis. Mann-Whitney U test was applied for comparison of patients with serum concentrations above and below the upper limit of the therapeutic reference range of each target drug with regard to CRP concentration and leukocyte count. Linear regression analysis was applied to correct for confounding parameters age and sex. RESULTS: Pathological concentrations of CRP were significantly associated with elevated values of C/D of quetiapine (n=166, Spearman's Rho: r=0.269, p<0.001; linear regression: p<0.001). Among patients with quetiapine serum concentrations below 500 ng/mL, CRP concentrations were significantly (p=0.006) lower compared to patients with quetiapine concentrations above 500 ng/mL. A trend for a positive correlation between CRP and serum concentration was found for olanzapine (n=24, Spearman's Rho: r=0.385, p=0.063; linear regression: p=0.086). CONCLUSION: During a period of inflammation in patients taking quetiapine, according to our results, attention in dosing strategies is required to prevent toxic plasma concentrations.

Smoking Is Associated With Lower Dose-Corrected Serum Concentrations of Escitalopram.

BACKGROUND: Tobacco smoking rates in depressive patients are higher compared with the general population. Smoking was demonstrated to accelerate the metabolism of different drugs metabolized by CYP1A2, but possibly also by CYP2C19 and CYP3A4. The principle aim of the present investigation from 2015 to 2018 was to determine the differences in the pharmacokinetics of escitalopram between smokers and nonsmokers. METHODS: A group of nonsmokers (n = 88) was compared with smokers (n = 36), both receiving escitalopram, using the Mann-Whitney U test. Linear regression analysis was used to account for the impact of escitalopram dose, age, and sex in addition to smoking on the steady-state serum concentration of escitalopram. RESULTS: Smokers received by mean 17.6% higher doses of escitalopram (P = 0.026) but showed 31.9% lower serum concentrations (P = 0.031). To control for confounders, linear regression analysis showed that dose (P < 0.001), sex (P = 0.03), and smoking tobacco (P = 0.027) did significantly influence serum concentrations of escitalopram with higher levels in women and nonsmokers. CONCLUSIONS: Notwithstanding higher daily doses, smokers had significantly lower serum concentrations of escitalopram. In concordance with previous results, besides CYP1A2, a possible induction of CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 by tobacco smoke, resulting in lower serum concentrations of escitalopram in smokers than in nonsmokers, is suggested. Therefore, to provide personalized therapy, clinicians should consider smoking status and inform patients on the interactions of smoking and escitalopram metabolism.

Dried blood spot testing for estimation of renal function and analysis of metformin and sitagliptin concentrations in diabetic patients: a cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: Dried blot spot (DBS) analysis of drugs or clinical parameters offers many advantages. We investigated the feasibility of using DBS for analysis of anti-diabetic drugs concomitantly with the estimated creatinine clearance (Clcrea). METHODS: The cross-sectional study involved physicians in an enabling analysis with 70 diabetic patients and community pharmacists in a field investigation with 84 participants. All 154 DBS samples were analyzed for creatinine, metformin, and sitagliptin. RESULTS: The diabetic patients revealed of a wide range of age (32-88 years), BMI values (19.8-54.7 kg/m2), and extent of polypharmacotherapy (1-21 drugs). A correlation factor to convert capillary blood creatinine from DBS into plasma concentrations was determined. Patients' Clcrea ranged from 21.6-155.9 mL/min. The results indicated statistically significant correlations (p < 0.05) between the use of two or three particular drug classes (diuretics, NSAIDs, renin-angiotensin system blockers) and a decreased renal function. DBS concentrations of metformin ranged between 0.23-4.99 µg/mL. The estimated elimination half-life (t ½) of metformin was 11.9 h in patients with a ClCrea higher than 60 mL/min and 18.5 h for diabetics with lower ClCrea. Sitagliptin capillary blood concentrations ranged between 11.12-995.6 ng/mL. Calculated t ½ of sitagliptin were 8.4 h and 13.0 h in patients with a ClCrea above and below 60 mL/min, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: DBS allow for the analysis of concentrations of predominantly renally eliminated drugs and community pharmacists can provide a valuable contribution to DBS sampling.