[Graduates of the Model Study Courses in the Health Professions in North Rhine-Westphalia: Employment Characteristics and Competencies in Professional Practice]. / Verbleib der Absolventinnen und Absolventen der Modellstudiengänge in den Gesundheitsfachberufen in Nordrhein-Westfalen: Ergebnisse zu Beschäftigungsmerkmalen und Kompetenzen in der Berufspraxis.

AIM: The aim of this article was to present key results of the graduates' survey VAMOS. The study examined the professional status of the graduates of 12 model study courses in the health professions in North Rhine-Westphalia. The focus of the article was on the employment characteristics of the current main jobs and the application of the academic competencies in everyday professional life. METHODS: In the early summer of 2018 (April to June), 515 graduates of the model study courses in nursing (N=244), physiotherapy (N=97), speech therapy (N=95), occupational therapy (N=47), and midwifery (N=32) were included in an online cross-sectional survey. Graduating classes between the winter semester 2013/2014 and the summer semester 2017 were included. In addition, employers (N=109) were interviewed who hired graduates from the model study courses. RESULTS: The main jobs of the graduates were mostly located in hospitals and outpatient therapy practices. Eight out of ten graduates (84%) performed tasks in direct contact with patients as the main part of their employment. In 71% of these cases, the regular tasks were combined with extended activities in comparison to colleagues without an academic degree. On average, the graduates felt confident in all competency dimensions examined in this study. In all dimensions, employers perceived a "competence advantage" for graduates compared to colleagues without an academic degree. CONCLUSION: The results of this graduate survey support the current recommendation to have the study programs in the five health care professions governed by professional laws and to enable the programs to be carried out at universities.

[Exposure to aggressive patient behaviour and its' association with the nurses' "work ability" in Germany]. / Konfrontation mit aggressiven Klienten-- Auswirkungen auf die Arbeitsfähigkeit von Pflegekräften in Deutschland.

BACKGROUND: Aggressive behavior and violence in patients, residents or clients are growing challenges in nursing. Aggressive behavior can have both, physical and psychological consequences for nurses and can lead to a reduced performance at work, demotivation, sickness absence and the premature exit from the nursing profession. To develop purposive strategies and to deal with aggressive behavior and health promotion programs, it is crucial to know more about the prevalence of aggressive behavior from patients and the effect on the work ability of nurses in different types of institutions. METHOD: Data of 1735 German nurses was derived from the European NEXT-Study. Description and analysis of variance for each working area (hospital ward, Intensive Care Unit, psychiatric ward, nursing home and home care) were conducted. The work ability was measured with the Work Ability Index (WAI). The aggressive behavior was measured by one item developed by the NEXT Study Group. Linear regression models were applied to analyze the effect of aggressive behavior on the work ability of nurses in a comparison of the five different working areas. RESULTS: A total of 84.9 percent of the nurses were "sometimes" or "often/always" confronted with aggressive behavior from patients. In the comparison of the five working areas, nurses were exposed to different levels of aggressive behavior, while differences in the work ability of nurses were also observed. It was found that aggressive behavior from patients was associated with reduced work ability in nurses working in hospital wards, nursing homes and home care, but not nurses working in ICUs and psychiatric wards. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that many nurses in Germany are exposed to aggressive behavior from patients, which has negative effect on the nurses' work ability. However, it is assumed that strategies to deal with aggressive behavior could play a buffer role between aggressive behavior and work ability of nurses, highlighting one possibility of intervention in future.

Assessing the effect of a complex psychosocial intervention: a methodological note on determining measurement intervals.

AIM: Guidelines describing how to carry out a randomised controlled trial (RCT) provide no advice concerning when to measure an intervention effect. Possibly as a result, most papers give no rationales for the time frames chosen for data collection. This paper discusses four general strategies to identify when to collect data. Furthermore, an additional individual strategy concerning the current German young carers project is presented. BACKGROUND: The first German young carers project is being implemented and evaluated in a pilot study's RCT. Organisational difficulties as well as problems accessing the field led to a delay in the research and ended with a change to the overall timeframe for data assessment. This process resulted in a discussion by the research team about whether the shorter timeframe would lead to biased data. DISCUSSION: The authors discuss how they reviewed the literature and decided how to determine the best point to conduct follow ups with their study participants. CONCLUSION: The authors conclude that the standard three-month intervals used in RCTs are not necessarily applicable to psychosocial interventions and researchers should determine more appropriate intervals where possible.

The use of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in children and adolescents as an outcome criterion to evaluate family oriented support for young carers in Germany: an integrative review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Young people below the age of 18, whose lives are affected by looking after a relative with a disability or long-term illness, are called young carers. Evidence based family oriented support for young carers and their families in Germany is currently being developed. To allow for scientific evaluation, an outcome criterion needs to be chosen. Until today, there are no assessment instruments available, which focus on young carer's specific demands and needs. As HRQOL seems to be an adequate alternative outcome criterion, an integrative review of the literature was carried out to verify this assumption. METHODS: The aim of the integrative review was to get information about a) the concept and the common definition of HRQOL in children, b) preferable HRQOL assessment techniques in children, and c) the relevance of HRQOL measures for the population of young carers. An additional aim of the review was to give advice on which instrument fits best to assess young carer's HRQOL in Germany. Searches were conducted in PubMed in order to obtain papers reporting about a) the development or psychometric assessment of instruments measuring HRQOL in children and adolescents up to the age of 18, and b) on the conceptual framework of HRQOL in children. RESULTS: HRQOL is a multidimensional construct covering physical, emotional, mental, social, and behavioural components of well-being and functioning as subjective perceived by a person depending on the cultural context and value system one is living in. Young carer's problems and needs are well covered by these common domains of HRQOL. Since no specific HRQOL-measures are available to address young carers, a generic one has to be chosen which a) has been created for use in children, b) allows self- and proxy-report, and c) has good psychometric testing results. Comparing four generic measures with currently best published psychometric testing results, items of the KIDSCREEN cover young carer's specific problems most accurate. CONCLUSION: The KIDSCREEN questionnaires seems adequate to evaluate the intervention as their items cover young carer's needs and problems most accurate.

Implementing and evaluating the first german young-carers project: intentions, pitfalls and the need for piloting complex interventions.

The aim of the study was to develop, implement and evaluate a concept for the first support program for young carers and their families in Germany. This paper intends to critically review the implementation of that study and describe the problems experienced by the research team, including: the complexity of the intervention itself, the difficulty of finding host organizations, the lack of infrastructure, different values and beliefs about the project aims held between the host organization and the research team, shortage of time, identifying and recruiting families among the hidden population of young carers. These initial problems led to the re-constructuring of the original research design. In order to evaluate factors that influenced these difficulties, the original research intentions, emerging problems and their consequences will be presented.

Germany's First Young Carers Project's Impact on the Children: Relieving the Entire Family. A Qualitative Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: In 2009, the first German young carers project "SupaKids" was implemented in a large German city. The project's concept was mainly based on findings of a prior Grounded Theory study, and the concept's aim was to focus on supporting enrolled families (especially the children) in order to prevent negative effects. Quantitative as well as qualitative data have been assessed for the project's evaluation. In this paper, first results on the mainly qualitative evaluation concerning the project's impact are presented. RESULTS: The project has an impact on the entire family. Both parents and children perceive the project as a kind of shelter, where they a) are allowed to be as they are, b) don't have to explain themselves, c) meet others in similar situations, d) may deposit their sorrows, e) have a first port of call for any problem, f) experience a hiatus from the domestic situation, and g) find friends and peers. All enrolled families value this shelter as a copious relief. CONCLUSIONS: The project's concept has delivered an optimal performance in practice: the family-orientation seems to be appropriate, the concept's modules seem to be all-embracing, and the modular body of the concept has been confirmed. The project relieves the entire family. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00734942.