Helical Behavior of the Interdomain Linker of the Escherichia coli AraC Protein.

In Escherichia coli, the dimeric AraC protein actively represses transcription from the l-arabinose araBAD operon in the absence of arabinose but induces transcription in its presence. Here we provide evidence that, in shifting from the repressing to the inducing state, the behavior of the interdomain linker shifts from that of an α helix to that of a more flexible form. In vivo and in vitro experiments show that AraC with a linker sequence that favors helix formation is shifted toward the repressing state in the absence and presence of arabinose. Conversely, AraC containing a linker sequence that is unfavorable for helix formation is shifted toward the inducing state. Experiments in which the presumed helical linker is shortened or lengthened, protein helical twist experiments, are also consistent with a helix transition mechanism. Previous experiments have shown that, upon the binding of arabinose, the apparent rigidity with which the DNA binding domains of AraC are held in space decreases. Thus, arabinose likely controls the stability or rigidity of the interdomain linker. Circular dichroism experiments with peptides show that the helicity of the linker sequence can be controlled by the helicity of residues preceding the linker, providing a plausible mechanism for arabinose to control the repressing-inducing state of AraC protein.

Arabinose Alters Both Local and Distal H-D Exchange Rates in the Escherichia coli AraC Transcriptional Regulator.

In the absence of arabinose, the dimeric Escherichia coli regulatory protein of the l-arabinose operon, AraC, represses expression by looping the DNA between distant half-sites. Binding of arabinose to the dimerization domains forces AraC to preferentially bind two adjacent DNA half-sites, which stimulates RNA polymerase transcription of the araBAD catabolism genes. Prior genetic and biochemical studies hypothesized that arabinose allosterically induces a helix-coil transition of a linker between the dimerization and DNA binding domains that switches the AraC conformation to an inducing state [Brown, M. J., and Schleif, R. F. (2019) Biochemistry, preceding paper in this issue (DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.9b00234)]. To test this hypothesis, hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry was utilized to identify structural regions involved in the conformational activation of AraC by arabinose. Comparison of the hydrogen-deuterium exchange kinetics of individual dimeric dimerization domains and the full-length dimeric AraC protein in the presence and absence of arabinose reveals a prominent arabinose-induced destabilization of the amide hydrogen-bonded structure of linker residues (I167 and N168). This destabilization is demonstrated to result from an increased probability to form a helix capping motif at the C-terminal end of the dimerizing α-helix of the dimerization domain that preceeds the interdomain linker. These conformational changes could allow for quaternary repositioning of the DNA binding domains required for induction of the araBAD promoter through rotation of peptide backbone dihedral angles of just a couple of residues. Subtle changes in exchange rates are also visible around the arabinose binding pocket and in the DNA binding domain.

A genetic and physical study of the interdomain linker of E. Coli AraC protein--a trans-subunit communication pathway.

Genetic experiments with full length AraC and biophysical experiments with its dimerization domain plus linker suggest that arabinose binding to the dimerization domain changes the properties of the inter-domain linker which connects the dimerization domain to the DNA binding domain via interactions that do not depend on the DNA binding domain. Normal AraC function was found to tolerate considerable linker sequence alteration excepting proline substitutions. The proline substitutions partially activate transcription even in the absence of arabinose and hint that a structural shift between helix and coil may be involved. To permit fluorescence anisotropy measurements that could detect arabinose-dependent dynamic differences in the linkers, IAEDANS was conjugated to a cysteine residue substituted at the end of the linker of dimerization domain. Arabinose, but not other sugars, decreased the steady-state anisotropy, indicating either an increase in mobility and/or an increase in the fluorescence lifetime of the IAEDANS. Time-resolved fluorescence measurements showed that the arabinose-induced anisotropy decrease did not result from an increase in the excited-state lifetime. Hence arabinose-induced decreases in anisotropy appear to result from increased tumbling of the fluorophore. Arabinose did not decrease the anisotropy in mutants incapable of binding arabinose nor did it alter the anisotropy when IAEDANS was conjugated elsewhere in the dimerization domain. Experiments with heterodimers of the dimerization domain showed that the binding of arabinose to one subunit of the dimer decreases the fluorescence anisotropy of only a fluorophore on the linker of the other subunit.

Mutations in LOXHD1, a recessive-deafness locus, cause dominant late-onset Fuchs corneal dystrophy.

Fuchs corneal dystrophy (FCD) is a genetic disorder of the corneal endothelium and is the most common cause of corneal transplantation in the United States. Previously, we mapped a late-onset FCD locus, FCD2, on chromosome 18q. Here, we present next-generation sequencing of all coding exons in the FCD2 critical interval in a multigenerational pedigree in which FCD segregates as an autosomal-dominant trait. We identified a missense change in LOXHD1, a gene causing progressive hearing loss in humans, as the sole variant capable of explaining the phenotype in this pedigree. We observed LOXHD1 mRNA in cultured human corneal endothelial cells, whereas antibody staining of both human and mouse corneas showed staining in the corneal epithelium and endothelium. Corneal sections of the original proband were stained for LOXHD1 and demonstrated a distinct increase in antibody punctate staining in the endothelium and Descemet membrane; punctate staining was absent from both normal corneas and FCD corneas negative for causal LOXHD1 mutations. Subsequent interrogation of a cohort of >200 sporadic affected individuals identified another 15 heterozygous missense mutations that were absent from >800 control chromosomes. Furthermore, in silico analyses predicted that these mutations reside on the surface of the protein and are likely to affect the protein's interface and protein-protein interactions. Finally, expression of the familial LOXHD1 mutant allele as well as two sporadic mutations in cells revealed prominent cytoplasmic aggregates reminiscent of the corneal phenotype. All together, our data implicate rare alleles in LOXHD1 in the pathogenesis of FCD and highlight how different mutations in the same locus can potentially produce diverse phenotypes.

Computational and experimental investigation of constitutive behavior in AraC.

Many mutations in the N-terminal arm of AraC result in constitutive behavior in which transcription of the araBAD genes occurs even in the absence of arabinose. To begin to understand the mechanism underlying this class of mutations, we used molecular dynamics with self-guided Langevin dynamics to simulate (1) wild-type (WT) AraC, (2) known constitutive mutants resulting from alterations in the regulatory arm, particularly alanine and glycine substitutions at residue 8 because P8G is constitutive, whereas P8A behaves like wild type, and (3) selected variant AraC proteins containing alterations in the dimerization core. In all of the constitutive arm mutants, but not the WT protein, residues 37-42, which are located in the core of the dimerization domain, became restructured. This raised the question of whether or not these structural changes are an obligatory component of constitutivity. Using molecular dynamics, we identified alterations in the core that produced a similar restructuring. The corresponding mutants were constructed and their ara constitutivity status was determined experimentally. Because the core mutants were not found to be constitutive, we conclude that restructuring of core residues 37-42 does not, itself, lead to constitutivity of AraC. The available data lead to the hypothesis that the interaction of the N-terminal arm with something other than the front lip is the primary determinant of the inducing versus repressing state of AraC.

Modulation of DNA binding by gene-specific transcription factors.

The transcription of many genes, particularly in prokaryotes, is controlled by transcription factors whose activity can be modulated by controlling their DNA binding affinity. Understanding the molecular mechanisms by which DNA binding affinity is regulated is important, but because forming definitive conclusions usually requires detailed structural information in combination with data from extensive biophysical, biochemical, and sometimes genetic experiments, little is truly understood about this topic. This review describes the biological requirements placed upon DNA binding transcription factors and their consequent properties, particularly the ways that DNA binding affinity can be modulated and methods for its study. What is known and not known about the mechanisms modulating the DNA binding affinity of a number of prokaryotic transcription factors, including CAP and lac repressor, is provided.

Understanding the basis of a class of paradoxical mutations in AraC through simulations.

Most mutations at position 15 in the N-terminal arm of the regulatory protein AraC leave the protein incapable of responding to arabinose and inducing the proteins required for arabinose catabolism. Mutations at other positions of the arm do not have this behavior. Simple energetic analysis of the interactions between the arm and bound arabinose do not explain the uninducibility of AraC with mutations at position 15. Extensive molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, carried out largely on the Open Science Grid, were done of the wild-type protein with and without bound arabinose and of all possible mutations at position 15, many of which were constructed and measured for this work. Good correlation was found for deviation of arm position during the simulations and inducibility as measured in vivo of the same mutant proteins. Analysis of the MD trajectories revealed that preservation of the shape of the arm is critical to inducibility. To maintain the correct shape of the arm, the strengths of three interactions observed to be strong in simulations of the wild-type AraC protein need to be preserved. These interactions are between arabinose and residue 15, arabinose and residues 8-9, and residue 13 and residue 15. The latter interaction is notable because residues L9, Y13, F15, W95, and Y97 form a hydrophobic cluster which needs to be preserved for retention of the correct shape.

Heterodimers reveal that two arabinose molecules are required for the normal arabinose response of AraC.

AraC protein, which regulates expression of the l-arabinose operon in Escherichia coli, is a dimer whose DNA binding affinity for pairs of DNA half-sites is controlled by arabinose. Here we have addressed the question of whether the arabinose response of AraC requires the binding of one or two molecules of arabinose. This was accomplished by measuring the DNA dissociation rates of wild-type AraC and heterodimeric AraC constructs in which one subunit is capable of binding arabinose and the other subunit does not bind arabinose. Solutions consisting entirely of heterodimers were formed by spontaneous subunit exchange between two different homodimers, with heterodimers being trapped by the formation of an intersubunit disulfide bond between cysteine residues strategically positioned within the dimerization interface. We found that the normal arabinose response of AraC requires the binding of two arabinose molecules. These results provide additional constraints on mechanistic models for the action of AraC.

A new and unexpected domain-domain interaction in the AraC protein.

An interaction between the dimerization domains and DNA binding domains of the dimeric AraC protein has previously been shown to facilitate repression of the Escherichia coli araBAD operon by AraC in the absence of arabinose. A new interaction between the domains of AraC in the presence of arabinose is reported here, the regulatory consequences of which are unknown. Evidence for the interaction is the following: the dissociation rate of arabinose-bound AraC from half-site DNA is considerably faster than that of free DNA binding domain, and the affinity of the dimerization domains for arabinose is increased when half-site DNA is bound. In addition, an increase in the fluorescence intensity of tryptophan residues located in the arabinose-bound dimerization domain is observed upon binding of half-site DNA to the DNA binding domains. Direct physical evidence of the new domain-domain interaction is demonstrated by chemical crosslinking and NMR experiments.

A Career's Work, the l-Arabinose Operon: How It Functions and How We Learned It.

Very few labs have had the good fortune to have been able to focus for more than 50 years on a relatively narrow research topic and to be in a field in which both basic knowledge and the research technology and methods have progressed as rapidly as they have in molecular biology. My research group, first at Brandeis University and then at Johns Hopkins University, has had this opportunity. In this review, therefore, I will describe largely the work from my laboratory that has spanned this period and which was carried out by 40 plus graduate students, several postdoctoral associates, my technician, and me. In addition to presenting the scientific findings or results, I will place many of the topics in scientific context and, because we needed to develop a good many of the experimental methods behind our findings, I will also describe some of these methods and their importance. Also included will be occasional comments on how the research community or my research group functioned. Because a wide variety of approaches were used throughout our work, no ideal organization of this review is apparent. Therefore, I have chosen to use a hybrid structure in which there are six sections. Within each of the sections, experiments and findings will be described roughly in chronological order. Frequent cross references between parts and sections will be made because some findings and experimental approaches could logically have been described in more than one place.

Where to From Here?

The biological-biochemical community has been shocked and delighted by the remarkable progress that has recently been made on a problem that has consumed the attention, energy, and resources of many, if not most of the scientists in the field for the past 50 years. The problem has been to predict the tertiary structure of a protein merely from its amino acid sequence. Nature does it easily enough, but it has been an incredibly difficult problem, often considered intractable, for humankind. The breakthrough has come in the form of two computer-based approaches, AlphaFold2 and RoseTTAFold in conjunction with factors such as the use of vast computing power, the field of artificial intelligence, and the existence of huge protein sequence databases. The advancement of these tools depended upon and was stimulated by the last 50 years of development of smaller and smaller and more and more powerful electronics components, mainly processors and memory. Along with the problem of protein folding, determining the function or mechanism of action of proteins has similarly limped along as did protein folding until the recent breakthroughs. Perhaps AlphaFold2 and RoseTTAFold can substantially aid in protein mechanistic studies. Now it is not completely insane to consider what might be the next grand challenge in biochemistry-biology. We offer several possibilities.

Active role of the interdomain linker of AraC.

Mutations in the interdomain linker of the gene for the AraC regulatory protein of Escherichia coli that severely interfere with the protein's ability either to repress or to activate transcription have been found. These mutations have relatively small effects on the dimerization domain's ability to bind arabinose or to dimerize the protein or on the DNA-binding domain's affinity for a single DNA half-site. The linker mutations, however, dramatically change the affinity of AraC for binding to two direct-repeat DNA half-sites. Less dramatically, the induction-deficient linker variants also display altered DNA sequence selectivity. These results show that changing the sequence of the interdomain linker can profoundly affect the dimerization domain-DNA-binding domain interactions in AraC. The smaller effects on the functions of the individual domains could be the direct result of the linker alterations but more likely are the indirect result of the altered dimerization domain-DNA-binding domain interactions. In summary, the linker does not simply function as a passive and flexible connector between the domains of AraC but, instead, is more directly involved in the protein's dimerization domain-DNA-binding domain interactions.

DNA tape measurements of AraC.

A new method for measuring distances between points in the AraC-DNA complex was developed and applied. It utilizes variable lengths of single-stranded DNA that connect double-stranded regions containing the two half-site binding sequences of AraC. These distances plus the protein interdomain linker distances are compatible with two classes of structure for the dimeric AraC gene regulatory protein. In one class, the N-terminal regulatory arm of one dimerization domain is capable of interacting with the DNA-binding domain on the same polypeptide chain for a cis interaction. In the other class, the possible arm-DNA-binding domain interaction is trans, where it adds to the dimerization interface.

Constitutive mutations in the Escherichia coli AraC protein.

The Escherichia coli AraC protein represses and induces the araBAD operon in response to the absence or presence of l-arabinose. Constitutive mutations in the AraC gene no longer require the presence of l-arabinose to convert AraC from its repressing to its inducing state. Such mutations were isolated directly by virtue of their constitutivity or by their resistance to the nonmetabolizable arabinose analog, d-fucose. The majority of the constitutive mutations lie within the same residues of the N-terminal regulatory arm of AraC. Two, however, were found in the core of the dimerization domain. As predicted by the light switch mechanism of AraC, constitutive mutations increase the susceptibility of the N-terminal arms to digestion by trypsin or chymotrypsin, suggesting that these mutations weaken or disrupt the arm structure required for repression by AraC. Fluorescence, circular dichroism, and cysteine reactivity measurements show that the constitutive mutations in the core of the dimerization domain lead to a weakening of the support for the arms and reduce the stability of the minus-arabinose arm structure. These mutations also weaken the interaction between the two-helix bundle and the beta-barrel subdomains of the dimerization domain and reduce the structural stability of the beta-barrels.

Solution structure of the DNA binding domain of AraC protein.

We report the solution structure of the DNA binding domain of the Escherichia coli regulatory protein AraC determined in the absence of DNA. The 20 lowest energy structures, determined on the basis of 1507 unambiguous nuclear Overhauser restraints and 180 angle restraints, are well resolved with a pair wise backbone root mean square deviation of 0.7 A. The protein, free of DNA, is well folded in solution and contains seven helices arranged in two semi-independent sub domains, each containing one helix-turn-helix DNA binding motif, joined by a 19 residue central helix. This solution structure is discussed in the context of extensive biochemical and physiological data on AraC and with respect to the DNA-bound structures of the MarA and Rob homologs.

Functional modes of the regulatory arm of AraC.

One of the two crystal structures of the arm-dimerization domain determined in the absence of arbinose fails to show the arm, whereas the other structure does show it. The two structures lead to different pictures for the regulatory behavior of the arms. Trypsin digestion, fluorescence anisotropy, and NMR experiments presented here were designed to resolve the issue and show that in arm-dimerization domain, the arms are structured, although differently, in the presence and absence of arabinose. The arms have also been shown to interact with the DNA binding domains of AraC by their requirement for the immobilization of the DNA binding domains that is necessary for DNA looping and repression. The binding of arabinose has been shown to release the DNA binding domains and looping ceases. The picture resulting from the new experiments and the crystal structures of the arm-dimerization domain is that in the absence of arabinose, the arm adopts one structure on the dimerization domain and that the DNA binding domain then binds to this complex. Upon binding arabinose, the arm restructures and as a result, no longer serves as a gasket between the DNA binding domain and dimerization domain. The DNA binding domain is then released, subject only to the constraints imposed by the flexible linker connecting it to dimerization domain, and the protein relocates on the DNA and activates transcription.

Structure and properties of a truely apo form of AraC dimerization domain.

The arabinose-binding pockets of wild type AraC dimerization domains crystallized in the absence of arabinose are occupied with the side chains of Y31 from neighboring domains. This interaction leads to aggregation at high solution concentrations and prevents determination of the structure of truely apo AraC. In this work we found that the aggregation does not significantly occur at physiological concentrations of AraC. We also found that the Y31V mutation eliminates the self-association, but does not affect regulation properties of the protein. At the same time, the mutation allows crystallization of the dimerization domain of the protein with only solvent in the arabinose-binding pocket. Using a distance difference method suitable for detecting and displaying even minor structural variation among large groups of similar structures, we find that there is no significant structural change in the core of monomers of the AraC dimerization domain resulting from arabinose, fucose, or tyrosine occupancy of the ligand-binding pocket. A slight change is observed in the relative orientation of monomers in the dimeric form of the domain upon the binding of arabinose but its significance cannot yet be assessed.

Specific interactions by the N-terminal arm inhibit self-association of the AraC dimerization domain.

Deletion of the regulatory N-terminal arms of the AraC protein from its dimerization domain fragments increases the susceptibility of the dimerization domain to form a series of higher order polymers by indefinite self-association. We investigated how the normal presence of the arm inhibits this self-association. One possibility is that arms can act as an entropic bristles to interfere with the approach of other macromolecules, thereby decreasing collision frequencies. We examined the repulsive effect of flexible arms by measuring the rate of trypsin cleavage of a specially constructed ubiquitin-arm protein. Adding an arm to ubiquitin or increasing its length produced only a modest repulsive effect. This suggests that arms such as the N-terminal arm of AraC do not reduce self-association by entropic exclusion. We consequently tested the hypothesis that the arm on AraC reduces self-association by binding to the core of the dimerization domain even in the absence of arabinose. The behaviors of dimerization domain mutants containing deletions or alterations in the N-terminal arms substantiate this hypothesis. Apparently, interactions between the N-terminal arm and the dimerization domain core position the arm to interfere with the protein-protein contacts necessary for self-association.

Biochemical and physiological properties of the DNA binding domain of AraC protein.

Intact AraC protein is poorly soluble and difficult to purify, whereas its dimerization domain is the opposite. Unexpectedly, the DNA binding domain of AraC proved also to be soluble in cells when overproduced and is easily purified to homogeneity. The DNA binding affinity of the DNA binding domain for its binding site could not be measured by electrophoretic mobility shift because of its rapid association and dissociation rates, but its affinity could be measured with a fluorescence assay and was found to have a dissociation constant of 1 x 10(-8)M in 100 mM KCl. The binding of monomers of the DNA binding domain to adjacent half-sites occurs without substantial positive or negative cooperativity. A simple analysis relates the DNA binding affinities of monomers of DNA binding domain and normal dimeric AraC protein.

Mutational analysis of residue roles in AraC function.

The previously isolated hemiplegic, induction-negative, repression-positive mutants, H80R and Y82C, were found to be defective in the binding of arabinose. Randomization of other residues close to arabinose in the three-dimensional structure of AraC or that make strong interactions with arabinose yielded induction-negative, repression-positive mutants. The induction and repression properties of mutants obtained by randomizing individual residues of the N-terminal arm of AraC allowed identification of the domain with which that residue very likely makes its predominant interactions. Residues 8-14 of the arm appear to make their predominant interaction with the DNA-binding domain. Although the side-chain of residue 15 interacts directly with arabinose bound to the N-terminal dimerization domain, the properties of mutant F15L indicate that this mutation increases the affinity of the arm for the DNA-binding domain.