Contrast-enhanced MRI of the temporomandibular joint: findings in children without juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is highly sensitive for assessing temporomandibular joint (TMJ) involvement in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), but only sparse data exist on normal TMJ appearance in children. PURPOSE: To determine normal MRI appearance and enhancement pattern of pediatric TMJ as basis for diagnosing early arthritis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 27 children (age range, 1.2-16.8 years) without TMJ pathology undergoing head MRI, fat-saturated T2-weighted (T2W) and postcontrast fat-saturated T1-weighted (T1W) images sagittally aligned to the 54 TMJs, besides standard T1W and T2W images, were assessed for bony and soft tissue signal intensity (SI), the amount of perceptible joint fluid, and contrast enhancement (CE). RESULTS: Bone marrow SI and CE of the mandible were consistent with varying degrees of residual red marrow in 96% of joints. The mandibular condyles were mostly isointense to the ramus, but in 9% showed mild edema-like bone marrow SI and CE. Small amounts of intraarticular fluid were detected in 31% on T2W images without fat saturation and in 83% on T2W images with fat saturation as fine lines in the upper or lower joint compartment or as small dots in an articular recess. Seventy-nine percent of all TMJs showed intense joint enhancement on early images restricted to areas of intraarticular fluid. CONCLUSION: Small amounts of joint fluid with intense CE are a common MRI finding in TMJs of children without JIA and therefore should not be considered diagnostic for early arthritis.

Prevalence of Neck Pain in Patients with Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy and Short-Term Response After Operative Treatment: A Cohort Study of 664 Patients From 26 Global Sites.

STUDY DESIGN: Ambispective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: 1) To define the prevalence of neck pain in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). 2) To identify associated factors of preoperative neck pain in patients with DCM. 3) To assess the neck pain response to surgical intervention. METHODS: 757 patients with DCM were enrolled at 26 global sites from 2005 to 2011. A total of 664 patients had complete neck pain scores preoperatively (Neck Disability Index, NDI). The prevalence and severity of neck pain preoperatively and at the 6-months follow-up was summarized. Functional assessments of individuals with and without pain were compared. Associations of preoperative neck pain and related factors were evaluated. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 79.2% of patients reported neck pain while 20.8% had no neck pain. Of individuals with neck pain, 20.2% rated their pain as very mild, 27.9% as moderate, 19.6% as fairly severe, 9.6% as very severe and 1.9% as the worst imaginable. Functional status (mJOA), number of stenotic levels, age, and duration of symptoms did not significantly differ in patients with and without pain. Factors associated with the presence of neck pain were female gender, BMI ≥27 kg/m2, rheumatologic and gastrointestinal comorbidities, and age <57 years. Neck pain improved significantly from the preoperative examination to the 6-months postoperative follow-up (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Here, we demonstrate a high prevalence of neck pain in patients with DCM as well as a link between gender, body weight, comorbidity and age. We highlight a significant reduction in neck pain 6 months after surgery.

The Barrow Neurological Institute Grading Scale as a Predictor for Delayed Cerebral Ischemia and Outcome After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Data From a Nationwide Patient Registry (Swiss SOS).

BACKGROUND: The Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) scale is a novel quantitative scale measuring maximal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) thickness to predict delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). This scale could replace the Fisher score, which was traditionally used for DCI prediction. OBJECTIVE: To validate the BNI scale. METHODS: All patient data were obtained from the prospective aneurysmal SAH multicenter registry. In 1321 patients, demographic data, BNI scale, DCI, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score up to the 1-yr follow-up (1FU) were available for descriptive and univariate statistics. Outcome was dichotomized in favorable (mRS 0-2) and unfavorable (mRS 3-6). Odds ratios (OR) for DCI of Fisher 3 patients (n = 1115, 84%) compared to a control cohort of Fisher grade 1, 2, and 4 patients (n = 206, 16%) were calculated for each BNI grade separately. RESULTS: Overall, 409 patients (31%) developed DCI with a high DCI rate in the Fisher 3 cohort (34%). With regard to the BNI scale, DCI rates went up progressively from 26% (BNI 2) to 38% (BNI 5) and corresponding OR for DCI increased from 1.9 (1.0-3.5, 95% confidence interval) to 3.4 (2.1-5.3), respectively. BNI grade 5 patients had high rates of unfavorable outcome with 75% at discharge and 58% at 1FU. Likelihood for unfavorable outcome was high in BNI grade 5 patients with OR 5.9 (3.9-8.9) at discharge and OR 6.6 (4.1-10.5) at 1FU. CONCLUSION: This multicenter external validation analysis confirms that patients with a higher BNI grade show a significantly higher risk for DCI; high BNI grade was a predictor for unfavorable outcome at discharge and 1FU.