Intermediate-dose cytarabine plus mitoxantrone versus standard-dose cytarabine plus daunorubicin for acute myeloid leukemia in elderly patients.

Background: The combination of intermediate-dose cytarabine plus mitoxantrone (IMA) can induce high complete remission rates with acceptable toxicity in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We present the final results of a randomized-controlled trial comparing IMA with the standard 7 + 3 induction regimen consisting of continuous infusion cytarabine plus daunorubicin (DA). Patients and methods: Patients with newly diagnosed AML >60 years were randomized to receive either intermediate-dose cytarabine (1000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1, 3, 5, 7) plus mitoxantrone (10 mg/m2 days 1-3) (IMA) or standard induction therapy with cytarabine (100 mg/m2 continuously days 1-7) plus daunorubicin (45 mg/m2 days 3-5) (DA). Patients in complete remission after DA received intermediate-dose cytarabine plus amsacrine as consolidation treatment, whereas patients after IMA were consolidated with standard-dose cytarabine plus mitoxantrone. Results: Between February 2005 and October 2009, 485 patients were randomized; 241 for treatment arm DA and 244 for IMA; 76% of patients were >65 years. The complete response rate after DA was 39% [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 33-45] versus 55% (95% CI: 49-61) after IMA (odds ratio 1.89, P = 0.001). The 6-week early-death rate was 14% in both arms. Relapse-free survival curves were superimposable in the first year, but separated afterwards, resulting in 3-year relapse-free survival rates of 29% versus 14% in the DA versus IMA arms, respectively (P = 0.042). The median overall survival was 10 months in both arms (P = 0.513). Conclusion: The dose escalation of cytarabine in induction therapy lead to improved remission rates in the elderly AML patients. This did not translate into a survival advantage, most likely due to differences in consolidation treatment. Thus, effective consolidation strategies need to be further explored. In combination with an effective consolidation strategy, the use of intermediate-dose cytarabine in induction may improve curative treatment for elderly AML patients.

[Standard operating procedures (SOPs) for palliative care : Presence and relevance of palliative SOPs within the network of German Comprehensive Cancer Centers (CCCs) funded by the German Cancer Aid]. / Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) in der Palliativmedizin : Vorhandensein und Relevanz palliativmedizinischer SOPs in den von der Deutschen Krebshilfe geförderten Comprehensive Cancer Centers (CCCs).

BACKGROUND: Standard operating procedures (SOPs) can contribute to the improvement of patient care. OBJECTIVES: Survey the presence and relevance of SOPs for palliative care (PC) within the network of German Comprehensive Cancer Centers (CCCs) funded by the German Cancer Aid. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a descriptive survey, palliative care services within 15 CCCs funded by the German Cancer Aid were asked to rate availability and thematic relevance of (1) symptom-related, (2) clinical pathways and (3) measures- and processes-oriented SOPs using a structured questionnaire. RESULTS: Pain management SOPs were the most common (n =11; 73 %). The most thematic relevance showed SOPs dedicated to pain management, care in the last days of life and delirium and other neuro-psychiatric diseases (each n =13; 87 %), followed by bowel obstruction, dyspnoea, nausea and palliative sedation (each n =12; 80 %). CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide gap between availability and perceived relevance of palliative care SOPs within the network of German CCCs funded by the German Cancer Aid. It is obvious that there is a need for further development of relevant SOPs in palliative care.

[State of integration of palliative care at Comprehensive Cancer Centers funded by German Cancer Aid]. / Integration der Palliativmedizin in die von der Deutschen Krebshilfe e. V. geförderten onkologischen Spitzenzentren.

BACKGROUND: Similarities and differences of integration of palliative care in clinical care, research and education structures at German Comprehensive Cancer Centers (CCC) are not known in detail. OBJECTIVE: Provide an overview of availability and the way of integration of specialized palliative care at CCCs funded by the German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe, DKH). METHOD: We conducted structured interviews from May to August 2014 with heads of palliative care departments (personally or by telephone). The interviews included a quantitative and a qualitative part. Other stakeholders of CCCs were asked the questions of the qualitative part. We evaluated the qualitative data using the content analysis by Mayring and MAXQDA 11.0. SPSS 21.0 was used for quantitative analysis. RESULTS: 26 interviews were realized in 13 CCCs with 14 sites, which received funding, by DKH till August 2014 (one CCC had two university hospitals). Of these, 12 sites had a palliative care unit (86%), 11 sites had palliative care consulting services available (79%). Participation of palliative care specialists in tumor boards is not provided in 3 institutions (21%) and is often not feasible on regular basis in the other institutions, due to staffing shortage. In 7 sites (50%) defined criteria to integrate palliative care into CCCs were available. In the last 5 years specialized palliative care of 4 sites received an invitation for a research project by another department within the CCC (29%). 10 sites (71%) had started own palliative care research projects. Chairs in palliative care were available in 4 CCCs (29%). CONCLUSION: The extent and depth of palliative care integration in the 14 CCC sites is heterogeneous.

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulfan and evaluation of the bioavailability of the oral formulation in conditioning for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Busulfan (BU) is included in many conditioning protocols for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Pharmacokinetic parameters in individual patients have been related to short-term toxicity and risk of relapse after HSCT. In a series of 11 patients receiving the usual 16 x 1 mg/kg schedule over 4 days, we investigated the pharmacokinetics of replacing one dose with an intravenous formulation (BU in DMSO) which we had previously investigated in dogs. A dose of 0.5-0.6 mg/kg was used. No acute side-effects of BU/DMSO infusions administered over 1 h were observed. Bioavailability of BU powder capsules was on average 70% (range, 44-94%). Interindividual variability of the resulting AUC after intravenous doses was still substantial. Further studies are under way to define the possible role of BU/DMSO infusions in conditioning before HSCT.

Prophylaxis of fungal infections.

Considering the high morbidity and mortality of deep-seated opportunistic mycoses in severely immunosuppressed patients, strategies for prophylaxis appear to be indicated. Exposure to Aspergillus spp. can be prevented by air filtration which has been shown to reduce the rate of infection. However, Candida infections are predominantly caused by colonizing fungi; therefore drug prophylaxis is more promising. Prospective randomized studies proved the effectiveness of fluconazole (FLU) to prevent infections in patients after bone marrow transplantation.

Myeloablation by intravenous busulfan and hematopoietic reconstitution with autologous marrow in a canine model.

We have previously described pharmacokinetic studies with a dimethylsulfoxide-based intravenous busulfan preparation in a canine model and in preliminary clinical trials. Using the same intravenous busulfan preparation, we carried out a dose escalation study to determine a marrow-ablative dose and to test the ability of autologous marrow to reconstitute hematopoiesis in dogs so treated. Busulfan was given intravenously at doses of 3.75 to 40 mg/kg. Marrow ablation was achieved at 20 mg/kg given either as a single dose or in four daily increments of 5 mg/kg each. There was a relative sparing of lymphocytes. A busulfan dose of 40 mg/kg resulted in severe central nervous system toxicity. Otherwise, nonhematopoietic toxicity was minimal and restricted to mild hepatic abnormalities. Four dogs were given busulfan at 20 mg/kg followed 30 hours later by infusion of autologous marrow, and all showed prompt and complete hematopoietic reconstitution. The area under the curve (AUC) determined by busulfan concentration in plasma over time was dose dependent, ranging from 12 to 100 microg x h/mL for busulfan doses of 3.75-20 mg/kg. There was a suggestion that the plasma half-life increased at the highest busulfan doses used. Intravenous administration of busulfan circumvented differences in bioavailability; nevertheless, considerable variations in the pharmacokinetic parameters were observed between individual animals. Thus, intravenous busulfan can be given safely and is effective in ablating hematopoiesis. However, factors other than absorption influence the AUC, and individualization of dosing may be required even with intravenous administration of the drug.

Intravenous busulphan for conditioning before autologous or allogeneic human blood stem cell transplantation.

This study was undertaken to evaluate the toxicity and pharmacokinetics of a dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO)-based intravenous formulation of busulphan in the conditioning of 45 patients undergoing allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT). Busulphan was given as a single daily dose. In 15 patients a single dose of intravenous busulphan, given over 3 h in 1 d, was combined with additional oral (single daily) doses. Thirty patients received all four daily doses intravenously. Busulphan plasma levels were analysed using high performance liquid chromatography. There was no major acute toxicity with daily intravenous doses of 2.8-3.1 mg/kg infused over 3 h. No veno-occlusive disease (VOD) was seen in 30 patients receiving busulphan as an intravenous formulation over 4 d. In the group of 15 patients receiving three oral doses and one intravenous single daily dose, one patient experienced mild VOD. Pharmacokinetic samples were taken over at least 2 d of treatment in 44 patients. The area under the concentration time curve (AUC) values normalized for a dose of 1 mg/kg were 7000 ng/ml x h on d 1 and 5890 ng/ml x h on d 4, thus showing a moderate decrease over time. This was accompanied by a moderate increase of the clearance from 2.6 to 3.0 ml/min/kg. Administration of busulphan as a DMSO-based intravenous formulation was well tolerated. The total dose of busulphan can be given in four (rather than the typical 16) doses. With such a regimen, the intravenous administration becomes feasible on an outpatient basis.