Is there an elephant in the room? A study of convergences and divergences of adult attachment measures commonly used in clinical studies.

Objective: In view of the persisting conceptual confusion related to the convergence of attachment measures, we investigated several common measures within a clinical and a non-clinical sample, tested the convergence/divergence of different measures, and tried to find a dimensional model. Method: 175 patients with panic disorder/agoraphobia and 143 matched non-clinical individuals completed seven self-report attachment measures/ clinical self-reports and were interviewed by applying the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI), the Adult Attachment Rating (AAR) and the Adult Attachment Projective (AAP). Results: The categorical and most dimensional attachment measures differentiated between the samples. The convergence of the categorical measures was low, whereas we found moderate to high correlations between similar scales in the dimensional self-report measures. Expectedly, the convergence of dimensional and categorical attachment measures was low. In a factorial (exploratory as well as confirmatory) model, four independent dimensions were extracted reflecting self-rated attachment anxiety and avoidance, the categories of the AAI and those of the AAP, indicating significant differences between the measures. Discussion: Measures of adult attachment are only partially convergent, underlining the need for clarification of which aspect of attachment is actually being assessed in individual clinical investigations. The question remains whether the different measures are in fact related to one construct.

Movement and Emotional Facial Expressions during the Adult Attachment Interview: Interaction Effects of Attachment and Anxiety Disorder.

INTRODUCTION: Adult attachment is commonly associated with emotion regulation. Less is known about the nonverbal embodiment of adult attachment. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that dismissing attachment is related to less movement and fewer facial expressions of emotions, whereas preoccupied attachment is associated with more negative emotional facial expressions. Moreover, the interaction of attachment and the presence of an anxiety disorder (AD) was explored. METHODS: The sample included 95 individuals, 21 with AD without comorbidity, 21 with AD and comorbid major depression (AD-CD), and 53 healthy controls. We analyzed nonverbal behavior during a part of the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) asking about the family and parental figures. The movements of the interviewees were captured via Motion Energy Analysis. Facial expressions were coded according to the Facial Action Coding System using the OpenFace software. We compared individuals with secure, dismissing, and preoccupied states of mind (assessed with the AAI) with regard to the frequency and complexity of movements and the frequency of the facial expressions such as happy, sad, and contemptuous. RESULTS: As expected, dismissingly attached individuals moved less often and with lower complexity than securely attached. For emotional facial expressions, a main effect of the disorder group and interaction effects of attachment by disorder were found. In the AD-CD group, dismissingly attached patients showed comparatively fewer happy facial expressions than securely attached individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced movement specifically seems to be related to dismissing attachment when interviewees talk about significant parental figures. Facial expressions of emotions related to attachment occurred when maladaptive emotion regulation strategies were intensified by a psychological disorder.

Incongruence Between Implicit Attachment Schemes and Unconscious Attachment Representations.

Assessments based on reaction time and language-based interviews postulate that unconscious attachment processes be measured. Nevertheless, a possible empirical equivalence of these two approaches has not yet been investigated. To fill this void, the Adult Attachment Interview and the Implicit Association Test were implemented with a group of patients with panic disorder (n = 157, mean age = 29, SD = 2.47) based on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, axis I and II disorders and a group of healthy individuals (n = 138). In total, the securely attached individuals showed significantly more positive attitudes toward their mother than the insecurely attached individuals. In the healthy individuals, the secure and disorganized classifications showed significantly more positive attitudes toward the mother in comparison with the insecure attachment classification, as well as the patient group. In summary, implicit attachment patterns based on reaction times are not equivalent to an attachment representation based on language markers. For the disorganized attachment representation, no differences were present between the information processing of the memory/association network and the autobiographic memory function.

Implicit Attachment Schemas and Therapy Outcome for Panic Disorder Treated with Manualized Confrontation Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Different studies have shown that a patient's attachment correlates with the psychotherapy outcome. However, these findings are based on the traditional interview and paper and pencil attachment methods. Latency-based methods like the Implicit Association Test (IAT) have not yet been investigated in clinical attachment research, specifically in therapy outcome research. OBJECTIVES: It can be hypothesized that patients with positive schemas of their mother and their partner may show a better psychotherapeutic outcome than those with less positive schemas of their mother/partner. METHOD: A sample of 103 patients suffering from panic disorder with or without agoraphobia (age 36.73, SD = 10.80), including 56% of patients with affective or other anxiety disorders as comorbidities without a personality disorder, based on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-I/II), were treated with a manualized cognitive-behavioral confrontation therapy. Two IATs (for mother and partner) were implemented before the therapy (t1). The symptom reduction was assessed by the Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) with symptoms at t1 and IAT at t1 as predictors of symptoms at t2. RESULTS: The results confirmed a moderate to high therapeutic effect of the confrontation therapy. Furthermore, the mother's IAT at t1 predicted the Global Severity Index (ß = 0.20) as well as the Anxiety subscale (ß = 0.18) at t2 above and beyond the t1 measurement of the criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Implicit attitudes of the mother predicted the symptom reduction and a better therapeutic outcome. Relationship aspects with less impact awareness predicted the therapeutic outcome, even though mostly cognitive-behavioral techniques were used.

Suppressor effects in associations between patient attachment to therapist and psychotherapy outcome.

OBJECTIVE: Several studies propose that patient attachment to therapist is associated with therapy outcome. However, the magnitude of the effect is diverse, which might be explicable by suppressor effects and the new concept of pseudo-security. METHOD: Associations between patient attachment to therapist (client-attachment-to-therapist-scale [CATS]) and psychotherapy outcome ("global severity index" of the Symptom Check List) were evaluated in N = 368 patients. Multilevel models were performed. RESULTS: When tested in separate models, secure attachment to therapist was associated with a more favourable outcome (p < 0.05), whereas avoidant and preoccupied attachment to therapist were correlated with a less favourable outcome (both p < 0.05). Avoidant but not preoccupied attachment to therapist suppressed the association between secure attachment to therapist and the outcome. When controlling for the other two CATS scales, avoidant as well as preoccupied attachment to therapist remained associated with a less favourable outcome (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Avoidant attachment to therapist suppresses the association between secure attachment to therapist and psychotherapy outcome. Pseudo-security has to be taken into consideration in self-report data on patient attachment to therapist.

The alliance-outcome association in borderline and obsessive-compulsive personality disorder.

Personality disorders are considered a possible factor affecting the relationship between therapeutic alliance and therapy outcome. The present study investigated the alliance-outcome effect in patient groups with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and obsessive-compulsive personality disorder (OCPD). Data derived from a sample of n = 66 patients, treated in a day care hospital setting with a dialectical-behavioral and schema therapeutic treatment concept. Patients rated their symptom severity at admission, early alliance after 4-6 therapy sessions and symptom severity as well as alliance at discharge. Results showed no significant differences between BPD and OCPD patients regarding symptom severity and alliance. Multiple regression analyses indicated that the alliance was a significant predictor of symptom reduction, however only in the OCPD group. Our results showed an exceptionally strong alliance-outcome relationship in OCPD patients, suggesting that focusing on building a strong alliance and measuring it early in therapy may be especially beneficial for this patient group. For patients with BPD, a more regular screening of the therapeutic alliance might be helpful.

Is It Attachment Style or Socio-Demography: Singlehood in a Representative Sample.

Since the percentage of single adults is steadily increasing, the reasons for this development have become a matter of growing interest. Hereby, an individual's attachment style may have a connection to the partnership status. In the following analysis, attachment style, gender, age, education, and income were compared in regard to the partnership status. Furthermore, an analysis of variance was computed to compare the attachment style within different groups. In 2012, a sample of 1,676 representative participants was used. The participants were aged 18 to 60 (M = 41.0, SD = 12.3); 54% of the sample were female, and 40% were single. Attachment-related attitudes were assessed with the German version of the adult attachment scale (AAS). Single adult males did not show a more anxious attachment style than single adult females or females in relationships. Younger, i.e., 18 to 30 years old, paired individuals showed greater attachment anxiety than single individuals, whereby single individuals between the ages of 31 to 45 showed greater attachment anxiety than individuals in relationships. In addition, single individuals more frequently had obtained their high school diploma in contrast to individuals in relationships. Concerning attachment style, the individuals who had not completed their high school diploma showed less faith in others independent of singlehood or being in a relationship. Concerning age, older single individuals, i.e., 46 to 60 years, felt less comfortable in respect to closeness and showed less faith in others compared to paired individuals. Logistic regression showed that individuals were not single if they did not mind depending on others, showed high attachment anxiety, were older, and had lower education. An income below € 2000/month was linked to a nearly 13-fold increase of likelihood of being single. In sum, the attachment style had a differential age-dependent association to singlehood versus being in a relationship. Education played also a role, exclusively concerning faith in others.