A phase III randomized efficacy trial of 2000 mg citicoline in acute ischemic stroke patients.

BACKGROUND: Citicoline may reduce CNS ischemic injury by stabilizing cell membranes and reducing free radical generation. Previous safety and efficacy trials in patients who have had acute strokes suggested that citicoline may improve neurologic outcome with minimal side effects. OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of citicoline treatment in acute stroke patients. METHOD: An 118-center, randomized, double-blind, efficacy trial in 899 patients compared placebo (n = 446) with citicoline (n = 453) (1000 mg PO twice a day) for 6 weeks, with a 6-week post-treatment follow-up period. Patients with acute (< or =24 hours) ischemic strokes clinically thought to be in the middle cerebral artery territory with NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores > or =8 were enrolled. RESULTS: Mean time to treatment was 13 hours for both groups and mean age was 67 years for those receiving placebo and 68 years for those receiving citicoline. Mean baseline NIHSS scores were 14.5 for placebo and 13.9 for citicoline (p = 0.06); medians were 14 for placebo and 13 for citicoline (p = 0.04). The incidence and type of side effects were similar between the groups. There were no between-group differences on the planned primary analysis, percent of patients with a > or =7-point NIHSS score change at 90 days (placebo 51%, citicoline 52%). There were no between-group differences on the other planned secondary analyses at 90 days, including mortality. However, post hoc analyses using standard "excellent recovery" measures suggested a possible treatment effect on the modified Rankin 0 or 1 (last observation carried forward: placebo 20%, citicoline 26%; p = 0.025) as well as a global outcome statistic. CONCLUSIONS: Citicoline was safe but ineffective in improving the outcome of patients with acute ischemic stroke as measured by the planned analyses. Post hoc analyses suggest that a modest treatment effect may have been seen if more traditional analyses had been used.

Response of anxiety and agitation symptoms during nefazodone treatment of major depression.

A meta-analysis of six randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials was carried out to evaluate the effectiveness of the new antidepressant nefazodone in relieving symptoms of anxiety and agitation associated with major depression. Nefazodone blocks serotonin2 (5-HT2) receptors and selectively inhibits serotonin (5-HT) reuptake. This pharmacologic profile may confer clinical benefits that differ from those of other antidepressants, such as tricyclics (TCAs) and serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). The data base included 817 patients with major depression and baseline 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) scores > or = 18; 345 received placebo, 288 imipramine, and 184 nefazodone. Both nefazodone and imipramine exhibited antidepressant efficacy compared with that of placebo, irrespective of baseline anxiety levels. Statistically significant improvement in Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A), HAM-D anxiety factor, HAM-D psychic anxiety item, and HAM-D agitation item scores was observed with both active treatments. Nefazodone-treated patients showed significantly greater improvement in somatic anxiety (HAM-D item 11) ratings than placebo-treated patients from Week 4 through end of treatment (p < or = .01), while imipramine-treated patients did not differ from placebo patients on this item. Nefazodone-treated patients improved more rapidly (as early as Week 1) than imipramine- and placebo-treated patients on agitation (HAM-D item 9) (p < or = .01). Nefazodone was found to have an excellent safety profile and was well tolerated, with 5% of nefazodone patients prematurely discontinuing treatment for adverse experiences compared with 17% for imipramine and 5% for placebo treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Responders to antidepressant drug treatment: a study comparing nefazodone, imipramine, and placebo in patients with major depression.

BACKGROUND: Nefazodone hydrochloride, an antidepressant that acts as a 5-HT2 antagonist and serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine uptake inhibitor, was evaluated in a double-blind, imipramine- and placebo-controlled study involving 128 patients with major depression. METHOD: Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo (2 to 6 capsules/day), imipramine (100 to 300 mg/day), or nefazodone (200 to 600 mg/day) for 8 weeks. The principal efficacy outcome measure assessed was the number of patients who experienced an adequate response during treatment. RESULTS: Based on global improvement (Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement), 67% of nefazodone-treated patients (p < or = .01) and 63% of imipramine-treated patients (p < or = .05) responded during 8 weeks of treatment, compared with 36% of placebo controls. Sixty-two percent of nefazodone-treated, 53% of imipramine-treated, and 26% of placebo-treated patients had 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) scores < or = 10 on completion of acute treatment. Nefazodone-treated patients had a lower incidence of premature treatment discontinuation and fewer dropouts for adverse events than the imipramine group. CONCLUSION: In a three arm comparison with imipramine and placebo, nefazodone had the greatest number of patients with major depression who responded to therapy. Nefazodone, a new antidepressant with novel pharmacology, is a well-tolerated, efficacious antidepressant.

Symptom comorbidity in anxiety and depressive disorders.

The ability of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, and 50 items from the self-rated Hopkins Symptom Checklist to discriminate generalized anxiety disorder from major depressive disorder was examined for over 3,000 patients entering studies in three drug development projects at Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. Discriminant analysis models using stepwise procedures were developed for each scale separately, combining both Hamilton scales, and combining all three scales. The statistical model using both Hamilton scales produced the best discrimination. Items from the Hopkins Symptom Checklist scale did not improve the ability to discriminate patients by diagnosis correctly. The generalizability was tested by applying the discriminant models to new data sets or subsets of the data sets used in the model-building process. Correct classification rates for differentiating the two disorders ranged from 87-99% for the final model.

Placebo-controlled dose-ranging trial designs in phase II development of nefazodone.

Nefazodone is a selective 5-HT2 receptor antagonist. Nefazodone has a pharmacologic profile similar to trazodone and other phenylpiperazine antidepressants, but distinct from nonselective first-generation agents and other selectively acting second-generation agents. Results of a multicenter, double-blind, fixed-dose trial indicate nefazodone is effective in improving depressive symptoms of outpatients with major depressive disorder treated with daily doses of 100 mg to 200 mg. A comparison of the fixed-dose trial design with an alternative design permitting dose titration within fixed ranges is presented. The relative merits of each design for establishing therapeutic dose ranges are discussed.

Effect of citicoline on ischemic lesions as measured by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Citicoline 010 Investigators.

We examined the effect of the neuroprotective and neuroreparative agent citicoline on the growth of cerebral ischemic lesions in a double-blind placebo-controlled study involving patients with acute ischemic stroke using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI). Patients with acute ischemic stroke symptom onset 24 hours or less before the start of treatment, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores of 5 or higher, and lesions of 1 to 120 cc in cerebral gray matter by DWI were enrolled. DWI, T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), perfusion-weighted MRI, and magnetic resonance angiography were obtained at baseline, week 1, and week 12. Citicoline (500 mg/day) was administered orally for 6 weeks, and patients were followed for 12 weeks. The primary assessment was progression of ischemic lesion volume from baseline to 12 weeks as measured by MRI. A total of 100 patients entered the study. The primary MRI analysis included 40 placebo-treated patients and 41 citicoline-treated patients with both baseline and week 12 MRI data and failed to demonstrate a significant difference in lesion volume change from baseline to week 12. From baseline to week 12, ischemic lesion volume [all values mean (SE)] expanded by 180% (107) among placebo-treated patients compared with 34% (19) among citicoline-treated patients. In a secondary analysis, lesion volume decreased from week 1 to week 12 by 6.9 cc (2.8) on placebo versus 17.2 cc (2.6) on citicoline. Baseline variables that were predictors of change in lesion size over 12 weeks were the volume of hypoperfusion (strongest association), baseline NIHSS score, lesion volume on DWI, arterial lesion by magnetic resonance angiography, and categorized elapsed time (< or =12 or >12 hours) from stroke onset to first dose. A marked association between lesion volume reduction and improvement of NIHSS score by seven or more points was observed. Significant correlations between lesion volumes and clinical measures were found, replicating values reported in the literature for smaller case series. We observed a reduction in lesion volume growth from baseline to week 12 with citicoline treatment, with a significantly greater reduction in volume from week 1 to week 12 with citicoline. We found a significant inverse relationship between lesion volume change over 12 weeks as measured by MRI and clinical outcome for ischemic stroke. This relationship supports the role of DWI as a surrogate marker of clinically meaningful lesion progression in stroke clinical trials. The hypothesis that citicoline reduces lesion growth and improves clinical outcome will be tested further.