Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
N Engl J Med ; 390(5): 409-420, 2024 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38294973

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Studies evaluating surgical-site infection have had conflicting results with respect to the use of alcohol solutions containing iodine povacrylex or chlorhexidine gluconate as skin antisepsis before surgery to repair a fractured limb (i.e., an extremity fracture). METHODS: In a cluster-randomized, crossover trial at 25 hospitals in the United States and Canada, we randomly assigned hospitals to use a solution of 0.7% iodine povacrylex in 74% isopropyl alcohol (iodine group) or 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol (chlorhexidine group) as preoperative antisepsis for surgical procedures to repair extremity fractures. Every 2 months, the hospitals alternated interventions. Separate populations of patients with either open or closed fractures were enrolled and included in the analysis. The primary outcome was surgical-site infection, which included superficial incisional infection within 30 days or deep incisional or organ-space infection within 90 days. The secondary outcome was unplanned reoperation for fracture-healing complications. RESULTS: A total of 6785 patients with a closed fracture and 1700 patients with an open fracture were included in the trial. In the closed-fracture population, surgical-site infection occurred in 77 patients (2.4%) in the iodine group and in 108 patients (3.3%) in the chlorhexidine group (odds ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55 to 1.00; P = 0.049). In the open-fracture population, surgical-site infection occurred in 54 patients (6.5%) in the iodine group and in 60 patients (7.3%) in the chlorhexidine group (odd ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.27; P = 0.45). The frequencies of unplanned reoperation, 1-year outcomes, and serious adverse events were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with closed extremity fractures, skin antisepsis with iodine povacrylex in alcohol resulted in fewer surgical-site infections than antisepsis with chlorhexidine gluconate in alcohol. In patients with open fractures, the results were similar in the two groups. (Funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; PREPARE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03523962.).


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos Locais , Clorexidina , Fixação de Fratura , Fraturas Ósseas , Iodo , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica , Humanos , 2-Propanol/administração & dosagem , 2-Propanol/efeitos adversos , 2-Propanol/uso terapêutico , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/administração & dosagem , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/efeitos adversos , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/uso terapêutico , Antissepsia/métodos , Canadá , Clorexidina/administração & dosagem , Clorexidina/efeitos adversos , Clorexidina/uso terapêutico , Etanol , Extremidades/lesões , Extremidades/microbiologia , Extremidades/cirurgia , Iodo/administração & dosagem , Iodo/efeitos adversos , Iodo/uso terapêutico , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/efeitos adversos , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Pele/microbiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Estudos Cross-Over , Estados Unidos
2.
J Orthop Trauma ; 35(4): 181-186, 2021 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33727521

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Examine factors associated with fixation failure in patients treated with superior intramedullary ramus screws. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Single, Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Unstable pelvic ring fractures amenable fixation that included superior intramedullary ramus screws. INTERVENTION: Percutaneously inserted intramedullary superior ramus screw fixation of superior pubic ramus (SPR) fractures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Loss of reduction (LOR) of the SPR fracture defined as >2 mm displacement on pelvic radiographs at any time point in follow-up. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-five fractures in 211 patients (age 44, 95% confidence interval 40.8%-46.4%, 59.3% women, 55.1% retrograde screws) were included in the analysis. 14 (4.9%) of fractures had LOR. Patients were significantly more likely to have LOR as age increased (P = 0.01), body mass index (BMI) increased (P = 0.01), and if they were women (P < 0.01). There was a significantly decreased LOR (P < 0.01) as fractures moved further from the pubis symphysis. Retrograde screws were significantly (P < 0.01) more likely to have LOR. In SPR fractures treated with retrograde screws, failure was significantly associated with increasing BMI (P = 0.02), the presence of an inferior ramus fracture (P = 0.02), and trended toward significance with increasing age (P = 0.06), and decreased distance from the symphysis (P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Superior ramus screws are associated with a low failure rate (4.9%), which is lower than previously reported. Retrograde screw insertion, distance from the symphysis, increasing age, increasing BMI, decreased distance from the symphysis, and ipsilateral inferior ramus fractures were predictors of failure. In these patients, alternative modalities should be considered, although low rates of failure can still be expected. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Fraturas Ósseas , Ossos Pélvicos , Adulto , Parafusos Ósseos , Feminino , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osso Púbico , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
J Orthop Trauma ; 34 Suppl 2: S5-S6, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32639336

RESUMO

Comminuted extraarticular metaphyseal and diaphyseal fractures of the distal humerus frequently require operative fixation through a posterior approach. Most of the previously described approaches to the posterior humerus are dependent on large and extensile approaches. This video demonstrates open reduction and internal fixation of a comminuted metaphyseal distal humerus fracture through a minimally invasive posterior approach.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Úmero , Placas Ósseas , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Humanos , Fraturas do Úmero/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Úmero/cirurgia , Úmero , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 26(4): e68-e76, 2018 Feb 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29351135

RESUMO

The use, timing, and priority of angioembolization in the management of bleeding pelvic fractures remain ambiguous. The most common vessels for angioembolization are, in decreasing order, the internal iliac artery and its branches, the superior gluteal artery, the obturator artery, and the internal pudendal artery. Technical success rates for this treatment option range from 74% to 100%. The fracture patterns most commonly requiring angioembolization are the Young and Burgess lateral compression and anterior-posterior compression types and Tile type C. Mortality rates after angioembolization of 16% to 50% have been reported, but deaths are usually related to concomitant injuries. The sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced CT in detecting the need for angioembolization range from 60% to 90% and 92% to 100%, respectively. Angioembolization can be effective in the management of bleeding pelvic fractures, but as with any treatment, the risks of complications must be considered. Availability of angioembolization and institutional expertise/preference for the alternative strategy of pelvic packing influence its use.


Assuntos
Angiografia , Embolização Terapêutica , Fraturas Ósseas/complicações , Hemorragia/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemorragia/terapia , Ossos Pélvicos/lesões , Artérias/diagnóstico por imagem , Embolização Terapêutica/efeitos adversos , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Fraturas Ósseas/classificação , Hemorragia/etiologia , Humanos , Seleção de Pacientes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Am J Surg ; 211(3): 495-500, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26781723

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mortality in patients sustaining pelvic fractures has been reported to be 4% to 15%. We sought to investigate the cause of death based on timing and evaluate if type of fracture and Injury Severity Score have an influence on the survival time. METHODS: Sixty-nine patients of eight hundred sixty seven with a pelvic fracture who died during their hospital admission were included. Fractures were classified using the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association system. Cause determined by autopsy in 48/69. RESULTS: The leading cause of death within 6 hours was abdominal and pelvic hemorrhage; 6 to 24 hours head injury, and greater than 24 hours multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Survival time did not correlate between fracture type (P < .12) or Injury Severity Score. Only 2 patients died of isolated pelvic hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the advances made in acute management of the traumatized patient in the emergency department, mortality is unavoidable in a small group of patients with hemorrhage being the commonest cause of early death but isolated pelvic hemorrhage rare.


Assuntos
Fraturas Ósseas/etiologia , Fraturas Ósseas/mortalidade , Ossos Pélvicos/lesões , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/complicações , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Causas de Morte , Feminino , Fraturas Ósseas/terapia , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA