RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Our aim is to estimate the long-term neurological sequelae and prognosis in term neonatal asphyxia treated with hypothermia via volumetric apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map histogram analysis (HA). METHODS: Brain MRI studies of 83 term neonates with asphyxia who received whole-body hypothermia treatment and examined between postnatal (PN) fourth and sixth days were retrospectively re-evaluated by 2 radiologists. Volumetric HA was performed for the areas frequently affected in deep and superficial asphyxia (thalamus, lentiform nucleus, posterior limb of internal capsule, corpus callosum forceps major, and perirolandic cortex-subcortical white matter) on ADC map. The quantitative ADC values were obtained separately for each region. Qualitative-visual (conventional) MRI findings were also re-evaluated. Neonates were examined neurodevelopmentally according to the Revised Brunet-Lezine scale. The distinguishability of long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes was statistically investigated. RESULTS: With HA, the adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes could only be distinguished from mild-moderated impairment and normal development at the thalamus with 10th percentile ADC (P = .02 and P = .03, respectively) and ADCmin (P = .03 and P = .04, respectively). Also with the conventional MRI findings, adverse outcome could be distinguished from mild-moderated impairment (P = .04) and normal development (P = .04) via cytotoxic oedema of the thalamus, corpus striatum, and diffuse cerebral cortical. CONCLUSION: The long-term adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in newborns with asphyxia who received whole-body hypothermia treatment can be estimated similarly with volumetric ADC-HA and the conventional assessment of the ADC map. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study compares early MRI ADC-HA with neurological sequelae in term newborns with asphyxia who received whole-body hypothermia treatment. We could not find any significant difference in predicting adverse neurological sequelae between the visual-qualitative evaluation of the ADC map and HA.
Assuntos
Asfixia Neonatal , Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética , Hipotermia Induzida , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Hipotermia Induzida/métodos , Asfixia Neonatal/diagnóstico por imagem , Asfixia Neonatal/terapia , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , PrognósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a useful method to evaluate tumor biology and tumor microstructure. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value correlates negatively with the cellular density of the tumor. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the ADC histogram analysis in showing the relationship between breast cancer prognostic factors and ADC parameters. METHODS: This study is a retrospective observational descriptive study. ADC histogram parameters were evaluated in all tumor volumes of 67 breast cancer patients. Minimum, 5, 10, 25, 50, 75, 90, 95 percentiles, maximum, mean, median ADC values, kurtosis, and skewness were calculated. Breast MRI examinations were performed on a 3T MR scanner. We evaluated the fibroglandular tissue density of bilateral breasts, background enhancement, localization of masses, multifocality-multicentricity, shape, rim, internal contrast enhancement, and kinetic curve on breast MRI. BIRADS scoring was performed according to breast MRI. Pathologically, histologic type, histologic grade, HER 2, Ki 67, ER-, and PR status were evaluated. RESULTS: A significant correlation was found between tumor volume and ADC scores. There is a significant correlation between min ADC values (p< 0.031), max ADC (p< 0.001), and skewness (p< 0.019). A significant correlation was found between tumor kurtosis and lymph nodes (p< 0.029). There was a significant difference in ADC values depending on ER-and PRstatus. (for ER p = 0.004, p = 0.018, p = 0.010, p = 0.008, p = 0.004, p = 0.004, p = 0.02, p = 0.02 and p = 0.038, for PR p < 0.001, p = 0.028, p = 0.011, p = 0.001, p < 0.001, p =<0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively; p < 0.05). These values were lower in ER-and PR-positive status than in ER-and PR-negative receptor status. According to HER2 status, there was a statistically significant difference in ADC
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama
, Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética
, Humanos
, Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem
, Feminino
, Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética/métodos
, Estudos Retrospectivos
, Pessoa de Meia-Idade
, Prognóstico
, Adulto
, Idoso
, Carga Tumoral
, Mama/diagnóstico por imagem
, Mama/patologia