Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 38(3): 733-745, 2023 02 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35521751

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Vascular calcification (VC) is a common comorbidity among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), indicating major cardiovascular events. This study aimed to evaluate the effects and safety of intravenous sodium thiosulphate (STS) for VC in CKD patients. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for clinical trials that provided data comparing outcomes among patients treated with and without STS. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. Efficacy was assessed using calcification scores and arterial stiffness. Safety was examined by analyzing adverse symptoms, electrolytes and bone mineral density (BMD). Random-effects models were performed. Meta-regression and sensitivity analysis were done. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tools. RESULTS: Among the 5601 publications, 6 studies involving 305 participants (mean age: 56 years, male: 56.6%) with all participants on maintenance hemodialysis met eligibility criteria. For efficacy, the progression in Agatston scores in the coronary arteries [107 patients, mean difference (MD): -241.27, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): -421.50 to -61.03] and iliac arteries (55 patients, MD: -382.00, 95% CI: -751.07 to -12.93) was lower in the STS treated group compared with controls. The increase in pulse wave velocity was lower in the STS group (104 patients, MD: -1.29 m/s, 95% CI: -2.24 to -0.34 m/s). No association was found between the change in calcification scores and STS regimen. For safety, gastrointestinal symptoms (e.g. nausea) and increased anion gap acidosis were noted. No reduction in BMD by STS was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous STS may attenuate the progression of VC and arterial stiffness in hemodialysis patients. Large and well-designed randomized controlled trials are warranted.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Calcificação Vascular , Rigidez Vascular , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise de Onda de Pulso , Calcificação Vascular/tratamento farmacológico , Diálise Renal
2.
BMC Nephrol ; 23(1): 36, 2022 01 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35042465

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Olfactory and gustatory changes may contribute to poor appetite and food aversion in chronic kidney disease (CKD), though the prevalence of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction is not known in the CKD population. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study among 3527 US adults aged ≥40 years old in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 2013 and 2014. We measured the prevalence of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction among patients with CKD defined as eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m2 using the "scratch and sniff" NHANES Pocket Smell Test and quinine whole-mouth test. We also examined the association between CKD and olfactory/gustatory dysfunction, and nutritional markers. RESULTS: The prevalence of olfactory dysfunction was 30% among CKD and 15% among non-CKD (p < 0.001). The prevalence of gustatory dysfunction was 13% among CKD and 17% among non-CKD (p = 0.10). After adjusting for confounders, CKD was significantly associated with olfactory dysfunction (OR = 1.47, 95% CI [1.07, 2.01]; p = 0.02) but not gustatory dysfunction (OR = 1.76, 95%CI [0.99, 3.11]; p = 0.05). Among the CKD population, the odds of olfactory dysfunction was 72% higher for every 10 kg decrease in grip strength (OR = 1.72, 95% CI [1.39, 2.13]; adjusted p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: CKD was associated with higher odds of olfactory but not gustatory dysfunction. Olfactory dysfunction was associated with lower grip strength among those with CKD. Screening and early intervening on olfactory dysfunction among CKD may preserve muscle strength and improve nutritional status in this vulnerable population.


Assuntos
Transtornos do Olfato/epidemiologia , Transtornos do Olfato/etiologia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/complicações , Distúrbios do Paladar/epidemiologia , Distúrbios do Paladar/etiologia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência
5.
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes ; 7(1): 81-92, 2023 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36712824

RESUMO

Objective: To describe the pain intensity among hospitalized patients with calciphylaxis, elucidate the factors associated with pain improvement, and examine the link between pain improvement and clinical outcomes. Patients and Methods: Patients were identified from the Partners Research Patient Data Registry and the Partners Calciphylaxis Registry and Biorepository (Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT03032835). Those with calciphylaxis requiring hospitalization for at least 14 consecutive days during the study period from May 2016 through December 2021 were included. Pain intensity was assessed using patient-reported pain scores on numerical rating scales from 0 to 10. Associations between pain improvement and clinical outcomes, including lesion improvement, amputation, and mortality, were examined using univariate and multivariate regression models. Results: Our analysis included 111 patients (age, 58±14 years; men, 40%; on maintenance dialysis, 79%). No significant improvement of pain intensity was observed over the 14 days of hospitalization (mean difference, -0.71; P=.08). However, among 49 (44.1%) patients who showed at least 1-point improvement in the pain score, there was an association with surgical debridement during hospitalization (odds ratio, 3.37; 95% CI, 1.17-9.67; P=.02). Hyperbaric oxygen therapy was associated with pain improvement (odds ratio, 5.38; 95% CI, 1.14-25.50; P=.03) in patients on maintenance dialysis. Pain improvement was associated with lower rates of subsequent amputation at 6 months of follow up (6% vs 13%; P<.05) but did not predict lesion improvement or survival. Conclusion: Pain control remains a challenge among hospitalized patients with calciphylaxis. Surgical debridement and hyperbaric oxygen therapy may improve pain intensity. Pain improvement predicted a lower risk of future amputation.

6.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(4): e2310068, 2023 04 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37099293

RESUMO

Importance: Calciphylaxis is a rare disease with high mortality mainly involving patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Sodium thiosulphate (STS) has been used as an off-label therapeutic in calciphylaxis, but there is a lack of clinical trials and studies that demonstrate its effect compared with those without STS treatment. Objective: To perform a meta-analysis of the cohort studies that provided data comparing outcomes among patients with calciphylaxis treated with and without intravenous STS. Data Sources: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched using relevant terms and synonyms including sodium thiosulphate and calci* without language restriction. Study Selection: The initial search was for cohort studies published before August 31, 2021, that included adult patients diagnosed with CKD experiencing calciphylaxis and could provide a comparison between patients treated with and without intravenous STS. Studies were excluded if they reported outcomes only from nonintravenous administration of STS or if the outcomes for CKD patients were not provided. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Random-effects models were performed. The Egger test was used to measure publication bias. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test. Main Outcomes and Measures: Skin lesion improvement and survival, synthesized as ratio data by a random-effects empirical Bayes model. Results: Among the 5601 publications retrieved from the targeted databases, 19 retrospective cohort studies including 422 patients (mean age, 57 years; 37.3% male) met the eligibility criteria. No difference was observed in skin lesion improvement (12 studies with 110 patients; risk ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.85-1.78) between the STS and the comparator groups. No difference was noted for the risk of death (15 studies with 158 patients; risk ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.70-1.10) and overall survival using time-to-event data (3 studies with 269 participants; hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.57-1.18). In meta-regression, lesion improvement associated with STS negatively correlated with publication year, implying that recent studies are more likely to report a null association compared with past studies (coefficient = -0.14; P = .008). Conclusions and Relevance: Intravenous STS was not associated with skin lesion improvement or survival benefit in patients with CKD experiencing calciphylaxis. Future investigations are warranted to examine the efficacy and safety of therapies for patients with calciphylaxis.


Assuntos
Calciofilaxia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Calciofilaxia/etiologia , Calciofilaxia/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Teorema de Bayes , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/complicações
7.
PLoS One ; 18(2): e0279765, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36848366

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an important risk factor for mortality from COVID-19. Remdesivir has been shown to shorten time to recovery in patients with severe COVID-19. However, exclusion of patients with severe kidney function impairment in clinical trials has led to concerns about kidney safety of remdesivir in patients with pre-existing kidney disease. METHODS: Retrospective propensity score matched cohort study of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 admitted with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between 15 - 60 mL/min/1.73m2. Remdesivir-treated patients were 1:1 matched to historical comparators admitted during the first wave of COVID-19 (between March-April 2020) prior to emergency use authorization of remdesivir using propensity scores accounting for factors predicting treatment assignment. Dependent outcomes included in-hospital peak creatinine, incidence of doubling of creatine, rate of kidney replacement therapy initiation and eGFR among surviving patients at day 90. RESULTS: 175 remdesivir-treated patients were 1:1 matched to untreated historical comparators. Mean age was 74.1 (SD 12.8), 56.9% were male, 59% patients were white, and the majority (83.1%) had at least one co-morbidity. There were no statistically significant differences in peak creatinine during hospitalization (2.3mg/dL vs. 2.5 mg/dL, P = 0.34), incidence of doubling of creatinine (10.3% vs. 13.1%, P = 0.48), and rate of kidney replacement therapy initiation (4.6% vs. 6.3%, P = 0.49) in remdesivir-treated patients versus matched untreated historical comparators, respectively. Among surviving patients, there was no difference of the average eGFR at day 90 (54.7 ± 20.0 mL/min/1.73m2 for remdesivir-treated patients vs. 51.7 ± 19.5 mL/min/1.73m2 for untreated comparators, P = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Remdesivir use in patients with impaired kidney function (eGFR between 15 - 60 mL/min/1.73m2) who present to the hospital with COVID-19 is not associated with increased risk of adverse kidney outcomes.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Insuficiência Renal , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Creatinina , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Rim
8.
NPJ Breast Cancer ; 9(1): 70, 2023 Aug 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37598278

RESUMO

Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors have significantly improved overall and progression free survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer, but their effect on short and long-term kidney function is unknown. We found that early, mild estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline was common in patients treated with CDK 4/6 inhibitors; however, severe kidney injury is rare and long-term eGFR decline is uncommon.

9.
Kidney360 ; 3(2): 269-278, 2022 02 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35373125

RESUMO

Background: Remdesivir is not currently approved for patients with eGFR <30 ml/min per 1.73 m2. We aimed to determine the safety of remdesivir in patients with kidney failure. Methods: This study was a retrospective cohort study of patients with COVID-19 hospitalized between May 2020 and January 2021 with eGFR <30 ml/min per 1.73 m2 who received remdesivir and historical controls with COVID-19 hospitalized between March 1, 2020 and April 30, 2020 prior to the emergency use authorization of remdesivir within a large health care system. Patients were 1:1 matched by propensity scores accounting for factors associated with treatment assignment. Adverse events and hospital outcomes were recorded by manual chart review. Results: The overall cohort included 34 hospitalized patients who initiated remdesivir within 72 hours of hospital admission with eGFR<30 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and 217 COVID-19 controls with eGFR <30 ml/min per 1.73 m2. The propensity score-matched cohort included 31 remdesivir-treated patients and 31 nonremdesivir-treated controls. The mean age was 74.0 (SD=13.8) years, 57% were women, and 68% were white participants. A total of 26% had ESKD. Among patients who were not on dialysis prior to initiating remdesivir, one developed worsening kidney function (defined as ≥50% increase in creatinine or initiation of KRT) compared with three in the historical control group. There was no increased risk of cardiac arrythmia, cardiac arrest, altered mental status, or clinically significant anemia or liver function test abnormalities. There was a significantly increased risk of hyperglycemia, which may be partly explained by the increased use of dexamethasone in the remdesivir-treated population. Conclusions: In this propensity score-matched study, remdesivir was well tolerated in patients with eGFR <30 ml/min per 1.73 m2.


Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Insuficiência Renal , Monofosfato de Adenosina/análogos & derivados , Idoso , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Antivirais/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Rim , Pontuação de Propensão , Diálise Renal , Insuficiência Renal/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
10.
Kidney360 ; 2(8): 1316-1325, 2021 08 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35369667

RESUMO

Through the discovery of direct-acting antiviral therapies over the last decade, hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been transformed from a highly morbid and potentially fatal chronic viral infection to a curable illness. HCV is common in patients with kidney disease, is a risk factor for progression of CKD, is associated with higher morbidity and mortality in patients receiving dialysis, and leads to worse allograft and patient outcomes in recipients of kidney transplants. Clinical trial and real-world data of direct-acting antivirals in patients with kidney disease demonstrate extremely high cure rates and favorable adverse event profiles. This review covers the transformative effects of curative HCV therapies on patients with kidney disease, including patients with CKD, ESKD, and those who have received a kidney transplant.


Assuntos
Hepatite C Crônica , Hepatite C , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Hepacivirus , Hepatite C/complicações , Hepatite C Crônica/complicações , Humanos , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/complicações
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA