T1ρ mapping for assessment of renal allograft fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: There is an unmet need for noninvasive methods to diagnose and stage renal allograft fibrosis. PURPOSE: To investigate the utility of T1ρ measured with MRI for the assessment of fibrosis in renal allografts. STUDY TYPE: Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved prospective. SUBJECTS: Fifteen patients with stable functional allograft (M/F 9/6, mean age 56 years) and 12 patients with allograft dysfunction and established fibrosis (M/F 6/6, mean age 51 years). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: T1ρ imaging at 1.5T using a custom-developed sequence. ASSESSMENT: Average T1ρ in the cortex and medulla was quantified and T1ρ repeatability (expressed by the coefficient of variation [CV]) was measured in four patients. STATISTICAL TESTS: Differences in T1ρ values between the 2 groups were assessed using Mann-Whitney U-tests. Diagnostic performance of T1ρ for differentiation between functional and fibrotic allografts was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Spearman correlations of T1ρ with Masson's trichrome-stained fractions and serum estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were assessed. RESULTS: Higher T1ρ repeatability was found for cortex compared with medulla (mean CV T1ρ cortex 7.4%, medulla 13.3%). T1ρ values were significantly higher in the cortex of fibrotic vs. functional allografts (111.8 ± 17.2 msec vs. 99.0 ± 11.0 msec, P = 0.027), while there was no difference in medullary T1ρ values (122.6 ± 20.8 msec vs. 124.3 ± 20.8 msec, P = 0.789). Cortical T1ρ significantly correlated with Masson's trichrome-stained fractions (r = 0.515, P = 0.044) and eGFR (r = -0.546, P = 0.004), and demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.77 for differentiating between functional and fibrotic allografts (sensitivity and specificity of 75.0% and 86.7%, using threshold of 106.9 msec). DATA CONCLUSION: Our preliminary results suggest that T1ρ is a potential imaging biomarker of renal allograft fibrosis. These results should be verified in a larger study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:1085-1091.

Prostate MRI using a rigid two-channel phased-array endorectal coil: comparison with phased array coil acquisition at 3 T.

BACKGROUND: To compare image quality, lesion detection and patient comfort of 3T prostate MRI using a combined rigid two-channel phased-array endorectal coil and an external phased-array coil (ERC-PAC) compared to external PAC acquisition in the same patients. METHODS: Thirty three men (mean age 65.3y) with suspected (n = 15) or biopsy-proven prostate cancer (PCa, n = 18) were prospectively enrolled in this exploratory study. 3T prostate MRI including T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was performed using an ERC-PAC versus PAC alone, in random order. Image quality, lesion detection and characterization (biparametric PI-RADSv2.1) were evaluated by 2 independent observers. Estimated signal-to-noise ratio (eSNR) was measured in identified lesions and the peripheral zone (PZ). Patient comfort was assessed using a questionnaire. Data were compared between sequences and acquisitions. Inter/intra-observer agreement for PI-RADS scores was evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty four prostate lesions (22 PCa) were identified in 20/33 men. Superior image quality was found for ERC-PAC compared to PAC for T2WI for one observer (Obs.1, p < 0.03) and high b-value DWI for both observers (p < 0.05). The sensitivity of PI-RADS for lesion detection for ERC-PAC and PAC acquisitions was 79.2 and 75% for Obs.1, and 79.1 and 66.7%, for Obs.2, without significant difference for each observer (McNemar p-values ≥0.08). Inter-/intra-observer agreement for PI-RADS scores was moderate-to-substantial (kappa = 0.52-0.84). Higher eSNR was observed for lesions and PZ for T2WI and PZ for DWI using ERC-PAC (p < 0.013). Most patients (21/33) reported discomfort at ERC insertion. CONCLUSION: Despite improved image quality and eSNR using the rigid ERC-PAC combination, no significant improvement in lesion detection was observed, therefore not supporting the routine use of ERC for prostate MRI.

Assessment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to 90Y Radioembolization Using Dynamic Contrast Material-enhanced MRI and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-weighted Imaging.

Purpose: To quantify diffusion and perfusion changes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) induced by yttrium 90 (90Y) radioembolization and to assess the value of dynamic contrast material-enhanced (DCE) MRI and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for predicting HCC response. Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this prospective study (clinical trial registry NCT01871545). Twenty-four participants with HCC (mean age, 69 years ± 9 [standard deviation], 18 men) underwent multiparametric MRI, including IVIM DWI and gadoxetic acid DCE MRI before (n = 24) and 6 weeks (n = 21) after radioembolization. IVIM DWI and DCE MRI histogram parameters were quantified in HCCs and liver parenchyma. HCC response was assessed by using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors at 6 weeks and 6-12 months after radioembolization. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of baseline MRI and clinical parameters for prediction of response. Results: Twenty-five HCCs were analyzed (mean size, 3.6 cm ± 1.9). Radioembolization resulted in significantly decreased perfusion (DCE MRI arterial flow, P = .002; IVIM pseudodiffusion coefficient [D*], P = .014). Multivariate logistic regression selected combined serum α-fetoprotein and portal flow (F p ) skewness (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.924) and combined D* standard deviation and F p kurtosis (AUC = 0.916) for prediction of objective and complete response at 6 weeks, respectively. Standard deviation of DCE MRI parameter arterial fraction was selected as the optimal predictor for complete response at 6-12 months (AUC = 0.857). Conclusion: Diffusion and perfusion MRI can be used to evaluate the response of HCC to radioembolization. Pretreatment DCE MRI histogram parameters may be useful for radioembolization treatment stratification. Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2020.