Is the popliteal tendon sufficient for all-inside suture in lateral meniscus repair? A 22-case cadaver study.

INTRODUCTION: Arthroscopic lateral meniscus repair is performed in the "figure-of-4 position" (supine, with the affected knee flexed and the lower leg crossed over the extended contralateral leg), and anchorage is often on the popliteal tendon. Extending the limb at the end of the procedure alters the relations between the popliteal tendon and the repaired meniscus. The present study aimed to assess lateral meniscal suture fixation on the popliteal tendon after a cycle of flexion-extension. HYPOTHESIS: Extending the knee can induce suture release. TYPE OF STUDY: Cadaver study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two fresh adult human cadaver knee specimens were used. Under arthroscopy with all-inside implants, a vertical suture onto the popliteal tendon was performed through the lateral meniscus. Suture status was assessed under arthroscopy after a cycle of flexion-extension, and deemed defective if the suture was sufficiently loose for the arthroscope to be able to be passed through the popliteal hiatus, if the stitch had passed through the meniscus, or if the suture was broken. RESULTS: Thirteen sutures (59.1%) remained well fixed, and 9 (40.1%) were defective: 4 (18.2%) were loose, in 4 (18.2%) the stitch had passed through the meniscus, and in 1 (4.5%) the suture had broken. CONCLUSION: In a population of elderly cadaver knee specimens, arthroscopic suture of the lateral meniscus to the popliteal tendon was defective after flexion-extension in 40% of cases. Stress seems to be exerted on the suture when extension is resumed. Thus, a single stitch seems insufficient for stable lateral meniscus repair. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Suture of the lateral meniscus to the popliteal tendon undergoes stress when extension is resumed, potentially causing failure of lateral meniscus repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Post-traumatic forearm bone defect reconstruction using the induced membrane technique.

INTRODUCTION: The induced membrane technique, first described by Masquelet, is now well standardized, but little studied in post-traumatic forearm bone defect. The main aim of the present study was to analyze consolidation rates in this indication. The study hypothesis was that the induced membrane technique provides good consolidation results. METHODS: We performed a retrospective assessment of our experience with 10 cases of induced membrane forearm reconstruction. The two main etiologies were acute trauma or treatment for non-union. Functional impact was assessed on range of motion and QuickDASH. The complications rate was also examined. RESULTS: There were 3 cases of post-traumatic bone defect, and 7 of non-union treatment, including 6 septic non-unions. Mean defect size was 4.3cm. Mean interval between induced membrane stages 1 and 2 was 3.3 months. Pure cancellous iliac bone graft was systematic. Nine of the patients showed consolidation, at a mean 9.2 months; there was 1 case of non-consolidation, but no other complications. Range of motion was satisfactory; mean QuickDASH score was 22 at a mean 50.3 months' follow-up. CONCLUSION: The induced membrane technique was reliable, reproducible and technically accessible, with good functional and radiographic results and few complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective study without control group.

Surgical management of proximal femoral metastasis: Fixation or hip replacement? A 309 case series.

INTRODUCTION: The proximal femur is the most frequent operative site for metastasis, but there is no consensus between internal fixation and hip replacement. The present multicenter retrospective observational study sought: (1) to compare early clinical results between internal fixation and hip replacement for proximal femoral metastasis (PFM), and (2) to assess events affecting survival. HYPOTHESIS: The study hypothesis was that internal fixation and hip replacement give comparable clinical results, operative site complications rates and survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The series comprised 309 cases, 10 of which were bilateral, in 182 females and 117 males, with a mean age of 67.2±11.5 years and 62.5±13.2 years, respectively. Primaries were mainly breast (118; 38.2%), lung (85; 25.5%) or kidney (40; 12.9%). PFM was revelatory in 114 cases (36.9%). There was visceral involvement in 142 patients (46%), multiple peripheral bone involvement in 212 (68.6%), and spinal involvement in 134 (43.4%). There were 124 pathologic fractures (40%), 51 of which were revelatory. Metastases were cervicocephalic in 135 cases (43.7%), metaphyseal in 166 (53.7%) and both in 8 (2.6%). PFM was osteolytic in 90% of cases, managed by hip replacement in 161 cases and internal fixation in 148 (12 screwed plates, 136 nails). Seventy-seven patients had postoperative radiation therapy. RESULTS: After hip replacement (n=144), walking was normal in 35 cases (24.3%), impaired but unassisted in 53 (36.8%), with 1 forearm crutch in 24 (16.6%), 2 crutches or a frame in 26 (18%), and impossible in 6 (4.1%). After nailing (n=125), results were respectively 38 (30.4%), 47 (37.6%), 15 (12%), 18 (14.4) and 7 (5.6%). Recovery of normal walking capacity did not significantly differ according to technique (p=0.162); nor did pain or function. Recovery of normal walking capacity was better after preventive surgery (p<0.001). Perioperative complications comprised: 10 cases of severe blood loss, 7 pulmonary embolisms, 6 digestive hemorrhages, and 5 lung infections. Secondarily, there were 11 infections (7 after hip replacement, 2 after nailing, 2 after plate fixation), 7 progressive osteolyses and 5 fractures. Complications rates were significantly higher with plate fixation, with no difference between nailing and hip replacement. Survival did not significantly differ between hip replacement (12 months [95% CI: 7-19]), nailing (7 months [95% CI: 6-11]) and plate fixation (16 months [95% CI: 6-not calculable]). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical results and survival were comparable between hip replacement and nailing, confirming the study hypothesis, in agreement with the literature. Each technique has its indications. Patients with severely impaired walking capacity benefited greatly from surgery. The importance of preventive surgery was highlighted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective study.