Preferences for Attributes of Sodium Oxybate Treatment: A Discrete Choice Experiment in Patients with Narcolepsy.

Purpose: Current US FDA-approved treatments for narcolepsy include sodium oxybate (SXB) and calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium oxybates (mixed-salt oxybates), which require 2 nightly doses, 1 at bedtime and another 2.5 to 4 hours later. Once-nightly SXB (ON-SXB; FT218) is under FDA review to treat adults with narcolepsy. This study quantitatively characterized attributes of SXB treatment preferred by individuals with narcolepsy via a discrete choice experiment (DCE) and evaluated preferences for the product profiles of once-nightly vs twice-nightly SXB treatment. Patients and Methods: Adults with self-reported physician-diagnosed narcolepsy for ≥1 year and current or prior twice-nightly SXB treatment were eligible for this 30-minute, web-based study capturing patient experiences and a DCE. Participants responded to a survey instrument using 9-point scales; higher scores indicated greater severity/preference/satisfaction. In the DCE, hundreds of profiles were generated, each combining attributes of twice-nightly SXB and ON-SXB based on clinical trial data. The DCE was analyzed using a hierarchical Bayesian model. Results: Seventy-five participants were surveyed (50 current and 25 past twice-nightly SXB users). Dosing frequency was the most important attribute of SXB treatment; once nightly was significantly preferred vs twice nightly. The most common reasons for overall product preference were lack of need to wake up in the middle of the night for a second dose (48%), fewer side effects (46%), and ease of administration (32%). Number of nightly doses was the most important driver of taking the medication exactly as directed and reduced anxiety/stress. Participants were significantly more likely to prefer the blinded product profile of once-nightly SXB over twice-nightly SXB (mean rating, 7.5 vs 4.3; P<0.05). Conclusion: Among the choices presented, dosing frequency was the most important attribute for overall product choice, likelihood to take medication exactly as directed, and reducing anxiety/stress. The ON-SXB blinded profile was significantly preferred over twice-nightly SXB.

Randomized, crossover, open-label study of the relative bioavailability and safety of FT218, a once-nightly sodium oxybate formulation: Phase 1 study in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVES: Treatment for narcolepsy with sodium oxybate (SXB) has required twice-nightly dosing, at bedtime and 2.5-4 h later. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of FT218, an investigational, extended-release, once-nightly formulation of SXB (ON-SXB), vs twice-nightly SXB. METHODS: In this phase 1, open-label study, healthy volunteers were randomized (1:1) to ON-SXB 6 g or twice-nightly SXB (two 3-g doses administered 4 h apart); minimum 3-day washout before crossover. Doses were administered 2 h post-evening meal. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic assessments were collected predose and up to 14 h after the first dose during each treatment period. RESULTS: Twenty-eight participants were enrolled (mean age, 39.6 years; 54% women; 93% white). Mean ± SEM area under the concentration-time curve for ON-SXB was 282.7 ± 30.2  µg·h/mL vs 273.3 ± 27.8 µg·h/mL for twice-nightly SXB. Geometric mean ratio (GMR; 90% CI) was 102.9 (98.0-108.0). Maximum γ-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) plasma concentration (Cmax) was 65.8 ± 4.0 µg/mL for ON-SXB vs 77.1 ± 4.9 µg/mL for twice-nightly SXB (GMR [90% CI], 88.3 [80.5-97.0]). The GMR (90% CI) for GHB plasma concentrations 8 h post dose (C8h) for ON-SXB vs twice-nightly SXB was 61.7 (45.8-83.0). The most frequently reported adverse events were the same for ON-SXB and twice-nightly SXB (nausea, dizziness, somnolence, vomiting). CONCLUSIONS: GHB exposure and Cmax with one 6-g dose of ON-SXB were bioequivalent to those with two 3-g doses of twice-nightly SXB, whereas C8h was lower with ON-SXB. If approved, ON-SXB will provide a single bedtime oxybate option, with clinically relevant pharmacologic exposure during the entire sleep period.

Effect of FT218, a Once-Nightly Sodium Oxybate Formulation, on Disrupted Nighttime Sleep in Patients with Narcolepsy: Results from the Randomized Phase III REST-ON Trial.

BACKGROUND: Sodium oxybate has been recognized as a gold standard for the treatment of disrupted nighttime sleep due to narcolepsy. Its short half-life and immediate-release formulation require patients to awaken 2.5-4 h after their bedtime dose to take a second dose. A novel extended-release, once-nightly sodium oxybate formulation (ON-SXB; FT218) is under US Food and Drug Administration review for the treatment of adults with narcolepsy. OBJECTIVE: A phase III trial of ON-SXB in individuals with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) or 2 (NT2) [the REST-ON trial; NCT02720744] has been conducted and the primary results reported elsewhere. Secondary objectives from REST-ON were to assess the efficacy of ON-SXB on disrupted nighttime sleep; the results of this analysis are reported here. METHODS: In the double-blind, phase III REST-ON trial, patients aged ≥ 16 years were randomly assigned 1:1 to ON-SXB (1 week, 4.5 g; 2 weeks, 6 g; 5 weeks, 7.5 g; 5 weeks, 9 g) or placebo. Secondary endpoints included polysomnographic measures of sleep stage shifts and nocturnal arousals and patient-reported assessments of sleep quality and refreshing nature of sleep at 6, 7.5, and 9 g; post hoc analyses included changes in time spent in each sleep stage, delta power, and assessments in stimulant-use subgroups for prespecified endpoints. RESULTS: In total, 190 participants (n = 97, ON-SXB; n = 93, placebo) were included in the efficacy analyses. All three ON-SXB doses demonstrated a clinically meaningful, statistically significant decrease vs placebo in the number of transitions to wake/N1 from N1, N2, and rapid eye movement (REM) stages (all doses p < 0.001) and the number of nocturnal arousals (p < 0.05 ON-SXB 6 g; p < 0.001 7.5 and 9 g). Sleep quality and refreshing nature of sleep were significantly improved with all three ON-SXB doses vs placebo (p < 0.001). Post hoc analyses revealed a significant reduction in time spent in N1 (p < 0.05 ON-SXB 6 g; p < 0.001 7.5 and 9 g) and REM (all p < 0.001) and increased time spent in N3 with ON-SXB vs placebo (all p < 0.001), with a significant increase in delta power (p < 0.01 ON-SXB 6 g; p < 0.05 7.5 g; p < 0.001 9 g) and increased REM latency (ON-SXB 7.5 g vs placebo; p < 0.05). Significant improvements in disrupted nighttime sleep were observed regardless of concomitant stimulant use. CONCLUSIONS: The clinically beneficial, single nighttime dose of ON-SXB significantly improved disrupted nighttime sleep in patients with narcolepsy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02720744.

Once-nightly sodium oxybate (FT218) demonstrated improvement of symptoms in a phase 3 randomized clinical trial in patients with narcolepsy.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of FT218, a novel once-nightly formulation of sodium oxybate (ON-SXB), in patients with narcolepsy in the phase 3 REST-ON trial. METHODS: Narcolepsy patients aged ≥16 years were randomized 1:1 to uptitration of ON-SXB (4.5, 6, 7.5, and 9 g) or placebo. Three coprimary endpoints were change from baseline in mean sleep latency on the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test, Clinical Global Impression-Improvement rating, and weekly cataplexy attacks at 9, 7.5, and 6 g. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Safety included adverse drug reactions and clinical laboratory assessments. RESULTS: In total, 222 patients were randomized; 212 received ≥1 dose of ON-SXB (n = 107) or placebo (n = 105). For the three coprimary endpoints and Epworth Sleepiness Scale, all three doses of ON-SXB demonstrated clinically meaningful, statistically significant improvement versus placebo (all p < 0.001). For ON-SXB 9 g versus placebo, increase in mean sleep latency was 10.8 versus 4.7 min (Least squares mean difference, LSMD [95% CI], 6.13 [3.52 to 8.75]), 72.0% versus 31.6% were rated much/very much improved on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (OR [95% CI], 5.56 [2.76 to 11.23]), change in mean weekly number of cataplexy attacks was -11.5 versus -4.9 (LSMD [95% CI], -6.65 [-9.32 to -3.98]), and change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale was -6.5 and -2.7 (LSMD [95% CI], -6.52 [-5.47 to -2.26]). Common adverse reactions included nausea, vomiting, headache, dizziness, and enuresis. CONCLUSIONS: ON-SXB significantly improved narcolepsy symptoms; its safety profile was consistent with SXB. ON-SXB conferred efficacy with a clearly beneficial single nighttime dose. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02720744, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02720744.

Pharmacokinetics of FT218, a Once-Nightly Sodium Oxybate Formulation in Healthy Adults.

PURPOSE: FT218 is an investigational, once-nightly, modified-release formulation of sodium oxybate (SO). SO effectively treats excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy in patients with narcolepsy. Current approved SO formulations, at effective doses of 6, 7.5, and 9 g, require twice-nightly divided dosing, with the first dose taken at bedtime and the second 2.5-4 h later. The purpose of the following studies was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic properties, safety profile, and tolerability of FT218 in healthy adults. METHODS: Four crossover, single-dose studies were conducted. The first was a pilot study (n = 16) that compared 3 prototype formulations of FT218 4.5 g to twice-nightly SO 4.5 g (2 divided doses of 2.25 g); the second, a dose-proportionality study (n = 20) that evaluated FT218 4.5, 7.5, and 9 g; the third, a relative bioavailability study (n = 28) that compared FT218 6 g with twice-nightly SO 6 g (2 divided doses of 3 g); and the fourth, a food-effect study (n = 16) of FT218 6 g. RESULTS: In the pilot study, FT218 prototype 2 had a lower Cmax, lower plasma concentration 8 h after dosing (C8h), similar exposure (AUC), and comparable interperson variability to twice-nightly SO 4.5 g. Exploratory pharmacodynamic data indicated similar sleep quality and morning alertness between FT218 and twice-nightly SO. Prototype 2 was selected for further development. In the dose-proportionality study, FT218 had dose proportionality for Cmax and slightly more than dose proportionality for AUC. The relative bioavailability study confirmed that FT218 6 g had lower Cmax and C8h than twice-nightly SO 6 g but equivalent AUC and comparable variability. In the food-effect study, FT218 6 g had longer tmax (1 h later), lower Cmax (67%), and decreased AUC (86%) in fed versus fasted states. For all studies, adverse events with FT218 were mostly mild or moderate in severity, nonserious, and known to be associated with SO. Most common adverse events included somnolence, dizziness, and nausea. Safety profiles of FT218 and twice-nightly SO at 4.5 and 6 g were similar. IMPLICATIONS: Once-nightly FT218 at 4.5 and 6 g had lower overall Cmax and C8h and similar exposure and variability compared with twice-nightly SO. FT218 was generally well tolerated and comparable to twice-nightly SO.

A Randomized, Crossover, Pharmacokinetics Evaluation of a Novel Continuous Release and Absorption Melatonin Formulation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetic and safety profile of a novel continuous release and absorption melatonin (CRA-melatonin) compared with an immediate-release melatonin (IR-melatonin) product. METHODS: The REM Absorption Kinetics Trial (REMAKT), an open-label, single-center, randomized, single-dose, 2-way crossover trial, compared the pharmacokinetic and safety profile of CRA-melatonin (5 mg) with IR-melatonin (5 mg) in healthy adult volunteers. The study was conducted from March 18, 2016, to April 20, 2016. RESULTS: Ten subjects completed REMAKT. Plasma melatonin levels exceeded the targeted maintenance threshold level of 1,000 pg/mL for a median of 6.7 hours for CRA-melatonin compared with 3.7 hours for IR-melatonin. The median Cmax was 4,690 pg/mL for CRA-melatonin and 23,352 pg/mL for IR-melatonin. In REMAKT, there were no treatment-emergent adverse events reported in the CRA-melatonin arm. Five treatment-emergent adverse events occurred with IR-melatonin. CONCLUSIONS: The novel, well-tolerated CRA-melatonin was shown to achieve quick release and then continuous release and absorption of melatonin for up to 7 hours, making it a significant advancement in the pharmacokinetic release profile of exogenous melatonin delivery and, therefore, an important potential consideration as a baseline therapy for sleep.

APD125, a selective serotonin 5-HT(2A) receptor inverse agonist, significantly improves sleep maintenance in primary insomnia.

INTRODUCTION: Insomnia is a condition affecting 10% to 15% of the adult population and is characterized by difficulty falling asleep, difficulty staying asleep, or nonrestorative sleep, accompanied by daytime impairment or distress. This study evaluates APD125, a selective inverse agonist of the 5-HT(2A) receptor, for treatment of chronic insomnia, with particular emphasis on sleep maintenance. In phase 1 studies, APD125 improved sleep maintenance and was well tolerated. METHODOLOGY: Adult subjects (n=173) with DSM-IV defined primary insomnia were randomized into a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-way crossover study to compare 2 doses of APD125 (10 mg and 40 mg) with placebo. Each treatment period was 7 days with a 7- to 9-day washout period between treatments. Polysomnographic recordings were performed at the initial 2 screening nights and at nights (N) 1/2 and N 6/7 of each treatment period. RESULTS: APD125 was associated with significant improvements in key sleep maintenance parameters measured by PSG. Wake time after sleep onset decreased (SEM) by 52.5 (3.2) min (10 mg) and 53.5 (3.5) min (40 mg) from baseline to N 1/2 vs. 37.8 (3.4) min for placebo, (P < 0.0001 for both doses vs. placebo), and by 51.7 (3.4) min (P = 0.01) and 48.0 (3.6) min (P = 0.2) at N 6/7 vs. 44.0 (3.8) min for placebo. Significant APD125 effects on wake time during sleep were also seen (P < 0.0001 N 1/2, P < 0.001 N 6/7). The number of arousals and number of awakenings decreased significantly with APD125 treatment compared to placebo. Slow wave sleep showed a statistically significant dose-dependent increase. There was no significant decrease in latency to persistent sleep. No serious adverse events were reported, and no meaningful differences in adverse event profiles were observed between either dose of APD125 and placebo. APD125 was not associated with next-day psychomotor impairment as measured by Digit Span, Digit Symbol Copy, and Digit Symbol Coding Tests. CONCLUSIONS: APD125 produced statistically significant improvements in objective parameters of sleep maintenance and sleep consolidation and was well tolerated in adults with primary chronic insomnia.

A randomized Phase 2 study to evaluate the orexin-2 receptor antagonist seltorexant in individuals with insomnia without psychiatric comorbidity.

BACKGROUND: Seltorexant is a potent and selective antagonist of the orexin-2 receptor that is being developed for the treatment of insomnia and major depressive disorder. AIMS: The primary objective was to investigate the effect of seltorexant on sleep efficiency after single and multiple dose administration in subjects with insomnia disorder without psychiatric comorbidity. Secondary objectives included evaluation of total sleep time, latency to persistent sleep, and wake after sleep onset. Subjects received 40 mg of seltorexant for five days during Period 1 and placebo during Period 2 or vice versa in this randomized, two-way crossover study. Objective sleep parameters were evaluated by polysomnography over 8 h on Day 1/2 (single dose) and on Day 5/6 (multiple doses). Subjective sleep parameters were assessed by questionnaires. RESULTS: Twenty-seven subjects completed the study. The mean changes in sleep efficiency (% (SD)) of seltorexant from placebo at Day 1/2 were 5.8 (9.2), and 7.9 (9.8) at Day 5/6 ( p < 0.001 at both time points); in total sleep time (min (SD)) 27.7 (44.3) and 37.9 (47.1), respectively; in latency to persistent sleep (min (SD)) -18.8 (21.3) and -29.9 (27.7), respectively; and in wake after sleep onset (min (SD)) -11.1 (36.4) and -11.3 (46.5). The most common adverse events were headache and somnolence. CONCLUSIONS: Sleep efficiency was increased with seltorexant treatment compared with placebo. Treatment with seltorexant resulted in a prolonged total sleep time, shorter latency to persistent sleep and wake after sleep onset. There were no unexpected safety findings.

Efficacy and safety of doxepin 1 mg, 3 mg, and 6 mg in adults with primary insomnia.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of doxepin 1, 3, and 6 mg in insomnia patients. DESIGN: Adults (18-64 y) with chronic primary insomnia (DSM-IV) were randomly assigned to one of four sequences of 1 mg, 3 mg, and 6 mg of doxepin, and placebo in a crossover study. Treatment periods consisted of 2 polysomnographic assessment nights with a 5-day or 12-day drug-free interval between periods. Efficacy was assessed using polysomnography (PSG) and patient-reported measures. Safety analyses included measures of residual sedation and adverse events. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were randomized. Wake time during sleep, the a priori defined primary endpoint, was statistically significantly improved at the doxepin 3 mg and 6 mg doses versus placebo. All three doses had statistically significant improvements versus placebo for PSG-defined wake after sleep onset, total sleep time, and overall sleep efficiency (SE). SE in the final third-of-the-night also demonstrated statistically significant improvement at all doses. The doxepin 6 mg dose significantly reduced subjective latency to sleep onset. All three doxepin doses had a safety profile comparable to placebo. There were no statistically significant differences in next-day residual sedation, and sleep architecture was generally clinically preserved. CONCLUSIONS: In adults with primary insomnia, doxepin 1 mg, 3 mg, and 6 mg was well-tolerated and produced improvement in objective and subjective sleep maintenance and duration endpoints that persisted into the final hour of the night. The side-effect profile was comparable to placebo, with no reported anticholinergic effects, no memory impairment, and no significant hangover/next-day residual effects. These data demonstrate that doxepin 1 mg, 3 mg, and 6 mg is efficacious in improving the sleep of patients with chronic primary insomnia.

SA4Ag, a 4-antigen Staphylococcus aureus vaccine, rapidly induces high levels of bacteria-killing antibodies.

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus is a leading cause of healthcare-associated infections. No preventive vaccine is currently licensed. SA4Ag is an investigational 4-antigen S. aureus vaccine, composed of capsular polysaccharide conjugates of serotypes 5 and 8 (CP5 and CP8), recombinant surface protein clumping factor A (rmClfA), and recombinant manganese transporter protein C (rMntC). This Phase 1 study aimed to confirm the safety and immunogenicity of SA4Ag produced by the final manufacturing process before efficacy study initiation in a surgical population. METHODS: Healthy adults (18-<65years) received one intramuscular SA4Ag injection. Serum functional antibodies were measured at baseline and Day 29 post-vaccination. An opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) assay measured the ability of vaccine-induced antibodies to CP5 and CP8 to kill S. aureus clinical isolates. For MntC and ClfA, antigen-specific immunogenicity was assessed via competitive Luminex® immunoassay (cLIA) and via fibrinogen-binding inhibition (FBI) assay for ClfA only. Reactogenicity and adverse event data were collected. RESULTS: One hundred participants were vaccinated. SA4Ag was well tolerated, with a satisfactory safety profile. On Day 29, OPA geometric mean titers (GMTs) were 45,738 (CP5, 95% CI: 38,078-54,940) and 42,652 (CP8, 95% CI: 32,792-55,477), consistent with 69.2- and 28.9-fold rises in bacteria-killing antibodies, respectively; cLIA GMTs were 2064.4 (MntC, 95% CI: 1518.2-2807.0) and 3081.4 (ClfA, 95% CI: 2422.2-3920.0), consistent with 19.6- and 12.3-fold rises, respectively. Similar to cLIA results, ClfA FBI titers rose 11.0-fold (GMT: 672.2, 95% CI: 499.8-904.2). The vast majority of participants achieved the pre-defined biologically relevant thresholds: CP5: 100%; CP8: 97.9%, ClfA: 87.8%; and MntC 96.9%. CONCLUSIONS: SA4Ag was safe, well tolerated, and rapidly induced high levels of bacteria-killing antibodies in healthy adults. A Phase 2B efficacy trial in adults (18-85years) undergoing elective spinal fusion is ongoing to assess SA4Ag's ability to prevent postoperative invasive surgical site and bloodstream infections caused by S. aureus. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02364596.

Immunogenicity and safety of an AS03-adjuvanted H7N1 vaccine in adults 65years of age and older: A phase II, observer-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: H7 influenza strains can cause severe and often fatal human infections, especially in the elderly. This phase II, observer-blind, randomized trial (www.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01949090) assessed the immunogenicity and safety of a novel AS03-adjuvanted H7N1 vaccine that may serve as a model H7-subtype vaccine. METHODS: 360 adults ≥65years of age in stable health received either 1 of 4 adjuvanted A/mallard/Netherlands/12/2000 split virion vaccine formulations (3.75µg or 7.5µg hemagglutinin adjuvanted with either AS03A or AS03B) or saline placebo, given as a 2-dose series. Immunogenicity was assessed using hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) and microneutralization (MN) assays for the per-protocol cohort, comprising 332 participants at 21days post-each dose, 332 at month 6, and 309 at month 12 (HI assay only). Safety was assessed up to month 12 for all participants who had received ≥1 dose (360 participants). RESULTS: For H7N1 HI antibody assessment at day 42 (21days post-dose 2), seroprotection rates (SPR) in the vaccinated groups were 69.6%-88.7%, seroconversion rates (SCR) 69.6%-88.5%, mean geometric increase (MGI) 11.0-18.9, and HI geometric mean titers (GMTs) 55.0-104.8. These parameters declined by month 6 and month 12. Microneutralization GMTs were 46.2-74.7 in the vaccinated groups at day 42, while vaccine response rate (VRR; proportion with ≥4-fold increase in MN titer) was 46.4%-81.5%. For the cross-reactive H7N9 strain, at day 42, HI GMT were 64.3-201.3, SPR 78.6%-96.3%, SCR 79.3%-96.3%, and MGI 14.1-37.7; MN GMTs were 44.0-85.6, and VRR 46.4-85.2%. The most frequent solicited symptom was injection site pain (41.7%-65.0% of vaccine recipients). In total, 40 participants reported 67 serious adverse events; none were considered causally related to vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: In adults aged ≥65years, the adjuvanted H7N1 vaccine was immunogenic after 2 doses, and had an acceptable safety profile. www.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01949090.

Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a 4-antigen Staphylococcus aureus vaccine (SA4Ag): Results from a first-in-human randomised, placebo-controlled phase 1/2 study.

BACKGROUND: A prophylactic Staphylococcus aureus four-antigen vaccine (SA4Ag) is under development for prevention of invasive S. aureus disease. A preliminary S. aureus three-antigen vaccine (SA3Ag) was reformulated to include a novel manganese transporter protein (MntC or rP305A). This study describes the first-in-human dose-finding, safety, and immunogenicity results for SA4Ag. METHODS: In this double-blind, sponsor-unblind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 study, 454 healthy adults aged 18-64years were randomised to receive a single dose of one of three formulations of SA4Ag with escalating dose levels of rP305A or placebo. Functional immune responses were measured using opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) killing and fibrinogen-binding inhibition (FBI) assays; antigen-specific immunogenicity was assessed using a four-plex competitive Luminex® immunoassay (cLIA). RESULTS: A high proportion of SA4Ag recipients met the pre-defined antibody thresholds for each antigen at Day 29. A substantial and dose-level dependent immune response was observed for rP305A, with up to 18-fold rises in cLIA titres at Day 29. Robust functional responses were demonstrated, with >80-fold and >20-fold rises in OPA assay titres at Day 29 using S. aureus strains expressing capsular polysaccharide serotypes 5 and 8, respectively. Durable antibody responses were observed through month 12, gradually waning from peak levels achieved by days 11-15. SA4Ag was well tolerated, and no vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose vaccination of SA4Ag in healthy adults aged 18-64years safely induced rapid and robust functional immune responses that were durable through month 12, supporting further development of this vaccine. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01364571.

Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a single dose 4-antigen or 3-antigen Staphylococcus aureus vaccine in healthy older adults: Results of a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: The decline in immune function with age is a challenge to vaccine development. Following an initial study in adults aged 18-64years, this study evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) 4-antigen (SA4Ag) and 3-antigen (SA3Ag) vaccine in older adults. SA3Ag included capsular polysaccharide serotypes 5 and 8 (CP5 and CP8) conjugated to the nontoxic mutant form of diphtheria toxin (CRM197) and a recombinant version of clumping factor A (ClfA). SA4Ag included these antigens, with the addition of a recombinant manganese transporter C (rP305A or MntC). Both vaccines were unadjuvanted. METHODS: In this double-blind, sponsor-unblinded, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 study, 284 healthy adults (aged 65-85years) were randomised to receive a single dose of one of three formulations of SA4Ag with escalating dose levels of rP305A, SA3Ag, or placebo. Functional immune responses were measured using opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) killing and fibrinogen-binding inhibition (FBI) assays; immunogenicity was also assessed using a competitive Luminex® immunoassay (cLIA). T-cell responses were measured in a small subgroup of subjects using intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) assays. RESULTS: The results demonstrated rapid and robust functional immune responses to all antigens in healthy older adults. A high proportion of active vaccine recipients met the pre-defined antibody thresholds for each antigen at Day 29. SA4Ag elicited a dose-level response to rP305A with up to a 13-fold rise in cLIA titres at Day 29. Opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) assays showed >50- and >20-fold rises in functional titres using S. aureus strains expressing CP5 and CP8, respectively, at Day 29. T-cell cytokine responses were not substantially above background levels. There were no safety concerns in this study population and no increases in adverse events with higher rP305A dose levels. CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose vaccination of SA4Ag and SA3Ag in healthy adults aged 65-85years safely induced rapid and robust functional immune responses, supporting further development of SA4Ag for the prevention of S. aureus disease in adults up to age 85years. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01643941.

An efficacy, safety, and dose-response study of Ramelteon in patients with chronic primary insomnia.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and dose response of Ramelteon, a novel highly selective MT1/MT2 receptor agonist, in patients with chronic primary insomnia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, five-period crossover study design was performed. A total of 107 patients, aged 18-64 years, were randomized into a dosing sequence that included 4, 8, 16, and 32 mg of Ramelteon and placebo. Patients received all five treatments, with a 5- to 12-day washout period between treatments, and served as their own controls. Medication was administered 30 min before habitual bedtime and polysomnographic monitoring. Next-day residual effects were assessed with two visual analog scales (mood and feeling), digit symbol substitution test (DSST), word-list memory tests (immediate recall and delayed recall), and a post-sleep questionnaire that ascertained patients' alertness and ability to concentrate. RESULTS: All tested doses of Ramelteon resulted in statistically significant reductions in latency to persistent sleep (LPS) and increases in total sleep time (TST). No next-day residual effects were apparent at any dose, as compared with placebo. There were no differences in the number or type of adverse events between any active treatment and placebo group. The most commonly reported adverse events were headache, somnolence, and sore throat. CONCLUSIONS: Ramelteon demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in LPS and a statistically significant increase in TST, with no apparent next-day residual effects, in patients with chronic primary insomnia.

Effects of ramelteon on patient-reported sleep latency in older adults with chronic insomnia.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of ramelteon, a selective MT(1)/MT(2) receptor agonist, for chronic insomnia treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 35-night outpatient trial with weekly clinic visits at multiple centers. Patients include older adults (>or=65 years; N=829) with chronic insomnia. Placebo, ramelteon 4mg, or ramelteon 8mg were taken nightly for five weeks, and patient-reported sleep data were collected using sleep diaries. Primary efficacy was sleep latency at week 1. Sustained efficacy was examined at weeks 3 and 5. Rebound insomnia and withdrawal effects were evaluated during a 7-day placebo run-out. RESULTS: Both doses of ramelteon produced statistically significant reductions in sleep latency vs. placebo at week 1 (ramelteon 4mg: 70.2 vs. 78.5min, P=.008; ramelteon 8mg: 70.2 vs. 78.5 min, P=.008). Patients continued to report reduced sleep latency at week 3 with ramelteon 8mg (60.3 vs. 69.3min, P=.003), and at week 5 with ramelteon 4 mg (63.4 vs. 70.6 min, P=.028) and ramelteon 8 mg (57.7 vs. 70.6 min; P<.001). Statistically significant increases in total sleep time were observed with ramelteon 4 mg at week 1 (324.6 vs. 313.9 min, P=.004) and week 3 (336.0 vs. 324.3min, P=.007) compared with placebo. There was no evidence of significant rebound insomnia or withdrawal effects following treatment discontinuation. The incidence of adverse events was similar among all treatment groups; most were mild or moderate. CONCLUSIONS: In older adults with chronic insomnia, ramelteon significantly reduced patient reports of sleep latency over five weeks of treatment with no significant rebound insomnia or withdrawal effects.

A 2-week efficacy and safety study of eszopiclone in elderly patients with primary insomnia.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the efficacy of eszopiclone in primary insomnia. DESIGN/SETTING: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter in outpatient setting with weekly visits. PARTICIPANTS: Two-hundred thirty one men and women aged 65 to 85 years (mean age 72.3 years) with primary insomnia, as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition. INTERVENTIONS: Eszopiclone 1 mg (n = 72), eszopiclone 2 mg (n = 79), or placebo (n = 80) nightly for 2 weeks. MEASUREMENTS/RESULTS: Efficacy was assessed using an interactive voice response system. Following the predefined hierarchical testing strategy, the eszopiclone 2-mg group had a significantly shorter sleep latency compared with placebo over the double-blind period (P = .0034). The eszopiclone 2-mg group had significantly longer total sleep time (P = .0003) and eszopiclone 1-mg group had significantly shorter sleep latency (P < or = .012) compared with placebo. The eszopiclone 1-mg group was not significantly different from placebo on total sleep time or any other secondary efficacy endpoint. Secondary analyses indicated that the eszopiclone 2-mg group had significantly less wake after sleep onset; significantly fewer and shorter in duration daytime naps; and significantly higher ratings of sleep quality and depth, daytime alertness, and sense of physical well-being compared with placebo (P < .05). Eszopiclone was well tolerated. The most frequent treatment-related adverse event was unpleasant taste. CONCLUSION: Nightly treatment with eszopiclone 1 mg effectively induced sleep, while the 2-mg dose was effective in inducing and maintaining sleep. Eszopiclone was well tolerated in elderly patients with primary insomnia, and the sleep efficacy was accompanied by significantly less napping and significantly higher ratings of daytime alertness, sense of physical well-being, and several quality-of-life parameters at the higher dose.

Gender discrimination and sexual harassment in medical education: perspectives gained by a 14-school study.

PURPOSE: The authors attempted to determine male and female medical students' exposures to and perceptions of gender discrimination and sexual harassment (GD/SH) in selected academic and nonacademic contexts. METHOD: An anonymous, self-report questionnaire was administered in the spring of 1997 to senior medical students at 14 U.S. medical schools. Data were collected about students' exposures to GD/SH during undergraduate medical education and outside the medical training environment. Students' perceptions of GD/SH in various medical specialties and practice settings were also measured. RESULTS: Of the 1,911 questionnaires administered, 1,314 were completed (response rate, 69%). Both men and women reported exposures to GD/SH. More women than men reported all types of exposures to GD/SH across all academic and nonacademic contexts. Differences between men and women in the frequencies of exposures were greatest outside the medical training environment (t = 15.67, df = 1171, p

A randomized, double-blind, single-dose, placebo-controlled, multicenter, polysomnographic study of gabapentin in transient insomnia induced by sleep phase advance.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of single doses of gabapentin 250 and 500 mg on polysomnographic (PSG) and participant-reported sleep measures in a 5-h phase advance insomnia model. METHODS: Adults reporting occasional disturbed sleep received gabapentin 500 mg (n = 125), 250 mg (n = 125), or placebo (n = 127) 30 min prior to bedtime and were in bed from 17:00 to 01:00, ∼5 h before their habitual bedtime. Sleep was assessed by PSG, post-sleep questionnaire, and the Karolinska Sleep Diary (KSD). Next-day residual effects (Digit Symbol Substitution Test [DSST] and Stanford Sleepiness Scale [SSS]) and tolerability were assessed. RESULTS: Demographics were comparable among groups. Among PSG endpoints, wake after sleep onset (primary endpoint) (135.7 [placebo], 100.7 [250 mg], and 73.2 [500 mg] min) was significantly lower and total sleep time (TST) (311.4, 356.5, and 378.7 min) significantly greater in both gabapentin groups versus placebo. Latency to persistent sleep was not significantly different among groups. Percent slow wave sleep (12.6%, 15.4%, and 17.0%, respectively) was significantly greater and percent stage 1 (15.1%, 11.8%, and 10.8%, respectively) significantly lower relative to placebo. Gabapentin was associated with significantly higher values of KSD Sleep Quality Index and reported TST versus placebo; no other reported outcomes were significant. Neither gabapentin dose produced evidence of next-day residual effects as measured by DSST and SSS. Adverse events were infrequent (< 5%). CONCLUSION: Participants with occasional disturbed sleep treated with gabapentin showed significantly longer sleep duration and greater depth (versus placebo) in response to a phase advance manipulation known to disrupt sleep maintenance.

The effect of armodafinil on patient-reported functioning and quality of life in patients with excessive sleepiness associated with shift work disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether treatment with armodafinil for 6 weeks affected patient-reported overall functioning and daily quality of life compared with placebo in patients with excessive sleepiness associated with shift work disorder. METHOD: This 6-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was conducted in 45 sleep centers across the United States between February and October 2010. Patients included in the study were 18 to 65 years of age and diagnosed with excessive sleepiness associated with shift work disorder on the basis of the International Classification of Sleep Disorders: Diagnostic and Coding Manual, Second Edition and DSM-IV-TR criteria. These patients also experienced late-in-shift sleepiness between 4 AM and 8 AM (Karolinska Sleepiness Scale score ≥ 6) and were functionally impaired (Global Assessment of Functioning score < 70). Patients were administered 150 mg of armodafinil or placebo on nights worked, and efficacy measures included changes in patient-reported overall functioning (modified Sheehan Disability Scale [SDS-M]) and daily quality of life (10-question Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire [FOSQ-10]). RESULTS: Patients treated with armodafinil had significantly greater improvement in SDS-M composite scores at final visit (last observation carried forward) (-6.8 vs -4.5, respectively, P = .0027) than those receiving placebo. Although the armodafinil group, compared to the placebo group, showed a greater improvement in total FOSQ-10 score from baseline to final visit (+3.4 vs +2.7, respectively, P = .0775), a statistically significant improvement was observed only at week 6 (+3.6 vs +2.7, respectively, P = .0351). CONCLUSIONS: These findings are consistent with our previous report on clinician-rated measures of efficacy by demonstrating that armodafinil improves patient-rated functioning in patients with shift work disorder. Additionally, the current findings show for the first time that armodafinil may have benefits on quality of life after 6 weeks of treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01080807.