HLA-A*31:01 and different types of carbamazepine-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions: an international study and meta-analysis.

HLA-A*31:01 was reported to be associated with carbamazepine (CBZ)-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR), including drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). We conducted an international study using consensus diagnosis criteria to enroll a total of 93 patients with CBZ-SCAR from Europe or Asia. We found that HLA-A*31:01 showed a significant association with CBZ-DRESS in Europeans (P<0.001; odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI))=57.6 (11.0-340)), and the strong association was also found in Chinese (P<0.001; OR (95% CI)=23.0 (4.2-125)). However, HLA-A*31:01 had no association with CBZ-SJS/TEN in neither Chinese nor Europeans. By comparison, HLA-B*15:02 showed a strong association with CBZ-SJS/TEN in Chinese (P<0.001, OR (95% CI)=58.1 (17.6-192)). A meta-analysis of this and other published studies confirmed that in all populations, HLA-A*31:01 had an extremely strong association with CBZ-DRESS (P<0.001, a pooled OR (95% CI)=13.2 (8.4-20.8)), but a much weaker association with CBZ-SJS/TEN (P=0.01, OR (95% CI)=3.94 (1.4-11.5)). Our data revealed that HLA-A*31:01 is a specific predictor for CBZ-DRESS but not for CBZ-SJS/TEN. More studies are needed to investigate the genetic determinant of CBZ-SJS/TEN in Europeans. Considering the potential clinical utility, the cost-effectiveness of the combined HLA-A*31:01 and HLA-B*15:02 genetic test to prevent CBZ-SCAR in Chinese needs further investigation.

Prognosis of generalized bullous fixed drug eruption: comparison with Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis.

BACKGROUND: Generalized bullous fixed drug eruption (GBFDE) is a rare cutaneous adverse reaction to drugs, and may resemble Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) or toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), but is usually considered less severe. OBJECTIVES: To compare the severity and mortality rate in cases of GBFDE and control cases of SJS or TEN of similar extent of skin detachment. METHODS: This was a case-control analysis of 58 patients with GBFDE matched by age and extent of skin detachment to 170 control patients with a validated diagnosis of SJS or SJS/TEN overlap. Data for cases and controls were extracted from the EuroSCAR and RegiSCAR databases resulting from two population-based studies of severe cutaneous adverse reactions conducted in Europe. Preselected outcome criteria were death (primary), and fever, duration of hospitalization and transfer to an intensive care or burn unit (secondary). RESULTS: GBFDE affected mainly older patients (median age 78 years, interquartile range 68-84 years); 13 of 58 cases died (22%). The mortality rate was slightly but not significantly lower for patients with GBFDE than controls [28%, multivariate odds ratio 0·6 (95% confidence interval 0·30-1·4)]. Patients with GBFDE and controls did not differ in other preselected criteria for severity. CONCLUSIONS: Although our study featured limited statistical power, we were not able to confirm that GBFDE had better prognosis than SJS or SJS/TEN of similar disease extent in older patients. Severe cases of GBFDE deserve the attention and active management given to patients with SJS or TEN.

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS): an original multisystem adverse drug reaction. Results from the prospective RegiSCAR study.

BACKGROUND: Cases of severe drug hypersensitivity, demonstrating a variable spectrum of cutaneous and systemic involvement, are reported under various names, especially drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS). Case definition and overlap with other severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR) are debated. OBJECTIVES: To analyse the spectrum of signs and symptoms of DRESS and distribution of causative drugs in a large multicentre series. PATIENTS AND METHODS: RegiSCAR, a multinational registry of SCAR, prospectively enrolled 201 potential cases from 2003 to mid-2009. Using a standardized scoring system, 117 cases were validated as showing probable or definite DRESS. RESULTS: The male/female ratio was 0.80; females were borderline significantly younger than males. Next to the ubiquitous exanthema, the main features were eosinophilia (95%), visceral involvement (91%), high fever (90%), atypical lymphocytes (67%), mild mucosal involvement (56%) and lymphadenopathy (54%). The reaction was protracted in all but two patients; two patients died during the acute phase. Drug causality was plausible in 88% of cases. Antiepileptic drugs were involved in 35%, allopurinol in 18%, antimicrobial sulfonamides and dapsone in 12% and other antibiotics in 11%. The median time interval after drug intake was 22 days (interquartile range 17-31) for all drugs with (very) probable causality, with differences between drugs. CONCLUSION: This prospective observational study supports the hypothesis that DRESS is an original phenotype among SCAR in terms of clinical and biological characteristics, causative drugs, and time relation. The diversity of causative drugs was rather limited, and mortality was lower than that suggested by prior publications.

The role of prior corticosteroid use on the clinical course of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: a case-control analysis of patients selected from the multinational EuroSCAR and RegiSCAR studies.

BACKGROUND: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are immunologically mediated, severe cutaneous adverse reactions involving cytotoxic T cells, natural killer cells and various mediators. In large studies, up to 15% of SJS/TEN occurred in patients with chronic corticosteroid use. It is unclear if this prior exposure to corticosteroids modified the disease course. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether systemic corticosteroid usage prior to the onset of SJS/TEN modified the clinical course and outcome. If a disease-modifying effect is present, information from such an analysis may have implications on the therapeutic use of corticosteroids in SJS/TEN. METHODS: This is a case-control study based on data collected in the EuroSCAR and RegiSCAR studies. Ninety-two cases of SJS/TEN with exposure to corticosteroids prior to the onset of disease, and 321 randomly selected SJS/TEN patients without prior exposure were included. Primary outcomes included progression of disease, disease severity and mortality. A secondary analysis of latency between the beginning of drug use and the onset of disease, based on exposure to a single high-risk drug, was also performed. RESULTS: On multivariate analysis, cases with prior exposure to corticosteroids had a longer progression of disease by 2·2 days [95% confidence interval (CI) 1·1-3·2]. The disease severity and mortality outcome were unaffected. In addition, there is evidence that corticosteroids delayed the onset of SJS/TEN in patients with exposure to high-risk drugs by 7·1 days (CI -0·2 to 14·5). CONCLUSIONS: The prior use of corticosteroids prolonged the period of disease progression without influencing the disease severity or mortality. In addition, when SJS/TEN is preceded by use of a single high-risk drug, the latency between the drug intake and the onset of SJS/TEN may also be increased. These findings suggest that corticosteroids have a mild impact on the course of SJS/TEN, and further studies are required to clarify any potential therapeutic effects.

An application of propensity score methods to estimate the treatment effect of corticosteroids in patients with severe cutaneous adverse reactions.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether propensity score (ps) methods could reasonably be applied to estimate the treatment effect on mortality, based on a comparatively small sample of patients with severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR) and who come from different countries where physicians prefer different treatment schemes. METHODS: Ps methods were applied to cope with confounding due to non-randomized treatment assignment for the analysis of the treatment data obtained in the case-control study EuroSCAR. For the study's purpose, the analysis focused on the comparison of the treatments: corticosteroids (STER) and supportive care only (SUPP). RESULTS: 206 French and German patients were treated either with SUPP or STER. Imbalances between treatment groups as well as between the countries were recognized. Concerning the balance between the treatment groups no ps model for the full cohort was satisfying. In addition, the inclusion of a variable for patient's country led to a separation of the patients by country. Thus, we developed ps models for each country separately and estimated the treatment effects (France: odds ratio (OR) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09-3.10, Germany: OR 0.23, CI 0.06-0.92, Overall: OR 0.33 CI 0.11-1.04). CONCLUSIONS: The application of the ps methods was successful and provided valuable information. We could confirm the findings of the original analysis which was based on standard logistic regression, especially concerning the necessity of a country-specific analysis. The observed country differences in the estimated treatment effects were less pronounced and thus seemed to be more reasonable than those of the past analysis.