Atezolizumab as the First Systemic Therapy Approved for Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to review the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of atezolizumab (Tecentriq) for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients aged 2 years and older with unresectable or metastatic alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS). DATA SOURCES: A literature search was conducted using PubMed and MEDLINE databases, published abstracts, and ongoing studies from ClinicalTrials.gov between January 1, 1981, and May 31, 2023. Keywords included atezolizumab, Tecentriq, MPDL3280, immunotherapy, PD-L1, PD-1, pediatrics, sarcoma, and ASPS. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All English-language studies involving atezolizumab for ASPS were included and discussed. DATA SYNTHESIS: Atezolizumab is an anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibody designed to block the interaction between PD-L1 and the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) receptor. Atezolizumab was granted approval by the FDA specifically for ASPS based on a phase II clinical trial in adult and pediatric patients (n = 49), which reported an overall response rate of 24% and a durable response rate at 6 and 12 months of 67% and 42%, respectively. Common grade 3/4 adverse reactions include musculoskeletal pain (8%), followed by hypertension (6%), weight gain (6%), headache (4%), and dizziness (4%). RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE IN COMPARISON WITH EXISTING DRUGS: Advanced ASPS is a high-risk disease with limited treatment options. Atezolizumab appears to be a viable treatment option in ASPS demonstrating clinical efficacy and a manageable toxicity profile. CONCLUSIONS: With no other treatments that are FDA approved specifically for ASPS, and few demonstrating efficacy in the advanced setting, the approval of atezolizumab, including the first approval for pediatric patients, represents a landmark improvement to the therapeutic arsenal against this rare disease.

CDK4/6 and autophagy inhibitors synergize to suppress the growth of human head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) accounts for over 10,000 deaths in the United States annually. Approximately 80% of HNSCC are human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative which have an overall poorer prognosis compared to the HPV-positive disease. Treatment options are mainly nontargeted chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery. The cyclin-d-CDK4/6-RB pathway, which regulates cell cycle progression, is often deregulated in HNSCC, making it an attractive therapeutic target. In the current study, we investigated the therapeutic effects of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors in preclinical models of HNSCCs. Our results show that the specific CDK4/6 inhibitor, abemaciclib, inhibited cell growth, and induced apoptosis in HNSCC cell lines. We also demonstrated that both the pro-survival autophagy pathway and the ERK pathway in HNSCC cells were activated with abemaciclib treatment through the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Coinhibition of CDK4/6 and autophagy synergistically decreased cell viability, induced apoptosis, and inhibited tumor growth in both in vitro and in vivo preclinical HNSCC models. These results reveal a potential therapeutic strategy that supports the rationale for further clinical development of a combination of CDK4/6 and autophagy inhibitors in HNSCC.

PARP1 and POLD2 as prognostic biomarkers for multiple myeloma in autologous stem cell transplant.

Multiple Myeloma (MM) is an incurable plasma cell malignancy often treated by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Clinical response to ASCT has been associated with DNA repair efficiency. Here we interrogated the role of the base excision DNA repair (BER) pathway in MM response to ASCT. Across 450 clinical samples and six disease stages, expression levels of genes in the BER pathway were found to be highly upregulated during the development of MM. In a separate cohort of 559 patients with MM treated with ASCT, expression of BER pathway members MPG and PARP3 was positively associated with overall survival (OS) while expression of PARP1, POLD1, and POLD2 was negatively associated with OS. In a validation cohort of 356 patients with MM treated with ASCT, PARP1 and POLD2 findings were replicated. In patients with MM who never received ASCT (n=319), PARP1 and POLD2 were not associated with OS, suggesting that the prognostic effect of these genes may be treatment-dependent. In preclinical models of MM, synergy was observed in anti-tumor activity when poly (ADPribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (olaparib, talazoparib) were used in combination with melphalan. The negative prognosis associated with PARP1 and POLD2 expression along with the apparent melphalan-sensitizing effect of PARP inhibition may suggest this pathway as a potential biomarker in patients with MM in the setting of ASCT. Further understanding of the role of the BER pathway in MM is vital to improve therapeutic strategies related to ASCT.

Integration of EMT and cellular survival instincts in reprogramming of programmed cell death to anastasis.

Apoptosis is a tightly controlled, coordinated cellular event responsible for inducing programmed cell death to rid the body of defective or unfit cells. Inhibition of apoptosis is, therefore, an essential process for cancer cells to harness. Genomic variants in apoptotic-controlling genes are highly prevalent in cancer and have been identified to induce pro-proliferation and pro-survival pathways, rendering cancer cells resistant to apoptosis. Traditional understanding of apoptosis defines it as an irreversible process; however, growing evidence suggests that apoptosis is a reversible process from which cells can escape, even after the activation of its most committed stages. The mechanism invoked to reverse apoptosis has been termed anastasis and poses challenges for the development and utilization of chemotherapeutic agents. Anastasis has also been identified as a mechanism by which cells can recover from apoptotic lesions and revert back to its previous functioning state. In this review, we intend to focus the attention of the reader on the comprehensive role of survival, metastasis, and epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT), as well as DNA damage repair mechanisms in promoting anastasis. Additionally, we will emphasize the mechanistic consequences of anastasis on drug resistance and recent rational therapeutic approaches designed to combat this resistance.

Sacituzumab Govitecan-hziy: An Antibody-Drug Conjugate for the Treatment of Refractory, Metastatic, Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of sacituzumab govitecan (-hziy; IMMU-132, Trodelvy) for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) who have received at least 2 prior therapies for metastatic disease. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was conducted utilizing PubMed and MEDLINE databases, applicable published abstracts, and ongoing studies from ClinicalTrials.gov between January 1, 1981, and September 3, 2020. Keywords included sacituzumab govitecan (-hziy), IMMU-132, Trop-2 (trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2), and TACSTD2. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All English-language trials involving sacituzumab govitecan for mTNBC were included and discussed. DATA SYNTHESIS: Sacituzumab govitecan is an antibody-drug conjugate targeted for Trop-2 and conjugated to the topoisomerase-1 inhibitor SN-38. It was granted accelerated Food and Drug Administration approval based on a phase I/II single-arm, multicenter study (n = 108), which reported an overall response rate of 33.3% and median duration of response of 7.7 months (95% CI = 4.9-10.8 months). Common adverse reactions include nausea, neutropenia, diarrhea, fatigue, anemia, vomiting, alopecia, constipation, rash, decreased appetite, abdominal pain, and respiratory infection. A confirmatory, randomized phase III clinical trial is ongoing (NCT02574455). RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: This review covers the efficacy, safety, and clinical use of sacituzumab govitecan, a third-line drug with activity in mTNBC. CONCLUSION: Sacituzumab govitecan is a novel targeted treatment with promising activity in mTNBC.

BRCA1/2 Functional Loss Defines a Targetable Subset in Leiomyosarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) describe a heterogeneous group of mesenchymal tumors with limited treatment options. Targeted therapies exist for BRCA1/2 gene alterations, but their prevalence and role have not been fully described in STS. Here, we present the largest effort to characterize the frequency of homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair pathway alterations in STS subtypes and highlight the unique nature of leiomyosarcoma (LMS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: DNA sequencing data were analyzed for HR pathway alterations for 1,236 patients with STS. DNA sequencing data from an additional 1,312 patients were used to confirm the prevalence of HR pathway alterations in LMS. Four uterine LMS (uLMS) patients with functional BRCA2 loss were evaluated for response to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition. RESULTS: In an unselected STS study population, BRCA2 alterations were identified in 15 (1%) patients, and homozygous BRCA2 loss was detected in 9 (<1%). However, subset analysis revealed that these BRCA2 alterations were concentrated in uLMS as compared with any other STS subtype. Notably, 10% of uLMS tumors had a BRCA2 alteration. We further report that PARP inhibitors had demonstrated durable clinical benefit in four uLMS patients with BRCA2 loss. CONCLUSION: HR pathway alterations are rare in most STS. However, we identify uLMS to be enriched for BRCA2 loss and report the positive outcomes of a series of patients treated with PARP inhibitors. Our data suggest that patients with uLMS should be considered for somatic BRCA2 profiling. Prospective trials are necessary to confirm the efficacy of PARP inhibition in uLMS. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Soft-tissue sarcomas are a highly morbid, diverse set of tumors with limited treatment options. This study identifies an increased prevalence of functional BRCA1/2 loss in patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS). It also presents four patients with uLMS and BRCA2 loss who achieved durable clinical benefit from poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition. These data suggest that patients with uLMS in particular should be screened for BRCA1/2 alterations and may benefit from treatment targeted to these alterations.

Degree of MDM2 Amplification Affects Clinical Outcomes in Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Dedifferentiated liposarcomas (DDLPS) are mesenchymal tumors associated with universally poor response to treatment. Genomic amplification of murine double minute 2 (MDM2) is used as a diagnostic biomarker; however, no established biomarkers exist to guide DDLPS treatment. In the largest study of its kind, we report that the extent of MDM2 amplification, not simply the presence of MDM2 amplification, may be biologically important to the actions of DDLPS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The distribution of MDM2 amplification in DDLPS was assessed using data from a commercial sequencing laboratory (n = 642) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (n = 57). Data from two retrospective clinical trials (n = 15, n = 16) and one prospective clinical trial (n = 25) were used to test MDM2's utility as a clinical biomarker. in vitro and in vivo assessments were conducted in DDLPS cell lines. RESULTS: Genomic MDM2 amplification follows a highly reproducible log-normal distribution. In patients with DDLPS treated with complete tumor resection, elevated MDM2 was associated with shortened time to recurrence as measured by genomic amplification (p = .003) and mRNA expression (p = .04). In patients requiring systemic therapy, higher MDM2 amplification was associated with reduced overall survival (p = .04). Doxorubicin treatment of DDLPS cells in vitro demonstrated variable sensitivity based on baseline MDM2 levels, and doxorubicin treatment elevated MDM2 expression. In vivo, treatment with doxorubicin followed by an MDM2 inhibitor improved doxorubicin sensitivity. CONCLUSION: MDM2 amplification levels in DDLPS follow a reproducible distribution and are associated with clinical outcomes and drug sensitivity. These results suggest that a prospective study of MDM2 as a predictive biomarker in DDLPS is warranted. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: No validated biomarkers exist for treatment selection in dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS). Although murine double minute 2 (MDM2) is currently used for diagnosis, the clinical relevance of MDM2 amplification has yet to be fully assessed. This study found that MDM2 amplification follows a predictable distribution in DDLPS and correlates with clinical and biological outcomes. These data suggests that MDM2 amplification may be a useful biomarker in DDLPS.

XRCC1-mediated DNA repair is associated with progression-free survival of multiple myeloma patients after autologous stem cell transplant.

Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) with high-dose melphalan (HDM) is the standard treatment for fit multiple myeloma (MM) patients. It is generally believed that some DNA repair proteins impact the activity to repair melphalan-induced DNA damage, thus potentially contributing to the patient's clinical response. However, knowledge of these proteins is limited. In the current study, we investigated the roles of XRCC1, a protein involved in base excision repair and single-strand break repair, in melphalan response in MM cells. Small interfering RNA knockdown of XRCC1 significantly increased the accumulation of melphalan-induced DNA damage in MM cells and sensitized them to melphalan treatment, indicating that genetic variation in XRCC1 may impact response to melphalan treatment. We then evaluated the association between an XRCC1 variant with reduced activity, rs25487 (R399Q), and clinical outcomes of 108 MM patients with melphalan therapy. Our results showed that XRCC1 rs25487 was associated with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in MM patients. The adjusted hazard ratio for PFS between patients carrying rs25487 AA/AG and GG was 0.42 (95% confidence interval: 0.25, 0.84, P = .014). Taken together, these results indicate that XRCC1 is involved in the repair of melphalan-induced DNA damage and XRCC1 rs25487 variant with impaired DNA repair function influences the clinical responses of HDM in MM patients.

Evaluating the Impact of the Addition of Cladribine to Standard Acute Myeloid Leukemia Induction Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has remained relatively unchanged over the past few decades. Although recent drug approvals have provided an increase in the number of treatment options in AML, further optimization of standard induction therapy is still necessary. The most commonly utilized induction options have been well studied, but there is a paucity of literature comparing the combination of idarubicin with cytarabine and cladribine. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical effectiveness of the addition of cladribine to idarubicin and cytarabine (7+3 IA) induction therapy in the treatment of AML. METHODS: This retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study evaluated 37 patients with previously untreated AML who received either 7+3 IA or idarubicin, cytarabine, and cladribine (7+3+5 IAC) as induction therapy. The primary end point of this study was complete response (CR), with secondary end points including hospital length of stay (LOS), and adverse event rates. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, odds of reaching CR in the 7+3+5 IAC cohort were increased by 33% (95% CI = 1.09-1.55; P < 0.01) compared with the 7+3 IA cohort. Patients who received cladribine were also found to have a reduction in hospital LOS by 3.5 days (95% CI = 0.07-6.85; P = 0.045) without an increase in adverse event rates. CONCLUSION: The addition of cladribine to the 7+3 IA regimen may improve clinical outcomes when used as initial induction therapy, without increasing the incidence of adverse event rates.

Molecular markers of proliferation, DNA repair, and immune infiltration defines high-risk subset of resectable retroperitoneal sarcomas.

INTRODUCTION: For retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS), aggressive surgical resection offers the only chance for a cure; however, 5-year survival remains below 65%. Therefore, there is a critical need to identify drivers of poor clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To identify biomarkers of tumors likely to recur following curative intent resection, we performed genomic and transcriptomic sequencing for 47 and 34 patients, respectively, with non-metastatic RPS at a single, high-volume sarcoma center. RESULTS: At the DNA level, alterations in TERT were associated with poor disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Increased RNA expression of gene sets related to growth signaling and DNA repair were associated with poor DFS and OS. Infiltration of CD8+ T-Cells and activated dendritic cells were associated with poor DFS and OS. CONCLUSION: These findings may help to better identify and treat non-metastatic, high-risk RPS.

A multicenter, randomized, non-comparative, phase II study of nivolumab ± ipilimumab for patients with metastatic sarcoma (Alliance A091401): expansion cohorts and correlative analyses.

BACKGROUND: In this open-label, randomized, non-comparative, multicenter phase II study (Alliance A091401) we report on three expansion cohorts treated with nivolumab (N) with and without ipilimumab (N+I) and provide a multi-omic correlative analysis of actionable biomarkers. METHODS: Patients were randomized (non-comparative) to receive either N or N+I. The primary endpoint was a 6-month confirmed response rate (CRR) defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Secondary endpoints included treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), progression-free survival, and overall survival. Multi-omic correlative analyses were conducted using samples from both the primary and expansion cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients were evaluated for the primary endpoint with disease including gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST, n=18), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS, n=24), and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS, n=24). Neither N nor N+I achieved a complete or partial response in the GIST expansion cohort. In DDLPS and UPS, the primary response endpoint of CRR was met with N+I (both 16.6%, 2/12) but not with N alone (both 8.3%, 1/12). In the GIST cohort, TRAE was higher with N+I treatment, halting enrollment as required per protocol. In a correlative analysis of patients for the expansion cohort and the original cohort (n=86), traditional biomarkers of immunotherapy response were not correlated with response in any histological subtype. Markers of genomic instability including the presence of gene fusions and increased subclonal mutations correlated with improved clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This expansion cohort reaffirms the outcomes of A091401. There remains a pressing need to determine the role of and predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy in sarcoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02500797.

Comparison of variants in TPMT and NUDT15 between sequencing and genotyping methods in a multistate pediatric institution.

The risk of severe adverse events related to thiopurine therapy can be reduced by personalizing dosing based on TPMT and NUDT15 genetic polymorphisms. However, the optimal genetic testing platform has not yet been established. In this study, we report on the TPMT and NUDT15 genotypes and phenotypes generated from 320 patients from a multicenter pediatric healthcare system using both Sanger sequencing and polymerase chain reaction genotyping (hereafter: genotyping) methods to determine the appropriateness of genotyping in our patient population. Sanger sequencing identified variant TPMT alleles including *3A (8, 3.2% of alleles), *3C (4, 1.6%), and *2 (1, 0.4%), and NUDT15 alleles including *2 (5, 3.6%) and *3 (1, 0.7%). For genotyped patients, variants identified in TPMT included *3A (12, 3.1%), *3C (4, 1%), *2 (2, 0.5%), and *8 (1, 0.25%), whereas NUDT15 included *4 (2, 1.9%) and *2 or *3 (1, 1%). Between Sanger sequencing and genotyping, no significant difference in allele, genotype, or phenotype frequency was identified for either TPMT or NUDT15. All patients who were tested using Sanger sequencing would have been accurately phenotyped for either TPMT (124/124), NUDT15 (69/69), or both genes (68/68) if they were assayed using the genotyping method. Considering 193 total TPMT and NUDT15 Sanger Sequencing tests reviewed, all tests would have resulted in an appropriate clinical recommendation if the test had instead been conducted using the comparison genotyping platforms. These results suggest that, in this study population, genotyping would be sufficient to provide accurate phenotype calls and clinical recommendations.

Gene partners of the EWSR1 fusion may represent molecularly distinct entities.

EWSR1 fusions are highly promiscuous and are associated with unique malignancies, clinical phenotypes, and molecular subtypes. However, rare fusion partners (RFP) of EWSR1 has not been well described. Here, we conducted a cross-sectional, retrospective study of 1,140 unique tumors harboring EWSR1 fusions. We identified 64 unique fusion partners. RFPs were identified more often in adults than children. Alterations in cell cycle control and DNA damage response genes as driving the differences between fusion partners. Potentially clinically actionable genomic variants were more prevalent in tumors harboring RFP than common fusions. While the data presented here is limited, tumors harboring RFP of EWSR1 may represent molecularly distinct entities and may benefit from further molecular testing to identify targeted therapeutic options.

Integrating pharmacogenomic testing into paired germline and somatic genomic testing in patients with cancer.

Precision medicine has revolutionized clinical care for patients with cancer through the development of targeted therapy, identification of inherited cancer predisposition syndromes and the use of pharmacogenetics to optimize pharmacotherapy for anticancer drugs and supportive care medications. While germline (patient) and somatic (tumor) genomic testing have evolved separately, recent interest in paired germline/somatic testing has led to an increase in integrated genomic testing workflows. However, paired germline/somatic testing has generally lacked the incorporation of germline pharmacogenomics. Integrating pharmacogenomics into paired germline/somatic genomic testing would be an efficient method for increasing access to pharmacogenomic testing. In this perspective, the authors argue for the benefits of implementing a comprehensive approach integrating somatic and germline testing that is inclusive of pharmacogenomics in clinical practice.

CYP3A5 influences oral tacrolimus pharmacokinetics and timing of acute kidney injury following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Introduction: Polymorphisms in genes responsible for the metabolism and transport of tacrolimus have been demonstrated to influence clinical outcomes for patients following allogeneic hematologic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT). However, the clinical impact of germline polymorphisms specifically for oral formulations of tacrolimus is not fully described. Methods: To investigate the clinical impact of genetic polymorphisms in CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and ABCB1 on oral tacrolimus pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes, we prospectively enrolled 103 adult patients receiving oral tacrolimus for the prevention of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) following allo-HSCT. Patients were followed in the inpatient and outpatient phase of care for the first 100 days of tacrolimus therapy. Patients were genotyped for CYP3A5 *3 (rs776746), CYP3A4 *1B (rs2740574), ABCB1 exon 12 (rs1128503), ABCB1 exon 21 (rs2032582), ABCB1 exon 26 (rs1045642). Results: Expression of CYP3A5 *1 was highly correlated with tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in the inpatient phase of care (p < 0.001) and throughout the entirety of the study period (p < 0.001). Additionally, Expression of CYP3A5 *1 was associated with decreased risk of developing AKI as an inpatient (p = 0.06). Variants in ABCB1 were not associated with tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in this study. We were unable to discern an independent effect of CYP3A4 *1B or *22 in this population. Conclusion: Expression of CYP3A5 *1 is highly influential on the pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes for patients receiving oral tacrolimus as GVHD prophylaxis following allo-HSCT.

Genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 screen identifies etoposide response modulators associated with clinical outcomes in pediatric AML.

Etoposide is used to treat a wide range of malignant cancers, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in children. Despite the use of intensive chemotherapeutic regimens containing etoposide, a significant proportion of pediatric patients with AML become resistant to treatment and relapse, leading to poor survival. This poses a pressing clinical challenge to identify mechanisms underlying drug resistance to enable effective pharmacologic targeting. We performed a genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 synthetic-lethal screening to identify functional modulators of etoposide response in leukemic cell line and integrated results from CRISPR-screen with gene expression and clinical outcomes in pediatric patients with AML treated with etoposide-containing regimen. Our results confirmed the involvement of well-characterized genes, including TOP2A and ABCC1, as well as identified novel genes such as RAD54L2, PRKDC, and ZNF451 that have potential to be novel drug targets. This study demonstrates the ability for leveraging CRISPR/Cas9 screening in conjunction with clinically relevant endpoints to make meaningful discoveries for the identification of prognostic biomarkers and novel therapeutic targets to overcome treatment resistance.

Clinical Utility of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Sarcoma: Successes and Future Challenges.

PURPOSE: Soft tissue and bone sarcomas are rare malignancies that exhibit significant pathologic and molecular heterogeneity. Deregulation of the CDKN2A-CCND-CDK4/6-retinoblastoma 1 (Rb) pathway is frequently observed in about 25% of unselected sarcomas and is pathognomonic for specific sarcoma subtypes. This genomic specificity has fueled the clinical evaluation of selective CDK4/6 inhibitors in sarcomas. Here, we highlight successes, opportunities, and future challenges for using CDK4/6 inhibitors to treat sarcoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This review summarizes the current evidence for the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in sarcoma while identifying molecular rationale and predictive biomarkers that provide the foundation for targeting the CDK4/6 pathway in sarcoma. A systematic review was performed of articles indexed in the PubMed database and the National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov). For each sarcoma subtype, we discuss the preclinical rationale, case reports, and available clinical trials data. RESULTS: Despite promising clinical outcomes in a subset of sarcomas, resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors results in highly heterogeneous clinical outcomes. Current clinical data support the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in subsets of sarcoma primarily driven by CDK4/6 deregulation. When dysregulation of the Rb pathway is a secondary driver of sarcoma, combination therapy with CDK4/6 inhibition may be an option. Developing strategies to identify responders and the mechanisms that drive resistance is important to maximize the clinical utility of these drugs in patients with sarcoma. Potential biomarkers that indicate CDK4/6 inhibitor sensitivity in sarcoma include CDK4, CCND, CCNE, RB1, E2F1, and CDKN2A. CONCLUSION: CDK4/6 inhibitors represent a major breakthrough for targeted cancer treatment. CDK4/6 inhibitor use in sarcoma has led to limited, but significant, early clinical success. Targeted future clinical research will be key to unlocking the potential of CDK4/6 inhibition in sarcoma.

Development of a Campus-Wide Community Service Initiative during a Pandemic.

Community service serves as a major aspect of pharmacy education; however, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) represented a significant disruption to student involvement. The College of Pharmacy student council, which serves as the local student government organization for the University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Jacksonville campus, developed a community service initiative to offer more consistent opportunities for students to participate in community service events, while adapting to COVID-19 restrictions. A retrospective, qualitative review of this initiative demonstrates the potential value of this model. Prior to this initiative, students relied on individual student organizations to provide service opportunities to their members. This excluded portions of the student body and led to sparse and inconsistent events, with limited variation in the types of service events available. Furthermore, de-centralized planning of service opportunities increased the difficulty of ensuring that COVID-19 safety restrictions were followed appropriately. This initiative resulted in 39 students logging over 200 service hours through nine events in the first seven months after its development. Despite the challenges presented by the COVID-19 pandemic, our centralized initiative serves as a model for improving community service involvement.

Drivers of genomic loss of heterozygosity in leiomyosarcoma are distinct from carcinomas.

Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is a rare, aggressive, mesenchymal tumor. Subsets of LMS have been identified to harbor genomic alterations associated with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD); particularly alterations in BRCA2. Whereas genomic loss of heterozygosity (gLOH) has been used as a surrogate marker of HRD in other solid tumors, the prognostic or clinical value of gLOH in LMS (gLOH-LMS) remains poorly defined. We explore the genomic drivers associated with gLOH-LMS and their clinical import. Although the distribution of gLOH-LMS scores are similar to that of carcinomas, outside of BRCA2, there was no overlap with previously published gLOH-associated genes from studies in carcinomas. We note that early stage tumors with elevated gLOH demonstrated a longer disease-free interval following resection in LMS patients. Taken together, and despite similarities to carcinomas in gLOH distribution and clinical import, gLOH-LMS are driven by different genomic signals. Additional studies will be required to isolate and confirm the unique differences in biological factors driving these differences.

Dabrafenib Versus Dabrafenib + Trametinib in BRAF-Mutated Radioactive Iodine Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Results of a Randomized, Phase 2, Open-Label Multicenter Trial.

Background: Oncogenic BRAF mutations are commonly found in advanced differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), and reports have shown efficacy of BRAF inhibitors in these tumors. We investigated the difference in response between dabrafenib monotherapy and dabrafenib + trametinib therapy in patients with BRAF-mutated radioactive iodine refractory DTC. Methods: In this open-label randomized phase 2 multicenter trial, patients aged ≥18 years with BRAF-mutated radioactive iodine refractory DTC with progressive disease by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 within 13 months before enrollment were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned to receive dabrafenib alone or dabrafenib + trametinib. The primary endpoint was objective response rate by modified RECIST (minor response of -20% to -29%, partial and complete response) within the first 24 weeks of therapy. Trial Registration Number: NCT01723202. Results: A total of 53 patients were enrolled. The objective response rate (modified RECIST) was 42% (11/26 [95% confidence interval {CI} 23-63%]) with dabrafenib versus 48% (13/27 [CI 29-68%]) with dabrafenib + trametinib (p = 0.67). Objective response rate (RECIST 1.1) was 35% (9/26 [CI 17-56%]) with dabrafenib and 30% (8/27 [CI 14-51%]) with dabrafenib + trametinib. Most common treatment-related adverse events included skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (17/26, 65%), fever (13/26, 50%), hyperglycemia (12/26, 46%) with dabrafenib alone and fever (16/27, 59%), nausea, chills, fatigue (14/27, 52% each) with dabrafenib + trametinib. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: Combination dabrafenib + trametinib was not superior in efficacy compared to dabrafenib monotherapy in patients with BRAF-mutated radioiodine refractory progressive DTC.