Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in High-Risk Patients: Success versus Risk.

BACKGROUND: Surgical atrial ablation is evaluated by surgeons in relation to the estimated surgical risk. We analyze whether high-risk patients (HRPs) experience risk escalation by ablation procedures. METHODS: The CASE-Atrial Fibrillation (AF) registry is a prospective, multicenter, all-comers registry of atrial ablation in cardiac surgery. We analyzed the 1-year outcome regarding survival and rhythm endpoints of 1,000 consecutive patients according to the operative risk classification (EuroSCORE II ≤ 2 vs. >2). RESULTS: Higher NYHA (New York Heart Association) score, ischemic heart failure, status poststroke, renal insufficiency, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and diabetes mellitus were strongly represented in HRPs. HRPs exhibit more left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% (19.2 vs. 8.8%; p < 0.001) but identical left atrial diameter and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter compared with low-risk patients (LRPs). CHA2DS-Vasc-score (2.4 ± 1 vs. 3.6 ± 1.5; p < 0.001), sternotomies, combination surgeries, coronary artery bypass graft, and mitral valve procedures were increased in HRPs. LRPs underwent stand-alone ablations as well. Ablation energy did not differ. Left atrial appendage closure was performed in up to 86.1% (mainly cut-and-sew procedures). Mortality corresponded to the original risk class without an escalation that may be related to ablation, stroke rate, or myocardial infarction. A total of 60.6% of HRPs versus 75.1% of LRPs were discharged in sinus rhythm. Long-term EHRA (European Heart Rhythm Association) score symptoms were lower in HRPs. Repeated rhythm therapies were rare. Additional antiarrhythmics received a minority without group dependency. A total of 1.6 versus 4.1% of HRPs (p = 0.042) underwent long-term stroke; excess mortality was not observed. Anticoagulation remained common in HRPs. CONCLUSION: Surgical risk and long-term mortality are determined by the underlying disease. In HRPs, freedom from AF and symptom relief can be achieved. Preoperative risk scores should not lead to withholding an ablation procedure.

Cardiac, possible cardiac, and likely non-cardiac origin of chest pain : A hitherto underestimated parameter in German chest pain units.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines emphasize the diagnostic value of non-cardiac or possibly cardiac chest pain. The goal of this analysis was to determine whether German chest pain units (CPUs) adequately address conditions with "atypical" chest pain in existing diagnostic structures. METHOD: A total of 11,734 patients from the German CPU registry were included. The analyses included mode of admission, critical time intervals, diagnostic steps, and differential diagnoses. RESULTS: Patients with unspecified chest pain were younger, more often female, were less likely to have classic cardiovascular risk factors and tended to present more often as self-referrals. Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) mostly had prehospital medical contact. Overall, there was no difference between these two groups regarding the time from the onset of first symptoms to arrival at the CPU. In the CPU, the usual basic diagnostic measures were performed irrespective of ACS as the primary working diagnosis. In the non-ACS group, further ischemia-specific diagnostics were rarely performed. Extra-cardiac differential diagnoses were not specified. CONCLUSION: The establishment of broader awareness programs and opening CPUs for low-threshold evaluation of self-referring patients should be discussed. Regarding the rigid focus on the clarification of cardiac causes of chest pain, a stronger interdisciplinary approach should be promoted.

Electrophysiology lab efficiency comparison between cryoballoon and point-by-point radiofrequency ablation: a German sub-analysis of the FREEZE Cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is recommended to treat paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). This analysis aimed to assess the hospital efficiency of single-shot cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and point-by-point radiofrequency ablation (RFA). METHODS: The discrete event simulation used PVI procedure times from the FREEZE Cohort study to establish the electrophysiology (EP) lab occupancy time. 1000 EP lab days were simulated according to an illustrative German hospital, including 3 PVI cases per day using CBA at one site and RFA at the other. RESULTS: The analysis included 1560 CBA patients and 1344 RFA patients from the FREEZE Cohort. Some baseline patients' characteristics were different between groups (age, AF type, and some concomitant diseases), without being statistically associated to ablation procedure time. Mean procedure time was 122.2 ± 39.4 min for CBA and 160.3 ± 53.5 min for RFA (p < 0.0001). RFA was associated with a more than five-fold increase of cumulative overtime compared to CBA over the simulated period (1285 h with RFA and 253 h with CBA). 70.7% of RFA lab days included overtime versus 25.7% for CBA. CBA was associated with more days with an additional hour at the end of the EP lab shift compared to RFA (47.8% vs 11.5% days with one hour left, respectively). CONCLUSION: CBA is faster and more predictable than point-by-point RFA, and enables improvements in EP lab efficiency, including: fewer cumulative overtime hours, more days where overtime is avoided and more days with remaining time for the staff or for any EP lab usage. Clinical trial registration NCT01360008 (first registration 25/05/2011).

The German CArdioSurgEry Atrial Fibrillation Registry: In-Hospital Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to describe outcomes of patients undergoing surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) as either stand-alone or concomitant cardiosurgical procedures in Germany. METHODS: Patients with AF undergoing concomitant or stand-alone surgical ablation were included in the registry. Cardiac surgery centers across Germany were invited to participate and sought to enroll 1,000 consecutive patients. Data was obtained through electronic case report forms. The protocol mandated follow-up interviews at 1 year. RESULTS: Between January 2017 and April 2020, 17 centers enrolled 1,000 consecutive patients. Among concomitant surgical patients (n = 899), paroxysmal AF was reported in 55.4% patients. Epicardial radio frequency (RF) bilateral pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with excision of the left atrial appendage (LAA) was the most common operative strategy. In the stand-alone cohort (n = 101), persistent AF forms were reported in 84.1% of patients. Moderate-to-severe symptoms were reported in 85.1%. Sixty-seven patients had previously underwent at least two failed catheter ablative procedures. Thoracoscopic epicardial RF bilateral PVI and completion of a "box-lesion" with LAA closure were frequently preformed. Major cardiac and cerebrovascular complications occurred in 38 patients (4.3%) in the concomitant group. No deaths were reported in the stand-alone group. At discharge, sinus rhythm was achieved in 88.1% of stand-alone and 63.4% concomitant patients. CONCLUSION: The CArdioSurgEry Atrial Fibrillation registry provides insights into surgical strategies for AF ablation in a considerable cohort across Germany. This in-hospital data demonstrates that concomitant and stand-alone ablation during cardiac surgery is safe and effective with low complication rates.

The German Cardiosurgery Atrial Fibrillation Registry: 1-Year Follow-up Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: This study of German Cardiosurgery Atrial Fibrillation (CASE-AF) registry aims to describe the 1-year outcomes of patients undergoing ablative procedures for atrial fibrillation (AF) in a cardiosurgical setting. METHODS: Between January 2017 and April 2020, 17 German cardiosurgical units enrolled 1,000 consecutive patients undergoing concomitant or stand-alone ablation for AF. In-hospital and 1-year follow-up data were collected on web-based electronic case report forms. The protocol mandated telephone-based follow-up contact after 1 year. RESULTS: At 1-year follow-up (median, 14.5 months [12.6-18.2 months]), significant improvement (p < 0.0001) in baseline modified European Heart Rhythm Association Class I was reported in both concomitant and stand-alone patients. Follow-up examinations were completed in 97.9% of cases, and a sinus rhythm was reported in 60.2 and 63.6% of stand-alone and concomitant patients, respectively. Statistically significant factors determining late recurrence were female gender (p = 0.013), preoperative persistent AF (p < 0.0001), and presence of cardiac implantable electronic device (p = 0.011). All-cause mortality at 1 year was 1% (n = 1) in stand-alone patients and 6.7% (n = 58) in concomitant patients. CONCLUSION: Surgical ablation of AF is safe and provides satisfactory results at short-term follow-up, with significant improvement in patient symptoms. Adequate cardiac rhythm monitoring should be prioritized for higher quality data acquisition.

Selection and outcome of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients with and without cardiac resynchronization therapy: Comparison of 4384 patients from the German Device Registry to randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Registry data add important information to randomized controlled trials (RCT) on real-life aspects of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients with and without cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-D). This analysis of the prospectively conducted German Device Registry aims at comparing mortality rates, comorbidities, complication rates to results from RCT. METHODS: The German Device registry (DEVICE) prospectively collected data on ICD and CRT-D first implantations from 50 German centres. Demographic data, details on cardiac disease, electrocardiogram (ECG), medication, and data about procedure, complications, and hospital stay were stored in electronic case report forms. One year after device implantation patients were contacted for follow-up. RESULTS: DEVICE included n = 4384 first ICD/CRT-D implantations (29.3% CRT-D devices). We found a strong adherence to guidelines with over 90% of patients being on ß-blocker and ACE-inhibitor medication and adequate QRS width in the majority of CRT-D patients. Patients receiving a CRT-D were older (67.6 ± 11.0 years vs. 63.9 ± 13.4 years, p < .001) and had lower ejection fractions (mean 25% vs. 30%, p < .001) compared to ICD patients. Dilated cardiomyopathy was the predominant underlying heart disease in CRT-D (53.3%), coronary artery disease in ICD patients (64.7%). Compared to RCT our DEVICE patients had more comorbidities (17.9% chronic kidney disease [CKD]) and higher 1-year mortality rates (10.7% ICD group, 12.3% CRT group). In multivariate analysis, CKD patients had an almost 2-fold higher risk of 1-year mortality. CONCLUSION: Despite relevant limitations of registry data, DEVICE highlights important differences between RCT and real-world registry data and the impact of comorbidities on mortality of ICD and CRT-D recipients.

Adverse events and stroke prevention by interventional left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with low CHA2 DS2 -VASc score-results from the multicenter German LAARGE registry.

BACKGROUND: Interventional left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is routinely performed in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and contraindications to standard anticoagulation. AIMS: We investigated its role in patients at low stroke risk, and compared the effectiveness and safety in patients with low versus high risk. METHODS: LAARGE is a prospective registry depicting the clinical reality of LAAO. LAAO was conducted with different standard commercial devices, and follow-up period was 1 year. Patients with started procedure and documented CHA2 DS2 -VASc score were selected from the whole database. RESULTS: A total of 638 patients from 38 centers were divided into CHA2 DS2 -VASc score ≤2, i.e., low-risk group (10.2%), and >2, i.e., high-risk group (89.8%). The latter had a pronounced cardiovascular risk profile and preceding strokes (0% vs. 23.9%; p < 0.001). Implantation success was consistently high (97.6%), frequencies of intrahospital major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (0% vs. 0.5%) and other major complications (4.6% vs. 4.0%) were low (each p = not significant [NS]). Numerous moderate complications were also observed in the low-risk patients (12.3% vs. 9.4%; p = NS). Frequencies of nonfatal strokes (0% vs. 0.7%) and severe bleedings (0% vs. 0.7%) were low (each p = NS). In a specific analysis, patients at very high risk of stroke (i.e., CHA2 DS2 -VASc score >4) did not have increased rates of complications or nonfatal strokes in the first year after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Low-risk patients had no nonfatal strokes and major bleedings within 1 year after hospital discharge but had unexpectedly high rates of moderate procedural complications. The indication in these patients should be strictly defined based on an individual benefit-risk assessment.

Unexpected high level of severe events even in low-risk profile chest pain unit patients.

AIMS: Early heart attack awareness programs are thought to increase efficacy of chest pain units (CPU) by providing live-saving information to the community. We hypothesized that self-referral might be a feasible alternative to activation of emergency medical services (EMS) in selected chest pain patients with a specific low-risk profile. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this observational registry-based study, data from 4743 CPU patients were analyzed for differences between those with or without severe or fatal prehospital or in-unit events (out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and/or in-unit death, resuscitation or ventricular tachycardia). In order to identify a low-risk subset in which early self-referral might be recommended to reduce prehospital critical time intervals, the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score for in-hospital mortality and a specific low-risk CPU score developed from the data by multivariate regression analysis were applied and corresponding event rates were calculated. Male gender, cardiac symptoms other than chest pain, first onset of symptoms and a history of myocardial infarction, heart failure or cardioverter defibrillator implantation increased propensity for critical events. Event rates within the low-risk subsets varied from 0.5-2.8%. Those patients with preinfarction angina experienced fewer events. CONCLUSIONS: When educating patients and the general population about angina pectoris symptoms and early admission, activation of EMS remains recommended. Even in patients without any CPU-specific risk factor, self-referral bears the risk of severe or fatal pre- or in-unit events of 0.6%. However, admission should not be delayed, and self-referral might be feasible in patients with previous symptoms of preinfarction angina.

Survey of clinical practice pattern in Germany's certified chest pain units : Adherence to the European Society of Cardiology guidelines on non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to analyze the 2020 standard of care in certified German chest pain units (CPU) with a special focus on non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) through a voluntary survey obtained from all certified units, using a prespecified questionnaire. METHODS: The assessment included the collection of information on diagnostic protocols, risk assessment, management and treatment strategies in suspected NSTE-ACS, the timing of invasive therapy in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and the choice of antiplatelet therapy. RESULTS: The response rate was 75%. Among all CPUs, 77% are currently using the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 0/3­h high-sensitive troponin protocol, and only 20% use the ESC 0/1­h high-sensitive troponin protocol as a default strategy. Conventional ergometry is still the commonly performed stress test with a utilization rate of 47%. Among NSTEMI patients, coronary angiography is planned within 24 h in 96% of all CPUs, irrespective of the day of the week. Prasugrel is the P2Y12 inhibitor of choice in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but despite the impact of the ISAR-REACT 5 trial on selection of antiplatelet therapy, ticagrelor is still favored over prasugrel in NSTE-ACS. If triple therapy is used in NSTE-ACS with atrial fibrillation, it is maintained up to 4 weeks in 51% of these patients. CONCLUSION: This survey provides evidence that Germany's certified CPUs ensure a high level of guideline adherence and quality of care. The survey also identified areas in need of improvement such as the high utilization rate of stress electrocardiogram (ECG).

Interventional occlusion of left atrial appendage in patients with atrial fibrillation. Gender-related outcomes in the German LAARGE Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Gender-based differences in atrial fibrillation have been identified, but limited data exist for patients undergoing left atrial appendage occluder (LAAO) implantation. This study reports gender-related periprocedural and 1-year outcomes of the prospective, multicenter German left atrial appendage occlusion registry (LAARGE). METHODS: LAARGE enrolled 641 patients who were scheduled for LAAO implantation from July 2014 to January 2016 in 38 hospitals in Germany. The data collected included demographics, clinical characteristics, details of implantation, and outcome. Efficacy and safety at 1-year follow-up were assessed by the occurrence of thrombembolic and bleeding events, as well as mortality. RESULTS: Of 638 patients undergoing LAAO implantation 38.9% were female and 61.1% male. Females were older (76.4 ± 8.2 [females] vs. 75.6 ± 7.7 [males], p = .042) and had a higher stroke risk (CHA2 DS2 -VASc score: 4.9 ± 1.5 vs. 4.3 ± 1.5, p < .001). In contrast, males suffered more often from coronary artery (33.1% vs. 53.8%, p < .001) and vascular disease (18.5% vs. 31.0%, p < .001). Technical success was high and similar for both genders (98.4% vs. 97.2%, p = .33). Severe periprocedural complications (6.9% vs. 3.1%, p = .032) occurred more often in females. At 1-year follow-up the rates of all-cause stroke (0.5% vs. 1.3%, p = .65) and severe bleeding (0.0% and 1.0%, p = .29) were low and comparable between the genders. Also, one-year all-cause mortality (9.2% vs. 13.1%, p = .14) did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: LAARGE documented in this elderly patient population undergoing LAAO implantation a higher rate of severe periprocedural complications in females. At 1-year follow-up similar efficacy and safety outcomes were observed for both genders.

The impact of basic atrial rhythm during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation on clinical outcomes: Lessons from the German Ablation Registry.

BACKGROUND: The impact of basic atrial rhythm (sinus rhythm [SR] vs. atrial fibrillation [AF]) during AF ablation on efficacy and safety is unknown. METHODS: About 3375 patients from the German Ablation Registry undergoing first-time AF ablation were divided according to the type of AF and the basic atrial rhythm during the ablation procedure: paroxysmal AF (PAF) and SR [group Ia], PAF and AF [group Ib]), persistent AF and SR (IIa), and persistent AF and AF (IIb). RESULTS: Patients in SR (n = 2312 [67%]) underwent cryoballoon ablation more often (Ia vs. Ib p = .002 and IIa vs. IIb p = .010, whereas in patients in AF (n = 1063 [33%]) radiofrequency (RF)-based ablation (Ia vs. Ib p = .006 and IIa vs. IIb p = .014) including left and/or right atrial substrate modification was more frequently performed. Depending on the basic rhythm there was no difference regarding arrhythmia recurrence during long-term follow-up. For patients suffering from persistent AF acute procedure-related complications were more often documented when ablated in AF (9.1% vs. 4.6%, p = .012). which was mainly driven by the higher occurrence of pericardial effusion/tamponade. For patients suffering from persistent AF, favorable results were found regarding 366-day Kaplan-Meier estimates of the incidence of MACCE (death, myocardial infarction, and stroke; p = .011) and the composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and major bleeding (p = .006), when ablated in SR. CONCLUSION: Basic atrial rhythm at the time of AF ablation did not affect long-term rhythm outcome. For patients suffering from persistent AF a more favorable acute and long-term safety profile was observed when ablated in SR.

Management of Pulmonary Embolism: Results from the German Chest Pain Unit Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Since 2008, specialized chest pain units (CPUs) were implemented across Germany ensuring structured diagnostics in acute chest pain. This study aims to analyze the management of pulmonary embolism (PE) patients in such certified CPUs. METHODS: Data were retrieved from 13,902 patients enrolled in the German CPU registry and analyzed for the diagnosis of PE including patient characteristics, critical time intervals, diagnostic workup, treatment, and prognosis. PE patients were compared to the overall CPU patient cohort. Only patients with a complete 3-month follow-up were included. RESULTS: Overall, 1.1% of all CPU patients were diagnosed with PE. Chest pain and dyspnea were the leading symptoms. Patients with PE were older, presented with higher heart rates, and more frequently exhibited signs of heart failure, despite a normal left ventricular function. PE patients showed significantly longer time delays between symptom onset and the first medical contact, while PE patients with chest pain presented earlier than PE patients with dyspnea only. Whereas more PE patients had to be transferred to the intensive care unit, in-CPU mortality and event rates over 3 months were low. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: This study suggests a certain risk for underdiagnosis and consecutive potential undertreatment of PE patients in German Cardiac Society (GCS)-certified CPUs, which is thought to result from an anticipated focus on patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Public awareness for PE beyond chest pain should be improved. Certified CPUs should be urged to implement strategic pathways for a better simultaneous diagnostic workup of differential diagnosis beyond ACS.

German chest pain unit registry: data review after the first decade of certification.

In 2008, the German Cardiac Society (GCS) introduced a certification program for specialized chest pain units (CPUs). In order to benchmark the performance of the certified CPUs, a nationwide German CPU registry was established. Since then, data for more than 34,000 patients have been included. The concept of certified CPUs in Germany has been widely accepted and its success is underlined by its recent inclusion in national and international guidelines. As of December 2019, 286 CPUs have been successfully certified or recertified by the GCS. This review focuses on the data retrieved from the CPU registry during the first decade of certification. As demonstrated by 16 manuscripts stemming from the registry, certified German CPUs demonstrate high quality of care in acute coronary syndrome and beyond. It is also noted that the German CPU registry allowed for further analysis of the gap in guideline adherence. With the current update of the CPU certification criteria, central data collection as a best-practice criterion will be abandoned, and after some productive years the registry has temporarily been stopped.

Quality benchmarks for chest pain units and stroke units in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Chest pain units (CPUs) and stroke units (SUs) provide specialized multidisciplinary in-hospital management for acute chest pain and ischemic stroke. We analyzed exemplary equivalent quality benchmarks in both concepts. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from the German CPU registry (2012-2015; 45 certified CPUs, 5881 patients) were compared with data from the SU registry of Rhineland-Palatinate (2011-2015; 29 SUs; 40,380 patients). Parameters comprised demographics, symptoms, diagnosis, medication, critical time intervals, therapeutics, and in-unit outcome. RESULTS: Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (47.4%) and ischemic stroke (63.0%) were the most frequent entities. An electrocardiogram was performed on average within 7 min in CPUs, cranial imaging within 49 min in SUs. The mean time interval from admission until coronary intervention or lysis was 42 min or 57 min, respectively. Rates of antiplatelet therapy (90.1% vs. 96.0%), brain imaging, and coronary angiography were high (99.3% vs. 81.1%) and the mortality was low (0.8% for CPUs vs. 3.6% for SUs). The length of stay was shorter in CPUs (1.5 days vs. 4.4 days). CONCLUSION: As reimbursement for emergency medicine in Germany was recently rearranged, quality benchmarking has gained incremental importance. Mandatory joint quality measurement in both concepts ensuring gap analysis and process improvement is encouraged.

[Comparison between chest pain units and stroke units : Essential components of the vascular emergency care system: comparison of structure, certification process, quality benchmarking and reimbursement]. / Vergleich von Chest Pain Units und Stroke Units : Elementare Bausteine der vaskulären Akutversorgung: Vergleich von Struktur, Zertifizierung, Qualitätserfassung und Vergütung.

BACKGROUND: Chest pain units (CPU) and stroke units (SU) have both become established as essential components of clinical emergency care. For both instances dedicated certification processes are installed. Up to summer 2020, 290 CPUs and 335 SUs have been successfully certified. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to compare the structures and the current certification situation of CPUs and SUs. Also, the younger CPU certification process is compared to the long established SU certification standard. MATERIAL UND METHODS: The comparison includes the historical background, the certification process, quality benchmarking, possible additive structures, the current status of certification in Germany, the transfer of the concept to the European level as well as reimbursement issues. RESULTS: Both certification concepts show clear analogies. Evidence for SUs is supported by a positive Cochrane analysis and for CPUs there are many studies from the German CPU registry. The main differences include a uniform CPU system versus a multistep SU system of certification. Furthermore, SU have obligatory elements of quality documentation but only facultative quality indicator assessment for CPUs. From an economic viewpoint operation and procedural key (OPS) numbers guarantee a better reflection of the use of resources in the complex treatment of stroke, which could not yet be established for CPUs. CONCLUSION: The well-established CPU concept could additionally benefit from a superordinate quality control. Adequate quality benchmarking appears to be fundamental for gap analyses and for the establishment of a separate remuneration structure. In this respect the German Society for Cardiology as the certifying institution is required to establish an appropriate mechanism within the framework of regular updates of criteria.

Does Preoperative Sinus Rhythm Influence Surgical Ablation's Perioperative Safety in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation?

BACKGROUND: Despite excellent data on lowering long-term stroke and all-cause mortality rates, currently, only 25-40% of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergo simultaneous surgical ablation therapy (SA) during cardiac surgery. Surgeon's fear exposing their patients to an additional, unjustified, and disproportionate risk when performing SA in AF patients presenting with sinus rhythm (SR) before surgery. To clarify the influence of preoperative SR before SA for AF, we conducted a subgroup analysis of the German Cardiosurgical Atrial Fibrillation (CASE-AF) register. METHODS: Between September 2016 and August 2020, 964 AF patients with an underlying cardiac disease were scheduled for surgery with SA and enrolled in the CASE-AF register. Data prospectively were collected and analyzed retrospectively. We divided the entire cohort into an SR-group (38.2%, N = 368) and an AF-group (61.8%, N = 596), based on preoperative heart rhythm. RESULTS: Over half of the patients were moderately affected by their AF, with no difference between the groups (European Heart Rhythm Association class ≥IIb: SR-group 54.2% versus AF-group 58.5%, P = .238). The AF-group had a higher preoperative EuroSCORE II (4.8 ± 8.0% versus 4.2 ± 6.3%, P = .014). In-hospital mortality (SR-group 0.8% versus AF-group 1.7%, P = .261), major perioperative adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (SR-group 2.7% versus AF-group 3.5%, P = .500), and the new pacemaker implantation rate (SR-group 6.0% versus AF-group 5.9%, P = .939) were low and showed and no group difference. Logistic regression analysis showed a protective effect for preoperative SR to perioperative complications in AF patients undergoing SA (odds ratio (OR) 0.72 (95% CI 0.52 - 0.998); P = .0485). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant SA in AF patients presenting in SR before cardiac surgery is safe, has a low perioperative risk profile, and should be carried out with almost no exceptions.

Underweight is associated with inferior short and long-term outcomes after MitraClip implantation: Results from the German TRAnscatheter mitral valve interventions (TRAMI) registry.

BACKGROUND: Underweight and obesity represent classical risk factors for adverse outcome in patients treated for cardiovascular disease. AIMS: The current analysis examines the impact of underweight, overweight and obesity on intra-hospital, short and long-term outcomes in patients treated by MitraClip therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: From August 2010 until July 2013, 799 patients (age 75.3 ±â€¯8.6 years, male gender 60.7%, median logistic EuroSCORE 20% [12; 31], functional mitral regurgitation (MR): 69.3%) were prospectively enrolled into the multicenter German Transcatheter Mitral Valve Interventions registry. Patients were stratified according to body mass index (BMI) into 4 groups: BMI <20 kg/m2 (underweight), BMI 20.0 to <25.0 kg/m2 (normal weight, reference group), BMI 25.0 to <30.0 kg/m2 (overweight) and BMI ≥30 kg/m2 (obese). Significant increased rates of procedural failure, transfusion/bleeding, sepsis or multiorgan failure and low cardiac output failure were found for underweight patients only. Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated inferior survival for underweight patients, but comparable outcomes for all other patients (global log rank test, P < .01). Multivariable Cox-regression analysis (adjusted for age, gender, creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL, diabetes, left ventricular ejection fraction <30% and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) confirmed underweight (as compared to normal weight) as an independent risk factor of death (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.58, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-2.46, P = .044) and overweight as protective against death (HR: 0.71; 95%-CI: 0.55-0.93; P = .011). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to other weight groups, underweight patients undergoing MitraClip implantation are exposed to increased rates of procedural failure, bleeding and low cardiac output as well as increased short- and long-term mortality rates and should therefore be carefully discussed in the heart-team.

Gender-related differences in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve interventions in clinical practice: 1-year results from the German TRAMI registry.

OBJECTIVES: Information on gender-related differences in terms of baseline characteristics and clinical outcome of patients undergoing MitraClip® implantation in daily clinical practice have been studied in smaller populations previously. This study sought to additionally evaluate gender-related differences in a larger German real-world patient population. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed data from the prospective and multicenter German TRAMI Registry. Between 08/2010 and 07/2013 327 women and 501 men underwent MitraClip® implantation for significant mitral valve regurgitation. Female patients were significantly older and showed higher rates of frailty compared to men. In contrast, men had significantly higher rates of comorbidities compared to women. The majority of patients underwent MitraClip® implantation for secondary mitral regurgitation, with no significant gender-related differences. MitraClip® treatment was equally effective in terms of procedural results and residual mitral regurgitation in women and men and complication rates were low. However, in this real-world analysis severe bleeding complications were significantly higher in women (p = .02) and re-intervention rates were significantly higher in men after MitraClip® treatment (p = .02). Women showed less improvement in functional NYHA class after MitraClip® treatment compared to men at 1-year follow-up (FU; p < .001). No significant differences between female and male patients were found in 1-year mortality and in re-hospitalization rates. CONCLUSION: In this analysis from a large prospective, multicenter real-world registry MitraClip® implantation is safe and effective for treatment of significant mitral regurgitation with equal postprocedural results and mortality rates during 1-year follow-up. Men and women showed a persisting and significant clinical benefit at 1-year FU after treatment. Complication and re-intervention rates were low. Additional studies are needed to further evaluate our findings on increased bleeding complications and decreased functional improvement in women at 1-year follow-up after MitraClip® therapy.

Implantation of one versus two MitraClips in the German TRAMI registry: Is more always better?

OBJECTIVES: To compare baseline characteristics and outcomes in patients treated with either 1 or 2 MitraClips in the German TRAMI (Transcatheter Mitral Valve Interventions) registry. BACKGROUND: The MitraClip community seems to silently assume that results should intrinsically be better after implantation of more than one clip, although data is still sparse. METHODS: In 2010-2013, 803 patients were enrolled prospectively into TRAMI (461 one-clip and 312 two-clip procedures). Follow-up was performed centrally at 30 days and 1 year. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of TRAMI-patients with two clips differed significantly from single-clip patients regarding constitutional (more men, taller body height) and heart failure-related factors (larger left ventricular dimensions, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, more severe heart failure). Also, a significant increase in two-clip procedures over time was present. After propensity score matching for differing baseline characteristics, residual moderate mitral regurgitation (MR) occurred more frequently after implantation of two clips, whereas residual severe MR could more frequently be observed after one-clip procedures. However, no or mild residual MR at discharge was present in 71.6% after single-clip and in 70.1% after two-clips implantation (p = .81). After 1 year, no significant differences regarding mortality or New York Heart Association status could be detected in the propensity matched cohorts. However, TRAMI-patients treated with two clips had a significantly higher incidence of cerebral-vascular events (p = .02). CONCLUSIONS: TRAMI data cannot support the theory that implantation of more than one clip is associated with better clinical outcomes. The finding of more cerebral-vascular events after two-clip procedures might be hypothesis-generating.

Gender Differences in Patients Admitted to a Certified German Chest Pain Unit: Results from the German Chest Pain Unit Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Gender-specific atypical clinical presentation in acute coronary syndrome and sex-specific outcomes in cardiovascular disease in women are well known. The aim of this study is to analyze possible differences between men and women presenting to certified German chest pain units (CPUs). METHODS: Data from 13,900 patients derived from the German CPU registry were analyzed for gender differences in patient characteristics, cardiovascular disease manifestation, critical time intervals, treatment and prognosis. RESULTS: A total of 37.8% of patients were female. Typical chest pain occurred more frequently in men, while atypical symptoms occurred more frequently in women. Female gender was associated with longer pre- and in-hospital time delays. Women were more often diagnosed with a nonischemic origin of pain. In a 3-month follow-up, there was no gender-specific difference in combined major adverse coronary and cerebrovascular events. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: This study points out gender-specific differences in prehospital time intervals and a significantly higher percentage of atypical symptoms in suspected myocardial ischemia as well as more noncoronary diagnoses in women. Symptom awareness and a broader diagnostic workup in women are essential.