RESUMO
Identifying tools and processes to effectively and efficiently evaluate technologies is an area of need for many sport stakeholders. This study aimed to develop a standardised, evidence-based framework to guide the evaluation of sports technologies. In developing the framework, a review of standards, guidelines and research into sports technology was conducted. Following this, 55 experts across the sports industry were presented with a draft framework for feedback. Following a two-round Delphi survey, the final framework consisted of 25 measurable features grouped under five quality pillars. These were 1) Quality Assurance & Measurement (Accuracy, Repeatability, Reproducibility, Specifications), 2) Established Benefit (Construct Validity, Concurrent Validity, Predictive Validity, Functionality), 3) Ethics & Security (Compliance, Privacy, Ownership, Safety, Transparency, Environmental Sustainability), 4) User Experience (Usability, Robustness, Data Representation, Customer Support & Training, Accessibility) & 5) Data Management (Data Standardisation, Interoperability, Maintainability, Scalability). The framework can be used to help design and refine sports technology in order to optimise quality and maintain industry standards, as well as guide purchasing decisions by organisations. It may also serve to create a common language for organisations, manufacturers, investors, and consumers to improve the efficiency of their decision-making relating to sports technology.
Assuntos
Esportes , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Tecnologia , PrevisõesRESUMO
Leprosy stands tall among the oldest and most misunderstood diseases of man. Today leprosy is easily treated; unfortunately, persistent misconceptions result in unnecessary stigmatization. Thus the present study aims to assess the knowledge and attitudes regarding leprosy in people with and without leprosy, factors affecting the same; and to study their relationship with treatment status in leprosy patients. Detailed knowledge and attitude questionnaires were administered to 260 subjects (100 leprosy patients, 60 family members of leprosy patients and 100 people with non-leprosy skin diseases) at AIIMS, New Delhi. Crude scores based on subject responses were used for inter-group comparisons. Leprosy patients had significantly higher knowledge scores than family members who in turn scored significantly higher than people with other skin diseases. Leprosy patients had fair knowledge about common symptoms, but awareness about MDT was low. Delayed diagnosis and non-compliance were common. Attitudes did not differ between groups. Fear of the leprosy-affected and reluctance for physical contact, food sharing and marriage were prominent. Treated leprosy patients had the highest knowledge scores. Higher education and greater knowledge scores were positive predictors of attitude. Knowledge and attitude scores showed significant positive correlation. Knowledge and attitude towards leprosy are unsatisfactory. Improving knowledge may help to improve attitudes. In the post-elimination era, we must incorporate education about the disease into routine care of leprosy patients and focus on community education about leprosy.
Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Hanseníase/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Análise de Variância , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Escolaridade , Família/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Índia/epidemiologia , Hanseníase/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Atenção Terciária à Saúde , Adulto JovemRESUMO
A 41-year-old male with a history of tobacco and alcohol use presented to our clinic for a follow up of an incidentally diagnosed splenic mass. The patient was sent for further diagnostic evaluation, and computed tomography showed a large splenic mass with heterogenous enhancement raising concern for neoplasm. Due to the uncertain nature of the splenic lesion and high complication rate of percutaneous splenic biopsy, a splenectomy was performed. The specimen was sent to pathology, and the report favored neoplasm but was inconclusive. The samples were sent to another institution for a consult, where the patient's spleen was determined to be the result of a previously suffered hemorrhagic infarct. This case demonstrates the difficulty of diagnosing splenic lesions using diagnostic imaging and the discrepancy that may occur between radiology and pathology assessments. In the setting of uncertain pathology, the removal of what might be a functional spleen is often preferred over a percutaneous biopsy due to concerns of intraabdominal bleeding and tumor dissemination.
RESUMO
Over the years, healthcare system in India has been largely centralized, expensive and impersonal. In a country where expenditure on healthcare is low, most healthcare expenditure is out-of-pocket and where most of the population continue to live in rural areas or in urban fringes, such a care is inaccessible, unresponsive and unaffordable. COVID pandemic exposed these realities further. Based on experiences of directly managing health services during COVID-19 pandemic in different settings and across different levels, authors of this paper argue for a decentralized, distributed and responsive health systems for India, that is likely to be more effective and sustainable in normal times, and in times of crisis.
RESUMO
Pigmented epithelioid melanocytomas (PEMs) are low-grade, intermediate-type borderline melanocytic tumors with limited metastatic potential. To date, PEMs have been treated via gross-total resections. Postoperative recurrence and mortality are rare. This case highlights a unique presentation of a PEM that involved bone destruction and intradural infiltration, which required a subtotal resection. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first report of a PEM extending through the dura and necessitating subtotal resection, which is contrary to the standard of care, gross-total resection. Surveillance imaging 10 months after resection remained negative for clinical and radiological recurrence.