Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
1.
J Biomed Inform ; 68: 50-57, 2017 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28232241

RESUMO

We compare methods to develop an adaptive strategy for therapy choice in a class of breast cancer patients, as an example of approaches to personalize therapies for individual characteristics and each patient's response to therapy. Our model maintains a Markov belief about the effectiveness of the different therapies and updates it as therapies are administered and tumor images are observed, reflecting tumor response. We compare three different approximate methods to solve our analytical model against standard medical practice and show significant potential benefit of the computed dynamic strategies to limit tumor growth and to reduce the number of time periods patients are given chemotherapy, with its attendant side effects.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Medicina de Precisão , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Humanos , Cadeias de Markov
2.
J Gen Intern Med ; 30(7): 979-91, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25693651

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Patients receiving opioid therapy are at elevated risk of attempting suicide. Guidelines recommend practices to mitigate risk, but it is not known whether these are effective. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to examine associations between the receipt of guideline-recommended care for opioid therapy and risk of suicide attempt. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a retrospective analysis of administrative data for all Veteran patients prescribed any short-acting opioids on a chronic basis or any long-acting opioids from the Veterans Health Administration during fiscal year 2010. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Multivariate, mixed-effects logistic regression analyses were conducted to define the associations between the risk of suicide attempt and receipt of guideline-recommended care at the individual level and rates of use of recommended care at the facility level, while accounting for patient risk factors. RESULTS: At the individual level, having a mood disorder was highly associated with suicide attempts (odds ratios [ORs] = 3.5, 3.9; 95% confidence intervals [CIs] = 3.3-3.9, 3.3-4.6 for chronic short-acting and long-acting groups, respectively). At the facility level, patients on opioid therapy within the facilities ordering more drug screens were associated with decreased risk of suicide attempt (ORs = 0.2, 0.3; CIs = 0.1-0.3, 0.2-0.6 for chronic short-acting and long-acting groups, respectively). In addition, patients on long-acting opioid therapy within the facilities providing more follow-up after new prescriptions were associated with decreased risk of suicide attempt (OR = 0.2, CI = 0.0-0.7), and patients on long-acting opioid therapy within the facilities having higher sedative co-prescription rates were associated with increased risk of suicide attempt (OR = 20.3, CI = 1.1-382.2). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Encouraging facilities to make more consistent use of drug screening, provide follow-up within 4 weeks for patients initiating new opioid prescriptions, and avoid sedative co-prescription in combination with long-acting opioids may help prevent suicide attempts. Some clinicians may selectively employ guideline-recommended practices with at-risk patients.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Dor Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Tentativa de Suicídio/estatística & dados numéricos , Veteranos/psicologia , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/toxicidade , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Manejo da Dor/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Uso Indevido de Medicamentos sob Prescrição/prevenção & controle , Uso Indevido de Medicamentos sob Prescrição/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Tentativa de Suicídio/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos
3.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 15: 515, 2015 Nov 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26596421

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In fiscal year (FY) 2008, 133,658 patients were provided services within substance use disorders treatment programs (SUDTPs) in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system. To improve the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of SUDTPs, we analyze the impacts of staffing mix on the benefits and costs of specialty SUD services. This study demonstrates how cost-effective staffing mixes for each type of VA SUDTPs can be defined empirically. METHODS: We used a stepwise method to derive prediction functions for benefits and costs based on patients' treatment outcomes at VA SUDTPs nationally from 2001 to 2003, and used them to formulate optimization problems to determine recommended staffing mixes that maximize net benefits per patient for four types of SUDTPs by using the solver function with the Generalized Reduced Gradient algorithm in Microsoft Excel 2010 while conforming to limits of current practice. We conducted sensitivity analyses by varying the baseline severity of addiction problems between lower (2.5 %) and higher (97.5 %) values derived from bootstrapping. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the actual staffing mixes in FY01-FY03, the recommended staffing mixes would lower treatment costs while improving patients' outcomes, and improved net benefits are estimated from $1472 to $17,743 per patient.


Assuntos
Pessoal de Saúde/economia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hospitais de Veteranos/economia , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/reabilitação , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/economia , Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos
4.
Nat Commun ; 13(1): 1014, 2022 02 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35197467

RESUMO

Randomized clinical trials (RCT) are the gold standard for informing treatment decisions. Observational studies are often plagued by selection bias, and expert-selected covariates may insufficiently adjust for confounding. We explore how unstructured clinical text can be used to reduce selection bias and improve medical practice. We develop a framework based on natural language processing to uncover interpretable potential confounders from text. We validate our method by comparing the estimated hazard ratio (HR) with and without the confounders against established RCTs. We apply our method to four cohorts built from localized prostate and lung cancer datasets from the Stanford Cancer Institute and show that our method shifts the HR estimate towards the RCT results. The uncovered terms can also be interpreted by oncologists for clinical insights. We present this proof-of-concept study to enable more credible causal inference using observational data, uncover meaningful insights from clinical text, and inform high-stakes medical decisions.


Assuntos
Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Causalidade , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Projetos de Pesquisa
5.
JCO Clin Cancer Inform ; 5: 379-393, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33822653

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Knowing the treatments administered to patients with cancer is important for treatment planning and correlating treatment patterns with outcomes for personalized medicine study. However, existing methods to identify treatments are often lacking. We develop a natural language processing approach with structured electronic medical records and unstructured clinical notes to identify the initial treatment administered to patients with cancer. METHODS: We used a total number of 4,412 patients with 483,782 clinical notes from the Stanford Cancer Institute Research Database containing patients with nonmetastatic prostate, oropharynx, and esophagus cancer. We trained treatment identification models for each cancer type separately and compared performance of using only structured, only unstructured (bag-of-words, doc2vec, fasttext), and combinations of both (structured + bow, structured + doc2vec, structured + fasttext). We optimized the identification model among five machine learning methods (logistic regression, multilayer perceptrons, random forest, support vector machines, and stochastic gradient boosting). The treatment information recorded in the cancer registry is the gold standard and compares our methods to an identification baseline with billing codes. RESULTS: For prostate cancer, we achieved an f1-score of 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97 to 1.00) for radiation and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.99 to 1.00) for surgery using structured + doc2vec. For oropharynx cancer, we achieved an f1-score of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.58 to 0.93) for chemoradiation and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.95) for surgery using doc2vec. For esophagus cancer, we achieved an f1-score of 1.0 (95% CI, 1.0 to 1.0) for both chemoradiation and surgery using all combinations of structured and unstructured data. We found that employing the free-text clinical notes outperforms using the billing codes or only structured data for all three cancer types. CONCLUSION: Our results show that treatment identification using free-text clinical notes greatly improves upon the performance using billing codes and simple structured data. The approach can be used for treatment cohort identification and adapted for longitudinal cancer treatment identification.


Assuntos
Processamento de Linguagem Natural , Neoplasias , Estudos de Coortes , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Aprendizado de Máquina , Masculino , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/terapia
6.
J Infect Dis ; 200(8): 1311-7, 2009 Oct 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19751153

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori vaccines are under development to prevent infection. We quantified the cost-effectiveness of such a vaccine in the United States, using a dynamic transmission model. METHODS: We compartmentalized the population by age, infection status, and clinical disease state and measured effectiveness in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). We simulated no intervention, vaccination of infants, and vaccination of school-age children. Variables included costs of vaccine, vaccine administration, and gastric cancer treatment (in 2007 US dollars), vaccine efficacy, quality adjustment due to gastric cancer, and discount rate. We evaluated possible outcomes for periods of 10-75 years. RESULTS: H. pylori vaccination of infants would cost $2.9 billion over 10 years; savings from cancer prevention would be realized decades later. Over a long time horizon (75 years), incremental costs of H. pylori vaccination would be $1.8 billion, and incremental QALYs would be 0.5 million, yielding a cost-effectiveness ratio of $3871/QALY. With school-age vaccination, the cost-effectiveness ratio would be $22,137/QALY. With time limited to <40 years, the cost-effectiveness ratio exceeded $50,000/QALY. CONCLUSION: When evaluated with a time horizon beyond 40 years, the use of a prophylactic H. pylori vaccine was cost-effective in the United States, especially with infant vaccination.


Assuntos
Vacinas Bacterianas/economia , Vacinas Bacterianas/imunologia , Simulação por Computador , Infecções por Helicobacter/prevenção & controle , Helicobacter pylori/imunologia , Modelos Biológicos , Criança , Análise Custo-Benefício , Infecções por Helicobacter/economia , Infecções por Helicobacter/epidemiologia , Humanos , Lactente , Qualidade de Vida , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
7.
J Cancer Educ ; 24(3): 194-9, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19526406

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Many oncologists consult the Adjuvant! prognostic model to communicate risk with breast cancer patients; however, little is known about how effective that communication is. METHODS: The authors analyzed this small data set featuring 20 breast cancer patients' risk estimates, focusing on rankings or gist of the estimates. RESULTS: Overall, there was no gain in the accuracy of patient rankings. The number of patients with more accurate estimates was matched by the number of patients with less accurate estimates after consultation. CONCLUSIONS: The current methods used by oncologists to present Adjuvant! risks were not effective in helping patients to get the gist of their risks.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Comunicação , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Adulto , Idoso , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Relações Médico-Paciente , Projetos Piloto , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Stud Health Technol Inform ; 107(Pt 1): 13-7, 2004.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15360765

RESUMO

Since the widespread adoption of mammographic screening in the 1980's there has been a significant increase in the detection and biopsy of both benign and malignant microcalcifications. Though current practice standards recommend that the positive predictive value (PPV) of breast biopsy should be in the range of 25-40%, there exists significant variability in practice. Microcalcifications, if malignant, can represent either a non-invasive or an invasive form of breast cancer. The distinction is critical because distinct surgical therapies are indicated. Unfortunately, this information is not always available at the time of surgery due to limited sampling at image-guided biopsy. For these reasons we conducted an experiment to determine whether a previously created Bayesian network for mammography could predict the significance of microcalcifications. In this experiment we aim to test whether the system is able to perform two related tasks in this domain: 1) to predict the likelihood that microcalcifications are malignant and 2) to predict the likelihood that a malignancy is invasive to help guide the choice of appropriate surgical therapy.


Assuntos
Teorema de Bayes , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Calcinose/diagnóstico por imagem , Sistemas Inteligentes , Interpretação de Imagem Radiográfica Assistida por Computador , Humanos , Mamografia , Redes Neurais de Computação , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Probabilidade , Estudos Retrospectivos
9.
Acad Emerg Med ; 13(7): 755-66, 2006 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16723725

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To examine the cost-effectiveness of a quantitative D-dimer assay for the evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) in an urban emergency department (ED). METHODS: The authors analyzed different diagnostic strategies over pretest risk categories on the basis of Wells criteria by using the performance profile of the ELISA D-dimer assay (over five cutoff values) and imaging strategies used in the ED for PE: compression ultrasound (CUS), ventilation-perfusion (VQ) scan (over three cutoff values), CUS with VQ (over three cutoff values), computed tomography (CT) angiogram (CTA) with pulmonary portion (CTP) and lower-extremity venous portion, and CUS with CTP. Data used in the analysis were based on literature review. Incremental costs and quality-adjusted-life-years were the outcomes measured. RESULTS: Computed tomography angiogram with pulmonary portion and lower-extremity venous portion without D-dimer was the preferred strategy. CUS-VQ scanning always was dominated by CT-based strategies. When CTA was infeasible, the dominant strategy was D-dimer with CUS-VQ in moderate- and high-Wells patients and was D-dimer with CUS for low-Wells patients. When CTP specificity falls below 80%, or if its overall performance is markedly degraded, preferred strategies include D-dimer testing. Sensitivity analyses suggest that pessimistic assessments of CTP accuracy alter the results only at extremes of parameter settings. CONCLUSIONS: In patients in whom PE is suspected, when CTA is available, even the most sensitive quantitative D-dimer assay is not likely to be cost-effective. When CTA is not available or if its performance is markedly degraded, use of the D-dimer assay has value in combination with CUS and a pulmonary imaging study. These conclusions may not hold for the larger domain of patients presenting to the ED with chest pain or shortness of breath in whom PE is one of many competing diagnoses.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Produtos de Degradação da Fibrina e do Fibrinogênio/análise , Produtos de Degradação da Fibrina e do Fibrinogênio/economia , Embolia Pulmonar/sangue , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Erros de Diagnóstico/economia , Medicina de Emergência/instrumentação , Humanos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
10.
Radiology ; 240(3): 666-73, 2006 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16926323

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine whether a Bayesian network (BN) computer model can accurately predict the probability of breast cancer on the basis of risk factors and mammographic appearance of microcalcifications, to improve the positive predictive value (PPV) of biopsy, with pathologic examination and follow-up as reference standards. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant study; informed consent was not required. Results of 111 consecutive image-guided breast biopsies performed for microcalcifications deemed suspicious by radiologists were analyzed. Mammograms obtained before biopsy were analyzed in a blinded manner by a breast imager who recorded Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) descriptors and provided a probability of malignancy. The BN uses probabilistic relationships between breast disease and mammography findings to estimate the risk of malignancy. Probability estimates from the radiologist and the BN were used to create receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and area under the ROC curve (A(z)) values were compared. PPV of biopsy was also evaluated on the basis of these probability estimates. RESULTS: The BN and the radiologist achieved A(z) values of 0.919 and 0.916, respectively, which were not significantly different. If the 34 patients estimated by the BN to have less than a 10% probability of malignancy had not undergone biopsy, the PPV of biopsy would have increased from 21.6% to 31.2% without missing a breast cancer (P < .001). At this level, the radiologist's probability estimation improved the PPV to 30.0% (P < .001). CONCLUSION: A probabilistic model that includes BI-RADS descriptors for microcalcifications can distinguish between benign and malignant abnormalities at mammography as well as a breast imaging specialist can and may be able to improve the PPV of image-guided breast biopsy.


Assuntos
Doenças Mamárias/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Calcinose/diagnóstico por imagem , Mamografia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Teorema de Bayes , Biópsia , Doenças Mamárias/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Calcinose/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fatores de Risco
11.
J Biomed Inform ; 38(4): 281-97, 2005 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16084471

RESUMO

Complex decision models in expert systems often depend upon a number of utilities and subjective probabilities for an individual. Although these values can be estimated for entire populations or demographic subgroups, a model should be customized to the individual's specific parameter values. This process can be onerous and inefficient for practical decisions. We propose an interactive approach for incrementally improving our knowledge about a specific individual's parameter values, including utilities and probabilities, given a decision model and a prior joint probability distribution over the parameter values. We define the concept of value of elicitation and use it to determine dynamically the next most informative elicitation for a given individual. We evaluated the approach using an example model and demonstrate that we can improve the decision quality by focusing on those parameter values most material to the decision.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Inteligência Artificial , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas , Diagnóstico por Computador/métodos , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/métodos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Terapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fatores de Risco
12.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 182(2): 481-8, 2004 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14736686

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether a probabilistic expert system can provide accurate automated imaging-histologic correlations to aid radiologists in assessing the concordance of mammographic findings with the results of imaging-guided breast biopsies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We created a Bayesian network in which Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) descriptors are used to convey the level of suspicion of mammographic abnormalities. Our system is a computer model that links BI-RADS descriptors with diseases of the breast using probabilities derived from the literature. Mammographic findings are used to update pretest probabilities (prevalence of disease) into posttest probabilities applying Bayes' theorem. We evaluated the histologic results of 92 consecutive imaging-guided breast biopsies for concordance with the mammographic findings during radiology-pathology review sessions. First, radiologists with no knowledge of the biopsy results chose BI-RADS descriptors for the mammographic findings. After the histologic diagnosis was revealed, the radiologists assessed concordance between the pathologic results and the mammographic findings. We then input the information gathered from these sessions into the Bayesian network to produce an automated mammographic-histologic correlation. RESULTS: We had a sampling error rate of 1.1% (1/92 biopsies). Our expert system was able to integrate pathologic diagnoses and mammographic findings to obtain probabilities of sampling error, thereby enabling us to identify the incorrect pathologic diagnosis with 100% sensitivity while maintaining a specificity of 91%. CONCLUSION: Our probabilistic expert system has the potential to help radiologists in identifying breast biopsy results that are discordant with mammographic findings and discovering cases in which biopsy sampling errors may have occurred.


Assuntos
Teorema de Bayes , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Sistemas Inteligentes , Mamografia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biópsia por Agulha , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Estatísticos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Probabilidade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA