Reply to Lissing et al. Comment on "Ramai et al. Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Porphyria: A Systematic Review. Cancers 2022, 14, 2947".

We thank Dr. Lissing and colleagues for providing us with these helpful comments [...].

Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Porphyria: A Systematic Review.

Acute porphyrias are a group of metabolic disorders resulting in defective porphyrin synthesis and reduced heme production, which carries a risk of malignancy. Porphyrias are inborn defects in the heme biosynthesis pathway resulting in neurovisceral manifestations and cutaneous photosensitivity attacks with multi-systemic involvement. Its estimated prevalence nears 5 per 100,000 patients worldwide. Subclinical liver disease is common, which can progress into transaminitis, fibrosis, cirrhosis, and malignancy. However, data on the incidence of primary liver cancer are lacking. We aim to determine the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with porphyria. A systematic review and pooled analysis were conducted through 2021 on studies assessing blood tests, imaging, cancer development, liver transplant, surgical resection, and outcomes in porphyria. In total, 19 studies, which included 7381 patients with porphyria (3476 females), were considered for the final review. In eight studies, alpha-fetoprotein levels were elevated between 200 and 1000 IU/mL. Of the total cohort of patients with porphyria, primary liver cancer was diagnosed in 351 patients (4.8%), of whom 243 (3.3% of the total) were found to have HCC. A subset of patients was found to have cholangiocarcinoma (n = 18; 0.3% of the total). Interestingly, advanced liver disease or cirrhosis was not a prerequisite for the formation of HCC in a small group of patients. Of the total cohort, 30 patients underwent liver resection, 48 patients underwent liver transplantation, and 327 patients died. Patients with porphyria are at risk of developing primary liver malignancy. Further studies should aim to develop diagnostic and prognostic models aimed at the early detection of HCC in porphyria.

Refractory symptoms in paediatric palliative care: can ketamine help?

BACKGROUND: One of the main challenges for paediatric palliative care (PPC) is the management of concomitant, different and severe symptoms that frequently affect the quality of life of PPC patients and are often refractory to commonly used pharmacological treatments. Consequently, many efforts are still needed to find the best therapeutic options to handle these refractory conditions. Since the first synthesis of ketamine in the 1960s, its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties have been largely investigated and its potential wide range of clinical applications has become clear. However, this molecule still receives poor attention in some areas, including in children and PPC. This narrative review analyses the use of ketamine in children and the potential extension of its applications in PPC in order to provide new options for treatment in the PPC setting. METHODS: Scientific papers published before October 2020 on MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were considered. The cited references of the selected papers and the authors' personal collections of literature were reviewed. The terms "palliative care", "ketamine", "neuropathic pain", "procedural pain", "status epilepticus", "refractory pain" and "child", adding "age: birth-18 years" on a further filter were used for the search. DISCUSSION: The use of ketamine in PPC should be more widely considered due to its overall favourable safety profile and its efficacy, which are supported by an increasing number of studies, although in settings different from PPC and of mixed quality. Ketamine should be proposed according to a case-by-case evaluation and the specific diagnosis and the dosage and route of administration should be tailored to the specific needs of patients. Furthermore, there is evidence to suggest that ketamine is safe and efficacious in acute pain. These findings can prompt further research on the use of ketamine for the treatment of acute pain in PPC. CONCLUSION: Ketamine could be a suitable option after the failure of conventional drugs in the treatment of different refractory conditions in PPC.

Do we always need to treat patients with spinal muscular atrophy? A personal view and experience.

BACKGROUND: We report the clinical outcomes observed in our patients with SMA type 1 or 2 receiving nusinersen, and we comment on the ethical implications of this treatment, in line with our results and those reported by Audic et al. in their analysis published in the Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. METHODS: We analyzed records of all children with a genetically diagnosed SMA and clinically confirmed diagnosis of SMA Type 1 or 2 to whom nusinersen was offered. Follow-up lasted 30 months. RESULTS: Among the 17 children with SMA type 1, 6 interrupted treatment with nusinersen due to adverse events or lack of efficacy. Of the remaining 11 patients, 9 are responding to therapy, though multidisciplinary complex care is still required. All those children started nusinersen at a very early age. Eighteen patients with SMA type 2 received nusinersen; five required treatment interruption. The other 13 patients are still on nusinersen therapy, and 6 are responders. Among the seven non-responders, only two met the inclusion criteria of the pivotal trial. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis further supports the findings reported in the study by Audic et al. We believe that a wider use of nusinersen in clinical practice would require a comprehensive assessment of its actual benefits weighed against the discomfort caused to patients, as well as the identification of the patients who may obtain the best benefits from this treatment.

Progressive Liver Fibrosis in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a chronic and progressive form of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Its global incidence is increasing and makes NASH an epidemic and a public health threat. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with major morbidity and mortality, with a heavy burden on quality of life and liver transplant requirements. Due to repeated insults to the liver, patients are at risk for developing hepatocellular carcinoma. The progression of NASH was initially defined according to a two-hit model involving an initial development of steatosis, followed by a process of lipid peroxidation and inflammation. In contrast, current evidence proposes a "multi-hit" or "multi-parallel hit" model that includes multiple pathways promoting progressive fibrosis and oncogenesis. This model includes multiple cellular, genetic, immunological, metabolic, and endocrine pathways leading to hepatocellular carcinoma development, underscoring the complexity of this disease.

Hospital Frailty Risk Score Is Independently Associated with Mortality and Encephalopathy in Hospitalized Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Frailty represents a state of vulnerability to multiple internal physiologic factors, as well as external pressures, and has been associated with clinical outcomes. We aim to understand the impact of frailty on patients admitted with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by using the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score, which is implemented in several hospitals worldwide. We conducted a nation-wide retrospective cohort study to determine the effect of frailty on the risk of in-patient mortality, hepatic encephalopathy, length of stay and cost. Frailty was associated with a 4.5-fold increased risk of mortality and a 2.3-fold increased risk of hepatic encephalopathy. Adjusted Cox regression showed that frailty was correlated with increased risk of in-patient mortality (hazard ratio: 2.3, 95% CI 1.9-2.8, p < 0.001). Frail HCC patients had longer hospital stay (median 5 days) vs. non-frail HCC patients (median 3 days). Additionally, frail patients had higher total costs of hospitalization ($40,875) compared with non-frail patients ($31,667). Frailty is an independent predictor of hepatic encephalopathy and in-patient mortality. Frailty is a surrogate marker of hospital length of stay and cost.

Target therapies plus somatostatin analogs in NETs: a network meta-analysis.

Although combination therapy is not recommended in patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), this strategy is widely used in clinical practice. This network meta-analysis of randomized trials evaluates targeted therapies and somatostatin analogues in GEP-advanced NETs, either alone or in combination, comparing the efficacy of different, single or combined treatment strategies in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). Interventions were grouped as analogs, everolimus, everolimus plus SSAs, sunitinib and placebo. In a secondary analysis, we also assessed the efficacy of individual-specific pharmacological treatments vs placebo or each other. From 83 studies identified, 8 randomized controlled trials were selected, with a total of 1849 patients with either functioning or non-functioning NETs. The analysis confirmed the superiority of all treatments over placebo (HR ranging from 0.34, 95% CI: 0.24-0.37 with the combination of everolimus plus SSAs to 0.42, 0.31-0.57 with the analogs; moderate quality of evidence). On ranking analysis, the combination of everolimus plus SSA (P score = 0.86) and then everolimus alone (P score = 0.65) ranked highest in increasing PFS. On comparative evaluation of different interventions, pasireotide (P score = 0.96) and everolimus + octreotide (P score = 0.82) ranked as the best pharmacological treatment options. Our findings support the use of combination therapy in the treatment of functioning and non-functioning GEP NETs. The role of pasireotide should be explored in selected subgroups of patients. Lastly, the combination of everolimus and octreotide appears promising and should be more widely considered in clinical practice.

Sustained virological response in patients with HCV treated with daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir, with or without ribavirin: a large, field-practice study.

BACKGROUND: The once-daily oral combination of daclatasvir (DCV) and sofosbuvir (SOF), with or without ribavirin (RBV), is effective and well tolerated in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV). However, further field-practice studies are necessary to investigate the effectiveness and safety of the DCV+SOF combination in diverse subpopulations of patients with HCV, including those who are more challenging to treat such as patients with a genotype 3 (G3) infection. The aim of this retrospective, multicenter, field-practice study was to investigate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of the oral combination of DCV and SOF, with or without RBV (DCV+SOF±RBV), in a large unselected cohort of patients with chronic HCV infection (CHC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients received DCV+SOF±RBV for 12 or 24 weeks. The efficacy endpoint was sustained virological response at 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12). Safety factors were also considered. RESULTS: A total of 620 patients were included in this study; the predominant genotype was G3 (55.3%). Of the total sample, 248 (40%) patients were treated with DCV+SOF+RBV and 372 (60%) did not receive RBV. The majority of patients assessed at week 12 (98%, 596/608) achieved SVR12. Among G3 patients, 98.8% (335/339) achieved SVR12. The most common adverse event was elevated bilirubin (30.6%), recorded in 4.9% of cases as a grade 3-4 adverse event. CONCLUSION: This study shows the high pan-genotypic effectiveness and safety of the DCV+SOF±RBV combination in a large, unselected sample of CHC patients with G1-4, including a wide proportion of G3 CHC patients.