Are European marketed acyclovir 5% cream products similar? Comparison with EU and US reference product.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to perform a comparative evaluation of composition and in vitro release performance of multisource acyclovir 5% creams. SIGNIFICANCE: The outcome was analyzed in relation with the principles of the Topical drug Classification System (TCS). METHODS: The in vitro drug release testing (IVRT) was based on selection of an inert artificial membrane and a medium providing sink conditions, and utilizing the vertical diffusion cells. US and European innovator products, with marked difference in excipients, were used as references for the assessment of the in vitro release similarity. The qualitative composition of the topical semisolid products was inventoried, with no quantitative details being available. A Principal Component Analysis was applied by either dichotomy ranking or grouping the individual excipients into categories according to their functional role. RESULTS: The results confirmed the sensitivity and discriminative characteristics of IVRT with respect to the qualitative composition, as well as its relevance in the comparative assessment of multisource drug products beyond the current strict requirements of Q1 and Q2 similarity. CONCLUSIONS: This is in line with the principles of the TCS and with the central role assigned to IVRT.

Rheological and in vitro release measurements of manufactured acyclovir 5% creams: confirming sensitivity of the in vitro release.

Previous evaluation of marketed acyclovir 5% creams using in vitro release testing (IVRT) and its correlation with the qualitative composition confirmed the discriminative characteristics of this methodology. This was in line with the principles of Topical drug Classification System (TCS). For the current research, experimental formulations were designed and prepared by applying controlled changes in manufacturing process, sources of raw materials, and amount of the excipients. The topical semisolids were representative for the four classes of TCS. The outcome of the IVRT and rheological assessments was evaluated in relation with the nature of the change and the functional role of the excipients. The variations in propylene glycol content from 5% to 40% impacted both the in vitro release rates (gradual decrease from 16.23 to 8.97 µg/cm2/min0.5) and the microstructural characteristics (proportional increase of yield stress from 17.98 to 46.40 Pa). The inert excipients e.g. cetostearyl alcohol or white soft paraffin altered majorly the rheological behavior, as their functionality is mainly related to vehicle properties. IVRT was discriminative for the microstructural differences induced by both categories of excipients according to TCS dichotomy. This simple, reliable, and reproducible test reflected the impact of difference in quantitative composition and characteristics of excipients.

Biorelevant in vitro performance testing of orally administered dosage forms-workshop report.

Biorelevant in vitro performance testing of orally administered dosage forms has become an important tool for the assessment of drug product in vivo behavior. An in vitro performance test which mimics the intraluminal performance of an oral dosage form is termed biorelevant. Biorelevant tests have been utilized to decrease the number of in vivo studies required during the drug development process and to mitigate the risk related to in vivo bioequivalence studies. This report reviews the ability of current in vitro performance tests to predict in vivo performance and generate successful in vitro and in vivo correlations for oral dosage forms. It also summarizes efforts to improve the predictability of biorelevant tests. The report is based on the presentations at the 2013 workshop, Biorelevant In Vitro Performance Testing of Orally Administered Dosage Forms, in Washington, DC, sponsored by the FIP Dissolution/Drug Release Focus Group in partnership with the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) and a symposium at the AAPS 2012 Annual meeting on the same topic.

Current challenges in bioequivalence, quality, and novel assessment technologies for topical products.

This paper summarises the proceedings of a recent workshop which brought together pharmaceutical scientists and dermatologists from academia, industry and regulatory agencies to discuss current regulatory issues and industry practices for establishing therapeutic bioequivalence (BE) of dermatologic topical products. The methods currently available for assessment of BE were reviewed as well as alternatives and the advantages and disadvantages of each method were considered. Guidance on quality and performance of topical products was reviewed and a framework to categorise existing and alternative methods for evaluation of BE was discussed. The outcome of the workshop emphasized both a need for greater attention to quality, possibly, via a Quality-By-Design (QBD) approach and a need to develop a "whole toolkit" approach towards the problem of determination of rate and extent in the assessment of topical bioavailability. The discussion on the BE and clinical equivalence of topical products revealed considerable concerns about the variability present in the current methodologies utilized by the industry and regulatory agencies. It was proposed that academicians, researchers, the pharmaceutical industry and regulators work together to evaluate and validate alternative methods that are based on both the underlying science and are adapted to the drug product itself instead of single "universal" method.

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of three metronidazole topical products.

Two 1% and one 0.75% metronidazole cream products were approved as bioequivalent products. These products were evaluated for their in vivo cutaneous penetration characteristics by dermatopharmacokinetic (DPK) and dermal microdialysis (DMD) sampling methodologies. The same three products were also evaluated for their rheological and in vitro drug release (IVR) properties. Structural differences were observed in the resulting flow curves. However, similar IVR profiles were obtained for the two topical semisolid dosage forms containing 1% metronidazole. For the lower strength product, a higher IVR rate was associated with the lower DPK profile. All three products exhibited similar values of area under the curve when investigated by DMD. This in vitro evaluation corroborated the divergent penetration characteristics found using in vivo methodologies.

Best practices for the development, scale-up, and post-approval change control of IR and MR dosage forms in the current quality-by-design paradigm.

In this whitepaper, the Manufacturing Technical Committee of the Product Quality Research Institute provides information on the common, best practices in use today in the development of high-quality chemistry, manufacturing and controls documentation. Important topics reviewed include International Conference on Harmonization, in vitro-in vivo correlation considerations, quality-by-design approaches, process analytical technologies and current scale-up, and process control and validation practices. It is the hope and intent that this whitepaper will engender expanded dialog on this important subject by the pharmaceutical industry and its regulatory bodies.

Biowaiver Monograph for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Isavuconazonium Sulfate.

A Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS)-based biowaiver monograph is presented for isavuconazonium sulfate. A BCS-based biowaiver is a regulatory option to substitute appropriate in vitro data for in vivo bioequivalence studies. Isavuconazonium sulfate is the prodrug of isavuconazole, a broad-spectrum azole antifungal indicated for invasive fungal infections. While the prodrug can be classified as a BCS Class III drug with high solubility but low permeability, the parent drug can be classified as a BCS Class II drug with low solubility but high permeability. Interestingly, the in vivo behavior of both is additive and leads isavuconazonium sulfate to act like a BCS class I drug substance after oral administration. In this work, experimental solubility and dissolution data were evaluated and compared with available literature data to investigate whether it is feasible to approve immediate release solid oral dosage forms containing isavuconazonium sulfate according to official guidance from the FDA, EMA and/or ICH. The risks associated with waiving a prodrug according to the BCS-based biowaiver guidelines are reviewed and discussed, noting that current regulations are quite restrictive on this point. Further, results show high solubility but instability of isavuconazonium sulfate in aqueous media. Although experiments on the dissolution of the capsule contents confirmed 'very rapid' dissolution of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) isavuconazonium sulfate, its release from the commercial marketed capsule formulation Cresemba is limited by the choice of capsule shell material, providing an additional impediment to approval of generic versions via the BCS-Biowaiver approach.

Biowaiver Monograph for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Fexofenadine.

In this monograph, the potential use of methods based on the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) framework to evaluate the bioequivalence of solid immediate-release (IR) oral dosage forms containing fexofenadine hydrochloride as a substitute for a pharmacokinetic study in human volunteers is investigated. We assessed the solubility, permeability, dissolution, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, therapeutic index, bioavailability, drug-excipient interaction, and other properties using BCS recommendations from the ICH, FDA and EMA. The findings unequivocally support fexofenadine's classification to BCS Class IV as it is neither highly soluble nor highly permeable. Further impeding the approval of generic equivalents through the BCS-biowaiver pathway is the reference product's inability to release ≥ 85 % of the drug substance within 30 min in pH 1.2 and pH 4.5 media. According to ICH rules, BCS class IV drugs do not qualify for waiving clinical bioequivalence studies based on the BCS, even though fexofenadine has behaved more like a BCS class I/III than a class IV molecule in pharmacokinetic studies to date and has a wide therapeutic index.

Biowaiver Monograph for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Raltegravir Potassium.

The present monograph discusses the possibility of BCS-based biowaivers for immediate release pharmaceutical products containing raltegravir potassium, which is used to treat human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections. Raltegravir potassium can be assigned to BCS class II or IV since this compound has low solubility and uncertain permeability. Therefore, according to the ICH M9 guideline, it is not recommended to apply BCS-based biowaiver to approval of immediate release solid dosage forms of raltegravir potassium, either for new generic versions or when moderate to major changes in composition and/or the manufacturing method of the product are made.

Biowaiver Monograph for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Levocetirizine Dihydrochloride.

Levocetirizine, a histamine H1-receptor antagonist, is prescribed to treat uncomplicated skin rashes associated with chronic idiopathic urticaria as well as the symptoms of both seasonal and continual allergic rhinitis. In this monograph, the practicality of using Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) based methodologies as a substitute for pharmacokinetic studies in human volunteers to appraise the bioequivalence of immediate-release (IR) oral, solid dosage forms containing levocetirizine dihydrochloride was investigated, using data from the literature and in-house testing. Levocetirizine's solubility and permeability properties, as well as its dissolution from commercial products, its therapeutic uses, therapeutic index, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic traits, were reviewed in accordance with the BCS, along with any reports in the literature about failure to meet bioequivalence (BE) requirements, bioavailability issues, drug-excipient interactions as well as other relevant information. The data presented in this monograph unequivocally point to classification of levocetirizine in BCS Class 1. For products that are somewhat supra-equivalent or somewhat sub-equivalent, clinical risks are expected to be insignificant in light of levocetirizine's wide therapeutic index and unlikelihood of severe adverse effects. After careful consideration of all the information available, it was concluded that the BCS-based biowaiver can be implemented for products which contain levocetirizine dihydrochloride, provided (a) the test product comprises excipients that are typically found in IR oral, solid drug products that have been approved by a country belonging to or associated with ICH and are used in quantities that are typical for such products, (b) data supporting the BCS-based biowaiver are gathered using ICH-recommended methods, and (c) all in vitro dissolution requirements specified in the ICH guidance are met by both the test and comparator products (in this case, the comparator is the innovator product).

Biowaiver Monograph for Immediate-Release Dosage Forms: Levamisole Hydrochloride.

This work describes the potential applicability of the BCS-based Biowaiver to oral solid dosage forms containing Levamisole hydrochloride, an anthelmintic drug on the WHO List of Essential Medicines. Solubility and permeability data of levamisole hydrochloride were searched in the literature and/or measured experimentally. Levamisole hydrochloride is a highly soluble drug, but there is no clear evidence of high permeability in humans, indicating that it should provisionally be assigned to BCS class III. The biowaiver procedure would thus be applicable for solid oral dosage forms containing levamisole hydrochloride as the only active ingredient. Due to the lack of data in the literature regarding excipient effects on the bioequivalence of products containing levamisole, it is currently recommended that the products comply with the ICH and WHO guidelines: the test formulation should have the same qualitative composition as the comparator, contain very similar quantities of those excipients, and be very rapidly dissolving at pH 1.2, 4.5, and 6.8. However, for certain well-studied excipients, there appears to be opportunity for additional regulatory relief in future versions of the ICH BCS Guidance M9, such as not requiring that the quantities of these common excipients in the test and comparator be the same.

In vitro release test (IVRT): Principles and applications.

In vitro drug release test has become one of the most important tools for drug development and approval process of semisolid dosage forms. In vitro release test (IVRT) has the ability to reflect the combined effects of several physicochemical characteristics, particle or droplet size, viscosity, microstructure arrangement of the matter and state of aggregation of dosage form. Genesis of IVRT, its principles and rank order relationship with pharmacodynamic response such as vasoconstriction or dermatopharmacokinetic (skin stripping) results and the evolution of test requirements for regulatory approval is discussed. IVRT reflects various parameters and is an essential part of the stepwise approach to compare topical formulation and its ability to release active in similar quantity at similar rate. Therefore, it is an essential tool, in addition to similar qualitative and quantitative composition (Q1 Q2), to assess the similarity of microstructural arrangement (Q3) as proposed in the Topical drug Classification System (TCS) approach of classes 1 and 3. The TCS system along with evolving concept for topical dermatological drug products from Q1, Q2, Q3 sameness to Q1, Q2, Q3 similar allowing greater permissiveness in formulation changes is discussed.

Biowaiver Monograph for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Sitagliptin Phosphate Monohydrate.

Sitagliptin is an antihyperglycemic drug used in adults for the treatment of diabetes Type 2. Literature data and in-house experiments were applied in this monograph to assess whether methods based on the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) could be used to assess the bioequivalence of solid immediate-release (IR) oral dosage forms containing sitagliptin phosphate monohydrate, as an alternative to a pharmacokinetic study in human volunteers. The solubility and permeability characteristics of sitagliptin were reviewed according to the BCS, along with dissolution, therapeutic index, therapeutic applications, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamic characteristics, reports of bioequivalence (BE) / bioavailability problems, data on interactions between the drug and excipients and other data germane to the subject. All data reviewed in this monograph unambiguously support classification of sitagliptin as a BCS Class 1 drug. In light of its broad therapeutic index and lack of severe adverse effects, the clinical risks associated with moderately supraoptimal doses were deemed inconsequential, as were the risks associated with moderately suboptimal doses. Taking all evidence into consideration, it was concluded that the BCS-based biowaiver can be implemented for solid IR oral drug products containing sitagliptin phosphate monohydrate, provided (a) the test product is formulated solely with excipients commonly present in solid IR oral drug products approved in ICH or associated countries and used in amounts commonly applied in this type of product, (b) data in support of the BCS-based biowaiver are obtained using the methods recommended by the WHO, FDA, EMA or ICH and (c) the test product and the comparator product (which is the innovator product in this case) meet all in vitro dissolution specifications provided in the WHO, FDA, EMA or ICH guidance.

A pragmatic regulatory approach for complex generics through the U.S. FDA 505(j) or 505(b)(2) approval pathways.

The diverse nature of complex drug products poses challenges for the development of regulatory guidelines for generic versions. While complexity is not new in medicines, the technical capacity to measure and analyze data has increased. This requires a determination of which measurements and studies are relevant to demonstrate therapeutic equivalence. This paper describes the views of the NBCD Working Group and provides pragmatic solutions for approving complex generics by making best use of existing U.S. Food and Drug Administration's abbreviated approval pathways 505(j) and 505(b)(2). We argue that decisions on the appropriateness of submitting a 505(j) or 505(b)(2) application can build on the FDA's complex drug product classification as well as the FDA's much applauded guidance document for determining whether to submit an ANDA or a 505(b)(2) application. We hope that this paper contributes to the discussions to increase the clarity of regulatory approaches for complex generics, as well as the predictability for complex generic drug developers, to facilitate access to much-needed complex generics and to promote the sustainability of the healthcare system.

Tackling the challenges of nanomedicines: are we ready?

PURPOSE: This review provides an overview of the proceedings of the symposium "Tackling the Challenges of Nanomedicines: Are We Ready?" organized by the International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP) Hospital Pharmacy Section and Non-Biological Complex Drugs (NBCDs) Working Group at the 2019 FIP World Congress of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. Debate centered on reasons underlying the current complex regulatory landscape for nanomedicines and their follow-on products (referred to as nanosimilars) and the pivotal role of hospital pharmacists in selecting, handling, and guiding usage of nanomedicines and nanosimilars. SUMMARY: The evaluation and use of nanomedicines are recognized among scientific, pharmaceutical, and regulatory bodies as complex. Interchangeability and substitutability of nanomedicines and nanosimilars are confounded by a lack of pharmaceutical and pharmacological equivalence, reflecting the inherent complex nature of these drug products and manufacturing processes. Consequences include implications for clinical safety and efficacy and, ultimately, comparability. Local regulatory approvals of some nanomedicines have occurred, but there is no standard to ensure streamlined evaluation and use of consistent measures of therapeutic equivalence of reference products and their nanosimilars. Hospital pharmacists are expected to be experts in the selection, handling, and substitution of nanomedicines and familiarize themselves with the limitations of current methods of assessing pharmaceutical and clinical equivalence of nanosimilars in order to ensure informed formulary decision-making and eventual patient benefit. CONCLUSION: Supportive guidance for pharmacists focusing on the substitutability and/or interchangeability of nanomedicines and their nanosimilars is needed. Current FIP guidance for pharmacists on therapeutic interchange and substitution should be extended to include nanomedicines and nanosimilars.

Biowaiver Monographs for Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Metformin Hydrochloride.

Data are examined regarding possible waiver of in vivo bioequivalence testing (i.e. biowaiver) for approval of metformin hydrochloride (metformin) immediate-release solid oral dosage forms. Data include metformin's Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) properties, including potential excipient interactions. Metformin is a prototypical transporter-mediated drug and is highly soluble, but only 50% of an orally administered dose is absorbed from the gut. Therefore, metformin is a BCS Class III substance. A BCS-based approval approach for major changes to marketed products and new generics is admissible if test and reference dosage forms have the identical active pharmaceutical ingredient and if in vitro dissolution from both are very rapid (i.e. at least 85% within 15 min at pH 1.2, 4.5, and 6.8). Recent International Council for Harmonisation BCS guidance indicates all excipients for Class III biowaivers are recommended to be qualitatively the same and quantitatively similar (except for preservatives, flavor agents, colorant, or capsule shell or film coating excipients). However, despite metformin being a prototypical transporter-mediated drug, there is no evidence that commonly used excipients impact metformin absorption, such that this restriction on excipients for BCS III drugs merits regulatory relief. Commonly used excipients in usual amounts are not likely to impact metformin absorption.

Biowaiver Monograph for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Carbamazepine.

Literature relevant to assessing whether BCS-based biowaivers can be applied to immediate release (IR) solid oral dosage forms containing carbamazepine as the single active pharmaceutical ingredient are reviewed. Carbamazepine, which is used for the prophylactic therapy of epilepsy, is a non-ionizable drug that cannot be considered "highly soluble" across the range of pH values usually encountered in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Furthermore, evidence in the open literature suggests that carbamazepine is a BCS Class 2 drug. Nevertheless, the oral absolute bioavailability of carbamazepine lies between 70 and 78% and both in vivo and in vitro data support the classification of carbamazepine as a highly permeable drug. Since the therapeutic and toxic plasma level ranges overlap, carbamazepine is considered to have a narrow therapeutic index. For these reasons, a BCS based biowaiver for IR tablets of carbamazepine cannot be recommended. Interestingly, in nine out of ten studies, USP dissolution conditions (900 mL water with 1% SLS, paddle, 75 rpm) appropriately discriminated among bioinequivalent products and this may be a way forward to predicting whether a given formulation will be bioequivalent to the comparator product.

From drug delivery systems to drug release, dissolution, IVIVC, BCS, BDDCS, bioequivalence and biowaivers.

This is a summary report of the conference on drug absorption and bioequivalence issues held in Titania Hotel in Athens (Greece) from the 28(th) to the 30(th) of May 2009. The conference included presentations which were mainly divided into three sections. The first section focused on modern drug delivery systems such as polymer nanotechnology, cell immobilization techniques to deliver drugs into the brain, nanosized liposomes used in drug eluting stents, encapsulation of drug implants in biocompatible polymers, and application of differential scanning calorimetry as a tool to study liposomal stability. The importance of drug release and dissolution were also discussed by placing special emphasis on camptothecins and oral prolonged release formulations. The complexity of the luminal environment and the value of dissolution in lyophilized products were also highlighted. The second session of the conference included presentations on the Biopharmaceutics Classification Scheme (BCS), the Biopharmaceutics Drug Disposition Classification System (BDDCS), and the role of transporters in the classification of drugs. The current status of biowaivers and a modern view on non-linear in vitro-in vivo (IVIVC) correlations were also addressed. Finally, this section ended with a special topic on biorelevant dissolution media and methods. The third day of the conference was dedicated to bioequivalence. Emphasis was placed on high within-subject variability and its impact on study design. Two unresolved issues of bioequivalence were also discussed: the use of generic antiepileptic drugs and the role of metabolites in bioequivalence assessment. Finally, the conference closed with a presentation of the current regulatory status of WHO and EMEA.

The pharmaceutical sciences in 2020: report of a conference organized by the board of pharmaceutical sciences of the International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP).

The Board of Pharmaceutical Sciences (BPS) of the International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP) has developed a view on the future of pharmaceutical sciences in 2020. This followed an international conference with invited participants from various fields (academicians, scientists, regulators, industrialists, venture capitalists) who shared their views on the forces that might determine how the pharmaceutical sciences will look in 2020. The commentary here provides a summary of major research activities that will drive drug discovery and development, enabling technologies for pharmaceutical sciences, paradigm shifts in drug discovery, development and regulations, and changes in education to meet the demands of academia, industry and regulatory institutions for pharmaceutical sciences in 2020.

Biowaiver Monograph for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Moxifloxacin Hydrochloride.

In this monograph, literature data is reviewed to evaluate the feasibility of waiving in vivo bioequivalence testing and instead applying the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) based methods to the approval of immediate-release solid oral dosage forms containing moxifloxacin hydrochloride as the sole active pharmaceutical ingredient. To facilitate the feasibility decision, solubility and permeability and dissolution characteristics in the context of the BCS, therapeutic index, therapeutic use, pharmacokinetic parameters, bioequivalence/bioavailability issues, drug-excipient interactions and other relevant data were taken into consideration. Moxifloxacin is a BCS class I drug with a wide therapeutic index. Bioequivalence risks arising from the presence of different excipients in the formulation and due to manufacturing variables were deemed to be low. The risks can be further reduced if the choice of excipients is limited to those present in products already approved in International Conference on Harmonisation or associated countries and if the results of in vitro dissolution studies comply with the specifications stipulated in the appropriate biowaiver guidelines. Under these conditions, we conclude that a BCS-based biowaiver can be recommended for moxifloxacin immediate-release solid oral dosage forms.