Barriers and facilitators for strengthening physiotherapy services in Nepal: perspectives from physiotherapists and health providers.

BACKGROUND: Physiotherapy provides non-invasive and non-pharmaceutical intervention for curative, rehabilitation and preventative purposes. Physiotherapy is also a central provider of health promotion. As the global burden of non-communicable diseases and chronic health conditions is rising, the importance of physiotherapy services increases. Unfortunately, physiotherapy services in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are generally unsatisfactory. In Nepal, the earthquake in 2015 and the COVID pandemic have clearly illuminated the importance of physiotherapy. OBJECTIVE: This qualitative study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators at different system levels for strengthening physiotherapy services in Nepal. METHODS: Forty semi-structured individual interviews were performed with different health providers. Transcribed interviews were assessed with thematic analysis. A five-level socioecological framework conceptualised multilevel determinants of barriers and facilitators. RESULTS: The study revealed various factors that were potential barriers and facilitators across five different levels, namely individual (taking the lead, need for advocacy), interpersonal (lack of recognition and autonomy, networking for referrals and coordination), community (lack of knowledge and awareness, social and family support), organisational (accessibility, workplace and clinical practice, educational opportunities, role of organisations and rehabilitation centres), and public policy level (planning and implementation of policies and programs, medical hegemony, priorities). Government officials, local leaders, and clinicians, half of whom were physiotherapists, agreed on many of the same issues, where a lack of awareness of what physiotherapy is and knowledge about what physiotherapists do was central. CONCLUSIONS: The results provide information for the development of physiotherapy by pointing out key elements that need attention. Our broad and structured investigation strategy is applicable to others for a comprehensive analysis of barriers and facilitators for physiotherapy services.

Physiotherapy and its service in Nepal: implementation and status reported from facility surveys and official registers.

BACKGROUND: Physiotherapy is a growing profession in Nepal. Despite efforts to promote strengthening and development, there are still challenges in providing equitable access and availability to services, particularly in underserved areas. Updated information is needed to address challenges to provide proper planning for resource allocation. OBJECTIVE: To assess implementation of physiotherapy services and to explore plans, policies and the general status of physiotherapy in Nepal. METHOD: Implementation was assessed with a cross-sectional survey conducted in Province III containing closed-ended questions addressing physiotherapy services, human resources, charging and record-keeping systems, and accessibility. Stratified purposive sampling was used to select eligible facilities from the list of Department of Health Services. Official records were explored through visits to governing institutions and by reviews of registers and reports to obtain data and information on status, plans and policy. RESULTS: The survey included 25 urban and 4 rural facilities, covering hospitals and rehabilitation centres; both public (37.9%) and non-public (62.1%). Most facilities (79.3%) employed physiotherapists with bachelor's degrees. Average number of visits were 29.55 physiotherapy outpatients and 14.17 inpatients per day. Patient records were mainly paper based. Most (69%) used the hospital main card, while others (31%) had their own physiotherapy assessment card. Most referrals came from doctors. The most offered services were musculoskeletal, neurological, and paediatric physiotherapy. Daily basis charging was common. A single visit averaged 311 Nepalese rupees ≈ 2.33 US$. Convenience for persons with disabilities was reported as partial by 79% of outpatient departments. Official register data showed 313 master's and 2003 bachelor's graduates. Six colleges offered physiotherapy bachelor's degree, whereof one also offered a master's program. Government records revealed significant progress in physiotherapy in Nepal. CONCLUSION: The study highlights variations in physiotherapy services within a province owing to type, size and location, but also unwarranted variations. Despite the progress, implementation of physiotherapy services in the perspective of official records imply a need of systems for proper planning and monitoring. Physiotherapy provision in underserved areas warrants further attention.