Prostate-specific antigen as a predictor of radiotherapy response and patterns of failure in localized prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: A study of preradiation and postradiation, serial serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels was performed in patients who had clinically localized prostate cancer. The prognostic value of the PSA in pretreatment evaluation and posttreatment follow-up was assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-three patients who presented with clinically localized prostate cancer and who were treated with external-beam radiation therapy were followed-up for a median of 25 months. A serum PSA and physical examination were performed at 3-month intervals, and a bone scan was done yearly. An increase in PSA triggered an additional metastatic workup. Prostate rebiopsy was performed for new, palpable nodules or for a serial increase in PSA in the context of a negative metastatic workup. RESULTS: Forty-one patients remained recurrence-free and 22 recurred clinically, 15 distantly and seven locally. The PSA was the strongest, independent, pretreatment prognostic indicator (P = .019) among pretreatment PSA, stage, and grade, but lost significance when the serum prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) status was included. The initial rate of the PSA decrease after radiation (median half-life, 2.6 months) failed to predict outcome. Recurrence-free patients reached postradiation PSA levels that were equivalent to those reported in disease-free male populations; failure of the PSA to reach such normal levels was a multivariate predictor of subsequent failure (P less than .037). All clinicopathologic documentations of failure were preceded by an increase in PSA levels during follow-up. Delayed versus early PSA increase was associated with clinically localized versus metastatic first recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The serum PSA is an independent pretreatment and posttreatment predictor of outcome. Additionally, for a median follow-up of 25 months, delayed PSA failure is associated with clinically localized rather than metastatic recurrence, a relationship that may help in selection for local salvage therapy.

Sucralfate in the prevention of treatment-induced diarrhea in patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy: A North Central Cancer Treatment Group phase III double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Randomized studies have suggested that sucralfate is effective in mitigating diarrhea during pelvic radiation therapy (RT). This North Central Cancer Treatment Group study was undertaken to confirm the antidiarrheal effect of sucralfate. Several other measures of bowel function were also assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients receiving pelvic RT to a minimum of 45 Gy at 1.7 to 2.1 Gy/d were eligible for the study. Patients were assigned randomly, in double-blind fashion, to receive sucralfate (1.5 g orally every 6 hours) or an identical looking placebo during pelvic RT. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-three patients were randomly assigned and found assessable. Overall, there was no significant difference in patient characteristics between those receiving sucralfate and those receiving placebo. Moderate or worse diarrhea was observed in 53% of patients receiving sucralfate versus 41% of those receiving placebo. Compared with patients receiving placebo, more sucralfate-treated patients reported fecal incontinence (16% v 34%, respectively; P =. 04) and need for protective clothing (8% v 23%, respectively; P =. 04). The incidence and severity of nausea were worse among those taking sucralfate (P =.03). Analysis of patient-reported symptoms 10 to 12 months after RT showed a nonsignificant trend toward more problems in patients taking sucralfate than in those taking placebo (average, 2.3 v 1.9 problems, respectively; P =.34). CONCLUSION: Sucralfate did not decrease pelvic RT-related bowel toxicity by any of the end points measured and seems to have aggravated some gastrointestinal symptoms.

Pentoxifylline for treatment of cancer anorexia and cachexia? A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Based on evidence that suggests pentoxifylline can inhibit tumor necrosis factor, we set out to evaluate the activity and toxicity of this drug in patients with cancer-associated anorexia and/or cachexia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2 with cancer anorexia and/or cachexia (defined by a weight loss of > or = 5 lb in the preceding 2 months or a caloric intake < 20 kcal/kg/d) were stratified and then randomly assigned to receive pentoxifylline or identical-appearing placebo tablets in a double-blind fashion. Patients' weights were monitored and patient questionnaires were used to assess appetite, toxicity, and perception of benefit. RESULTS: Pentoxifylline failed to improve the appetites of study patients. Pentoxifylline did not appear to cause any toxicity. CONCLUSION: This study failed to demonstrate any benefit of pentoxifylline at this dose and schedule as therapy for cancer anorexia and/or cachexia.

Placebo-controlled trial of sucralfate for inhibiting radiation-induced esophagitis.

PURPOSE: To determine whether a sucralfate oral solution can prevent/alleviate radiation-induced esophagitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients included on this clinical trial were beginning thoracic radiation therapy to the mediastinum. Following stratification, they were randomized, in a double-blind manner, to receive a sucralfate solution or an identical-appearing placebo solution. Esophagitis was measured by physicians who used standard criteria and also by patients who used short questionnaires completed weekly during the course of the trial. RESULTS: A total of 97 assessable patients were entered onto this clinical trial. During the first 2 weeks of the study, two placebo patients (4%) stopped their study medication, compared with 20 sucralfate patients (40%). This was related to substantially increased incidences of gastrointestinal toxicity (58% of sucralfate patients v 14% of placebo patients; P > .0001). There was no substantial benefit from the sucralfate in terms of esophagitis scores. CONCLUSION: This oral sucralfate solution does not appear to inhibit radiation-induced esophagitis and is associated with disagreeable gastrointestinal side effects in this patient population.

Phase III comparison of twice-daily split-course irradiation versus once-daily irradiation for patients with limited stage small-cell lung carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Because small-cell lung cancer is a rapidly proliferating tumor, it was hypothesized that it may be more responsive to thoracic irradiation (TI) given twice-daily than once-daily. This hypothesis was tested in a phase III trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer were entered onto a phase III trial, and all patients initially received three cycles of etoposide (130 mg/m(2) x 3) and cisplatin (30 mg/m(2) x 3). Subsequently, patients who did not have progression to a distant site (other than brain) were randomized to twice-daily thoracic irradiation (TDTI) versus once-daily thoracic irradiation (ODTI) given concomitantly with two additional cycles of etoposide (100 mg/m(2) x 3) and cisplatin (30 mg/m(2) x 3). The irradiation doses were TDTI, 48 Gy in 32 fractions, with a 2.5-week break after the initial 24 Gy, and ODTI, 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. After thoracic irradiation, the patients received a sixth cycle of etoposide/cisplatin, followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation (30 Gy/15 fractions) if they had a complete response. RESULTS: Of 311 assessable patients enrolled in the trial, 262 underwent randomization to TDTI or ODTI. There were no differences between the two treatments with respect to local-only progression rates, overall progression rates, or overall survival. The patients who received TDTI had greater esophagitis (> or = grade 3) than those who received ODTI (12.3% v 5.3%; P =.05). Although patients received thoracic irradiation encompassing the postchemotherapy volumes, only seven of 90 local failures were out of the portal of irradiation. CONCLUSION: When TI is delayed until the fourth cycle of chemotherapy, TDTI does not result in improvement in local control or survival compared with ODTI.

Minimization of small bowel volume within treatment fields utilizing customized "belly boards".

Thirty consecutive patients with pelvic malignancies were evaluated prospectively for the impact of a novel bowel minimization device ("belly board") on the volume of small bowel included within a four field pelvic radiation plan. A customized polyurethane and styrofoam bowel immobilization mold was created for each patient in the prone position. Using contrast enhanced CT scanning on a dedicated radiation treatment planning scanner, we imaged the location of the small intestine in the supine position and the prone position aided by the "belly board". Custom in-house interactive image analysis software was developed to allow volumetric determination of small bowel within the treatment portals. The mean small bowel volume was reduced by 66% (299 cm3 to 102 cm3), comparing the standard supine position to the prone position assisted by the "belly board". In 13 patients without prior pelvic surgery, the small bowel volume reduction was a more dramatic 74% (334 cm3 to 88 cm3). All patients were found to benefit from this prone "belly board" setup regardless of body habitus, weight, and age. Compliance with the set-up including use of bladder distension was excellent. All patients completed their pelvic radiotherapy without requiring a treatment break. Weight loss at completion averaged less than 5%. Seventy-six percent of patients experienced little or no diarrhea. This technique is comfortable, inexpensive, highly reproducible, and permits maximal bowel displacement from standard pelvic radiotherapy fields.

Phase III double-blind evaluation of an aloe vera gel as a prophylactic agent for radiation-induced skin toxicity.

PURPOSE: Considerable pilot data and clinical experience suggested that an aloe vera gel might help to prevent radiation therapy-induced dermatitis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two Phase III randomized trials were conducted. The first one was double blinded, utilized a placebo gel, and involved 194 women receiving breast or chest wall irradiation. The second trial randomized 108 such patients to aloe vera gel vs. no treatment. Skin dermatitis was scored weekly during both trials both by patients and by health care providers. RESULTS: Skin dermatitis scores were virtually identical on both treatment arms during both of the trials. The only toxicity from the gel was rare contact dermatitis. CONCLUSIONS: This dose and schedule of an aloe vera gel does not protect against radiation therapy-induced dermatitis.

Third place 1989 Alpha Cradle Award winner. Technical aspects in the use of "belly boards" for small bowel minimization.

The position in which a patient is treated for pelvic irradiation has been shown to have dramatic significance in regard to the volume of small bowel within the treatment field. Previous studies in the literature have repeatedly supported the fact that volume may be the leading factor in both acute and chronic morbidity. We have prospectively evaluated and treated 30 patients utilizing a custom-made polyurethane foam and styrofoam "belly board" with a dropout cut from the level of the xyphoid process to the superior border of the treatment field, specifically designed to allow maximal superior and anterior displacement of small bowel by bladder distention and gravity, while allowing reliable daily reproducibility, accurate immobilization and equally important, increased patient comfort and compliance. By evaluating all patients (in both the supine position alone, and prone in the "Belly Board") with a dedicated treatment planning CT scanner, we have been able to achieve 80-100% reduction in the volume of small bowel within the radiation portals. We will discuss data on the technical set-up, cost, and variations which allow the "Belly Board" to be specifically tailored for use when treating other intraabdominal sites. This technique is simple, inexpensive, highly reproducible, and permits maximal bowel displacement outside the treatment fields.

Phase I study of 5-fluorouracil administered by protracted venous infusion, leucovorin, and pelvic radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to assess the toxicity of pelvic radiation therapy, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) administered by protracted venous infusion, and leucovorin. METHODS: Pelvic radiation therapy consisted of 50.4-54 gray (Gy) administered in 28-30 fractions. Systemic treatment consisted of leucovorin (10 mg daily) administered orally and protracted venous infusion of 5-FU. The initial daily 5-FU dose was 150 mg/m(2). Dose escalations were planned in increments of 25 mg/m(2). RESULTS: Forty eligible patients were registered, of whom 37 were evaluable for chemoradiotherapy-related toxicity. Grade 3 or 4 toxicity secondary to radiation therapy, protracted venous infusion of 5-FU, and leucovorin occurred in 2 of 17 patients at a daily 5-FU dose of 150 mg/m(2), in 5 of 10 patients at a daily 5-FU dose of 175 mg/m(2), and in 5 of 10 patients at a daily 5-FU dose of 200 mg/m(2). Diarrhea was dose-limiting in 7 of 8 patients with Grade 4 toxicity. Venous thrombosis, a treatment-related complication not directly related to chemotherapy or radiation therapy, occurred in 5 of the 40 patients entered into this study. Four thromboses occurred at the site of a central catheter. No thrombotic complications occurred in the last 7 patients, who were given warfarin orally (1 mg daily) during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Toxicity due to radiation therapy, protracted venous infusion of 5-FU, and leucovorin when 5-FU is given daily at a dose of 150 mg/m(2) is similar to that observed in current chemoradiotherapy regimens for patients with rectal carcinoma. This regimen will be considered as a possible investigational treatment arm of a future trial of adjuvant therapy for rectal carcinoma patients.

Accelerated hyperfractionation radiation therapy after lumpectomy and axillary lymph node dissection in patients with stage I or II breast cancer: pilot study.

PURPOSE: To prospectively assess tolerance to accelerated hyperfractionation radiation therapy in patients undergoing breast-conservation therapy and to exclude, with 90% confidence, a 20% or greater risk of an acute toxic reaction of at least grade 3 (severe). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients (aged 33-80 years) with evaluatable cases received 48 Gy in twice-daily 1.6-Gy fractions to the breast and regional lymph nodes (if three or more lymph nodes were involved) and a boost of 9.6 Gy in twice-daily 1.6-Gy fractions. Acute and late effects were scored by using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer radiation morbidity criteria. RESULTS: One patient developed a grade 3 acute skin toxic reaction and another grade 3 (continuous) acute edema. There have been no grade 4 (life-threatening) acute toxic reactions, local recurrences, or cancer- or treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: This breast-conservation accelerated hyperfractionation radiation therapy schedule is tolerable. Additional follow-up is necessary to determine long-term morbidity and cosmesis, and further study in a larger patient group is necessary to confirm efficacy.