Fidelity to Best Practices of Psychiatric Assessments in Army Behavioral Health Settings.

While civilian and military psychiatric clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) exist for psychiatric assessments, data are lacking on providers' adherence to these criteria. This study evaluated the use of psychiatric CPGs' assessment criteria by Army behavioral health providers (BHPs). In a weighted cross-sectional survey, 348 BHPs were evaluated on their assessment of a systematically selected patient on 15 total domains recommended by the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Defense CPGs for substance use disorders, posttraumatic stress disorder, and major depressive disorder. The proportion of BHPs providing high-quality assessment and the association between high-quality assessment and BHP and patient characteristics were examined. Using the weighted sample, 80% of BHPs provided a high-quality assessment. BHPs who saw ≥20 patients per week were significantly more likely to provide high-quality assessments compared with BHPs who saw <20 patients per week [odds ratio (OR)=1.72, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.01-2.92]. Patients diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder [adjusted OR (AOR)=0.42, 95% CI=0.18-0.96] or whose BHPs did not assess patients' current overall physical health (AOR=0.26, 95% CI=0.07-0.97) or lifetime duration of treatment for mental health (AOR=0.03, 95% CI=0.01-0.20) were less likely to receive high-quality assessments. A majority of Army BHPs are conducting high-quality assessments for the 3 most common mental disorders in military populations. If recommendations to increase fidelity to assessment could be implemented, more patients could receive optimized care.

Prevalence of Bystander Intervention Opportunities and Behaviors Among U.S. Army Soldiers.

The bystander intervention model is one approach utilized to reduce risky behaviors within the U.S. Army; however, it is unclear how frequently soldiers experience opportunities to intervene and whether they already intervene in such situations. The present analysis aims to ascertain frequencies for opportunities to intervene and the rates at which soldiers intervene when presented with such opportunities. Soldiers ( N = 286) were asked whether they had witnessed particular risky behavior scenarios of interest to the Army (i.e., suicide-related behaviors, alcohol misuse, or sexual harassment/assault) during the previous 2 months and whether they had intervened in those scenarios. Prevalence rates within this sample were calculated to determine the frequency of such situations and subsequent interventions. Logistic regression was used to ascertain any differences in witnessing scenarios by demographic groups. Nearly half (46.8%) of the soldiers reported witnessing at least one scenario involving risky behaviors. Most soldiers who witnessed an event relating to suicide or alcohol misuse also reported consistently intervening (87.9% and 74.4%, respectively), whereas just half consistently intervened in response to scenarios relating to sexual harassment/assault (49.2%). Lower ranking soldiers were twice as likely as higher ranks to witness scenarios involving alcohol misuse (odds ratio = 2.18, 95% confidence interval [1.11, 4.26]) and sexual harassment/assault (odds ratio = 2.21, 95% confidence interval [1.05, 4.62]). These data indicate that soldiers regularly encounter opportunities to intervene in risky behaviors, and while a majority intervened in such scenarios, more training is warranted, particularly around sexual assault and harassment. This supports the notion that bystander intervention training is a worthwhile investment for the Army.