Mutant libraries reveal negative design shielding proteins from supramolecular self-assembly and relocalization in cells.

Understanding the molecular consequences of mutations in proteins is essential to map genotypes to phenotypes and interpret the increasing wealth of genomic data. While mutations are known to disrupt protein structure and function, their potential to create new structures and localization phenotypes has not yet been mapped to a sequence space. To map this relationship, we employed two homo-oligomeric protein complexes in which the internal symmetry exacerbates the impact of mutations. We mutagenized three surface residues of each complex and monitored the mutations' effect on localization and assembly phenotypes in yeast cells. While surface mutations are classically viewed as benign, our analysis of several hundred mutants revealed they often trigger three main phenotypes in these proteins: nuclear localization, the formation of puncta, and fibers. Strikingly, more than 50% of random mutants induced one of these phenotypes in both complexes. Analyzing the mutant's sequences showed that surface stickiness and net charge are two key physicochemical properties associated with these changes. In one complex, more than 60% of mutants self-assembled into fibers. Such a high frequency is explained by negative design: charged residues shield the complex from self-interacting with copies of itself, and the sole removal of the charges induces its supramolecular self-assembly. A subsequent analysis of several other complexes targeted with alanine mutations suggested that such negative design is common. These results highlight that minimal perturbations in protein surfaces' physicochemical properties can frequently drive assembly and localization changes in a cellular context.

Neuronal excitability as a regulator of circuit remodeling.

Postnatal remodeling of neuronal connectivity shapes mature nervous systems.1,2,3 The pruning of exuberant connections involves cell-autonomous and non-cell-autonomous mechanisms, such as neuronal activity. Indeed, experience-dependent competition sculpts various excitatory neuronal circuits.4,5,6,7,8,9 Moreover, activity has been shown to regulate growth cone motility and the stability of neurites and synaptic connections.10,11,12,13,14 However, whether inhibitory activity influences the remodeling of neuronal connectivity or how activity influences remodeling in systems in which competition is not clearly apparent is not fully understood. Here, we use the Drosophila mushroom body (MB) as a model to examine the role of neuronal activity in the developmental axon pruning of γ-Kenyon cells. The MB is a neuronal structure in insects, implicated in associative learning and memory,15,16 which receives mostly olfactory input from the antennal lobe.17,18 The MB circuit includes intrinsic neurons, called Kenyon cells (KCs), which receive inhibitory input from the GABAergic anterior paired lateral (APL) neuron among other inputs. The γ-KCs undergo stereotypic, steroid-hormone-dependent remodeling19,20 that involves the pruning of larval neurites followed by regrowth to form adult connections.21 We demonstrate that silencing neuronal activity is required for γ-KC pruning. Furthermore, we show that this is mechanistically achieved by cell-autonomous expression of the inward rectifying potassium channel 1 (irk1) combined with inhibition by APL neuron activity likely via GABA-B-R1 signaling. These results support the Hebbian-like rule "use it or lose it," where inhibition can destabilize connectivity and promote pruning while excitability stabilizes existing connections.